|
the first ai work to make smile
|
# ? Jan 20, 2023 19:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 09:09 |
|
|
# ? Jan 21, 2023 00:41 |
|
I agree but i think its good
|
# ? Jan 21, 2023 02:17 |
|
How many of the people who use this argument also sell commissions of characters without the permission of those characters' owners?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2023 06:51 |
|
intellectual property rights ftw
|
# ? Jan 21, 2023 08:12 |
|
super sweet best pal posted:How many of the people who use this argument also sell commissions of characters without the permission of those characters' owners? who cares do you want a sick job at openai or something
|
# ? Jan 21, 2023 10:40 |
|
super sweet best pal posted:How many of the people who use this argument also sell commissions of characters without the permission of those characters' owners? ah yes, code that scrapes together pictures from other people's work is just like fanart
|
# ? Jan 21, 2023 11:57 |
|
bitmap posted:ah yes,
|
# ? Jan 22, 2023 00:08 |
|
bitmap posted:ah yes, code that scrapes together pictures from other people's work is just like fanart yup it is
|
# ? Jan 22, 2023 00:49 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIRbN52PA0o Solar Sands just dropped a video about AI art and kinda digging into the framework of where legal arguments and other less opinion-driven discourse will go
|
# ? Jan 28, 2023 09:20 |
|
Has anyone suggested AI porn is progressive because there is no further exploitation beyond the use of the preexisting images used to train it?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 07:34 |
|
super sweet best pal posted:Has anyone suggested AI porn is progressive because there is no further exploitation beyond the use of the preexisting images used to train it? it would be a stupid and untrue thing to say, so surely someone would have
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 08:13 |
|
it would be completely true but you could say the same thing about written erotica or drawn jpegs already https://twitter.com/beetlemoses/status/1619817683222167552?s=20 pretty much anything is better than the 'pro' porn industry's hell vortex of abuse
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 08:19 |
What are deep fakes
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 09:42 |
|
Slavvy posted:What are deep fakes Using AI to seamlessly put somebody's face on another person's body so it looks like the target is saying/doing something they didnt, usually to their discredit.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 15:17 |
projecthalaxy posted:Using AI to seamlessly put somebody's face on another person's body so it looks like the target is saying/doing something they didnt, usually to their discredit. Whoa really?? I had no idea!! That's so progressive
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 17:20 |
|
Slavvy posted:Whoa really?? I had no idea!! That's so progressive no you see it uses preexisting images, so it's not exploitative
|
# ? Jan 31, 2023 17:32 |
|
AI Seinfeld exists now https://twitch.tv/watchmeforever It's mostly just chatbot conversations but sometimes the models glitch out and do weird poo poo like float off their chairs or juke around. e: lol, OpenAI went down so now it's set to output random nonsense for dialogue. super sweet best pal has issued a correction as of 09:20 on Feb 1, 2023 |
# ? Feb 1, 2023 08:43 |
|
Deepfakes had actually existed as early as 2017 - Vice did an article on it the year after, and Pornhub and reddit immediately did a crackdown on the things after people started using it on people like Ivanka Trump, presumably worrying about the legal liability. It took down the practice of making photoshops of still images of celebrities at the same time, which of course was even older. Streamers are vulnerable to such things because you need a lot of footage to build the model that'll be superimposed onto someone else's body - celebrities obviously have movies and shows, while streamers literally put their faces in front of a camera for hours at a time. Combine that with the better accessibility of compute power since then (read: two generations of GPUs) and the proliferation of tailor-made software to do it, and you have the ingredients for disaster.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 12:32 |
|
Sumerian Telecom posted:However! Boy if it isn't skeevy as hell to make datasets off of living artists work, who don't consent and in fact are actively protesting against it. What the hell, buddy, what's the matter with you (you here being the abstract internet person making datasets off of living artists), parents never taught you manners? Did you not develop an internal moral compass? Why do this, why gloat about it online? Jesus, what cunts. The strangest argument I'm seeing here now is that advocating for artists' work to have some kind of protection is un-socialist because practically, copyright is (and can only ever be) enforced by those with the money to fight for it. The thinking is that there should be no copyright ever, or at least no copyright respected- which is whatever, clearly not part a wholly mature or well-formed worldview, which fits well with it actually being an anarchist position than a socialist one. The thing people seem to be missing is it's particularly contradictory when you start and end at the bottom by depriving artists and not doing (or being able to do) anything against a giant like Disney. It's just odd to see people couching their support of AI like they're fighting Big Copyright while simultaneously admitting the truth that only the smaller artists can get hosed over by what they're doing. So yeah, Disney or whoever sucks for a great many reasons, but the actual artists that are being steamrolled are in no way representative of this big copyright machine like the AI defenders are pretending them to be
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 16:06 |
|
Zodium posted:people who get mad when other people aren't clapping their hands like trained seals at "artificial intelligence" have the same energy as people who get mad other people aren't excited about nfts
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 16:10 |
|
Personally I'm the kind of guy who thinks art shouldn't exist at all because its [insert political term for bad here] and im glad ai art is the stake through the heart of human expression
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 16:13 |
|
petit choux posted:I have yet to see a computer that produces synthetic porn. That's not gonna be happening for a while. But imagine the argument I've been seeing here as applied to synthetic porn. I think people might launch a Butlerian jihad if we had that nowadays. https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1620091517259087874 At first I watched the video and lol'd at this guy (and his wife??) wailing and rending garments over being caught watching porn on main (come on man), presuming Pokimane and Maya are characters from a cartoon or something. Then I actually read the tweet- they're fellow Twitch streamers and this guy claims to have "accidentally" viewed a deepfake porn video of them. Well why cry and apologize to this degree if it was really an accident? It should be obvious to everyone itt that he would have had to have commissioned that for it to even exist, hence the guilt and shame that would be disproportionate if it were actually accidental. Still lol at him going "I've been watching so much AI stuff" as if that was the specific thing that drove him to this moral implosion Sadly for him, only a human is capable of this kind of stupidity (and depravity).
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 16:31 |
|
Futanari Damacy posted:It should be obvious to everyone itt that he would have had to have commissioned that for it to even exist, hence the guilt and shame that would be disproportionate if it were actually accidental. idk how to tell you this but these twitch streamers get tens of thousands of viewers during their streams, probably 90% of them are insane obsessives at or near the level of incels. this guy didn't commission poo poo
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 16:40 |
|
turn off the TV posted:idk how to tell you this but these twitch streamers get tens of thousands of viewers during their streams, probably 90% of them are insane obsessives at or near the level of incels. this guy didn't commission poo poo Eh you're probably right. But lmao at that struggle session- "I just want to create a safe place" well it'd be better if those safe spaces weren't created by people who are basically wolves in sheeps clothing- at the very least the creation of that porn was non-consensual, which some of the comments do seem to understand.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:01 |
|
how did we go from "lie about everything, never post anything real about yourself on the internet, ever" to "yeah, just doxx yourself everyday everywhere, whatevs" as the dominant socially accepted common wisdom that doesn't excuse any of this poo poo of course, there ain't no level of short skirt that says you were asking for it after all. but still. because it seems like the former is still the way way better mindset.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:19 |
|
lol what the gently caress did they just do the ChatGPT? I mean, I understand the "why", they want a customer service bot, were using the public to beta test, but mechanically how did it get so much worse with the latest update? Is it still using the same language model and library? Also, from a PR perspective, why kill their own product?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:22 |
|
Tree Reformat posted:how did we go from "lie about everything, never post anything real about yourself on the internet, ever" to "yeah, just doxx yourself everyday everywhere, whatevs" as the dominant socially accepted common wisdom because you can make decent money by forming parasocial relationships with desperate nerds
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:27 |
|
Frosted Flake posted:lol what the gently caress did they just do the ChatGPT? because this was a public beta test to get the kinks out because they themselves couldn't figure out what to ask it to test it. they admitted this themselves. they now have all the training data they need due to being way, way more popular than expected, so now they have to start winding down the public beta both to try to stop hemorrhaging operating costs and to try and turn the heat down on public opinion on their ai products. chatgpt was never the product, it was the prototype for much larger systems. ones ideally (from theirs and the MIC's perspectives) the public will never know about.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:28 |
|
Tree Reformat posted:chatgpt was never the product, it was the prototype for much larger systems. ones ideally (from theirs and the MIC's perspectives) the public will never know about. https://github.com/features/copilot/ https://powerapps.microsoft.com/en-us/ crazy that these secret projects hidden from the public are just visible on the internet and advertised
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:39 |
|
turn off the TV posted:https://github.com/features/copilot/ the whole "MIC" part of that quote kinda just flew over your head, didn't it the real money is in nuclear missile train/submarine detection ais and even more dystopian 24/7 city police ais, my good dude
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:50 |
|
Tree Reformat posted:the whole "MIC" part of that quote kinda just flew over your head, didn't it There was an article recently about how the signal cast from wifi can identify where you are in a room down to your body's exact orientation by what it bounces back or reads as negative space, similar to radar. The goal will be to train the AI on predictive behaviours leading up to the commission of a crime- a sort of, "pre-crime" if you will
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:53 |
|
Tree Reformat posted:the whole "MIC" part of that quote kinda just flew over your head, didn't it i think that you're confused here GPT-3 is the AI that writes erotic sonic the hedgehog slashfic. CLIP is the AI that's tied into the image recognition and surveillance tech
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:55 |
|
Futanari Damacy posted:There was an article recently about how the signal cast from wifi can identify where you are in a room down to your body's exact orientation by what it bounces back or reads as negative space, similar to radar. The goal will be to train the AI on predictive behaviours leading up to the commission of a crime- a sort of, "pre-crime" if you will in addition to echolocation, gait recognition is a thing machine learning legitimately does very well.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 17:58 |
|
Rutibex posted:oh another AI thread, hello Zodium posted:in addition to echolocation, gait recognition is a thing machine learning legitimately does very well.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 18:03 |
|
Tree Reformat posted:chatgpt was never the product, it was the prototype for much larger systems. ones ideally (from theirs and the MIC's perspectives) the public will never know about. incidentally I'm now on the ledge about whether the Erdogan corruption tape recordings released in 2013 were "really real." it was a huge thing. Erdogan et al never denied the voices weren't their voices, but ardently claimed that the contents of the messages were assembled "in a montage" or synthesized in some way. at the time, the level of technology the public had been exposed to was not advanced at all, so opposition Turkish online commentators were dismissive and laughed at the idea that such a high fidelity recording could be assembled via "montage." foreign sources analyzers the tapes and determined they were true by looking at the pixels and poo poo: https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article24764323.html quote:Evidence mounted that a series of audio recordings in which Erdogan can be heard instructing his son, Bilal, to get rid of enormous sums of money are authentic, with the government firing two senior officials at the state scientific agency responsible for the security of encrypted telephones and a U.S.-based expert on encrypted communications, after examining the recordings, telling McClatchy that the recordings appear to be genuine.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 18:10 |
|
Futanari Damacy posted:Lol at this guy getting brain poisoned by AI and rightly eating poo poo for it buddy his brain was poisoned long before the AI
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 18:12 |
|
turn off the TV posted:i think that you're confused here GPT-3 can just as easily be used as a front-end for other ai systems. Some mutton-headed general types in "write me a report on current Russian nuclear readiness", GPT-n writes a bunch of commands to like the sat picture reading and comm listening ais, they crunch and send their raw findings to GPT-n, which then uses it to write a perfectly formatted briefing for the braindead general about how there is currently a gap in the eastern Siberian bases that would be best exploited by first-striking in the next 24 hours. And that's how Wargames becomes a documentary.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 18:17 |
|
mawarannahr posted:at the time I doubted the feasibility of such high fidelity montage. now I bet the government/MIC had this level of stuff in 2013. Absolutely. This tech has existed for a long time. The difference is the availability of the hardware that can do it on a desktop, in minutes.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 18:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 09:09 |
|
ai art is perfected https://clips.twitch.tv/SparklyEnergeticKiwiFUNgineer-e83HX3xDaOraecoZ
|
# ? Feb 1, 2023 22:18 |