|
TheRat posted:I get your point, but getting a quality attacker for 50mil these days is borderline black magic Martin Ødegaard for €35 mil or so? And the discussion around Mudryk is Shaktar pegged his value to the Antony transfer, so, thanks for that, United.
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 21:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 20:05 |
|
|
https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/chelsea-close-to-agreeing-mudryk-deal Mudryk to the Chels is NOT a DONE deal! Really though lmao this is embarrassing
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 21:47
|
|
|
at least now i can make fun of his stupid jesus neck tattoo
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 22:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LUFC/status/1614360980581933058 We're finally gonna find out how much abuse Rutter can take African AIDS cum fucked around with this message at 23:09 on Jan 14, 2023 |
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 22:03
|
|
|
African AIDS cum posted:https://twitter.com/LUFC/status/1614360980581933058 11 goals in 57 games what a signing
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 23:01
|
|
|
This is the deal that will sort everything, push for the European places starts here
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 23:02
|
|
|
Bea Nanner posted:at least now i can make fun of his stupid jesus neck tattoo What a dumb neck tattoo, right? I for one hadn't even begun to mentally prepare myself to pretend it was good
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 23:24
|
|
|
It sure is poo poo, though depending on the final word about that transfer it may grow on me quite rapidly
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2023 23:31
|
|
|
harperdc posted:And the discussion around Mudryk is Shaktar pegged his value to the Antony transfer, so, thanks for that, United. Antony at the point United signed him had 25 goals in 82 games in a significantly stronger league (and one which wasn't actively continuing to play in a warzone for financial reasons), and was starting for Brazil. And even then he was sold at a premium because United had already been in for Ten Hag + Martinez and Ajax had barely any time to get replacements. I'm not saying they can't price him the same, but if you get visited by the ghost of Andriy Voronin, it's your own fault.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 00:04
|
|
|
Can't wait for Man United fans to celebrate winning the Antony had 25 goals in 82 games in a significantly stronger league trophy
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 00:13
|
|
|
we would have bought the ajax trophy cabinet if they'd let us
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 00:43
|
|
|
Sure 100 million is a lot but washing the stink of Russian off the club is worth much more than that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 04:02
|
|
|
hadji murad posted:Sure 100 million is a lot but washing the stink of Russian off the club is worth much more than that. The results stink enough imo
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 05:50
|
|
|
https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/mudryk-completes-transfer-to-chelsea 8.5 years lol What I'm wondering is the wages. On one hand surely Chelsea wouldn't be willing to pay him that much when the contract is that long. On the other, why would he agree to a lowish wage and then commit to it for 8.5 years? With the duration of his contract, even if he comes real good and other teams were interested, there is no way they could pay out his €100m contract with like 5-6 years to go AND give him a huge wage increase right? I guess if he's good enough for PSG maybe but that's about it. Feels likely he'll be stuck on whatever wage he's on now for at least half his career pretty much.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 15:31
|
|
|
 lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 15:32
|
|
|
Insurrectionist posted:https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/mudryk-completes-transfer-to-chelsea Maybe with the new American owners they've started structuring contracts in American ways with increasing wages over time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 15:42
|
|
|
Insurrectionist posted:8.5 years lol gently caress me sideways. That's one way to avoid FFP I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 15:51
|
|
|
bellingham can most likely pick between any top club he wants though
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 16:05
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 17:44
|
|
|
Woodenlung posted:bellingham can most likely pick between any top club he wants though He'd do very nicely in the Ten Hag Project imo
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 18:18
|
|
|
Insurrectionist posted:https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/mudryk-completes-transfer-to-chelsea amortisation of the fee over an insanely long time means they can pay way over the odds and have it be fine from an FFP accounting stand point newcastle are supposedly interested in Sergej Milinković-Savić and while i've barely seen him play he's def an upgrade over sean longstaff
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 19:37
|
|
|
Jose posted:
He's been linked to Man Utd as the solution to their midfield every transfer window since about 1927
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 19:40
|
|
|
A longer period of amortization has the effect of borrowing from your future transfer budget. An eight-year amortization period eats away at your 2029, 2030 and 2031 transfer budgets when a five-year period wouldn't. It helps with FFP compliance today but hurts your ability to comply in future periods. It's not some magical wand that makes FFP go away. That said I'd be really interested in how they structure these contracts to mitigate the risks and assuage the player's concerns of giving up a massive future payday
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 19:54
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:A longer period of amortization has the effect of borrowing from your future transfer budget. An eight-year amortization period eats away at your 2029, 2030 and 2031 transfer budgets when a five-year period wouldn't. It helps with FFP compliance today but hurts your ability to comply in future periods. It's not some magical wand that makes FFP go away. Football club owners love to mortgage their future for results now. But also the amount they’re amortizing will presumably be worth significantly less eight years down the line, so that is helpful too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 20:09
|
|
|
in 8 years time you just start offering 16 year contracts. problem solved
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 20:25
|
|
|
probably end up getting loaned all over europe
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 20:39
|
|
|
Vegetable posted:A longer period of amortization has the effect of borrowing from your future transfer budget. An eight-year amortization period eats away at your 2029, 2030 and 2031 transfer budgets when a five-year period wouldn't. It helps with FFP compliance today but hurts your ability to comply in future periods. It's not some magical wand that makes FFP go away. Are you suggesting an extremely well-run club like Chelsea wouldn’t be considering the long term consequences of their decisions?!?!
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2023 22:27
|
|
|
This assumes that FFP matters which it doesn't. Also, maybe the Chels are just poo poo at transfers. There may be some evidence to support this hypothesis.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 03:31
|
|
|
Jhon Durán to Aston Villa is happening apparently? https://twitter.com/AVFCOfficial/status/1614978356637847552
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 14:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JacobsBen/statu...%5Es1_&ref_url=
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 15:36
|
|
|
Starting to think this is all just some elaborate chelsea-brighton money laundering operation
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 15:43
|
|
|
tristeham posted:probably end up getting loaned all over europe He'll be tearing it up at Vitesse Anhem next season
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 16:00
|
|
|
Frankston posted:Jhon Durán to Aston Villa is happening apparently? He looked really promising and I’m disappointed as a Chicago Fire appreciator. Kind of a Darwin Nunez chaos type (who knows how to finish).
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 16:07
|
|
|
the sex ghost posted:Starting to think this is all just some elaborate chelsea-brighton money laundering operation It's very funny they waited until after the season started to do most of this so potter has a bigger mess on his hands
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 16:27
|
|
|
Can't see Brighton selling Caceido in January unless it is a ludicrous amount of money, we have no one to replace him and it would be so disruptive.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 17:51
|
|
|
Surely by now Chelsea must be close to hitting some FFP ceiling? It’s not like they’ve been making much money on player sales while spunking hundreds of millions these last two windows. I guess FFP isn’t much of a thing anymore?
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 20:48
|
|
|
L.H.O.O.Q. posted:Surely by now Chelsea must be close to hitting some FFP ceiling? It’s not like they’ve been making much money on player sales while spunking hundreds of millions these last two windows. I guess FFP isn’t much of a thing anymore? Nah. Just give them a billion year contract and they can amortise the fee over that timespan.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 20:55
|
|
|
Also, after that court case with PSG FFP is pretty much dead
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 20:57
|
|
|
Excited for that one baseball contract where the guy gets paid a million dollars a year for 40 years to arrive in the prem
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 21:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 20:05 |
|
|
Masonity posted:Nah. Just give them a billion year contract and they can amortise the fee over that timespan. It's fun seeing the same techniques used to circumvent salary caps in 2022 that were used by hockey teams in like 2006. Nothing like giving a 32 year old player a 14 year contract to circumvent the cap.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2023 21:03
|
|
