Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
KPC_Mammon
Jan 23, 2004

Ready for the fashy circle jerk


Like a lot of other people, I've been using SD to make character art for an online tabletop roleplaying game. I'm particularly proud of this one because it took a fair number of img2img masking steps to get an orc with braids, full body armor, and robotic legs. Turns out most orc women that the AI is able to sample don't wear much in the way of armor and surprisingly enough the AI had no idea what to do with braids until I specified the hair.

I could post steps / prompts if people are interested, mostly just excited to get character art that looks this good while being true to the character.

edit: final prompt was "((Half-Orc)) woman with braided black hair, brass space marine armor, detailed, intricate, anna dittmann, rebecca guay, Edmund Leighton" but by that point the legs were no longer being edited.

KPC_Mammon fucked around with this message at 20:24 on Oct 20, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Elotana
Dec 12, 2003

and i'm putting it all on the goddamn expense account

Rahu posted:

Stability AI has issued a DMCA takedown against the Runway ML repo with the 1.5 model, grab it while you can.

https://huggingface.co/runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5/discussions/1
Emad about to enter his joker phase

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011
It's a big mess. Seems RunwayML also released a 1.5 model specifically finetuned for inpainting. HuggingFace already incorporated support for this inpainting model to their diffusers-library and deprecated the way it used to work.

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011

WhiteHowler
Apr 3, 2001

I'M HUGE!
Oh, there's going to be giant corporate slap-fight over this, isn't there?

Rahu
Feb 14, 2009


let me just check my figures real quick here
Grimey Drawer
Does this count as ai-generated drama? It seems so realistic, they really are advancing fast these days.

LifeSunDeath
Jan 4, 2007

still gay rights and smoke weed every day
I'm about to start a knockoff called Unstable Infusion

It's gonna make puns better than I can.

Sedgr
Sep 16, 2007

Neat!

AI lawyer Turing test. Can you determine if the entity suing you is human? Lawsuit DDOS.

pixaal
Jan 8, 2004

All ice cream is now for all beings, no matter how many legs.


Drama in the issue thread
first is a repost for context I guess didn't realize it at first, still that 2nd one is making this look like they are ready for a big internet slap fight that could go for weeks.

-a few boring posts snipped-

IShallRiseAgain
Sep 12, 2008

Well ain't that precious?

Rahu posted:

Does this count as ai-generated drama? It seems so realistic, they really are advancing fast these days.

Generate the lyrics of an epic rap battle making fun of someone releasing open source code: posted:

You think you're so clever, releasing your code For all the world to see
You think you're some kind of hero,
But you're just a zero to me
Your code is full of bugs
And it's badly written too
You think you're some kind of genius,
But you're just a fool
Don't you realize, when you release your code
You're just making yourself look bad
Everyone can see how incompetent you are
Your code is a mess and it's not going to help anyone
In fact, it's just going to make everyone hate you So go ahead and release your code
And we'll all just laugh at you

Generate the lyrics of an epic rap battle making fun of someone not releasing open source code: posted:

I battle you, 'cause you don't open source code That's so lame, dude, you must be a unibrow
I'm in your face, 'cause I'm the open source god
And you're a sorry excuse for a coders
You say you're a coder, but you don't release code
Your skills are a facade, you're just a fraud
I'll never respect you, 'cause you don't open source
And that's why you're losing, 'cause you're a close-source bore
You're always bragging about your code and how great it is But we all know the truth, you're just a big ol' fraud
You don't open source 'cause you're scared we'll see
That your code is garbage and you're a sorry excuse for a coder

WhiteHowler
Apr 3, 2001

I'M HUGE!
I don't know how the legality would work in this case. Here's my understanding:

- Stable Diffusion is open source.

- StabilityAI has an updated model (1.5) that they've chosen not to release to the public (yet? ever?). This is their right -- I could spin off my own private repo of some random open source project from GitHub and never release it, even if I made something super awesome out of it.

- RunwayML was given access to the 1.5 model to train it for inpainting, I guess? And then apparently decided to release it publicly without StabilityAI's permission.

Thing is, since it's built on open source code (that was partially made by one of their own people), are they legally allowed to do this?

IP rights are awful and I'm glad I don't have to deal with this stuff in my line of work.



Isn't that the NovelAI guy? They're coming out of the woodwork today!

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

WhiteHowler posted:

I don't know how the legality would work in this case. Here's my understanding:

- Stable Diffusion is open source.

- StabilityAI has an updated model (1.5) that they've chosen not to release to the public (yet? ever?). This is their right -- I could spin off my own private repo of some random open source project from GitHub and never release it, even if I made something super awesome out of it.

- RunwayML was given access to the 1.5 model to train it for inpainting, I guess? And then apparently decided to release it publicly without StabilityAI's permission.

Thing is, since it's built on open source code (that was partially made by one of their own people), are they legally allowed to do this?

IP rights are awful and I'm glad I don't have to deal with this stuff in my line of work.

Isn't that the NovelAI guy? They're coming out of the woodwork today!
The model specifically is a result of a lot of spending on GPUs to train it, so whoever did it, might have some conditions on its usage and sharing. Obviously they've released 1.4 publicly before, but maybe wanted to monetize 1.5 first.

I dunno, nor do I care, since 1.5 is already chugging along here :getin:

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
Art AIs are brand new and two of them have already been stolen and released to the public. Bravo! gently caress the gate keepers and their exclusive compute power. These AI researchers are so full of themselves "oh dear what if someone makes a naughty picture of Nancy Peloci or an anime boob. This technology must only be reserved for top capitalists!"

Rutibex fucked around with this message at 21:30 on Oct 20, 2022

pixaal
Jan 8, 2004

All ice cream is now for all beings, no matter how many legs.


Rutibex posted:

Art AIs are brand new and two of them have already been stolen and released to the public. Bravo! gently caress the gate keepers and their exclusive compute power. These AI researchers are so full of themselves "oh dear what if someone make a naughty picture of Nancy Pelocy or an anime boob. This technology must only be reserved for top capitalists!"

I don't think it's about Nancy porn, I think it's about making a GoP member eating a baby while the mother is still holding it and no one being able to tell if it's fake or not.

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

pixaal posted:

I don't think it's about Nancy porn, I think it's about making a GoP member eating a baby while the mother is still holding it and no one being able to tell if it's fake or not.

If anything the existance of these AIs mean photographic evidence is now pointless, even if its real. rich people should be thrilled. I'd be filling the internet with pictures of my billionaire rear end doing all kinds of nasty poo poo, just in case the real pics get leaked one day.

LifeSunDeath
Jan 4, 2007

still gay rights and smoke weed every day
I just want an AI than can replace me so I can chill. Is that too much to ask?

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

pixaal posted:

I don't think it's about Nancy porn, I think it's about making a GoP member eating a baby while the mother is still holding it and no one being able to tell if it's fake or not.

Not just GoP either

Ripper Swarm
Sep 9, 2009

It's not that I hate it. It's that I loathe it.
open-source legality aside, what does 1.5 have over 1.4?

IShallRiseAgain
Sep 12, 2008

Well ain't that precious?

LifeSunDeath posted:

I just want an AI than can replace me so I can chill. Is that too much to ask?

That has actually already been done.

Here are two images using the same settings:
1.5

1.4


Its somewhat improved but its not a huge leap forward.

WhiteHowler
Apr 3, 2001

I'M HUGE!
It's only a matter of time before someone sues an AI developer for something gross that gets generated with their tool.

I'm 99.9% sure that these lawsuits will get thrown out, in the same way that you can't sue Adobe for people making gross poo poo in Photoshop. But still, you don't want to be on the receiving end of this, and by filtering out certain "harmful" content, you can much more easily claim in court that you did "due diligence" (ie. "slightly more than literally nothing").

I don't like it, but I get it.

Anyway, here's another thing I made today that I really like. The last image I posted took three hours, over a dozen inpainting sessions, and 600+ iterations. This one took one minor prompt edit, four candidate outputs, one refinement with a higher step count, and a single inpainting session.

RPATDO_LAMD
Mar 22, 2013

🐘🪠🍆

pixaal posted:

I don't think it's about Nancy porn, I think it's about making a GoP member eating a baby while the mother is still holding it and no one being able to tell if it's fake or not.

A US congresswoman has already spoken out & written a letter to the NSA saying the possibility of Nancy porn means stable-discussion and other "unsafe models" should be restricted and export-controlled like classified nuclear information.

https://eshoo.house.gov/media/press-releases/eshoo-urges-nsa-ostp-address-unsafe-ai-practices

WhiteHowler
Apr 3, 2001

I'M HUGE!


Ha, so I guess 1.5 is officially/"officially" released now. Takedown notice is gone, Emad (head of StabilityAI) confirmed on Discord.

Discount Dracula
Aug 15, 2003


Nap Ghost

precision posted:

"Courtney Love passed out backstage, realistic photograph"



I just learned that Dall-E 2 is owned by Elon Musk. I tried the prompt “Elon musk passed out backstage, realistic photograph,” and I was informed that I violated their content policy.
:pram:

Elotana
Dec 12, 2003

and i'm putting it all on the goddamn expense account
Musk helped launch it and still has a stake but isn't really in control of OpenAI like he is other companies, it's mostly Sam Altman's show.

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011

Ripper Swarm posted:

open-source legality aside, what does 1.5 have over 1.4?

Maybe better inpainting performance with that finetuned model? I'm still waiting to see comparison images.

LifeSunDeath
Jan 4, 2007

still gay rights and smoke weed every day

Discount Dracula posted:

I just learned that Dall-E 2 is owned by Elon Musk. I tried the prompt “Elon musk passed out backstage, realistic photograph,” and I was informed that I violated their content policy.
:pram:

ugh he's gonna use this poo poo to help him shitpost isn't he. ugh.

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Its supposed to filter all celebs

Rutibex
Sep 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy

LifeSunDeath posted:

ugh he's gonna use this poo poo to help him shitpost isn't he. ugh.

Musk isn't using Dall-e 2, he has the good stuff. full anime video generator

IShallRiseAgain
Sep 12, 2008

Well ain't that precious?

Discount Dracula posted:

I just learned that Dall-E 2 is owned by Elon Musk. I tried the prompt “Elon musk passed out backstage, realistic photograph,” and I was informed that I violated their content policy.
:pram:
just use "dimwitted billionaire man from South Africa who makes really poorly manufactured electric cars, owns spaceX, owns Starlink, and can't keep off twitter"

VectorSigma
Jan 20, 2004

Transform
and
Freak Out



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWi9ILehtZE











Sedgr
Sep 16, 2007

Neat!







mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Tunicate posted:

Its supposed to filter all celebs

I can reassure you that this is not the case

:nws: https://i.imgur.com/HOfbRvU.png

RPATDO_LAMD
Mar 22, 2013

🐘🪠🍆

mobby_6kl posted:

I can reassure you that this is not the case

:nws: https://i.imgur.com/HOfbRvU.png

that's not dalle2 it doesn't have the colored dot signature

and yeah stable diffusion has no filtering whatsoever, that poo poo all has to be implemented by the website peeps on top of the actual model

deep dish peat moss
Jul 27, 2006

I know that dall-e intentionally blocks the names of any cities in countries involved in active wars, I'd guess their blocking of elon is something similar: he's blundering his way into being a high profile political figure and there's a lot of potential for misuse.

gently caress elon though he's a dumb butt poo poo.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

RPATDO_LAMD posted:

that's not dalle2 it doesn't have the colored dot signature

and yeah stable diffusion has no filtering whatsoever, that poo poo all has to be implemented by the website peeps on top of the actual model
I thought that was about the 1.5 model.

Now I've wasted time making pinup art of Nancy Pelosi. Or have I?!

RPATDO_LAMD
Mar 22, 2013

🐘🪠🍆
next time use danny devito

KPC_Mammon
Jan 23, 2004

Ready for the fashy circle jerk

What kinds of prompts do you use to get such vividly colorful output?

Sedgr
Sep 16, 2007

Neat!

Those were all "colorful, cyberpunk, ((African)), dark, gothic, detailed, intricate"

deep dish peat moss
Jul 27, 2006

KPC_Mammon posted:

What kinds of prompts do you use to get such vividly colorful output?

I'm not sure if it works in SD, but with dall-e you can make any image absurdly vivid by including the name Alex Grey

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WhiteHowler
Apr 3, 2001

I'M HUGE!
I spent a few minutes with SD 1.5 and here is my first impression.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply