Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider

i am a moron posted:

Someone literally asked ‘is anyone saying this’

Sorry that I was unclear. I meant "is anyone saying that this behavior, if true, is in any way acceptable?"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

i am a moron
Nov 12, 2020

"I think if there’s one thing we can all agree on it’s that Penn State and Michigan both suck and are garbage and it’s hilarious Michigan fans are freaking out thinking this is their natty window when they can’t even beat a B12 team in the playoffs lmao"

christmas boots posted:

Sorry that I was unclear. I meant "is anyone saying that this behavior, if true, is in any way acceptable?"

Seems like people are certainly ready to excuse it, might just be my Inexplicable Feminist Agenda flaring up

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO
Let's say he has issues with women that seemed to intimately inform that part of the game and a lot of other things that made it really feel genuine. Like really hit a lot of people where they live. Just like the poster 'dead gay comedy forums' posted also about laughing their rear end off at the communist magazine bit, having first hand experience with something similar.

What does that really have to do with having yours and others labor stolen and having to fight for your poo poo in court?

christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider

i am a moron posted:

Seems like people are certainly ready to excuse it, might just be my Inexplicable Feminist Agenda flaring up

Ah, you’re just trying to take potshots then

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

the source that is not Estonian Fraudman (Sam, Estonian Fraudman here) just said "it's not black and white" but they still respect Kurvitz and new people for some reason didn't want to say anything for reasons
there is no direct allegation that is not coming from the criminal
I think saying "yeah I could see Kurvitz being an rear end in a top hat with issues he has to work through" is as far as you can go without knowing something more

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

the source that is not Estonian Fraudman (Sam, Estonian Fraudman here) just said "it's not black and white" but they still respect Kurvitz and new people for some reason didn't want to say anything for reasons
there is no direct allegation that is not coming from the criminal
I think saying "yeah I could see Kurvitz being an rear end in a top hat with issues he has to work through" is as far as you can go without knowing something more



As the best loving detective ever I have serious questions for this CRIMINAL.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


i am a moron posted:

Yea I’m sure ZAUM is an iron fortress and it’s impossible to find an employee and ask them questions. They probably have a seven foot Estonian supremacist guarding the front door and there’s no way whoever wrote this article has the physical instrumentation necessary to get in and ask questions

"an anonymous source", emphasis on the singular, that favors the strongest party in this issue. is that good journalism, forums poster i am a moron

imho, why not check with more people? there's a public roster and there are the credits of the game, that's plenty of people to reach out that have dealt with them directly

i am a moron
Nov 12, 2020

"I think if there’s one thing we can all agree on it’s that Penn State and Michigan both suck and are garbage and it’s hilarious Michigan fans are freaking out thinking this is their natty window when they can’t even beat a B12 team in the playoffs lmao"

dead gay comedy forums posted:

"an anonymous source", emphasis on the singular, that favors the strongest party in this issue. is that good journalism, forums poster i am a moron

imho, why not check with more people? there's a public roster and there are the credits of the game, that's plenty of people to reach out that have dealt with them directly

People not talking about this stuff on the record and being anonymously sourced is extremely normal in this situation, yes. Are you being facetious?

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

i am a moron posted:

People not talking about this stuff on the record and being anonymously sourced is extremely normal in this situation, yes. Are you being facetious?

People are scared of the criminal (the fraudster)

turn off the TV
Aug 4, 2010

moderately annoying

i am a moron posted:

People not talking about this stuff on the record and being anonymously sourced is extremely normal in this situation, yes. Are you being facetious?

This is also a situation where there are people in the company who directly benefit from spinning a narrative that paints these people in a bad light, so an anonymous source might be a pretty lovely one. I think that wanting to hear from more than one anonymous source is pretty reasonable. The author already appears to be uncritically repeating what this named source with an incredibly obvious bias is saying, so who knows what's going on with the anonymous one.

Eason the Fifth
Apr 9, 2020
Folks it's time to hashtag cancelkurvitz

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


i am a moron posted:

People not talking about this stuff on the record and being anonymously sourced is extremely normal in this situation, yes. Are you being facetious?

deffo I am. how do you feel the bush era press corps listening about wmds

there's direct, public evidence to the contrary of what that source has been saying, such as Luiga, Rostov and Hindpere (which have been with them since the beginning) standing for Kurvitz, without rejecting creative animosity, nor disparaging any other team members. Why they weren't asked for commentary?

12 rats tied together
Sep 7, 2006

i am a moron posted:

People not talking about this stuff on the record and being anonymously sourced is extremely normal in this situation, yes. Are you being facetious?

yup i definitely need to anonymously agree with my employer. they wouldn't like it if they found out that i was backing them up online. this is the same as whistleblowing

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

dead gay comedy forums posted:

deffo I am. how do you feel the bush era press corps listening about wmds

there's direct, public evidence to the contrary of what that source has been saying, such as Luiga, Rostov and Hindpere (which have been with them since the beginning) standing for Kurvitz, without rejecting creative animosity, nor disparaging any other team members. Why they weren't asked for commentary?

Rhetoric [Medium: Passed] -
Because anything they say would counter the narrative you are trying to build. Use only what is useful to the case you want to make, discard all else.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

MariusLecter posted:

Rhetoric [Medium: Passed] -
Because anything they say would counter the narrative you are trying to build. Use only what is useful to the case you want to make, discard all else.

Drama [Easy: Failed] Well...what's "fraud" really?

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

So there are two narratives, both of which usually turn out to be true, neither of which contradicts the other, and which often go hand in hand and actively reinforce themselves.

1. A bunch of rich scumbags who already did A Fraud turned around and did A Fraud, loving a bunch of people out of their blood-and-sweat toil in a shameless bid for money.
2. A ~creative auteur~ who wrote a compelling misogynistic shitbag who hurt everyone around him turned out to be a misogynistic shitbag who hurt everyone around him.

The fact that the waters are muddied intrinsically benefits the people from narrative 1, who also have the resources and incentive to fabricate, overstate, or create the conditions for narrative 2. Narrative 2 has obvious holes--the other people who were fired or "left the company", the timeline of the game's production and release, probably other poo poo--but has the benefit of, historically, being a bad thing to bet against.

Flat-out picking a side means doubting the financial malfeasance of known financial malfeasants, which is lol, or doubting allegations of sexual misconduct, which is morally kinda lovely and generally long odds. Cutting the baby in half means inherently privileging one side anyways, being wrong twice on the chance you'll be right once, drawing a moral equivalence which is objectively cowardly and probably contemptible, and flattening the conflict into some bullshit "both sides are wrong" equivocation. In the absence of hard damning facts, which to my knowledge aren't actually out there, we're working on hearsay ranging from "bullshit" to "maybe true" to "highly suggestive but not concrete".

The correct thing to do is probably withhold speculation and judgment until we have something meaningful to engage with. The fun thing to do, which I therefore endorse, is to instead dice and grind aforesaid baby, assuming the worst possible behavior and motivations of literally everyone involved, however tangentially, and baselessly attacking their character with unholy fervor. In either case: gently caress everybody, including and especially you, but definitely not me.

Do As Thou Wilt.

UP AND ADAM
Jan 24, 2007

by Pragmatica
I don't care about the company and i love the game and my opinion actually won't affect a single thing. I hope they get their IP and the company burns.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Was Helen also fired for "belittling women"?

Vegetable
Oct 22, 2010

Fruits of the sea posted:

It’s ok to just not know where things stand
This. Since there’s a lawsuit, facts will come out. If there was gender-based harassment, it’ll come out in the journalistic exposé surely in the works. It’s okay to just not know anything.

Wafflecopper
Nov 27, 2004

I am a mouth, and I must scream

This is obviously pure speculation based on my own interpretation of the game but... I find it hard to believe that one of the creative leads behind DE, a game which has very progressive politics on all fronts, gender included, is actively misogynist. Like, the game is very critical towards misogyny. Playing as a fascist basically tells you you're blaming all your personal issues on women because of your failed relationship with one. I can see the argument that maybe Harry's misogynist side (if he's played that way) was written from experience, but if so, it still very much appears to be the experience of someone who has done a lot of genuine self-reflection, realised the error of their ways, and become a better person. The whole game is about letting go of the past and becoming a better person. I just can't see Kurvitz still being a raging misogynist, if indeed he ever was.

Wafflecopper fucked around with this message at 03:26 on Nov 10, 2022

e-dt
Sep 16, 2019

POWELL CURES KIDS posted:

So there are two narratives, both of which usually turn out to be true, neither of which contradicts the other, and which often go hand in hand and actively reinforce themselves.

1. A bunch of rich scumbags who already did A Fraud turned around and did A Fraud, loving a bunch of people out of their blood-and-sweat toil in a shameless bid for money.
2. A ~creative auteur~ who wrote a compelling misogynistic shitbag who hurt everyone around him turned out to be a misogynistic shitbag who hurt everyone around him.

The fact that the waters are muddied intrinsically benefits the people from narrative 1, who also have the resources and incentive to fabricate, overstate, or create the conditions for narrative 2. Narrative 2 has obvious holes--the other people who were fired or "left the company", the timeline of the game's production and release, probably other poo poo--but has the benefit of, historically, being a bad thing to bet against.

Flat-out picking a side means doubting the financial malfeasance of known financial malfeasants, which is lol, or doubting allegations of sexual misconduct, which is morally kinda lovely and generally long odds. Cutting the baby in half means inherently privileging one side anyways, being wrong twice on the chance you'll be right once, drawing a moral equivalence which is objectively cowardly and probably contemptible, and flattening the conflict into some bullshit "both sides are wrong" equivocation. In the absence of hard damning facts, which to my knowledge aren't actually out there, we're working on hearsay ranging from "bullshit" to "maybe true" to "highly suggestive but not concrete".

The correct thing to do is probably withhold speculation and judgment until we have something meaningful to engage with. The fun thing to do, which I therefore endorse, is to instead dice and grind aforesaid baby, assuming the worst possible behavior and motivations of literally everyone involved, however tangentially, and baselessly attacking their character with unholy fervor. In either case: gently caress everybody, including and especially you, but definitely not me.

Do As Thou Wilt.

Where are the accusations of sexual misconduct? In "gamesindustry.biz" the allegations of misogyny are that there was "misconduct in interacting with other colleagues that includes verbal abuse and gender discrimination", which doesn't actually include any sexual misconduct.

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

Cpt_Obvious posted:

Was Helen also fired for "belittling women"?

It's hardly implausible, given the host of incentives, that she might have enabled such behavior, or actively quashed and punished attempts to report it. The personal, professional, and creative stakes would in fact have rewarded her for allowing the perverse actions of her co-creator, and even heightened her perceived need to conceal it. We have a point of reference within the work itself, the toxic "relationship" between Ruby and Klaasje providing an obvious example. Flattening the possibilities of the situation into identity politics is a misogynistic act on its own, and subscribes to the same social frameworks which created these kinds of conditions to begin with.

Now, is any of that remotely likely to be the case, particularly given the competing interests at play? Pfffhahahahaha, gently caress no, Jesus Christ. Read that out loud and tell me you aren't tasting stupid. But there's a reason the Moralintern is so obviously modeled on the real world powers-to-be. Injecting doubt into the "storytelling" of what actually happened is an easy, effective way to negate the rhetoric of justice, and recenter the conflict into the arena where bloodsuckers are most comfortable: legal fuckery, institutional paralysis, and the default, indefinite maintenance of the status quo.

"Being right" is a bourgeois construct, one which must be purged from your being, through violence if possible. Embrace the Hell of the Real, and die, for the rest of your life, shrieking in unheard, unmitigated misery.

Eiba
Jul 26, 2007


MariusLecter posted:

Let's say he has issues with women that seemed to intimately inform that part of the game and a lot of other things that made it really feel genuine. Like really hit a lot of people where they live. Just like the poster 'dead gay comedy forums' posted also about laughing their rear end off at the communist magazine bit, having first hand experience with something similar.

What does that really have to do with having yours and others labor stolen and having to fight for your poo poo in court?
I believe part of their argument is that they were forced out for asking questions about the finances. If they were forced out for unrelated reasons it makes their "questions about finances" seem like something they made up later.

Wafflecopper posted:

This is obviously pure speculation based on my own interpretation of the game but... I find it hard to believe that one of the creative leads behind DE, a game which has very progressive politics on all fronts, gender included, is actively misogynist. Like, the game is very critical towards misogyny. Playing as a fascist basically tells you you're blaming all your personal issues on women because of your failed relationship with one. I can see the argument that maybe Harry's misogynist side (if he's played that way) was written from experience, but if so, it still very much appears to be the experience of someone who has done a lot of genuine self-reflection, realised the error of their ways, and become a better person. The whole game is about letting go of the past and becoming a better person. I just can't see Kurvitz still being a raging misogynist, if indeed he ever was.
I think it's a very self aware game about the issues and traps a man can fall into. But the thing about deep seated issues is that you can know they're issues and still fall into them. The idea isn't that he's some incel weirdo who's constructed a world view where women are evil, the idea is that he lets his emotions get the better of himself and even if he can reflect on those issues later, still causes issues in the moment.

That's reading a lot into the situation based on a character in a game though. I would not be comfortable arguing that that's particularly likely based just on the game and some hearsay. But I think that's the narrative people are wondering about. The game is good and progressive and self reflective. Doesn't necessarily mean the author is able to live up to all that all the time.

POWELL CURES KIDS posted:

The correct thing to do is probably withhold speculation and judgment until we have something meaningful to engage with. The fun thing to do, which I therefore endorse, is to instead dice and grind aforesaid baby, assuming the worst possible behavior and motivations of literally everyone involved, however tangentially, and baselessly attacking their character with unholy fervor. In either case: gently caress everybody, including and especially you, but definitely not me.

Do As Thou Wilt.
Yeah, basically this. I'm invested enough in this game and now having read the stories I feel like I've got some narratives floating about in my head, so I'm probably going to keep posting about this. But it's pretty clear that there's nothing we can really figure out from the sidelines.

Fortunately whatever the heck we say probably isn't going to matter in any way to anyone.

Pattonesque
Jul 15, 2004
johnny jesus and the infield fly rule
this whole thing is a CIA op imo

ANOTHER SCORCHER
Aug 12, 2018
Capital jangling a key labeled “woman belittler” in front of people’s faces.

e-dt
Sep 16, 2019

Estonian article and translation, found on Reddit:
https://ekspress.delfi.ee/artikkel/...i-tegijad-tulli
https://pastebin.com/CKKZZafT

POWELL CURES KIDS
Aug 26, 2016

e-dt posted:

Where are the accusations of sexual misconduct? In "gamesindustry.biz" the allegations of misogyny are that there was "misconduct in interacting with other colleagues that includes verbal abuse and gender discrimination", which doesn't actually include any sexual misconduct.



I mean, if I have a point here--which I do, though I'm not sure it's necessarily useful--it's that the rollout of information, which seems primarily created and controlled by "the company", is designed to shut down the (compelling but thus far unsubstantiated) arguments that there's been some kind of financial malfeasance. And it's a good tactic, because all they have to do to freeze out Kurvitz/Rostov/Hindpere et al. and keep things as they are is create a remotely plausible counter-narrative, then stall until the latter inevitably run out of resources. And, based on this admittedly kinda weird post by one of the dudes behind the original creative group, until they run out of the emotional and psychological energy to keep going, and either fall to infighting or give up. Unless there's something legally concrete--and Kurvitz and the others seem to think there is, though they're going up against people that are literal professionals at loving around on that front--all we have is innuendo and implication, which isn't enough. I've tried to make it clear that I'm against the money ghouls who have cheated these people out of a world they've been creating since their teens, but the narrative that's been formed means pushing back against the takeover requires, on some level, minimizing allegations of (at bottom, though you know they're gonna escalate) "gender discrimination", which I'm not personally enthusiastic about doing.

What's all this got to do with IP theft? Not much...except it's gonna suck some of the fire out from the little guys in the fight, and it's gonna make discussions like the one we're having go in kinda lovely directions. So I guess, at bedrock, I'm really just admiring the craftsmanship of the evil here.

POWELL CURES KIDS fucked around with this message at 23:17 on Nov 18, 2022

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Wafflecopper posted:

This is obviously pure speculation based on my own interpretation of the game but... I find it hard to believe that one of the creative leads behind DE, a game which has very progressive politics on all fronts, gender included, is actively misogynist. Like, the game is very critical towards misogyny. Playing as a fascist basically tells you you're blaming all your personal issues on women because of your failed relationship with one. I can see the argument that maybe Harry's misogynist side (if he's played that way) was written from experience, but if so, it still very much appears to be the experience of someone who has done a lot of genuine self-reflection, realised the error of their ways, and become a better person. The whole game is about letting go of the past and becoming a better person. I just can't see Kurvitz still being a raging misogynist, if indeed he ever was.

My man, no comment on if it's true because both narratives currently lack specific allegations, much less evidence, but people say the Right Progressive Things all the time and turn out to be enormous pieces of poo poo who don't live it.

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!
Is this the part of the thread where we find out the posters who believe Evrart is very bad will back the capitalist assholes over the artist creators of this game?

Because lol.

Sticko
Nov 24, 2007
Outrageous Lumpwad

Orange Devil posted:

Is this the part of the thread where we find out the posters who believe Evrart is very bad will back the capitalist assholes over the artist creators of this game?

Because lol.

Has been for the last couple of pages

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Alchenar posted:

My man, no comment on if it's true because both narratives currently lack specific allegations, much less evidence, but people say the Right Progressive Things all the time and turn out to be enormous pieces of poo poo who don't live it.

Kurvitzs claims are extremely specific: using company funds for personal use. And the person he accusers has a history of similar crimes proved in court of law.

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

Orange Devil posted:

Is this the part of the thread where we find out the posters who believe Evrart is very bad will back the capitalist assholes over the artist creators of this game?

Because lol.

It's just too perfect. Believing an actual wealthy criminal convicted of lying. You couldn't make this poo poo up.

John DiFool
Aug 28, 2013

Believe capitalists.

General Battuta
Feb 7, 2011

This is how you communicate with a fellow intelligence: you hurt it, you keep on hurting it, until you can distinguish the posts from the screams.

POWELL CURES KIDS posted:

I've tried to make it clear that I'm against the money ghouls who have cheated these people out of a world they've been creating since their teens, but the narrative that's been formed means pushing back against the takeover requires, on some level, minimizing allegations of (at bottom, though you know they're gonna escalate) "gender discrimination", which I'm not personally enthusiastic about doing. Fr'instance, and yo I'm sorry to use your post as an example but I'm trying to post on the internet over here:

Excuse me?

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO
"Women are bourgeois." Kurvitz irl probably.

Eiba posted:

That's reading a lot into the situation based on a character in a game though. I would not be comfortable arguing that that's particularly likely based just on the game and some hearsay. But I think that's the narrative people are wondering about. The game is good and progressive and self reflective. Doesn't necessarily mean the author is able to live up to all that all the time

It's an expression of pain, the video game.

General Battuta
Feb 7, 2011

This is how you communicate with a fellow intelligence: you hurt it, you keep on hurting it, until you can distinguish the posts from the screams.
I wrote a pretty lengthy and very mad post about the ways that game studios force people to work 400 hours a month for months on end, refuse to give them leave, deny them any kind of mental health support except for huge amounts of free alcohol in the studio, and then kick them out the door as 'toxic' when they scream at someone (because if you do this to some people, they will start screaming). This has not happened to me, but I have definitely seen it happen to people who were toxic, but were also at the end of several years of institutionalised psychological torture.

But if "how do we apportion moral responsibility to broken people an insanely hosed up human-corrosive environment being manipulated by ghouls? I don't know and find the issue really difficult" is going to be read as 'minimizing allegations of gender discrimination' then posting about it is a waste of time. Exploring why things happen isn't minimizing or excusing them. It's the only way we can make them better.

I will go ahead with my stupid dumb long post if it seems like a good idea after sitting on it for a while.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


I think this was mentioned in passing earlier but here's Mick Gordon talking about his experiences with id software: https://medium.com/@mickgordon/my-full-statement-regarding-doom-eternal-5f98266b27ce

For the sake of making the company look good, a thoroughly competent professional was thrown under the bus and wasn't even properly paid by his work.

quote:

Using NDAs, settlements and gag orders to silence truths is an appalling tactic used by people in high positions of power fearful of accountability. I am choosing to speak out because the alternative was to accept that tactic as okay.

Vagabong
Mar 2, 2019

Sardonik posted:

Evrart could at least have used his special skill and helped them find guns. :colbert:

I'm fairly certain the hardy boys had guns, it's just sort of poorly demonstrated in game. The whole tribunal post Harry getting shot is sort of confusingly laid out.

Also the death squad did at least three murders in Martinaise pre-tribunal as indicated by the kill markings on that one dudes gun and it's entirely unclear whether they were before or after they went rogue.

Vagabong fucked around with this message at 18:48 on Nov 10, 2022

Roobanguy
May 31, 2011

Vagabong posted:

I'm fairly certain the hardy boys had guns, it's just sort of poorly demonstrated in game. The whole tribunal post Harry getting shot is sort of confusingly laid out.

Also the death squad did at least three murders in Martinaise pre-tribunal as indicated by the kill markings on that one dudes gun and it's entirely unclear whether they were before or after they went rogue.

the old guy at least has a gun, because one of the failure states is him shooting you.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

Roobanguy posted:

the old guy at least has a gun, because one of the failure states is him shooting you.

I extremely need to know if it's intentional or if it's blue on blue.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply