Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

Supposedly it's a bunch of investors and while I haven't located the complaint, it alleges a sweeping conspiracy of fraud which would be quite the interesting challenge to prove. If they can prove it, that'll be really fascinating to play out, otherwise yeah, um, Steph Curry doesn't owe you a duty of candor on an ad.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

kw0134 posted:

Supposedly it's a bunch of investors and while I haven't located the complaint, it alleges a sweeping conspiracy of fraud which would be quite the interesting challenge to prove. If they can prove it, that'll be really fascinating to play out, otherwise yeah, um, Steph Curry doesn't owe you a duty of candor on an ad.

I might give you Steph Curry, but gently caress Tom Brady

drk
Jan 16, 2005
For those asking about the class action against FTX et al, I skimmed enough of it to summarize why he's suing and his laughable reasons for why various people and organizations owe him money or something

quote:

Plaintiff Garrison purchased an unregistered security from FTX in the form of a [yield bearing account] and funded the account with a sufficient amount of crypto assets to earn interest on his holdings

quote:

65. Defendant Stephen Curry had his own nationwide ad campaign pushing the Deceptive FTX Platform, known as the “#notanexpert” campaign.26 Throughout the ad, Curry repeatedly denies being cast as an expert in cryptocurrency, culminating in his statement that “I’m not an expert, and I don’t need to be. With FTX I have everything I need to buy, sell, and trade crypto 66. safely.”

apparently this makes Stephen Curry personally liable for all losses on FTX, I guess

complaint here: https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%253Aaaid%253Ascds%253AUS%253A1b438d61-787f-36cf-89e4-731df6d92236

JagGator
Oct 31, 2012
I mean if we can’t trust the financial, political, and religious advice of our country’s top athletes, then who can we trust?!?

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

drk posted:

For those asking about the class action against FTX et al, I skimmed enough of it to summarize why he's suing and his laughable reasons for why various people and organizations owe him money or something



apparently this makes Stephen Curry personally liable for all losses on FTX, I guess

complaint here: https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%253Aaaid%253Ascds%253AUS%253A1b438d61-787f-36cf-89e4-731df6d92236

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJTwwfS4vBs
not completely, but somewhat culpable. He bought into it and advertised for it.

repiv
Aug 13, 2009

he's trying to sue larry david for appearing in FTX ads where he plays an anti-crypto luddite lol

Chief McHeath
Apr 23, 2002
Probation
Can't post for 7 hours!

Mumpy Puffinz posted:

Nope. Sorry. That person put their name, that they want to protect, on an inferior, or dangerous product. They should also be held accountable

I got severely beaten by a mob who used George Foreman grills and successfully sued the George Foremans (George Foreman and his five large adult George Foreman sons) for $40 million.

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Chief McHeath posted:

I got severely beaten by a mob who used George Foreman grills and successfully sued the George Foremans (George Foreman and his five large adult George Foreman sons) for $40 million.

Wait, George Forman Grills don't collect cryptocurrency? Then why do I have 400 of them running in my kitchen at all times?

Mozi
Apr 4, 2004

Forms change so fast
Time is moving past
Memory is smoke
Gonna get wider when I die
Nap Ghost
it's the George Freeman Grill that's into crypto

Squiggle
Sep 29, 2002

I don't think she likes the special sauce, Rick.


Chief McHeath posted:

I got severely beaten by a mob who used George Foreman grills and successfully sued the George Foremans (George Foreman and his five large adult George Foreman sons) for $40 million.

the Georges Foreman

Dabir
Nov 10, 2012

Georges Foremen

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Dabir posted:

Georges Foremen

This is the misunderstanding. There are many Georges only one Forman. Its like attorneys general

Ups_rail
Dec 8, 2006

by Fluffdaddy
So can someone explain terra luna to me? Like what was it suppose to do.

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Ups_rail posted:

So can someone explain terra luna to me? Like what was it suppose to do.

its ancient speak for earth moon

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

The legal recitations are, uh, "novel" and will likely get most of the defendants yeeted because they vigorously misinterpret what terms like "agent" mean in the context of corporate law. If I use their expanded definitions I can sue the stagehands who helped build the set for Larry David's ad.

drk
Jan 16, 2005

Ups_rail posted:

So can someone explain terra luna to me? Like what was it suppose to do.

separate rubes from their money

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

kw0134 posted:

The legal recitations are, uh, "novel" and will likely get most of the defendants yeeted because they vigorously misinterpret what terms like "agent" mean in the context of corporate law. If I use their expanded definitions I can sue the stagehands who helped build the set for Larry David's ad.

did any of the famous defendants own any of it? Most stagehands don't own a part of the stage they work on

drk
Jan 16, 2005

kw0134 posted:

The legal recitations are, uh, "novel" and will likely get most of the defendants yeeted because they vigorously misinterpret what terms like "agent" mean in the context of corporate law. If I use their expanded definitions I can sue the stagehands who helped build the set for Larry David's ad.

Right, he could just sue FTX but they are an empty bag now. I think he's hoping the court will buy his reasons for including at least one of the celebrity defendants who could plausibly pay out a judgement (or settlement).

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

Most of the named defendants show up in an ad and the complaint alleges nothing else, including ownership. Further, even if you alleged ownership or some sort of equity stake, that's not an element of fraud (or whatever nonsense it's trying to push). That would mean Worldcom or Enron shareholders defrauded themselves when those companies imploded.

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

Like by this complaint's logic, the attorneys general of multiple states should have sued Perdue Pharma for the opioid epidemic, every physician who ever wrote a prescription for oxy, the pharmacist tech who filled it, the truck driver who drove it to the pharmacy, and the guy who put the shrinkwrap on the bottles, because all of them contributed to the sale of the product.

Fur20
Nov 14, 2007

すご▞い!
君は働か░い
フ▙▓ズなんだね!

Ups_rail posted:

So can someone explain terra luna to me? Like what was it suppose to do.

go from the earth to the moooooooon. it's right there in the name!

That DICK!
Sep 28, 2010

we are the nation of george formation

notwithoutmyanus
Mar 17, 2009
https://twitter.com/briab_briar/status/1592994526846939136

I really, really wish SBF responds to this person's DM.

Pf. Hikikomoriarty
Feb 15, 2003

RO YNSHO


Slippery Tilde

Ups_rail posted:

So can someone explain terra luna to me? Like what was it suppose to do.

it was supposed to algorithmically guarantee the price of terra was $1 usd

but you might say, the only way to guarantee something is worth a dollar is to have a big pile of dollars with which you buy that something, and this only works until you run out of dollars. and you'd be exactly right and way smarter than anyone who bought luna.

anyway the idea was that a 'smart contract' would let anyone exchange terra for $1 worth of luna or $1 worth of luna for 1 terra. so as long as luna is worth anything it pegs the price of terra to $1. anyway eventually the luna guy ran out of dollars to defend the price of luna, it quickly became worthless and the guy is now an international fugitive

if it sounds dumb, it's actually even dumber

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

I'm not sure who's getting threatened here, actually. If we hold those two accountable will this dude not release that horror of a tape or what?

Regrettable
Jan 5, 2010



notwithoutmyanus posted:

https://twitter.com/briab_briar/status/1592994526846939136

I really, really wish SBF responds to this person's DM.

Why doesn't this idiot just ask his parents for advice? They're both law professors at Stanford. I'm sure they could tell him to keep his stupid mouth shut.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Pf. Hikikomoriarty posted:

it was supposed to algorithmically guarantee the price of terra was $1 usd

but you might say, the only way to guarantee something is worth a dollar is to have a big pile of dollars with which you buy that something, and this only works until you run out of dollars. and you'd be exactly right and way smarter than anyone who bought luna.

anyway the idea was that a 'smart contract' would let anyone exchange terra for $1 worth of luna or $1 worth of luna for 1 terra. so as long as luna is worth anything it pegs the price of terra to $1. anyway eventually the luna guy ran out of dollars to defend the price of luna, it quickly became worthless and the guy is now an international fugitive

if it sounds dumb, it's actually even dumber

Basically terra was the casino chips, that suddenly the casino was no longer able to readily exchange for real money.

ikanreed
Sep 25, 2009

I honestly I have no idea who cannibal[SIC] is and I do not know why I should know.

syq dude, just syq!

kw0134 posted:

The legal recitations are, uh, "novel" and will likely get most of the defendants yeeted because they vigorously misinterpret what terms like "agent" mean in the context of corporate law. If I use their expanded definitions I can sue the stagehands who helped build the set for Larry David's ad.

I don't know. I get the point of what you're saying, but when it comes to securities, there could be a bottom line of opening your mouth and saying the word "safe" when you have an undeclared interest in the security.

I'm sure there's a lot of precedent actual lawyers can cite, but the securities act of 1934 itself seems pretty amenable to lie+profit=fraud interpretations to me.

more falafel please
Feb 26, 2005

forums poster

Pf. Hikikomoriarty posted:

it was supposed to algorithmically guarantee the price of terra was $1 usd

but you might say, the only way to guarantee something is worth a dollar is to have a big pile of dollars with which you buy that something, and this only works until you run out of dollars. and you'd be exactly right and way smarter than anyone who bought luna.

anyway the idea was that a 'smart contract' would let anyone exchange terra for $1 worth of luna or $1 worth of luna for 1 terra. so as long as luna is worth anything it pegs the price of terra to $1. anyway eventually the luna guy ran out of dollars to defend the price of luna, it quickly became worthless and the guy is now an international fugitive

if it sounds dumb, it's actually even dumber

"That sounds dumb, you must not be explaining it right"

"Yeah actually it's dumber than that"

Eeyo
Aug 29, 2004

Yeah it started with you’d get like a tenth of a luna for 1 terra dollar, but since the contract was written such that it would print however many luna it would take to make a dollar at the “market price” it was printing trillions of luna towards the end of the death spiral. It’s a spiral since you’re just pumping hyperinflation. Someone cashed in their holdings for a token nobody wants, so now the market price drops because you’re dumping more tokens.

notwithoutmyanus
Mar 17, 2009

Regrettable posted:

Why doesn't this idiot just ask his parents for advice? They're both law professors at Stanford. I'm sure they could tell him to keep his stupid mouth shut.

