Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Devor
Nov 30, 2004
Lurking more.

null_pointer posted:

I mean, are you asking, academically, if charging you price A and then refusing to ship unless you pay price B is wire fraud?

edit: The reason I ask, is because I assume it is incredibly time intensive, expensive, and tedious to sue someone for wire fraud over someone being an enormous pain in the rear end over an online purchase, especially when you have already done a chargeback and have no real damages to speak of. What relief would you be seeking, in this theoretical lawsuit?

Does wire fraud have a private cause of action at all? It's a federal crime

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

null_pointer
Nov 9, 2004

Center in, pull back. Stop. Track 45 right. Stop. Center and stop.

Devor posted:

Does wire fraud have a private cause of action at all? It's a federal crime

I was just about to edit my prior post with that point, but you beat me to it.

Azuth0667
Sep 20, 2011

By the word of Zoroaster, no business decision is poor when it involves Ahura Mazda.
I am asking because I'm going to refer it to law enforcement if it is.

Devor
Nov 30, 2004
Lurking more.

Azuth0667 posted:

I am asking because I'm going to refer it to law enforcement if it is.

If it makes you feel better to report it to police, go for it

You're going to get the same amount of eye-rolling from the guy taking your report whether or not it's really a federal crime. Police are there to serve Amazon, not Amazon's customers

Azuth0667
Sep 20, 2011

By the word of Zoroaster, no business decision is poor when it involves Ahura Mazda.

Devor posted:

If it makes you feel better to report it to police, go for it

You're going to get the same amount of eye-rolling from the guy taking your report whether or not it's really a federal crime. Police are there to serve Amazon, not Amazon's customers

Take a break from the CSPAM my friend the legal system might need improvement but the system doesn't work unless people engage with it.

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Realistically a credit card company doing a chargeback is more likely to get things done.

Devor
Nov 30, 2004
Lurking more.

Azuth0667 posted:

Take a break from the CSPAM my friend the legal system might need improvement but the system doesn't work unless people engage with it.

From a hypothetical CSPAM poisoned standpoint, your wasting the police's time is an even better outcome than you being disillusioned and giving up hope that they will help you

Azuth0667
Sep 20, 2011

By the word of Zoroaster, no business decision is poor when it involves Ahura Mazda.

Tunicate posted:

Realistically a credit card company doing a chargeback is more likely to get things done.

Yep, would be funny if the credit card company refused to service that merchant anymore.

Anonymous Zebra
Oct 21, 2005
Blending in like it ain't no thang

Tunicate posted:

Realistically a credit card company doing a chargeback is more likely to get things done.

It's this. Request the chargeback, explain to the credit card rep exactly what you told us. Include emails/receipts as requested by the dispute officer and let the card company do the rest. The card companies have both the resources and the ability to aggregate data on merchants that gives them a much better position to punish bad actors, so just chargeback and never order from that merchant again.

EDIT: As a sidenote, I've noticed this kind of behavior popping up a lot with smaller merchants that have storefronts on online marketplaces. I think that a lot of these guys don't actually have the products they are advertising, but instead are engaging in some kind of amateur arbitrage where they print the shipping label while ordering the actual product from another vendor who is selling it for cheaper. I see a lot of smaller merchants print the label within a day of order but sometimes sit on the order after that for over a week or more before it ships. Recently I've encountered several instances where they never ship the drat order after printing the label and I end up having to cancel the order after like 3 weeks, so I think supply chain issues might be loving these guys, or there is essentially giant chains of arbitrage where no one has the drat product and everyone is waiting for the next guy down the line to ship it.

Anonymous Zebra fucked around with this message at 19:17 on Jan 9, 2023

q_k
Dec 31, 2007





Anonymous Zebra posted:

EDIT: As a sidenote, I've noticed this kind of behavior popping up a lot with smaller merchants that have storefronts on online marketplaces.

It's a practice called drop shipping and it rose in popularity during the pandemic.

Anonymous Zebra
Oct 21, 2005
Blending in like it ain't no thang

q_k posted:

It's a practice called drop shipping and it rose in popularity during the pandemic.

Learn something new everyday. I suspected something like this was what was going on.

Guy Axlerod
Dec 29, 2008
Expect to get banned by the market site if you do a charge back. If it's a site that has digital goods, you may lose access to them.

I'm not telling you not to do a charge back here. If their dispute system is useless, I wouldn't bother shopping with them again.

Unless this is AliExpress, in that case you probably need to wait another month.

sephiRoth IRA
Jun 13, 2007

"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality."

-Carl Sagan
What ballpark am I looking at for an update to my will? The only things that have changed are the home in which we live and the person we would like to care for our daughter should we both die - MIL turns out is completely bonkers.

Everything else is the same, but I don't know A) if the new local firm can contact my old firm across the US to get an electronic copy to edit or B) if I'm making grand assumptions regarding the ease of changing these two things. Is 300-400 too low? Should I expect to pay a grand?

toplitzin
Jun 13, 2003


sephiRoth IRA posted:

What ballpark am I looking at for an update to my will? The only things that have changed are the home in which we live and the person we would like to care for our daughter should we both die - MIL turns out is completely bonkers.

Everything else is the same, but I don't know A) if the new local firm can contact my old firm across the US to get an electronic copy to edit or B) if I'm making grand assumptions regarding the ease of changing these two things. Is 300-400 too low? Should I expect to pay a grand?

Depending on complexity and geography, $200-500 is within expectations.

For us as a unmarried couple in MI, $300/ea, to redo after we get married, $300.

smackfu
Jun 7, 2004

You can specify who inherits your children?

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

bone shaking.
soul baking.

sephiRoth IRA posted:

What ballpark am I looking at for an update to my will? The only things that have changed are the home in which we live and the person we would like to care for our daughter should we both die - MIL turns out is completely bonkers.

Everything else is the same, but I don't know A) if the new local firm can contact my old firm across the US to get an electronic copy to edit or B) if I'm making grand assumptions regarding the ease of changing these two things. Is 300-400 too low? Should I expect to pay a grand?

You're looking for a codicil. You might be able to get one from the original firm if you're still in the same state. It's essentially an addendum to the original will that leaves everything intact except for the specific changes i nthe codicil.

bird with big dick
Oct 21, 2015

smackfu posted:

You can specify who inherits your children?

Yes but they aren’t legally obligated to accept them e.g. if you just will your kids to Elon Musk it’s unlikely that he’ll actually take ownership of them

DaveSauce
Feb 15, 2004

Oh, how awkward.
i thought your kids are sold during probate to settle your estate's debts :confused:

edit:

kids aren't property. They don't get willed to/inherited by anyone.

You can put "I want Grandma to take the kids" in your will, and courts will take it very seriously, but ultimately the courts decide what is best for the kids. If Grandma is 90 and bedridden, chances are she's not getting your 3 year old. And yeah, the person you put in the will doesn't have to take them. You can't force your kids on anyone.

NOT A LAWYER but where children go after you die is a wildly different process than deciding who gets your beanie babies.

DaveSauce fucked around with this message at 15:37 on Jan 10, 2023

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...

bird with big dick posted:

Yes but they aren’t legally obligated to accept them e.g. if you just will your kids to Elon Musk it’s unlikely that he’ll actually take ownership of them

So, like all of his children then?

Foxfire_
Nov 8, 2010

Even without final legal effect, putting your kids in a officialish document is good for reducing confusion and family drama.

Like if my nephew was orphaned, I wouldn't want him to go to the super catholic relatives, and I'm pretty sure his parents would agree, but "this is what his parents wrote down" is a lot more diplomatic than having to talk why to family/a court

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Isn't that what a godparent is for?

DaveSauce
Feb 15, 2004

Oh, how awkward.
Yeah I guess I should have been more clear on that aspect.

Putting the names of who you want to take care of your kids in your will is a very good idea. If you have kids, you should absolutely include the names of your preferred caretakers.

Just... don't go forward in life assuming that that's the final word on the matter, because it's way more complicated than deciding who gets whatever earthly possessions you leave behind.

Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

Tunicate posted:

Isn't that what a godparent is for?

I don't think godparenthood is legally binding either

toplitzin
Jun 13, 2003


DaveSauce posted:

Yeah I guess I should have been more clear on that aspect.

Putting the names of who you want to take care of your kids in your will is a very good idea. If you have kids, you should absolutely include the names of your preferred caretakers.

Just... don't go forward in life assuming that that's the final word on the matter, because it's way more complicated than deciding who gets whatever earthly possessions you leave behind.

Don't forget to talk/ask the people before you name them as expected guardian. No, Really. some folks don't even think of it.

null_pointer
Nov 9, 2004

Center in, pull back. Stop. Track 45 right. Stop. Center and stop.

Wasn't that part of the plot of the Casey Affleck film "Manchester by the Sea"?

Affleck's brother dies and leaves his son in Affleck's care, without telling him.

Cowman
Feb 14, 2006

Beware the Cow





I got prescribed opioids for a recent toe injury, however I haven't used them all. If I get injured in the future and use these currently prescribed opioids for pain, would I get in trouble legally? If so, is there a time limit (30 days, 6 months, a year etc) to when I should dispose of them?

My wife likes to hoard medications like zofran for future emergency use but I'm wary about opioids because they pop up on drug tests. I don't want my legal prescription to become illegal without my knowing and make me fail a drug test.

I'm not going to abuse them or sell them or anything like that, it's literally just the thought of if there's an injury in the future then having them on hand to manage pain until we can get to the doctor might be a good plan. If this is totally illegal (which I'm thinking it is but I don't know how long until it's illegal hence the question) then I'll go ahead and dispose of them this weekend since I don't need them anymore.

Cowman fucked around with this message at 22:07 on Jan 10, 2023

OPAONI
Jul 23, 2021
I'm not a lawyer. Keep the drugs.

sephiRoth IRA
Jun 13, 2007

"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality."

-Carl Sagan

DaveSauce posted:

Yeah I guess I should have been more clear on that aspect.

Putting the names of who you want to take care of your kids in your will is a very good idea. If you have kids, you should absolutely include the names of your preferred caretakers.

Just... don't go forward in life assuming that that's the final word on the matter, because it's way more complicated than deciding who gets whatever earthly possessions you leave behind.

Oh yeah, we're well aware it's not a slam dunk by any means, but I feel a lot better about it. Anyways, if the worst happens I'll be dead and probably won't care anymore. Thanks all for the input on expectations

Skunkduster
Jul 15, 2005




Cowman posted:

I got prescribed opioids for a recent toe injury, however I haven't used them all. If I get injured in the future and use these currently prescribed opioids for pain, would I get in trouble legally? If so, is there a time limit (30 days, 6 months, a year etc) to when I should dispose of them?

My wife likes to hoard medications like zofran for future emergency use but I'm wary about opioids because they pop up on drug tests. I don't want my legal prescription to become illegal without my knowing and make me fail a drug test.

I'm not going to abuse them or sell them or anything like that, it's literally just the thought of if there's an injury in the future then having them on hand to manage pain until we can get to the doctor might be a good plan. If this is totally illegal (which I'm thinking it is but I don't know how long until it's illegal hence the question) then I'll go ahead and dispose of them this weekend since I don't need them anymore.

Best just to sell whatever you have leftover. No sense in tossing them in the garbage when you can make a few bucks. Don't worry, I'm not a narc.

Muir
Sep 27, 2005

that's Doctor Brain to you

SkunkDuster posted:

Best just to sell whatever you have leftover. No sense in tossing them in the garbage when you can make a few bucks. Don't worry, I'm not a narc.

Legal Questions: Illegal Answers

blarzgh
Apr 14, 2009

SNITCHIN' RANDY
Grimey Drawer

smackfu posted:

You can specify who inherits your children?

You can, but there's no binding effect. A guardianship court will determine what's in the best interest of the children, regardless of your wishes, but the fact that you name someone in a will would at least be mildly influential in that process.

Epitope
Nov 27, 2006

Grimey Drawer
So rather than just writing someones name on an arcane document, I should help my child build a relationship with them? That sounds like work

EwokEntourage
Jun 10, 2008

BREYER: Actually, Antonin, you got it backwards. See, a power bottom is actually generating all the dissents by doing most of the work.

SCALIA: Stephen, I've heard that speed has something to do with it.

BREYER: Speed has everything to do with it.

Cowman posted:

I got prescribed opioids for a recent toe injury, however I haven't used them all. If I get injured in the future and use these currently prescribed opioids for pain, would I get in trouble legally? If so, is there a time limit (30 days, 6 months, a year etc) to when I should dispose of them?

My wife likes to hoard medications like zofran for future emergency use but I'm wary about opioids because they pop up on drug tests. I don't want my legal prescription to become illegal without my knowing and make me fail a drug test.

I'm not going to abuse them or sell them or anything like that, it's literally just the thought of if there's an injury in the future then having them on hand to manage pain until we can get to the doctor might be a good plan. If this is totally illegal (which I'm thinking it is but I don't know how long until it's illegal hence the question) then I'll go ahead and dispose of them this weekend since I don't need them anymore.

are you white?

Captain von Trapp
Jan 23, 2006

I don't like it, and I'm sorry I ever had anything to do with it.

Cowman posted:

I got prescribed opioids for a recent toe injury, however I haven't used them all. If I get injured in the future and use these currently prescribed opioids for pain, would I get in trouble legally? If so, is there a time limit (30 days, 6 months, a year etc) to when I should dispose of them?

Not a lawyer, can't say where (if anywhere) the "go to jail" line is. But I am aware of cases where people have popped positive on drug tests for legally prescribed drugs that they used for something other than what the prescription was originally for, and lost government security clearances over it. So at any rate is is possible under at least some circumstances for the government to cause you problems.

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time

Cowman posted:

I got prescribed opioids for a recent toe injury, however I haven't used them all. If I get injured in the future and use these currently prescribed opioids for pain, would I get in trouble legally? If so, is there a time limit (30 days, 6 months, a year etc) to when I should dispose of them?

My wife likes to hoard medications like zofran for future emergency use but I'm wary about opioids because they pop up on drug tests. I don't want my legal prescription to become illegal without my knowing and make me fail a drug test.

I'm not going to abuse them or sell them or anything like that, it's literally just the thought of if there's an injury in the future then having them on hand to manage pain until we can get to the doctor might be a good plan. If this is totally illegal (which I'm thinking it is but I don't know how long until it's illegal hence the question) then I'll go ahead and dispose of them this weekend since I don't need them anymore.

Do you get drug tested a lot?

Nissin Cup Nudist
Sep 3, 2011

Sleep with one eye open

We're off to Gritty Gritty land




Can you pass off a failed test because of a new poppy seed diet

BigHead
Jul 25, 2003
Huh?


Nap Ghost
I only ever seen that tried once. The judge was rolling his eyes as the expert testified "Technically it's possible but you would need to eat four hundred large muffins in about seven minutes."

Then the judge asked "What if I ate ur mom's one really big muffin for seven minutes? Lol gotem"

Seriously though the government recommends 2000ng/ml cutoff for "positive" results for the drugs that hit positive after consuming poppy seed muffins. It's extremely unlikely that any amount of muffins can get you that high of a number. Some testing methods have a cutoff of 300ng/ml which can get a "positive" but generally only if the poppy seeds are not baked with the product. So, like, a muffin probably won't hit 300ng/ml but a Danish might if the raw poppy seeds are mixed with the jam then liberally applied to the Danish.

I used to do a lot of drug DUIs.

BigHead fucked around with this message at 01:30 on Jan 13, 2023

therobit
Aug 19, 2008

I've been tryin' to speak with you for a long time
OP since you won’t give any details we can’t help. Go ask your parole officer instead.

Volmarias
Dec 31, 2002

EMAIL... THE INTERNET... SEARCH ENGINES...

BigHead posted:

I used to do a lot of drug DUIs.

As the Defendant, or the lawyer, or

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004
I think it's reasonable to save excess medication in case you aggravate the injury and the law mostly isn't worried about you taking prescribed pain meds.

You aren't supposed to prescribe yourself medication for new injuries though.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply