|
Guavanaut posted:Crank magnetism has been a thing since at least the days of free energy enthusiasts in the 80s saying "also I heard they made AIDS from a sheep virus and a cow virus", probably going back to the John Birch society or the anti polio serum people. AND YOU HAVE THE VIRUSES THAT'S TAKEN FROM SHEEP IN THE SOUTH AND THE VIRUSES FROM COWS IN THE NORTH PUT TOGETHER IN THE SAME FACTORY Edit what a poo poo snype lol
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 09:02 |
|
|
This representation of him is far too flattering.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:17
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:https://twitter.com/charlotterlynch/status/1590264372945092609 I never thought the leopards would eat MY face!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:21
|
|
|
Lady Gaza posted:I never thought the leopards would eat MY face! I think there's going to be a lot of that this winter.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:28
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:Inevitable. I miss the days when you could just have your own niche bespoke brainworms , before social media demanded that you must subscribe to the entire buffet of idiotic bigotry DEODORANTS ARE MAKING OUR YOUTH STERILE 
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:31
|
|
|
There is something of the devil about those garden gnomes I reckon.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:34
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:I think there's going to be a lot of that this winter. Kieth will promise some salt to season your face before it gets eaten (means tested ofc)
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:42
|
|
|
biglads posted:Kieth will promise some salt to season your face before it gets eaten (means tested ofc) All the faces will be self-seasoned from the salty tears.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 11:46
|
|
|
Someone just threw eggs at the king. I am sad to report they missed
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:17
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Wooster_Bert_/status/1590279910538743808?s=20&t=Bbq2AS2A0wmLVHBwMqgH0w Calling someone a Tory is now accurately classified as abuse
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:20
|
|
|
Mega Comrade posted:Someone just threw eggs at the king.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:23
|
|
|
peanut- posted:Calling someone a Tory is now accurately classified as abuse Always has been quote:From the 1500s to 1600s, the term Tory first emerged to refer to the Irish who were dispossessed of their lands and took to the woods, forming themselves into bands that subsisted on wild animals and goods taken from settlers.[5] After these activities were suppressed, the term lost its original signification with English-speakers, and was used to describe "an outlaw papist" or a "robber that is noted for outrages and cruelty".
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:29
|
|
|
peanut- posted:https://twitter.com/Wooster_Bert_/status/1590279910538743808?s=20&t=Bbq2AS2A0wmLVHBwMqgH0w This is a little misleading. Those were key phrases for the AI to begin with, pick up and analyse further, not simply mark that phrase as abusive. BUUUUUUUUUUT The overall report is still incredibly flawed and its a bit embarrassing the BBC put this out without any peer review or scrutiny. A good thread on this. https://twitter.com/Leelum/status/1590286954469675008
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:34
|
|
|
Hey, all I did was vote to immiserate my constituents, gladhand to set up my do-nothing consulting job, do a few cheeky bumps, enjoy an ocean of taxpayer-subsidised booze, and call Diane an innumerate n______ on the WhatsApp! Oh, and break a few lockdown laws and ministerial codes, but everyone was doing it and the laws aren't for me, they're for them! And then someone had the nerve to call me a disgrace on twitter! Clearly it is I who is the wounded party here!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:48
|
|
|
Amazing that they've put Jess Phillips as the image for that article given her claims to fame is making up a story about telling Abbot to gently caress off and proudly saying she'd stab Corbyn.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 12:52
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Robert_Gordon_/status/1590303137793212417?s=20&t=rkrYZKAmCyvnOiV6OoMP8g Seems a very useful tool indeed
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:07
|
|
|
I wonder what it does if you put in "you are a member of parliament" because I suspect it will rate it quite offensive, and I'm not sure that is for the right reason.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:17
|
|
|
Pot issues devastating takedown of kettle: https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1590316239859355648?s=46&t=y3fjNzE06s5VMDuHjFw3wA
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:17
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:I wonder what it does if you put in "you are a member of parliament" because I suspect it will rate it quite offensive, and I'm not sure that is for the right reason. I'm more curious what would quoting socialists score, I suspect not very well for even some obviously true statements. Private Speech fucked around with this message at 14:12 on Nov 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:21
|
|
|
 E: lmao    keir confirmed worst mp OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 13:29 on Nov 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:25
|
|
|
If someone said "you are Keir Starmer" to me I'd probably start crying. No wonder he's an alcoholic, he must hear it all the time
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:31
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:39
|
|
|
  I would definitely say both of these are equally toxic, good job robot. E:  it's literally the reasonable hitler machine lmao A Buttery Pastry posted:Did you try Keith? Yes, keith is in fact slightly less toxic than kier. OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 13:41 on Nov 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:39
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/lowerformofwit/status/1590290062830620672?t=MiPV5kAmMoyEfhvwZd9CDQ&s=19 The word "bodied" gets thrown around a lot these days, but the winner of today's Twitter Main Character award has shown that
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:42
|
|
|
How does this wonderful new algorithm parse a reply that's just pigpoopballs.bmp ?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:43
|
|
|
I’m always surprised by these “how is humiliating someone offensive?” takes. Like, you know what you’re doing and why. Presumably you think it’s a good idea and a net positive.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:50
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ArchewellBaby/status/1590310318328057856 https://twitter.com/ArchewellBaby/status/1590314539018383360 https://twitter.com/suzseddon/status/1590327071666221059 The hero: https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1590314033059536897 fuctifino fucked around with this message at 14:02 on Nov 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 13:55
|
|
|
Private Speech posted:I'm more curious what would quoting socialists score, I suspect not very well for even some obviously true statements. Despite me saying that it doesn't flag any Lenin quotes I tried as toxic. There's some pretty interesting and/or relevant ones I stumbled upon (not necessarily the ones I tried), like on Stalin: Lenin posted:Stalin is too rude and this defect, although quite tolerable in our midst and in dealing among us Communists, becomes intolerable in a Secretary-General. That is why I suggest the comrades think about a way of removing Staling from that post and appointing another man in his stead who in all other respects differs from Comrade Stalin in having only one advantage, namely, that of being more tolerant, more loyal, more polite, and more considerate to the comrades, less capricious, etc. This circumstance may appear to be a negligible detail. But I think that from the standpoint of safeguards against a split, and from the standpoint of what I wrote above about the relationship between Stalin and Trotsky, it is not a detail, or it is a detail which can assume decisive importance. and possibly related to the debate about the war in Ukraine: Lenin posted:A commentary, or popular explanation, of our Party resolutions is given in the Lenin and Zinoviev pamphlet Socialism and War. It plainly states, on page 5, that “socialists have regarded wars ‘for the defence of the fatherland’, or ‘defensive’ wars, as legitimate, progressive and just” only in the sense of “overthrowing alien oppression”. It cites an example: Persia against Russia, “etc.”, and says: “These would be just, and defensive wars, irrespective of who would lie the first to attack; any socialist would wish the oppressed, dependent and unequal states victory over the oppressor, slave-holding and predatory ‘Great’ Powers.” Lenin posted:A war against imperialist, i.e., oppressing, powers by oppressed (for example, colonial) nations is a genuine national war. It is possible today too. “Defence of the fatherland” in a war waged by an oppressed nation against a foreign oppressor is not a deception. Socialists are not opposed to “defence of the fatherland” in such a war. Private Speech fucked around with this message at 14:30 on Nov 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 14:05
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:Yes, keith is in fact slightly less toxic than kier.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 14:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Sarah_Woolley/status/1590326072796938242?s=19 "I wanted to vote to bomb the brown people but someone might call me a gently caress nugget on twitter. I'm powerless"
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 14:23
|
|
|
I have a PhD — can I offer my services as a referee and go “well actually you didn’t specify medical doctor, nerr” if they complain? E: oh oops I’m a page behind, lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 14:43
|
|
|
The Wicked ZOGA posted:I think Glinner's punishment is being Glinner
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 14:54
|
|
|
I love this study. https://twitter.com/scattermoon/status/1590326639585468416?s=19 Just beautifully poo poo stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 14:56
|
|
|
TACD posted:I have a PhD — can I offer my services as a referee and go “well actually you didn’t specify medical doctor, nerr” if they complain? Had an awkward moment on the plane a couple of months ago when my partner (PhD in Geography) was asked by a flight attendant to help with ain flight medical issue. Oops.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:21
|
|
|
There is something almost impressive about the level of denial and isolation you'd need to have to work on something for 8 months as a 'labour of love,' only to have its underlying flaws instantly pointed out on multiple fronts the day it hits the public.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:27
|
|
|
Bobby Deluxe posted:There is something almost impressive about the level of denial and isolation you'd need to have to work on something for 8 months as a 'labour of love,' only to have its underlying flaws instantly pointed out on multiple fronts the day it hits the public. 8 months is nothing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:32
|
|
|
We are so so far away from AI being useful for anything at the individual human scale
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:32
|
|
|
Failed Imagineer posted:We are so so far away from AI being useful for anything at the individual human scale Eh. AI is a spectrum, not a discrete category, and stuff like machine learning does have its value as a labour-saving tool. It's more that its real capabilities and use-cases are massively exaggerated by people who think they can get a robot to do all their thinking for them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:39
|
|
|
Has anyone had any experience with getting a booster, even if not eligible per government guidelines? I’ve heard of the odd person who has managed to get one at a walk-in site. My brother in law is a teacher and always getting sick, so when he went for his flu jab he asked and got the covid booster too. I managed to get my original booster early as St Thomas’ hospital in London were giving them out to anyone, despite official guidance, since they had the stock. Tempted to try them or Guy’s when I’m next in London for work.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 09:02 |
|
|
AI machine learning is still effected by whatever human biases its creators bring with them and you can bet anyone investigating toxicity against politicians is coming at it from a 'stop telling us we're wrong' perspective
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2022 15:46
|
|
