|
more falafel please posted:We brought RMS in to speak at my college because we all loved I mean, this is a reasonable and honest answer.
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 14:08 |
|
|
more falafel please posted:We brought RMS in to speak at my college because we all loved write what you know, I guess
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 19:00
|
|
|
Any excuse to post this thing I made the other day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wf6gzeqCnuo
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 19:02
|
|
|
Wait, that rules
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 19:04
|
|
|
Talorat posted:Any excuse to post this thing I made the other day: So true.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 19:44
|
|
|
The year is almost up, and the world's most exciting currency is only worth roughly 36% of what it was on January 1st.  Whaddaya mean BTC isn't a viable investment? FUD! FUD!!! Strong Sauce posted:Everytime I see a picture of Sam fried bank fried I have to laugh that they gave that guy so much money and he didn’t even bother with his appearance. Rememeber the social network where zuck went into a meeting with a robe? Now being slovenly is now apparently a positive signal IMO, I'll forever be on team "if you're a billionaire, you might as well dress nicely and have a decent hair cut," but some goons had a problem with me saying that last time. Even if it's just jeans and a t-shirt, there are plenty of companies that have cuts and styles that will better suit different body types, and most of them are affordable even to the average joe. They don't even need to get anything handmade in Italy. However, these goony grifters always look like everything they wear is straight off the rack from Grocery Outlet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 20:21
|
|
|
PITY BONER posted:For us plebes, how we dress at work, interviews, meetings, dates, events, etc., can make or break our success. For billionaires, I guess it's proven to investors that the money is there and that's what matters most, so nobody gives a poo poo how the person dresses. In a society that keeps believing the horseshit that billionaires are just boot-strapping their way to the top and have proven themselves, their value is tied to their money rather than how the present themselves, act, dress, are as people, and so on. Elon is a good example of a total idiot who gets a pass every time because of being a billionaire. They're trying to countersignal.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 21:02
|
|
|
Silly Newbie posted:Literally though you can't actually just sit in jail until that poo poo gets figured out, legally speaking, and letting it happen to absolutely ANYONE is a bad precedent to set. Our legal system is entirely built on precedents, so "we knew this one dude was guilty as hell so we put him in gitmo until we had a sufficient body of evidence to prove it" starts with using it on SBF and ends with using it on some person who made a big use of investor funds right before Bernie Madoff got caught because they're an idiot. Or a person who walked past a crack house one time. Oh you sweet summer child Crisis At Rikers: How Case Delays Are Locking Up More and More People For Years Without Trial Three Years on Rikers Without Trial VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 21:27 on Dec 9, 2022 |
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 21:18
|
|
|
https://www.axios.com/2022/12/09/bankman-fried-funded-crypto-news-site-block lol comma lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 21:24
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:Oh you sweet summer child And those are bad things that we shouldn't do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 21:33
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:Oh you sweet summer child
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 21:37
|
|
|
ryde posted:And those are bad things that we shouldn't do. Well yes obviously.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 21:46
|
|
|
About laws and bankman. I had a cousin who was on a board for a charity. One day she s on the phone with a chase customer representative reviewing her accounts and they decide she has too many account and merges a few. Turns out the chase dude didnt understand that one of those account belonged the charity so turns out she just closed it out and made it her account. The issue was discovered and corrected. She would never be charged with stealing because the bar for criminal behavior is set really loving high for good reason. you have to show that SBF did it on purpose. I would say having self deleting messages is proof enough. Also he gave to both sides coozed up to regulators and is now doing the apology tour explaining his mistake....
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 22:14
|
|
|
Ups_rail posted:She would never be charged with stealing because the bar for criminal behavior is set really loving high for good reason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 22:39
|
|
|
I would imagine because someone could hypothetically steal while claiming its a "bank error", thus a rule/law/guidance was put forth to catch said behavior.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 23:02
|
|
|
NoDamage posted:Why would she be charged with stealing for what sounds like a bank error? All of the charity's money went to her personal account without being approved by xyz. Therefore in the court of codeislaw, she would be found guilty and her current account would be branded with the dreaded SCAMMER TAG
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 23:43
|
|
|
It was just resting in my account!
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 23:46
|
|
|
NoDamage posted:Why would she be charged with stealing for what sounds like a bank error? I think because it sounds like she agreed to the merge of accounts, both parties not understanding what was happening
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 23:52
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:All of the charity's money went to her personal account without being approved by xyz. Therefore in the court of codeislaw, she would be found guilty and her current account would be branded with the dreaded SCAMMER TAG Actually in the court of codeislaw the money belongs to her and it would be unethical for the charity to want it back
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 23:56
|
|
|
My smart contract merging-the-account-not-illegal is raising a lot of questions already answered by my smart contract.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 00:00
|
|
|
Ups_rail posted:About laws and bankman. Well it's not a binary choice between throwing your cousin in jail for a bank teller's mistake and not prosecuting any millionaires for fraud unless they look into the camera and say "yes I did it I did the crimes", and imo the laws are skewed a bit too far toward making it too hard to convict white collar crime (for example, the only guy who went to jail for all the financial fraud banks were doing ahead of the 2008 collapse was a single middle manager who wrote an email to his girlfriend bragging about knowingly selling toxic securities, which is absolutely ludicrous) Although in SBF's case I don't think any of that will even matter because he has dangerously high levels of main character syndrome and keeps admitting to crimes in interviews despite his lawyers' pleas to shut the hell up. VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 03:41 on Dec 10, 2022 |
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 00:22
|
|
|
I think what popehat misses is that people aren't asking "why is this guy not in jail" in isolation, they're asking why this guy is not in jail in the context of a system which does this:VitalSigns posted:Oh you sweet summer child The answer to "Why wasn't the Y'all Queda compound riddled with bullets on day 1" isn't "because killing people is wrong".
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 00:56
|
|
|
more falafel please posted:We brought RMS in to speak at my college because we all loved I want to reiterate this take. I saw RMS speak at my school and frankly what was most impressive is how comfortable he felt stopping in the middle of the talk to pick something out of his teeth.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 01:45
|
|
|
Splicer posted:I think what popehat misses is that people aren't asking "why is this guy not in jail" in isolation, they're asking why this guy is not in jail in the context of a system which does this:
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 03:05
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ahcastor/status/1494291921170219008?s=20&t=tNUpH2vrm71O5I3RKtPG-w
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 21:46
|
|
|
Lmao who is surprised
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 22:19
|
|
|
I feel fairly confident in claiming every single NFT purchase that was in the news was some king of wash trade, and the only reason they were in the news was because journalists were tipped off that a big NFT sale had happened or was about to happen. Also, the person who tipped of reporters of these sales was almost always the person selling and buying the NFT, or someone connected to them. Either that or some fairly basic agreements between crypto idiots were they bought each other's NFTs for large sums to drum up price and publicity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 22:33
|
|
|
quote:Okay hear me out.. what if the U.S. government paid for every household to have a btc miner installed that mined btc for the household and people didn’t manage to mess up the mining device. (self.Bitcoin) ???
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 22:37
|
|
|
I'm the implicit idea that just by creating an entry in a database everyone can have universal basic income. Wait actually hold on
|
|
#
?
Dec 10, 2022 22:41
|
|
|
These are not the means of production we meant
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 01:33
|
|
|
djssniper posted:I think because it sounds like she agreed to the merge of accounts, both parties not understanding what was happening yes, I work in a law office (not a lawyer) Its my understanding that for something to be criminal it has to meet a rather high bar vs ( an honest mistake) I SBF is doing the whole Its was an accounting error I didnt just steal people deposits, and run a ponzi, It was a crypto exchange! I hosed UP! etc
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 01:40
|
|
|
Ups_rail posted:yes, I work in a law office (not a lawyer) Its my understanding that for something to be criminal it has to meet a rather high bar vs ( an honest mistake) I SBF is doing the whole Its was an accounting error I didnt just steal people deposits, and run a ponzi, It was a crypto exchange! I hosed UP! etc I mean criminal negligence is a thing. Also I feel like he probably just did a whole lot of lying about how he secure he was keeping peoples money and what he was doing with it and what not, which should be pretty easy to prove was intentional, and which could lead to criminal fraud changes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 01:50
|
|
|
dr_rat posted:I mean criminal negligence is a thing. Also I feel like he probably just did a whole lot of lying about how he secure he was keeping peoples money and what he was doing with it and what not, which should be pretty easy to prove was intentional, and which could lead to criminal fraud changes. while it is a thing I really doubt there are any financial crimes you can do where the intent would be satisfied by criminal negligence
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 03:48
|
|
|
Stefan Prodan posted:while it is a thing I really doubt there are any financial crimes you can do where the intent would be satisfied by criminal negligence member bernie madolf? he stole from rich people
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 04:44
|
|
|
hmm, tell me more about 'i did crimes'
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 21:27
|
|
|
Is that an overflowing bowl of broccoli behind him?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 22:36
|
|
|
minimalist coffee table design
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 22:42
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/metaltxt/status/1602002513468657664?s=46&t=ZKAHiylpkkHVFFA66LspZQ
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 23:33
|
|
|
Wow, no way, you mean to tell me the "smart contract" was coded by idiots on a platform that fundamentally cannot do what was promised???
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 23:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 14:08 |
|
|
'what the... you idiot! this is a SMRT contract! you forgot to code in the 'A'!'
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2022 00:06
|
|
