Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Glottis
May 29, 2002

No. It's necessary.
Yam Slacker
The Peripheral (first 2 episodes) were enjoyable diet cyberpunk for me. The second episode expands the universe at least as much as the first. It seems like it's gonna be a straight ready player one thing at first but diverges enough from that to be entertaining.

That said, none of it blew me away and it doesn't have the same feeling of "prestige tv" that I get from Westworld, but I'm glad to see more futurism on screen.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

punissuer
Nov 6, 2009
The Watcher house was on the market for rent for 50k during the pandemic, not sure if they ever got a tenant. Wouldn’t be surprised if they did tbh.

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1-Warriston-Ln-Rye-NY-10580/32974706_zpid/

I can’t tell if they did that godawful kitchen for the show or not

ONE YEAR LATER
Apr 13, 2004

Fry old buddy, it's me, Bender!
Oven Wrangler
Ryan Murphy has a boner for properties that may or may not be haunted

Nihonniboku
Aug 11, 2004

YOU CAN FLY!!!
The latest episode of Great British Baking Show is cracking me up. A bunch of british people having to make s'mores, something they've never heard of, involving them having to make "digestifs", marshmallow, and "chocolate ganache" from scratch. No lie, I do want to try their versions, but Paul Hollywood acting like this version is the definitive version is kind of crazy.

Papercut
Aug 24, 2005

Nihonniboku posted:

The latest episode of Great British Baking Show is cracking me up. A bunch of british people having to make s'mores, something they've never heard of, involving them having to make "digestifs", marshmallow, and "chocolate ganache" from scratch. No lie, I do want to try their versions, but Paul Hollywood acting like this version is the definitive version is kind of crazy.

I haven't watched this episode but the Mexican week was incredible. This tweet thread basically sums it up
https://twitter.com/andyheriaud/status/1577518672997863426

"No one at channel 4 has ever eaten a proper taco" lol

magiccarpet
Jan 3, 2005




Theres an episode from a few years ago with that sassy old lady judge where Noel acted like they put her in a burlap sack and threw her around. What a show.

Macdeo Lurjtux
Jul 5, 2011

BRRREADSTOOORRM!

Papercut posted:

I haven't watched this episode but the Mexican week was incredible. This tweet thread basically sums it up
https://twitter.com/andyheriaud/status/1577518672997863426

"No one at channel 4 has ever eaten a proper taco" lol

Theres always the classic Japanese week where the task was to make steamed buns.

smackfu
Jun 7, 2004

Somehow they stretched “baking” to include tortillas because they could only think of two Mexican baked goods and the show has three rounds.

withak
Jan 15, 2003


Fun Shoe
Aye caramba!

Chas McGill
Oct 29, 2010

loves Fat Philippe
Peripheral is pretty mediocre. I wish they'd adapted Pattern Recognition or something rather than such an overtly s/f novel. It just comes off ready player one-ish and a bit cheesy so far.

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

nu hellraiser is a dog. all it did was make me want to watch the original

ozmunkeh
Feb 28, 2008

hey guys what is happening in this thread
Yeah, the first half was shot with no lights which was a bold stylistic choice. I think they realized their error half way through though because they called in a bunch of floodlights for the second half, so it all evens out.

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

ozmunkeh posted:

Yeah, the first half was shot with no lights which was a bold stylistic choice. I think they realized their error half way through though because they called in a bunch of floodlights for the second half, so it all evens out.

I originally thought my TV settings were off but that went away real quick when it began to look like Scooby-Doo.

how did they make a sexless hellraiser

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer
Man I'm usually the first to complain about not enough lights but I only had trouble in some of the outdoor scenes in like the second act or so.

Perestroika
Apr 8, 2010

Macdeo Lurjtux posted:

Theres always the classic Japanese week where the task was to make steamed buns.

It was frankly incredible how across three rounds and around eight contestants, there was perhaps one dish that actually included a classic Japanese recipe/style. They literally had more dishes with an explicit US style (hamburger steamed buns) in that week than they had Japanese ones.

The Modern Leper
Dec 25, 2008

You must be a masochist
Catching up on Season 2 of Primal. The visual storytelling is still second to none, but it feels like Genndy saw the music video for Pearl Jam's "Do The Evolution." and made it his entire mood board.

That being said, the way the show plays with its own aesthetics of violence is truly something to behold. If the first season's brutality often felt like Metalocalypse (though less comic), everything here feels even darker, crueler, and (explicitly) so often unnecessary.

EDIT: Episode 5 is rear end, though.

The Modern Leper fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Oct 23, 2022

Bayham Badger
Jan 19, 2007

Secretly force socialism, communism and imperialism types of government onto the people of the United States of America.

yeah my thoughts on Hellraiser 2022 directly after watching it:
- Visual effects were gorgeous, which really buoyed it. really would have disliked it otherwise
- The main character was not that compelling or interesting. Also she looked like a muppet for 95% of the film thanks to the costume/make-up direction.
- Probably most importantly, it never felt scary at all. Not enough well used dark shots, poorly lit claustrophobic spaces, etc. The overly dark stuff felt pointless, and then once it got extremely brightly lit, what little suspense was drained out of the film. And once the Cenobites were confirmed to not be a drug addled hallucination, they just kind of appeared and meandered around. They never felt like a threat, more of an obstacle.
- Not enough bondage gear and/or leather. as pointed out in the thread, how did that manage to make a sexless Hellraiser flick???
- Not gory enough
- Soundtrack should have been wayyyyy better. I would have liked something more like the Guest, with dancy goth/industrial stuff popping up here and there, since the franchise has been such a staple/influence of that musical scene, it would have been a logical inclusion. We got ultra generic poo poo instead.
- Jamie Clayton did a great job with the role as given, but effectively she just wandered around the set like the rest of the Cenobites. Best scene with her was with Norah, the girl who gets stuck in the hidden passageway and then jabbed by the dude impaled by the sewing machine.

ultimately, felt like very high quality direct-to-DVD Hellraiser movie. C/C- film at best.

I would have liked a far more tense, dramatic horror where the main character's addiction issues lead to it not being clear at all what's real or not, culminating in a visually insane, gorefest with the Cenobites. Instead we got part of the plot of Hellraiser 2, and part of the plot of OG Hellraiser, with none of the stakes or tension that made either of them interesting.

doctorfrog
Mar 14, 2007

Great.

Having only ever seen the first Hellraiser, I always thought that the point of solving the box was that you'd be sucked into their dimension and torture/pleasured to an extreme degree, if not converted into one of them, and death was no escape. Instead, in 2022, they're just killed gruesomely, really quickly, I guess. I think? It wasn't clear what happened to folks after they get sucked in, beyond just dying.

Also, the point of Hellraiser (again, I've only seen the first one) is that by seeking too great heights of pleasure and basically being a selfish poo poo, you're essentially the architect of your own capture, there's an irony to it. In 2022, oh, you got poked by the box while it solved itself and now a monster gets you. There was a throwaway line about the main character being somewhat Frank-like, but I never got that from her character, she just seemed miserable and kind of a crappy person rather than a craven (ha) pleasure-seeker.

It was basically a monster movie where bad luck or someone entrapping you in an extremely lazy way gets monsters sent after you. There needs to be some level of gross temptation for it to give that ol' queasy feeling.

doctorfrog fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Oct 23, 2022

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

I’m really shocked everyone itt hates the new Hellraiser movie. I thought it was a good return to form after a thousand pure garbage sequels

Inspector Hound
Jul 14, 2003

If Hellraiser didn't work for you, slam it completely in reverse and watch Los Espookys on HBO. Hellraiser from the cenobite perspective. If that doesn't work, watch Scooby Doo or something idk

Papercut
Aug 24, 2005
Los Espookys is so loving good, I'm rewatching season 1 before I break into season 2. What a wonderfully entertaining show, it sorta reminds me of when Flight of the Conchords showed up and it was like, I have no idea who these people are but they are awesome.

Memnaelar
Feb 21, 2013

WHO is the goodest girl?

CelticPredator posted:

I’m really shocked everyone itt hates the new Hellraiser movie. I thought it was a good return to form after a thousand pure garbage sequels

What form, exactly? There's no sex, there's virtually no thematic overlap with the first two (the only good) movies, the worldbuilding is flat, you have no characters you can actually like, the writing is tortured (not in a fun hellraiser way), and the entire point of the lament configuration (you actively make the choice to call the cenobites and face the consequences) is replaced by just making it a pokey box of doom that sends innocent bystanders to their doom with a quick jab.

But other than that, it's pretty average.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

For one the cenobites aren’t lame Kenner toys or Freddy quip machines

Memnaelar
Feb 21, 2013

WHO is the goodest girl?

CelticPredator posted:

For one the cenobites aren’t lame Kenner toys or Freddy quip machines

"Save your breath... FOR SCREAMING."

1993 Freddy or 2022 Cenobite? You make the call.

Martman
Nov 20, 2006

Memnaelar posted:

What form, exactly? There's no sex, there's virtually no thematic overlap with the first two (the only good) movies, the worldbuilding is flat, you have no characters you can actually like, the writing is tortured (not in a fun hellraiser way), and the entire point of the lament configuration (you actively make the choice to call the cenobites and face the consequences) is replaced by just making it a pokey box of doom that sends innocent bystanders to their doom with a quick jab.

But other than that, it's pretty average.
lol this makes me want to watch it and see if it's about anti-vaxers or something

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Memnaelar posted:

"Save your breath... FOR SCREAMING."

1993 Freddy or 2022 Cenobite? You make the call.

“No tears please…it’s a waste of good suffering!”

Memnaelar
Feb 21, 2013

WHO is the goodest girl?

CelticPredator posted:

“No tears please…it’s a waste of good suffering!”

Go back to your original response and tell me how this helps make its point. So the original cenobites -were- Freddy quip machines after all?

In any case, plenty of folks have explained their take on why the old Hellraisers were good, even with their bad moments (which that quote falls into, imo) and why the new one just wasn't. You think it was a good return to form? I'm glad you found pleasure in it. But I think you'll continue to be in the minority there.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

ok

veni veni veni
Jun 5, 2005


The new Hellraiser reminded me of the new Predator, where it was so shocking that it wasn't literally awful that people got really hyperbolic about how good it was. Both are series with solid first entities, mostly followed up by complete crap and then rebooted in 2022 by different people. The new ones are both mediocre, but got a low key boost by unexpectedly not being the worst thing you have ever watched.

Maxwell Lord
Dec 12, 2008

I am drowning.
There is no sign of land.
You are coming down with me, hand in unlovable hand.

And I hope you die.

I hope we both die.


:smith:

Grimey Drawer

Memnaelar posted:

What form, exactly? There's no sex,

Pleasure and pain can take many forms, this one's about addiction. Riley may not be "likable" but she is to me a pretty engaging portrait of an addict, someone who is aware that they are making bad decisions and is trying to not screw up but still does and keeps hurting people anyway. She's in a tailspin and wants to fix things but may not be able to. I like that. It's a cool theme.

quote:

and the entire point of the lament configuration (you actively make the choice to call the cenobites and face the consequences) is replaced by just making it a pokey box of doom that sends innocent bystanders to their doom with a quick jab.

I mean that ties into the theme of the new one, it's not just that you personally suffer for your curiosity, but others suffer too, which if you care about any of the people around you can be worse.

Like yeah thematically it's different. That's... fine! Remakes/reboots/etc. should change things!

The Modern Leper
Dec 25, 2008

You must be a masochist
I think the point being raised is that, absolutely, you can connect with those themes in the new Hellraiser, but a) it's not a return to form (unless we specifically mean "low budget horror movie that surprisingly punches above its weight"), and b) even recognizing those themes does not mean that you necessarily think they were handled effectively, or that the world of Hellraiser is the place to do it.

I'm not super invested in the Hellraiser lore, but my understanding is that one concept has been that it's not the hands that open the box, but the desire. It's interesting to retell it as an addiction story (that your addiction directly harms others around you, and that ending the cycle is a literal choice between self-destruction and living with the harm you've already caused), but I can understand how that would feel at odds with the whole point of the series (or the good entries) to date.

HR was a solid 90 minutes "rainy afternoon" movie, and it was nice to see that guy from ER getting work. Prey was still the better resurrection of an otherwise played out 80s franchise, imho.

EDIT: Holy poo poo, this was a 2 hour flick.

The Modern Leper fucked around with this message at 14:55 on Oct 24, 2022

BisterdDave
Apr 21, 2004

Slitzweitz!

CelticPredator posted:

I’m really shocked everyone itt hates the new Hellraiser movie. I thought it was a good return to form after a thousand pure garbage sequels

I thought it was great, and the second half was even better! Funny enough, seems like everyone else hated the second half, so I dunno.

mutantIke
Oct 24, 2022

Born in '04
Certified Zoomer
New one was absolutely fine. A little slow and clunky but it had some cool gore and it kept my attention. I think it would have been way better received if it was called like "Hellraiser: Laments" or "Hellraiser: Resurrections" or whatever. There is no need to reboot the Hellraiser franchise! It has always been a very loose anthology with little established lore! Stop making me put dates after movie titles, I beg of you

doctorfrog
Mar 14, 2007

Great.

Glottis posted:

The Peripheral (first 2 episodes) were enjoyable diet cyberpunk for me. The second episode expands the universe at least as much as the first. It seems like it's gonna be a straight ready player one thing at first but diverges enough from that to be entertaining.

That said, none of it blew me away and it doesn't have the same feeling of "prestige tv" that I get from Westworld, but I'm glad to see more futurism on screen.

I read the book, which was a pretty fun read with ultimately a bit of a trippy premise with some typical William Gibson storytelling. From the trailer it looks like a very generic cyberspace thing. I'll wait for a year or so and see if anyone ITT even remembers the show before I try it.

pospysyl
Nov 10, 2012



Chas McGill posted:

Peripheral is pretty mediocre. I wish they'd adapted Pattern Recognition or something rather than such an overtly s/f novel. It just comes off ready player one-ish and a bit cheesy so far.

I've always thought Pattern Recognition would make for a good movie. Ideally you'd get David Fincher on it, but a Fincher imitator could cut their teeth on it too.

mystes
May 31, 2006

The Peripheral seems pretty dumb and since it's the westworld people it will probably have too many stupid mysteries that never get resolved, but I guess I'll keep watching it for now

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
Maybe they learned their lesson with Westworld.

isaboo
Nov 11, 2002

Muay Buok
ขอให้โชคดี
isn't the current / most recent Westworld season better? Seems like I saw that mentioned somewhere, but like others I gave up after S2 was over.

But I'll give Peripheral another couple episodes, I guess.

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
I do think that it's cool that The Peripheral immediately tells you that true time travel does not appear to be possible - only information can be sent - and changing the past is possible, just not your own past. Nice little dodges for the kind of poo poo that STEMlords like me obsess over.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

doctorfrog
Mar 14, 2007

Great.

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

I do think that it's cool that The Peripheral immediately tells you that true time travel does not appear to be possible - only information can be sent - and changing the past is possible, just not your own past. Nice little dodges for the kind of poo poo that STEMlords like me obsess over.

I don't know if the show goes into it, or will go into it (so beware), but in the book meddling with pocket time universes is a hobby of obscenely wealthy people who kinda see it as their own private game of Sid Meier's Civilization.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply