|
Son of Thunderbeast posted:I see a guy doing a jaunty lil walk Keep on Truckin'
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2022 20:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 07:07 |
|
|
i don't know how i feel about this format https://twitter.com/VictimOfMaths/status/1582660632482308096
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2022 22:47
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TheCaptain_Nemo/status/1582789925811822592
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2022 22:50
|
|
|
#SigmaMaleGrindset
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2022 23:00
|
|
redleader posted:i don't know how i feel about this format drug poisoning is overdose correct? it feels weird at first glance, but it does do a good job of highlighting both the increase and the age groups with the increases
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2022 23:42
|
|
|
Dude's too busy lifting to gently caress. Respect.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 00:10
|
|
|
Any sexual partners are catapulted away at speed before they can even get within fornication range
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 01:26
|
|
|
Brawnfire posted:Any sexual partners are catapulted away at speed before they can even get within fornication range Let's hope it's this and not a Lenny situation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 14:49
|
|
|
Oh God, I hope not. George is never gonna let him tend the rabbits, if so.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 14:53
|
|
|
Latest from the UK:smellmycheese posted:Diagram for American goons crowding this thread demanding answers.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 18:56
|
|
|
Son of Thunderbeast posted:I see a guy doing a jaunty lil walk Loss of approval dot jpeg 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 19:10
|
|
|
Angepain posted:Latest from the UK: 
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 19:15
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:what is the point of this chart? how is it supposed to be better than putting time along the X-axis and plotting both variables on the Y? I bet using time on the x axis yields a chart with two lines that don't appear very correlated.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 20:52
|
|
|
Count Roland posted:I bet using time on the x axis yields a chart with two lines that don't appear very correlated. A safe bet: https://twitter.com/TammogMelkhat/status/1582835120264081409 https://twitter.com/CuddlePotato/status/1582844369945513985
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2022 23:30
|
|
|
I really wonder how someone goes about making something so bad. Are you starting off with a stupid assumption, then purposefully finding an abstruse way to "prove" it? Or do you find yourself loving around with data sets and graphs, notice a correlation, then make no attempt whatsoever to confirm it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 00:32
|
|
|
that is graphic violence
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 01:09
|
|
|
I can't tell how much of this is wilful ignorance of the lack of the period meaning that the post is a joke.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 01:22
|
|
|
Count Roland posted:I really wonder how someone goes about making something so bad. yes
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 01:22
|
|
|
The graph (either version) sort of loosely supports the idea that gas prices affect presidential approval with a lag of about a month or something. Still just a correlation obviously but you can see this lag effect manifest on the dumb chart as its tendency to turn counter-clockwise more than clockwise. I think it would be interesting to see a plot of presidential approval vs "average gas price over the previous 3 months" or something like that. And also to see more data than just Biden's. Obviously presidential approval is more complicated than just gas prices but it wouldn't surprise me if there was a grain of truth in there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 03:09
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:that is graphic violence 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 03:10
|
|
|
Pasco posted:A safe bet: Wow change in approval affect the cost of gas
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 09:54
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Wow change in approval affect the cost of gas Quick, everyone disapprove of the President! (Gas price goes up, less people driving, less global warming)
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 20:46
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Quick, everyone disapprove of the President! Actually, unless I’m reading these charts wrong, the implication is high gas prices = high approval somehow. Which is even funnier.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 20:50
|
|
|
Also obligatory cartoon:
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2022 20:55
|
|
|
Zamujasa posted:different version, same idea:  She replaced a Johnson, but wasn't able to outlast a Bonar
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 01:48
|
|
|
They call me the Earl of Bute
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 01:49
|
|
|
Don't break the Bonar Law. It's a felony.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 02:32
|
|
|
White Rock posted:Don't break the Bonar Law. It’s true, you might end up doing hard time for that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 05:06
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Also obligatory cartoon: It has been updated. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 05:13
|
|
|
Whooping Crabs posted:
I take a bit of issue with the use of the word "elected" there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 05:21
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:I take a bit of issue with the use of the word "elected" there. Having a flashback to the time I pointed this was A Thing that could happen, and some smarmy Brit bloviated at me about how no PM is "unelected" because in the Westminster system you vote the party and not the individual and blah blah blah blah
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 06:01
|
|
|
I thought the joke was that it sounds like "erected".
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 06:04
|
|
|
She was elected by the Tory party though, which is a kind of election. In the same way that Xi was elected by the CCP, but elected is elected (until ejected)
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 06:50
|
|
|
I mean yes but that is not the same way that some of the others were elected. And I fear that if I were to seize power in a coup I could argue that I had also been elected via the one man one vote system.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 07:00
|
|
|
BonHair posted:She was elected by the Tory party though, which is a kind of election. In the same way that Xi was elected by the CCP, but elected is elected (until ejected) To be fair, with the level of voting rights in the 1700s in the UK, she may have been 'elected' by a larger proportion of the population than some of the older guys.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 07:15
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Wow change in approval affect the cost of gas It'd take some loving about with variables but I'm sure there is a kernel of truth in there. But more likely decreasing approval is correlated with economic drivers which blah blah blah gas prices blah blah blah global politics. It's all smoke and mirrors and burn everything to the ground and retreat to the trees my simian friends.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 09:22
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Quick, everyone disapprove of the President! Well, clearly it's the other way around - approval goes up, then with a lag gas prices also go up. It's true, jack!
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 10:22
|
|
|
Causality is a myth. The ball did not drop because I let it go. I let it go because it would drop. Namaste.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 11:56
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Having a flashback to the time I pointed this was A Thing that could happen, and some smarmy Brit bloviated at me about how no PM is "unelected" because in the Westminster system you vote the party and not the individual and blah blah blah blah Prime Ministers who come to power midway through a term are only “unelected” if they’re Labour.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 11:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 07:07 |
|
|
piL posted:Causality is a myth. The ball did not drop because I let it go. I let it go because it would drop. Namaste. That's still causality. Now if the ball dropped and you moved your hand but both were fully independent events unrelated to each other, that's non-causal.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2022 15:30
|
|