There's a limit to what can be done when you get the short end of the gene pool when it comes to intelligence, I suppose.

drk
Jan 16, 2005

Regrettable posted:

Why doesn't this idiot just ask his parents for advice? They're both law professors at Stanford. I'm sure they could tell him to keep his stupid mouth shut.

This guy has thoroughly convinced himself that maximizing his utility function involves never shutting up

more falafel please
Feb 26, 2005

forums poster

The other important thing about terra/luna is that basically everyone in the crypto ecosystem had massive exposure to it, directly or indirectly. It exploded in early summer and we're still seeing the fallout. FTX's implosion wasn't directly caused by the terra/luna collapse, but it was a significant chunk of what happened, indirectly.

Also, all these companies getting paper rich happened in a bill market for crypto. Crypto assets aren't backed by anything but vibes, so once it starts going down, it tends to death spiral. Once all these exchanges/prop desks realized they couldn't get double digit APY anymore while being leveraged to hell, they all started liquidating their loans, almost entirely collateralized with crypto. Which means they have to sell, which means the prices go down, which means the collateral risk on more loans is too risky, so they get liquidated, etc, etc.

ronya
Nov 8, 2010

I'm the normal one.

You hate ridden fucks will regret your words when you eventually grow up.

Peace.
it was a rather clever way to arbitrage against the widely voiced belief in certain crypto spheres that fiat would crash any day now

holding luna as a way to short tethercoins, consistent with this outlook

of course, fiat did not crash

this is one thing that sets the crypto retail period apart from earlier retail investor frenzies, I think - it's so much easier to convert any set of bullshit certainties into an implied set of trades, which then turn out to be very costly indeed

ronya fucked around with this message at 07:19 on Nov 17, 2022

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Regrettable posted:

Why doesn't this idiot just ask his parents for advice? They're both law professors at Stanford. I'm sure they could tell him to keep his stupid mouth shut.

Sam, this is your dad, I’m begging you to keep replying to DMs like this

Armitage_Shanks
May 16, 2004

Fear the aVICtar.
Wasn't it established he has mush brain from abusing Parkinson's meds? That he's continuing to make the worst decisions shouldn't be too surprising.

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

Armitage_Shanks posted:

Wasn't it established he has mush brain from abusing Parkinson's meds? That he's continuing to make the worst decisions shouldn't be too surprising.

I don't remember which cryptodope we're talking about so I'm just going to assume you're talking about all of them.

kw0134
Apr 19, 2003

I buy feet pics🍆

ikanreed posted:

I don't know. I get the point of what you're saying, but when it comes to securities, there could be a bottom line of opening your mouth and saying the word "safe" when you have an undeclared interest in the security.

I'm sure there's a lot of precedent actual lawyers can cite, but the securities act of 1934 itself seems pretty amenable to lie+profit=fraud interpretations to me.
You'd have to prove that A. the spokespersons knew that SBF were perpetuating a fraud at the time of their sponsorship, B. they received crypto that actually represented the fraudulent activity that you're alleging was unlawful. The complaint says they have "emails" and then goes on to quote a bunch of SBF tweets. The conspiracy that ties all the defendants together in knowledge is...where? And what crypto did they receive? If they paid them in bitcoin, guess what, that's not a security. The complaint doesn't even know! A lot of the stuff here might get dismissed under the Twiqbal standard for making bare assertions of a cause of action but not alleging the factual basis that would lead to a court to assume the plaintiffs know what the gently caress they're talking about. As far as everyone involved besides the top people at FTX, you download an app and you give FTX money and you can buy buttcoin. If you want to allege that Shohei Ohtani conspired with everyone to defraud depositors, you're gonna have to do a lot loving better than recite the fact he showed up in an ad. You may as well sue the model for the Marlboro Man for conspiring to give people lung cancer.

Ratios and Tendency
Apr 23, 2010

:swoon: MURALI :swoon:


kw0134 posted:

You'd have to prove that A. the spokespersons knew that SBF were perpetuating a fraud at the time of their sponsorship, B. they received crypto that actually represented the fraudulent activity that you're alleging was unlawful. The complaint says they have "emails" and then goes on to quote a bunch of SBF tweets. The conspiracy that ties all the defendants together in knowledge is...where? And what crypto did they receive? If they paid them in bitcoin, guess what, that's not a security. The complaint doesn't even know! A lot of the stuff here might get dismissed under the Twiqbal standard for making bare assertions of a cause of action but not alleging the factual basis that would lead to a court to assume the plaintiffs know what the gently caress they're talking about. As far as everyone involved besides the top people at FTX, you download an app and you give FTX money and you can buy buttcoin. If you want to allege that Shohei Ohtani conspired with everyone to defraud depositors, you're gonna have to do a lot loving better than recite the fact he showed up in an ad. You may as well sue the model for the Marlboro Man for conspiring to give people lung cancer.

This is just a longwinded way of saying the law sucks and protects rich people whenever possible. They were hawking a scam.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BoldFace
Feb 28, 2011
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1593161517167702017

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply