Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Loezi posted:

Our notes on the Russia of 2022 are simply "Join NATO ASAP" so I dunno how much help that'll be for Ukraine

You've also got notes for Imperial Russia, and Russia under Stalin, both of which are applicable to the current situation. Unfortunately, the notes on Cold War Russia probably aren't applicable any more.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

stackofflapjacks
Apr 7, 2009

Mmmmm

A.o.D. posted:

You've also got notes for Imperial Russia, and Russia under Stalin, both of which are applicable to the current situation. Unfortunately, the notes on Cold War Russia probably aren't applicable any more.

Yea the geographic challenge faced by Ukraine bordering a hostile Russia is massive. Not that Finland isn't similarly exposed but I'd much rather defend my cold muskeg peat bogs from bastards with no skis vs trying to stop the more refined Russian effort at UKR v3.0 2025 edition with more mechanized forces and actual officers hardened by combat, while your border is rolling farmland for the most part.

GD_American
Jul 21, 2004

LISTEN TO WHAT I HAVE TO SAY AS IT'S INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT!
Ukraine has a far clearer path to post-war rebuild than Russia does, despite being where all the damage is.

With a presumably new Russian ruler and regime, they’d have to walk a tightrope of conciliation and appeasement to the rest of the world while placating domestic nationalists .

Foreign capital will eventually return anyway just from greed, but the level of risk they’ll have to price in will be onerous to Russia.

Notahippie
Feb 4, 2003

Kids, it's not cool to have Shane MacGowan teeth
Zelensky has been pretty clear about his vision for a post-war Ukraine - he has explicitly invoked Israel as a model. A heavily defense-focused country with an expectation of universal service and an emphasis on self-reliance but one that's still engaged as a peer in the international system.

How that interacts with Ukrainian nationalist movements, and the risk for this evolving into a hard-line nationalist government over time... well, Israel is a demonstration of that too unfortunately.

golden bubble
Jun 3, 2011

yospos

https://rusi.org/explore-our-resear...uary-july-2022/
https://static.rusi.org/359-SR-Ukraine-Preliminary-Lessons-Feb-July-2022-web-final.pdf

I wonder where they are getting the numbers for this

quote:

Despite the importance of UAVs to remaining competitive, their attrition rates were extremely high. Of all UAVs used by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the first three phases of the war covered by this study (first 90 days of the war), around 90% were destroyed. The average life expectancy of a quadcopter remained around three flights. The average life expectancy of a fixed-wing UAV was around six flights.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006
Ukraine has also had a clear public will to pivot westward and align economically with the EU. A post-war marshall plan type scenario is unlikely to face significant pushback there, and in fact will kickstart the desired economic realignment. It doesn't hurt that there are nations in Eastern Europe that are eager to participate, and that there is significant goodwill in the US and Great Britain to draw on. Ukraine's position going forward should be far less fraught than Israel's.

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009

IPCRESS posted:

How do you put a country back together after you have thrown your insane, expansionist, genocidal neighbor back into their own front yard? I'm assuming Russia will continue to lob unguided missiles across the border just to keep the NATO option completely off the table.

I think it will eventually settle into a situation like Korea. The border will become a heavily armed DMZ with NATO troops facing off against a nuclear-armed failed state

Hopefully Ukraine is able to succeed financially as well as South Korea.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands
I feel like one thing Ukraine is almost certainly going to be fighting for post-war is security guarantees - preferably NATO membership, but anything they can get will do. Militarizing the country might fend off the Russians if they come knocking again, but it'd be better yet not to have to fend them off at all because they're in the NATO nuclear umbrella. The question is who might be able and willing to provide such guarantees? Actual NATO membership still seems unlikely despite the goodwill Ukraine has earned given spoiler states like Hungary and Turkey, and even leaving spoilers aside providing a defensive pact to a nation who has a demonstrable enemy quite likely to attack again at some point and potentially actually trigger the pact is a heck of a commitment for any country. That same issue complicates any other foreign guarantees they might look for - anyone agreeing to protect Ukraine has to face the non-zero possibility of Russia attacking again anyways in the future. Who's willing to run that risk - especially nuclear powers worried about escalation if the guarantee is triggered?

M_Gargantua
Oct 16, 2006

STOMP'N ON INTO THE POWERLINES

Exciting Lemon

Tomn posted:

I feel like one thing Ukraine is almost certainly going to be fighting for post-war is security guarantees - preferably NATO membership, but anything they can get will do. Militarizing the country might fend off the Russians if they come knocking again, but it'd be better yet not to have to fend them off at all because they're in the NATO nuclear umbrella. The question is who might be able and willing to provide such guarantees? Actual NATO membership still seems unlikely despite the goodwill Ukraine has earned given spoiler states like Hungary and Turkey, and even leaving spoilers aside providing a defensive pact to a nation who has a demonstrable enemy quite likely to attack again at some point and potentially actually trigger the pact is a heck of a commitment for any country. That same issue complicates any other foreign guarantees they might look for - anyone agreeing to protect Ukraine has to face the non-zero possibility of Russia attacking again anyways in the future. Who's willing to run that risk - especially nuclear powers worried about escalation if the guarantee is triggered?

Even if Turkey and Hungary try to play games Ukraine will be under the US protection at the end of this. You base some V Corps and a BCT or two in Kyiv and Dnipro and Russia really can't risk the escalation to go back in. You get that you've got 80% of the benefits of joining NATO for them.

SerthVarnee
Mar 13, 2011

It has been two zero days since last incident.
Big Super Slapstick Hunk
Right up until someone like Trump pulls the same stunt as Trump did to the Kurds.
Just suddenly telling the whole force to pick up their poo poo and gently caress off, leaving the local population to deal with the very curious Russian tourists coming to loot the abandoned base for trinkets.

HelloSailorSign
Jan 27, 2011

stackofflapjacks posted:

while your border is rolling farmland for the most part.

Sounds like there are more tractors there, problem solved.

LtCol J. Krusinski
May 7, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
You should 100% never depend on the U.S. for protection unless you are in the U.S.

And only then if you are a wealthy, white, land owner. In the U.S.

Explicitly in the U.S.

Everyone else? :lol:

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

golden bubble posted:

I wonder where they are getting the numbers for this

Have you read what they say?

quote:

This report is methodologically problematic. It draws on the operational data accumulated by the General Staff of the UAF during the conflict, which was made available to the authors. A significant proportion of this data cannot be made public but was used to inform the conclusions of this report. A good example is Ukrainian losses, which are factored into the conclusions reached as regards the relative effectiveness of tactics and capabilities but cannot be disclosed as they remain operationally sensitive. Other data that is cited was sometimes obtained through methods and sources of collection that are sensitive. The authors have considered the data in the context of its method of collection and the corresponding confidence in its accuracy.

However, these judgements cannot be discussed in the report because the nature of the underlying sources for this data remains classified. For this reason, this report should not be considered a work of academic scholarship and it does not use citations. Rather, it should be considered as testimony based on personal observations of the authors. This includes the direct participation in strategic and operational decision-making during the war by two of the authors: Lieutenant General Mykhaylo Zabrodskyi and Oleksandr V Danylyuk.

Grip it and rip it
Apr 28, 2020

SerthVarnee posted:

Right up until someone like Trump pulls the same stunt as Trump did to the Kurds.
Just suddenly telling the whole force to pick up their poo poo and gently caress off, leaving the local population to deal with the very curious Russian tourists coming to loot the abandoned base for trinkets.

The US, Russia, and UK were all supposed to come to Ukraine's aid if anyone ever invaded them or a couple other countries - I don't think anyone is going to design their national security apparatus on the presumed continuing good will of their neighbors or signatories. Ukraine will want broader economic deals that will allow them to rebuild their own economy and fuel their own war machine with as little foreign input or participation as they can possibly manage.

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice
The economic and political process to rebuild I get, but how do you handle the physical side? Assuming complete Ukranian victory with Russia told to gently caress the gently caress off, the remaining question is "What stops Russia from just missile striking transformer stations for the next decade?" and similar other attacks to make Ukraine impossible to rebuild. It's Russia, if Putin wants to keep going they'll be novichok-ing public figures as long as it's possible.

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009

bird food bathtub posted:

The economic and political process to rebuild I get, but how do you handle the physical side? Assuming complete Ukranian victory with Russia told to gently caress the gently caress off, the remaining question is "What stops Russia from just missile striking transformer stations for the next decade?" and similar other attacks to make Ukraine impossible to rebuild. It's Russia, if Putin wants to keep going they'll be novichok-ing public figures as long as it's possible.

Ukraine gets all of it's land back, then negotiates a ceasefire. Why would Russia accept a ceasefire? Well if Crimea and the Donbass are gone we can only assume Russia's military and economy would be in apocalyptic conditions, and having only losses to show for the entire "special operation" someone is going to cut losses somewhere eventually.

With a ceasefire and no more contested territories Ukraine can apply to join NATO and get a real guarantee of security.

If Ukraine can't do any one of those things, then we can expect this war to drag on in some way until one side loses support. Which might be decades. It's a miracle created by the people of Ukraine that the more ideal option is even plausible.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

That's been a pretty common theme in interviews with people piloting drones. Notably they emphasize that experienced drone pilots can often keep them alive for longer, but that the overall life expectancy of the drones is measured in days or at most weeks. It makes sense insofar as they're predominately using civilian drones that aren't even remotely designed to be rugged enough to last on a battlefield, much less against anti-drone systems or against actual air defense systems.

It's also hard to overstate just how many air defense resources Russia had in the first month of the war still.

Very little info makes it out about how Ukraine uses high end drone systems.

Herstory Begins Now fucked around with this message at 22:56 on Nov 30, 2022

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Herstory Begins Now posted:

That's been a pretty common theme in interviews with people piloting drones. Notably they emphasize that experienced drone pilots can often keep them alive for longer, but that the overall life expectancy of the drones is measured in days or at most weeks. It makes sense insofar as they're predominately using civilian drones that aren't even remotely designed to be rugged enough to last on a battlefield, much less against anti-drone systems or against actual air defense systems.

That honestly strikes me as pretty good for consumer-grade flight hardware operated in a warzone.

Diarrhea Elemental
Apr 2, 2012

Am I correct in my assumption, you fish-faced enemy of the people?

Tiny Timbs posted:

That honestly strikes me as pretty good for consumer-grade flight hardware operated in a warzone.

Cost of some COTS poo poo just powerful enough to fly a grenade and release system over top of some poor bastard taking a dump in the woods, pretty decent ROI even before you get into the chaos dunking them square through a sunroof or tank hatch.

EasilyConfused
Nov 21, 2009


one strong toad

Grip it and rip it posted:

The US, Russia, and UK were all supposed to come to Ukraine's aid if anyone ever invaded them or a couple other countries

IIRC that's not the case, they merely pledged to respect Ukraine's independence and non-nuclear status.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

EasilyConfused posted:

IIRC that's not the case, they merely pledged to respect Ukraine's independence and non-nuclear status.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

The wording of the memorandum in question is exceptionally weak, and certainly doesn't require military intervention on Ukraine's behalf. What little is provided for in the memorandum (it's not even a real treaty) can easily be argued as having been fulfilled by both the US and UK, since both have enacted sanctions and gone before the UN to protest Russia's misadventures in Donbass going back to 2014.

bulletsponge13
Apr 28, 2010

Diarrhea Elemental posted:

Cost of some COTS poo poo just powerful enough to fly a grenade and release system over top of some poor bastard taking a dump in the woods, pretty decent ROI even before you get into the chaos dunking them square through a sunroof or tank hatch.

This is just refinement of what ISIL put out. They had a multi-million dollar drone program utilizing COTS and 3D print files, and put it out open source, where plans and designs have been refined and utilized by groups all over the world.

In Iraq, the sound of "toy" drones brought the same terror to Iraqi forces as the thrum of a gun ship does to our enemies.


This is interesting to me, because it's re-teaching ancient Infantry TTPs- it's the exact opposite of what the US has been fighting, and it's making a lot of troops and leaders realize that we have been very lucky, and very lacking in what war is. We got spoiled by the amount of control we had at war.

Grip it and rip it
Apr 28, 2020

EasilyConfused posted:

IIRC that's not the case, they merely pledged to respect Ukraine's independence and non-nuclear status.

What would the value of a treaty that pledges to respect a country's interdependence and non-nuclear status even do? That just sounds like having normalized relations with a non-nuclear power.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Grip it and rip it posted:

What would the value of a treaty that pledges to respect a country's interdependence and non-nuclear status even do? That just sounds like having normalized relations with a non-nuclear power.

It's not a treaty.

Normalized relations for a post-Soviet state were the whole point.

Herman Merman
Jul 6, 2008

A.o.D. posted:

You've also got notes for Imperial Russia, and Russia under Stalin, both of which are applicable to the current situation. Unfortunately, the notes on Cold War Russia probably aren't applicable any more.
The first set of notes involved quietly aligning with Imperial Germany, and the second one with Nazi Germany, so they might not be all that desirable right now.

A.o.D.
Jan 15, 2006

Herman Merman posted:

The first set of notes involved quietly aligning with Imperial Germany, and the second one with Nazi Germany, so they might not be all that desirable right now.

Notes, not instruction manuals.

Baconroll
Feb 6, 2009
The latest video from 'Military Aviation History' on youtube is outstanding - its a senior fellow from the Royal United Services Institute talking about the current state of the air-war in Ukraine.

Its so night-and-day compared to usual shallow talking heads on youtube. Lots of good detail that I've never heard before with reasoned analysis from an expert - not just throwing out numbers that someone found on a wiki page.

Highly recommended,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lot6i8bqvpw

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

RUSI is one of those low key (until a war happens) areas where the UK really punches above its weight in terms of doing and publishing research and analysis.

aphid_licker
Jan 7, 2009


Baconroll posted:

The latest video from 'Military Aviation History' on youtube is outstanding - its a senior fellow from the Royal United Services Institute talking about the current state of the air-war in Ukraine.

Its so night-and-day compared to usual shallow talking heads on youtube. Lots of good detail that I've never heard before with reasoned analysis from an expert - not just throwing out numbers that someone found on a wiki page.

Highly recommended,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lot6i8bqvpw

Meteor-slinging Gripen Ukrainian air force in being would own so much

perfluorosapien
Aug 15, 2015

Oven Wrangler

aphid_licker posted:

Meteor-slinging Gripen Ukrainian air force in being would own so much

Hayard-Günnes now accepting payment in hryvnia

golden bubble
Jun 3, 2011

yospos

Counterpoint: the only way to get those in under a year would be to take them off the Swedish Air Force's active inventory. I'd be down for it, but I'm not sure Sweden would be.

Fivemarks
Feb 21, 2015

mlmp08 posted:

Haven't done one of these in a while, because they haven't been terribly interesting/informative lately as combat has slowed down or press briefings occurred days after other media sources covered the same topics.
https://www.defense.gov/News/Transc...round-briefing/

Intro, then questions as I choose.

Highlights:
-Russia switching to aerial attacks on infrastructure, especially civil power grid
-Heavy fighting in Kharkiv along P-66 highway
-Heavy fighting in Bakhmut
-NASAMS performance reportedly good so far (note that this means good where they can range, obviously there are areas beyond NASAMS' coverage)
-No more info regarding Iran and ballistic missiles and weapon supplies
-Russian artillery advantage still exists, but the ratio to which the Russians could outshoot the Ukrainian forces has decreased significantly over time
-Tactical Aircraft (jets) are not off the table, but they are not an immediate need given the nature of the fighting, and the maintenance/training challenge remains high, so it's still a thing in planning for the future, a ways out
-US had "a decent indication that there was a possibility [the missile that landed in Poland] was a Ukrainian-fired air defense system not meant to go into Poland."

This actually reminds me, somewhat, of the War of Cities phase of the Iran-Iraq War.

mlmp08
Jul 11, 2004

Prepare for my priapic projectile's exalted penetration
Nap Ghost
Breaking my own soft-rule of “No ATACMS chat” but this is actually new reporting.

https://twitter.com/ralee85/status/1599786769490198529?s=46&t=63GLLKkUbAEE87xWuQ2glg

orange juche
Mar 14, 2012



mlmp08 posted:

Breaking my own soft-rule of “No ATACMS chat” but this is actually new reporting.

https://twitter.com/ralee85/status/1599786769490198529?s=46&t=63GLLKkUbAEE87xWuQ2glg

it's likely reversible, if the US were ever to change their mind on it, but yeah it does prevent them from obtaining the missiles from another NATO partner under the table.

in a well actually
Jan 26, 2011

dude, you gotta end it on the rhyme

Digital Rocket Management

The X-man cometh
Nov 1, 2009

orange juche posted:

it's likely reversible, if the US were ever to change their mind on it, but yeah it does prevent them from obtaining the missiles from another NATO partner under the table.

This is Eastern Europe - the Ukrainians have already reversed it using the spare parts from a 1984 Yugo.

Nuclear Tourist
Apr 7, 2005

CCTV apparently caught an explosion at Engels air force base which is over 600km from the Ukraine border. Lots of strategic bombers there-Bears, Backfires etc.

There's the usual breathless speculation about new Ukrainian long range capabilities but no confirmation of anything yet, and I suppose it might as well have been some loner that got lucky with a DIY grenade-drone combo or something similar.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMMxaqkCzi0

Alan Smithee
Jan 4, 2005


A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.

Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...
weren't the Ukrainians the ones who hacked the firmware to the Right to Repair John Deere tractors?

Alan Smithee
Jan 4, 2005


A man becomes preeminent, he's expected to have enthusiasms.

Enthusiasms, enthusiasms...
https://twitter.com/walter_report/status/1599654381145595904

https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1599705880177430529

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Xakura
Jan 10, 2019

A safety-conscious little mouse!

Nuclear Tourist posted:

I suppose it might as well have been some loner that got lucky with a DIY grenade-drone combo or something similar.

Quadcopters don't make a noise like this


From the sound passing overhead until the explosion is about 25 s. Explosion sound comes 19 s after the flash => about 6.3 km away from the camera. Resulting in a travel speed of about 250 m/s, or mach 0.74.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply