Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Captain Jesus
Feb 26, 2009

What's wrong with you? You don't even have your beer goggles on!!

Wolfsheim posted:

This is tricky because 'Kylo and Rey kill Snoke and all his guards and then he asks her to join him' is the most exciting scene in the entire ST and I feel like structuring the movie to end there would have let the hype train run wild and overwhelmed the haters vs. the rest of the movie limping back to a safe spot

But it's also the kind of cliffhanger you'd have to address almost immediately and no other SW film has done the 'this takes place minutes after the last film ended' so it would be so structurally disruptive that it would be tricky to handle correctly even if they wanted to (and Trevorrow and Abrams would 100% not be up to the task lol)

My ideal ending would be Rey implicitly joining Kylo after the fight, where we would see the First Order fleet jump away into hyperspace and leave the Resistance alone. There could then be some ambiguity whether Rey was a hostage that had to be saved, or a willing participant. They could do pretty much anything with it in the third film.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

If there were a way to fit leia dying into the rey ambiguously joining kylo thing that probably would have been best of all, from a giving star wars 9 a fighting chance POV. But maybe that entails moving so many pieces around it's just a different movie at that point

Assepoester
Jul 18, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Melman v2

Grendels Dad posted:

Yeah,

maybe don't do that when there are definitely more movies, dude. You put the people following you into a lovely position, but I guess it's great that you got to end your movie with a bang.

Gonz posted:

Force Ghost Luke relentlessly trolling Kylo in Episode IX after teasing such a thing at the end of TLJ would've been fantastic.

Too bad everybody making that sequel trilogy existed within a vacuum and didn't talk to each other.

porfiria posted:

I mean, Rian Johnson wasn't operating in a vacuum, and he wasn't even in charge. Why didn't Kathleen Kennedy demand a more open-ended ending? There are a trillion things they wouldn't have let him do, so why'd they let him do that?

The whole project feels like death by half-measures: this is definitely a franchise that's going to be milked for all its worth, but let's let each director do whatever they want and not compromise their vision.

No Mods No Masters posted:

I mean it didn't, but that's just because trevorrow and jj both just decided to ignore everything (which to be fair star wars 8 itself seems to endorse at several points). Put it this way, a third film that actually dealt with all of rian's gremlin "setup" would have been in quite a corner

Nightmare Cinema posted:

A lot of concept art and a full script for IX was made during TLJ's production time.

It's just that it was all thrown out bc legacy deaths and corporate cowardice.
I don't know why we have to go over this again and again like the endless ring cycle that is star wars itself, but as Nightmare Cinema mentions there was absolutely a more unified vision for the series laid out ahead of time, and a third film that actually did follow up on what was laid out in TLJ, it was called Duel of the Fates and it would have been the safe focus group tested broadly appealing remix of all previous movies corporate trilogy capper we all expected Disney to make.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WEU1b2t1zM

And yes, it did include Force Ghost Luke trolling Kylo



For various sorts of reasons which will surely be fascinating to read about once it all comes out all of it was thrown in the dumpster in favor of the ever-evolving and endlessly rewritten amazingly unexpected and unpredictable corporate disaster that was Rise of Skywalker. Remember when Matt Smith was going to be in it?

https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/star-wars-matt-smith-rise-of-skywalker-character/


And no, Disney did not let each director just do what they want. If you believe that then I've got a bridge to sell you.

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

I'm plenty aware of duel of the fates, I just don't consider it to be a satisfying followup to TLJ setup either. Having luke's ghost talk to kylo is necessary but not sufficient

Captain Jesus
Feb 26, 2009

What's wrong with you? You don't even have your beer goggles on!!

No Mods No Masters posted:

If there were a way to fit leia dying into the rey ambiguously joining kylo thing that probably would have been best of all, from a giving star wars 9 a fighting chance POV. But maybe that entails moving so many pieces around it's just a different movie at that point

You could just start the next film with Leia's funeral. That would actually make for a pretty impactful beginning and would be way more tasteful than zombie Leia we got. I don't think it would be respectful (or really necessary) to change episode VIII due to Carrie Fisher's death, but they never should have forced her posthumous appearance in pisode IX.

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Captain Jesus posted:

You could just start the next film with Leia's funeral. That would actually make for a pretty impactful beginning and would be way more tasteful than zombie Leia we got. I don't think it would be respectful (or really necessary) to change episode VIII due to Carrie Fisher's death, but they never should have forced her posthumous appearance in pisode IX.

Something that would be a lot more practical if the whole trilogy didnt happen over 3 days or so

Wolfsheim
Dec 23, 2003

"Ah," Ratz had said, at last, "the artiste."
I always operated under the assumption that every Star Wars movie takes place over several days if not weeks to account for travel time, how long it would feasibly take to prep something like the assault on both Death Stars, infiltrating Jabba's palace, etc

And then for absolutely no reason Ep IX goes "the emperor is attacking the galaxy in 19 hours, Lando can you go rally the entire galaxy in the next 19 hours to stop him" and then he does

Grendels Dad
Mar 5, 2011

Popular culture has passed you by.

Wolfsheim posted:

I always operated under the assumption that every Star Wars movie takes place over several days if not weeks to account for travel time, how long it would feasibly take to prep something like the assault on both Death Stars, infiltrating Jabba's palace, etc

And then for absolutely no reason Ep IX goes "the emperor is attacking the galaxy in 19 hours, Lando can you go rally the entire galaxy in the next 19 hours to stop him" and then he does

Also between TFA and TLJ the First Order mounts an overwhelming counter attack within a few hours of having their hugest weapon destroyed. In the same timespan Poe goes from "Woah, these guys have a working Star Destroyer!" to "Oh yeah that's a dreadnought, I know those! We are totally cheesed, they brought their dreadnought."

Schwarzwald
Jul 27, 2004

Don't Blink

Wolfsheim posted:

I always operated under the assumption that every Star Wars movie takes place over several days if not weeks to account for travel time, how long it would feasibly take to prep something like the assault on both Death Stars, infiltrating Jabba's palace, etc

And then for absolutely no reason Ep IX goes "the emperor is attacking the galaxy in 19 hours, Lando can you go rally the entire galaxy in the next 19 hours to stop him" and then he does

Halloween Jack posted:

Anyway. When the history of the Empire is written, countless ages later in a galaxy far, far away, it will be about the struggle between Emperor Palpatine and General Calrissian. About how Palpatine underestimated Lando, and Lando showed up out of nowhere to destroy Palpatine's army, twice. Strangely, both times Palpatine was actually assassinated because of an obscure religious schism in the power-hungry cult where he was a dissident member.

General Battuta
Feb 7, 2011

This is how you communicate with a fellow intelligence: you hurt it, you keep on hurting it, until you can distinguish the posts from the screams.
I liked The Last Jedi in part because it hit enough of the Return of the Jedi beats (throne room confrontation, 'join me', the Emperor dies) that they absolutely couldn't remake Jedi for their third movie. They had to do something new.

Then, well, uh.

Jerkface
May 21, 2001

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE DEAD, MOTHERFUCKER?

Grendels Dad posted:

Also between TFA and TLJ the First Order mounts an overwhelming counter attack within a few hours of having their hugest weapon destroyed. In the same timespan Poe goes from "Woah, these guys have a working Star Destroyer!" to "Oh yeah that's a dreadnought, I know those! We are totally cheesed, they brought their dreadnought."

The timeline of the ST is hosed and one of my least favorite things (primarily JJs fault) but there is an indeterminate amount of time from when starkiller is destroyed to when the first order shows up.

There is time for finn to be stabilized, the secret Jedi map to be finished and then for Rey to travel to achto and find Luke.

When TLJ opens the resistance is in the middle of evacuating which they weren't doing at the end of tfa.

Why JJ didnt end on Rey leaving to find luke or finding Luke and ending on a big revelation instead of him grimly looking stoic the sequel would have been in a better spot.

edit: we've also discussed the Poe thing it's just where JJ uses the characters as audience surrogates and ignores what might be known or not.

Poe has entire canon comic series where he has been fighting the first order for years prior to tfa and knows all about them

Horizon Burning
Oct 23, 2019
:discourse:

Jerkface posted:

Poe has entire canon comic series where he has been fighting the first order for years prior to tfa and knows all about them

didn't that come out after tfa

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




Captain Jesus posted:

I don't think it would be respectful (or really necessary) to change episode VIII due to Carrie Fisher's death, but they never should have forced her posthumous appearance in episode IX.

I can think of something respectful. Have her swap place with Adm. Holdo for the suicide run. Leia goes out like a boss, and then you have Laura Dern for episode IX. You also have the synchronicity of both of the Skywalker twins going out within hours or days of each other, plus as a bonus you've cleared the tables of legacy characters who aren't Lando or a droid. Have an after-credits scene in IX where it's Lando telling tall tales in a bar, getting to the end of IX, and suggesting someone buy him another drink if they want to hear what's going to happen next.

Jerkface
May 21, 2001

HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE DEAD, MOTHERFUCKER?

Horizon Burning posted:

didn't that come out after tfa

Yea it released shortly after TFA came out i assume there was some pre planning though, the resistance clearly knows the fo and was fighting them, it's in the text crawl!

2house2fly
Nov 14, 2012

You did a super job wrapping things up! And I'm not just saying that because I have to!

mllaneza posted:

I can think of something respectful. Have her swap place with Adm. Holdo for the suicide run. Leia goes out like a boss, and then you have Laura Dern for episode IX. You also have the synchronicity of both of the Skywalker twins going out within hours or days of each other, plus as a bonus you've cleared the tables of legacy characters who aren't Lando or a droid. Have an after-credits scene in IX where it's Lando telling tall tales in a bar, getting to the end of IX, and suggesting someone buy him another drink if they want to hear what's going to happen next.

To film Leia doing things after Carrie Fisher died would require the same kind of ghoulish digital simulacrum they ended up doing anyway. It wouldn't have been less disrespectful, it would just have the disrespect taking place much closer to her death and therefore looking much ruder

Neo Rasa
Mar 8, 2007
Everyone should play DUKE games.

:dukedog:
They could have at least not had a plot point where the worst character in the entire franchise, Maz Kanata, steal a medal from her in repose corpse to give to Chewie.

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




2house2fly posted:

To film Leia doing things after Carrie Fisher died would require the same kind of ghoulish digital simulacrum they ended up doing anyway. It wouldn't have been less disrespectful, it would just have the disrespect taking place much closer to her death and therefore looking much ruder

You just need to edit the scene of Holdo getting on the shuttle, so Leia gets on board, and then a shot of her on the bridge which is easy enough to get from existing footage and composite in. I'd say that's far more respectful than the terrible dialogue they cobbled together from unused footage.

JonathonSpectre
Jul 23, 2003

I replaced the Shermatar and text with this because I don't wanna see racial slurs every time you post what the fuck

Soiled Meat
You've already got the character that 100% should have triggered the hyperspace ambush.

His name is... ADMIRAL ACKBAR.

Hux: "So, you're going to try and hold us off alone, eh, squiddie? Well, I'm afraid-"
Ackbar: "No. It's a trap."
>BOOM<

It was right there.

Angry Salami
Jul 27, 2013

Don't trust the skull.
Honestly, I think the Leia situation was something of an unsolvable problem. TLJ did pass the buck on it, but in the end there really wasn’t any option that would have a, felt respectful, b, made sense for the story, and c, was technically feasible.

YaketySass
Jan 15, 2019

Blind Idiot Dog
I wonder why Leia was the one out of the big three they decided to keep around the longest - maybe because Ford wanted out and Luke needed to go to make room for the new generation? But then the sequels are weirdly deferential to her and by extension the idea of the Republic in a way they absolutely aren't to the Jedi or Han, which is pretty :lol: if the point is to learn from the mistakes shown in the prequels.

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

I guess they didn’t want it to become the luke show, though I’m not really sure why considering mark was the only one of the big three willing and able to act- besides not wanting to pay him.

Kennedy never much concealed that she’s a leia fan and I think that influence feels pretty obvious over the disney wars tenure at this point

Robot Style
Jul 5, 2009

Part of it might come from using Lucas' outlines as a starting point, which included stuff like Han being in trouble with the underworld (and possibly not in posession of the Falcon), and Luke being sequestered away from the galaxy after his temple was destroyed. Leia was supposed to be the one who ended up the big hero at the end, by uniting a New Republic against Maul's underworld faction.

While Abrams is responsible for the creation of the First Order, the script for Episode 7 still carried some of Lucas' ideas, which meant Leia wouldn't have much to do until later.

Then in 2014 a bunch of Lucasfilm execs got together to brainstorm some ideas for where 8 and 9 could go, and one that they were really intent on was having Leia be responsible for Kylo's redemption, which wouldn't happen until the last movie.

BiggestBatman
Aug 23, 2018
Leia doing the kamikaze would have been an utterly inappropriate way to send off that character.

Star Wars traditionally has a fairly large cast of very minor military officials who are more consistent faces rather than movers of plot (Dodonna, Commander Cody, Panaka, Tarpals, even Ackbar, Wedge, and Piett if we're being honest with ourselves). They don't have character arcs or really even interact narratively with the main cast. The sequels also have a few of these kind of guys, but Holdo weirdly stands out as one of these actually being an important character to the story. I think the most "star wars" way to have done the ram scene would have been to have a whole bridge crew doing it without focus on a single character, perhaps akin to the ram attack in rogue one, or taking down the executor in jedi. In a sense its the "Rebel Alliance" as a composite character that achieves these victories.

It would take significant reworking to adjust TLJ this way though. Ultimately I think the entire Poe vs Command conflict screws the story up, since Leia is ultimately in command but can't be overly antagonistic to him, another person is required, who then demands her own storyline.

Assepoester
Jul 18, 2004
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Melman v2

Robot Style posted:

Part of it might come from using Lucas' outlines as a starting point, which included stuff like Han being in trouble with the underworld (and possibly not in posession of the Falcon), and Luke being sequestered away from the galaxy after his temple was destroyed. Leia was supposed to be the one who ended up the big hero at the end, by uniting a New Republic against Maul's underworld faction.

While Abrams is responsible for the creation of the First Order, the script for Episode 7 still carried some of Lucas' ideas, which meant Leia wouldn't have much to do until later.

Then in 2014 a bunch of Lucasfilm execs got together to brainstorm some ideas for where 8 and 9 could go, and one that they were really intent on was having Leia be responsible for Kylo's redemption, which wouldn't happen until the last movie.
Ironic then that ultimately it's Han coming back as a no poo poo actual ghost who is responsible for Kylo's redemption, not Leia.

Well I guess Leia dying distracted Kylo and got him skewered.

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS

F.D. Signifier posted:

And no, Disney did not let each director just do what they want. If you believe that then I've got a bridge to sell you.

Yup, 100%

I can understand not liking Johnson or Abrams but their respective filmographies are proof they can tell coherent stories. They definitely have to eat some of the blame (Kennedy & Disney didn't write or film or edit) but there's plenty to go around.

I think everyone involved was a fan of star wars; a case of too many cooks trying to please everyone, most like.

SuperMechagodzilla
Jun 9, 2007

NEWT REBORN

BiggestBatman posted:

Leia doing the kamikaze would have been an utterly inappropriate way to send off that character.

“Utterly inappropriate” is good.

HOW TO FIX THE LEIA PROBLEM:

Leia is on the bridge of the Raddus with ACKBAR. He gazes at her longingly, with a bit of sadness. “See you in the next life, my love.” Leia smiles back as their hands meet, and they SLAM that boost lever.

No Mods No Masters
Oct 3, 2004

Maybe it’s a question of better kayfabe, but rian has always maintained 8 was precisely the movie he wanted to make. People are just taking him on his word. JJ’s public remarks are much more in line with frustration at the compromises though

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS

Neo Rasa posted:

They could have at least not had a plot point where the worst character in the entire franchise, Maz Kanata, steal a medal from her in repose corpse to give to Chewie.

That part ruled tho??

It's an awful movie but I enjoyed ep 9 the most for how it cranked the dial to 11 on everything

Captain Jesus
Feb 26, 2009

What's wrong with you? You don't even have your beer goggles on!!

Angry Salami posted:

Honestly, I think the Leia situation was something of an unsolvable problem. TLJ did pass the buck on it, but in the end there really wasn’t any option that would have a, felt respectful, b, made sense for the story, and c, was technically feasible.

It was like that in TLJ, but there wasn't any reason to involve Leia in the next film. They didn't give her anything to do after digitally resurrecting her anyway. Episode IX could have started with the opening crawl saying she died and then have the characters dealing with that be part of the story.

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games

Captain Jesus posted:

It was like that in TLJ, but there wasn't any reason to involve Leia in the next film. They didn't give her anything to do after digitally resurrecting her anyway. Episode IX could have started with the opening crawl saying she died and then have the characters dealing with that be part of the story.

“Somehow, Leia died.”

Zoran
Aug 19, 2008

I lost to you once, monster. I shall not lose again! Die now, that our future can live!

No Mods No Masters posted:

Maybe it’s a question of better kayfabe, but rian has always maintained 8 was precisely the movie he wanted to make. People are just taking him on his word. JJ’s public remarks are much more in line with frustration at the compromises though

Interestingly, the decision to abandon Lucas’s outlines and Arndt’s first script based on those seems to have happened a few months after JJ came on for TFA. It appears he asked for and got permission to do basically whatever he wanted with that movie and then he made what he wanted to make (an anodyne retread of A New Hope)

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

No Mods No Masters posted:

Maybe it’s a question of better kayfabe, but rian has always maintained 8 was precisely the movie he wanted to make. People are just taking him on his word. JJ’s public remarks are much more in line with frustration at the compromises though

TLJ's script was also turned in very early and the production was a smooth affair with no major reshoots or rewrites.

Horizon Burning
Oct 23, 2019
:discourse:

Doctor Spaceman posted:

TLJ's script was also turned in very early and the production was a smooth affair with no major reshoots or rewrites.

Excepting the whole poe and finn go to canto bight thing, ofc

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Horizon Burning posted:

Excepting the whole poe and finn go to canto bight thing, ofc

That change happened during the writing process well before filming started. There was nothing in TLJ like Poe's survival in TFA or the major reworkings that Solo, Rogue One and RoS got during/after production.

Glottis
May 29, 2002

No. It's necessary.
Yam Slacker

porfiria posted:

“Somehow, Leia died.”

This would have been fine. Have her dead at the start of the movie or shortly into it, and make the grief some kind of motivating factor for some of the characters.

I remember them promising that there wouldn't be a CGI Carrie but honestly what we got was just as bad if not worse. It felt like the gifs of confused John Travolta pasted into scenes.

Neo Rasa
Mar 8, 2007
Everyone should play DUKE games.

:dukedog:

porfiria posted:

“Somehow, Leia died.”

Instead Disney went with "THE DEAD SPEAK!"

Uatu The Lurker
Sep 14, 2003

I can say no more!
Already I have over stayed my time in this ephemeral sphere!

Vintersorg posted:

Yeah, shifted to the right.



whack

BiggestBatman
Aug 23, 2018
SOME OF THE DEAD SPEAK

ruddiger
Jun 3, 2004

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Robot Style
Jul 5, 2009

Zoran posted:

Interestingly, the decision to abandon Lucas’s outlines and Arndt’s first script based on those seems to have happened a few months after JJ came on for TFA. It appears he asked for and got permission to do basically whatever he wanted with that movie and then he made what he wanted to make (an anodyne retread of A New Hope)

Yeah, it's really interesting to look at the concept art book for Episode 7 and see a bunch of stuff that lines up with Lucas' outlines, and then JJ finishes up with Star Trek Into Darkness and suddenly all the art is just Rich Evans chanting "AT-ST! AT-ST!"

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply