Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

tristeham posted:

they were. the frankfurt scholl got a poo poo ton of funding from the CIA.

there's even a former nazi propagandist (Paul de Man).

Called it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sunny Side Up
Jun 22, 2004

Mayoist Third Condimentist

tristeham posted:

there's a collective book called Foucault and neoliberalism that has some pretty good essays.

there's also this

https://ctheory.sitehost.iu.edu/resources/fall2020/Rockhill_Foucault_The_Faux_Radical_Final_Version.pdf

I found a really good two hour thing by this Gabriel Rockhill guy which doesn’t help enormously with Foucault but crystallizes a lot of thoughts. He also talks about what you all are talking about, three letter agencies deliberately cultivating an anti-communist left.

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Sunny Side Up posted:

I found a really good two hour thing by this Gabriel Rockhill guy which doesn’t help enormously with Foucault but crystallizes a lot of thoughts. He also talks about what you all are talking about, three letter agencies deliberately cultivating an anti-communist left.

All of the.problems with the modern Western Left can be that they were trained wrong, on ourpose as an Op

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!

Sunny Side Up posted:

I just lament how much time I wasted getting smart in stupid ways

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


Throwing postmodernism as a whole into the bin is just bad. Poststructuralism and a lot of excellent Marxist developments came because of it. The Frankfurt School, however, is lol and lmao

Angela Davies savaged them a few times and Lukacs famously dissed them about not wanting to compromise funding from West Germany IIRC

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Shame Angela Davis tells people to vote for Democrats now

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

I’m late to the counterfactuals but isn’t it possible that more assistance to the Arab states in 56, 67 and 73 would make it less likely for the Saudis to destroy the Soviet economy via oil overproduction at the US’ behest?

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...
What's with the Frankfurt School hate? Sure they were stuffy academic elitists or whatever but some of the stuff that Adorno and especially Walter Benjamin wrote is really good.

oscarthewilde
May 16, 2012


I would often go there
To the tiny church there
imho a lot of the frankfurter schüle hate is overblown and conspiratorial (it’s separated by like two degrees from the ‘adorno invented the Beatles to destroy western culture’ theories), but the second and third generation is pretty fail. loving habermas used to be president for gods sake

Cuttlefush
Jan 15, 2014

gotta have my purp
they killed eddie

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

Mechafunkzilla posted:

What's with the Frankfurt School hate? Sure they were stuffy academic elitists or whatever but some of the stuff that Adorno and especially Walter Benjamin wrote is really good.

I think Marcuse misdirected people into nihilistic pursuits from his own personal experience, focus on individualism (no wonder he was drawn to California), and psychologism. I used to worry a lot about "oh poo poo what if he was right???" There'd probably be some more people alive today whose lives were cut short, and with better ideas, if he never wrote that poo poo and didn't become some kind of "academic rockstar."

e: I'm prone to forgetting salient things about his life and I lol every time

quote:

Between 1943 and 1950, Marcuse worked in US government service for the Office of Strategic Services (predecessor of the Central Intelligence Agency) where he criticized the ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the book Soviet Marxism: A Critical Analysis (1958). In the 1960s and the 1970s he became known as the preeminent theorist of the New Left and the student movements of West Germany, France, and the United States; some consider him "the Father of the New Left".[9]

thanks for nothing herb

mawarannahr has issued a correction as of 17:57 on Feb 3, 2023

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Mechafunkzilla posted:

What's with the Frankfurt School hate? Sure they were stuffy academic elitists or whatever but some of the stuff that Adorno and especially Walter Benjamin wrote is really good.

they’re morons op

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

mawarannahr posted:

I think Marcuse misdirected people into nihilistic pursuits from his own personal experience, focus on individualism (no wonder he was drawn to California), and psychologism. I used to worry a lot about "oh poo poo what if he was right???" There'd probably be some more people alive today whose lives were cut short, and with better ideas, if he never wrote that poo poo and didn't become some kind of "academic rockstar."

e: I'm prone to forgetting salient things about his life and I lol every time

thanks for nothing herb

Trained wrong on purpose, as an op

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


Walter Benjamin is a totally blessed one and completely not in the Adorno/Horkheimer institutional camp. Marcuse sidetracked a whole lot of poo poo with the new left idea, but honestly I think it is the same old thing since Kautsky, Bernstein, etc - misplaced and/or misguided criticism because of things not happening in some supposed way they should, which unfortunately, leads to a rather convenient position in favor of the establishment that very much wants to destroy them too

That’s why Zizek did a lot of good by trolling the poo poo out of that position

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

https://twitter.com/BadSocialisms/status/1620066698794766338

Fish of hemp
Apr 1, 2011

A friendly little mouse!

Frosted Flake posted:

I’m late to the counterfactuals but isn’t it possible that more assistance to the Arab states in 56, 67 and 73 would make it less likely for the Saudis to destroy the Soviet economy via oil overproduction at the US’ behest?

Wouldn't it be better to USSR to develope economy not dependent on oil prices?

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!

Fish of hemp posted:

Wouldn't it be better to USSR to develope economy not dependent on oil prices?

oil was and is the currency of the world. what should they have done instead?

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

mass produced consumer goods for the west!!

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021
yeah, the US got a second wind by increasingly exporting tech and capital to...the People's Republic of China?

Mechafunkzilla
Sep 11, 2006

If you want a vision of the future...

croup coughfield posted:

oil was and is the currency of the world. what should they have done instead?

Anarcho-primitivism

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

Taffer posted:

A guy I've been arguing politics with wants me to read Bookchin. Is he worth reading?

bookchin is funny because he does some serious thinking about how an anarchist force could actually win and use power to run one or several cities and his reward is that other anarchists call him a statist or whatever for suggesting that we might need to do anything besides make really radical street art

there's a line i like from religious debates where a nonbeliever tells a believer "we are both atheists; i merely deny one more god than you do". likewise i would say to bookchin "we are both authoritarians,"

Ferrinus has issued a correction as of 19:31 on Feb 4, 2023

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!
giving some thought to chaining the mouse guy

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!

Fish of hemp posted:

This is not true, you are right.

It's that American leftists are too cowards for revolution.

"But we might face violence like Black Panthers!" :cry:

So? Panthers knew that and did it anyway. Every social revolution has met with violence. If you have problem with that then stop calling yourself communist or whatever.

Orwell went to Spain kill fascists. You can't even organize a loving union because you're afraid of "repression".

Capital has won, you can stop pretending that you care. If you did, you'd do something about it. Something real instead of posting.

never mind I love them

Sunny Side Up
Jun 22, 2004

Mayoist Third Condimentist
I’ve got this socialist book club doing Foundryside by Robert Jackson Bennett this month (we alternate theory and fiction) since I think it’s a stellar exploration of commodity fetishism, alienation, and exploitation (also the limits of idealism). Found out (mostly reading his tweets) the author is a technoutopian Democrat (not even pro-Bernie). He seems to dislike socialism because while he accurately understands it takes hundreds of years to change modes of production he seems to think that means you have to do incremental political change.

It’s like he accidentally backed into a good socialist trilogy that aptly describes crucial concepts (up there with the best of them). Really weird and if I was analyzing a movie instead I’d say it wasn’t possible.

BornAPoorBlkChild
Sep 24, 2012
https://twitter.com/Focus_entmt/status/1620779122107506689?t=TtJtDSZJ52MBafL0Xau_yg&s=19

im sure this games story about an AltUniverse USSR will be well thought out and not at all like something out of one of James Jesus Angleton's fever dreams :allears:

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

BornAPoorBlkChild has issued a correction as of 07:29 on Feb 10, 2023

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

https://twitter.com/Claude_kon/status/1622851910373097472

:hmmyes:

more seriously i'll be surprised if the USSR portrayal in this game is positive overall despite the vibes and tropes in that trailer

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

https://twitter.com/hum_dunkin/status/1623413826518503429

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018

aids

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!

lumpentroll
Mar 4, 2020

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
(you will learn not to post tweets in this thread, in time - consider this your trial by fire)

I forgot to write a post-mortem after I finished it two weeks ago but in case me posting excerpts was not evidence enough I quite liked "Terrorism and Communism" by Trotsky (with a foreword by Slavoj Zizek). It's written as a response to Karl Kautsky's criticisms of the USSR in the heady days of 1920, and I think it mostly works because it isn't yet bound up in "Stalinism" or having to rebut the crushing of the Hungarian operation like you would trying to do that at any other time*, to say nothing of how it's coming from someone that we mostly remember now for being opposed to the USSR.

___

* I've had a similar experience with reading The Making of the President 1972, which was written before Watergate really got going, and as a result manages to explain Nixon's re-election in a far more materialist and actual, at-the-time domestic politics kind of way, rather than anything that came after which commits the sin of attributing everything to CREEP.

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!
love him or hate him, trotsky was a pretty good writer with ideas that a lot of marxists here would agree with if they werent busy doing meme poo poo

speaking of materialist nixon, ive been wondering a lot lately about how much of the media blow-up over watergate was gassed by oil or manufacturing interests pissed off about the implementation of price controls

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

croup coughfield posted:

speaking of materialist nixon, ive been wondering a lot lately about how much of the media blow-up over watergate was gassed by oil or manufacturing interests pissed off about the implementation of price controls

I've long been a believer that Nixon was couped, though usually it's from the direction of pulling out of Vietnam hurting CIA drug ops and engaging in detente

You raise a good point about domestic interests

croup coughfield
Apr 8, 2020
Probation
Can't post for 70 days!

gradenko_2000 posted:

I've long been a believer that Nixon was couped, though usually it's from the direction of pulling out of Vietnam hurting CIA drug ops and engaging in detente

You raise a good point about domestic interests

gerald ford was the perfect president

Harold Fjord
Jan 3, 2004

croup coughfield posted:

gerald ford was the perfect president

And had the funniest name!

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

Nixon was the last president who personally exercised meaningful authority outside of corporate interests, he was just such a petty, venal, small-minded guy he used it to personally gently caress with his enemies as much as possible, rather than do anything big with it.

By the time he got reelected the powers that be considered him a liability because his petty poo poo and inability to be controlled was loving with their money, so they used one of the myriad of really dumb things he was doing to take him out and install Ford, who was the very definition of a corporate owned politician.

As a side-note on Ford, we basically only have MLMs today because of him. When he was in Congress, his district was the home of Amway, which the feds were well on their way to regulating out of business, but when Jerry got into office, he put a stop to that immediately.

I'd also argue that beyond Nixon loving with their money, the powers that be also realized that the kind of actual power Nixon wielded, which they'd previously used to their own ends, wasn't worth the risk that they might get someone in there who would seriously try to buck them. By that time, they were well on their way to breaking union power and crushing the left, and my theory is that the fear of the Left in the 60s is the only thing that kept them from doing what they did sooner.

HiroProtagonist
May 7, 2007

KomradeX posted:

Shame Angela Davis tells people to vote for Democrats now

This :(

HiroProtagonist
May 7, 2007

mawarannahr posted:

I think Marcuse misdirected people into nihilistic pursuits from his own personal experience, focus on individualism (no wonder he was drawn to California), and psychologism. I used to worry a lot about "oh poo poo what if he was right???" There'd probably be some more people alive today whose lives were cut short, and with better ideas, if he never wrote that poo poo and didn't become some kind of "academic rockstar."

e: I'm prone to forgetting salient things about his life and I lol every time

thanks for nothing herb

Lmao that he was OSS

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

gradenko_2000 posted:

(you will learn not to post tweets in this thread, in time - consider this your trial by fire)

I forgot to write a post-mortem after I finished it two weeks ago but in case me posting excerpts was not evidence enough I quite liked "Terrorism and Communism" by Trotsky (with a foreword by Slavoj Zizek). It's written as a response to Karl Kautsky's criticisms of the USSR in the heady days of 1920, and I think it mostly works because it isn't yet bound up in "Stalinism" or having to rebut the crushing of the Hungarian operation like you would trying to do that at any other time*, to say nothing of how it's coming from someone that we mostly remember now for being opposed to the USSR.

___

* I've had a similar experience with reading The Making of the President 1972, which was written before Watergate really got going, and as a result manages to explain Nixon's re-election in a far more materialist and actual, at-the-time domestic politics kind of way, rather than anything that came after which commits the sin of attributing everything to CREEP.

The Hungarian revolution was crushed in early 1920 though. shame it's apparently not touched on.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MeatwadIsGod
Sep 30, 2004

Foretold by Gyromancy
I'm reading a (not particularly good) book on Marx's philosophical/theoretical development, but it did have an interesting anecdote I was unaware of. Princess Vicky (Queen Victoria's daughter) was curious what Marx was like so she asked a Scottish MP to have a chat with him. This is the MP's letter to her the day after he and Marx talked for a few hours at the Devonshire Club.

quote:


February 1, 1879

Madam,

Your Imperial Highness, when I last had the honour of seeing you, chanced to express some curiosity about Carl Marx and to ask me if I knew him. I resolved accordingly to take the first opportunity of making his acquaintance; but that opportunity did not arise till yesterday when I met him at luncheon and spent three hours in his company.

He is a short, rather small man with grey hair and beard which contrast strangely with a still dark moustache. The face is somewhat round, the forehead well shaped and filled up -- the eye rather hard but the whole expression rather pleasant than not, by no means that of a gentleman who is in the habit of eating babies in their cradles -- which is I daresay the view which the Police takes of him.

His talk was that of a well-informed, nay; learned man -- much interested in Comparative Grammar which had led him into the Old Slavonic and other out of the way studies and was varied by many quaint turns and little bits of dry humour, as when speaking of Hesekiel's life of Prince Bismarck he always referred to it, by way of contrast to Dr. Busch's book, as the Old Testament. [Referring to G. Hesekiel's, Das Buch vom Grafen Bismarck, Bielefeld and Leipzig, 1869]

It was all very positif slightly cynical -- without any appearance of enthusiasm -- interesting and often, as I thought, showing very correct ideas when he was conversing of the past or the present; but vague and unsatisfactory when he turned to the future.

He looks, not unreasonably, for a great and not distant crash in Russia; thinks it will begin by reforms from above which the old bad edifice will not be able to bear and which will lead to its tumbling down altogether. As to what would take its place he had evidently no clear idea, except that for a long time Russia would be unable to exercise any influence in Europe.
Next he thinks that the movement will spread to Germany taking there the form of a revolt against the existing military system.

To my question "But how can you expect the army to rise against its commanders?" he replied -- you forget that in Germany now the army and the Nation are nearly identical. These Socialists you hear about are trained soldiers like anybody else. You must not think of the standing army only. You must think of the Landwehr -- and even in the standing army there is much discontent. Never was an army in which the severity of the discipline led to so many suicides. The step from shooting oneself to shooting one's officer is not long, and an example of the kind, once set, is soon followed.

But supposing I said the rulers of Europe came to an understanding amongst themselves for a reduction of armaments which might greatly relieve the burden on the people what would become of the Revolution which you expect it one day to bring about?

Ah, was his answer they can't do that. All sorts of fears and jealousies will make that impossible. The burden will grow worse and worse as science advances for the improvements in the Art of Destruction will keep pace with its advance and every year more and more will have to be devoted to costly engines of war. It is a vicious circle -- there is no escape from it. But I said you have never yet had a serious popular rising unless there was really great misery. You have no idea, he rejoined, how terrible has been the crisis through which Germany has been passing in these last five years.

Well I said supposing that your Revolution has taken place and that you have your Republican form of Government -- it is still a long long way to the realization of the special ideas of yourself and your friends. Doubtless he answered but all great movements are slow. It would merely be a step to better things as your Revolution of 1688 was -- a mere stage on the road.

The above will give Your Imperial Highness a fair idea of the kind of ideas about the near future of Europe which are working in his mind.
They are too dreamy to be dangerous except just in so far as the situation with its mad expenditure on armaments is obviously and undoubtedly dangerous.

If however within the next decade the rulers of Europe have not found means of dealing with this evil without any warning from attempted revolution I for one shall despair of the future of humanity at least on this continent.

In the course of conversation Carl Marx spoke several times both of Your Imperial Highness and of the Crown Prince and invariably with due respect and propriety. Even in the case of eminent individuals of whom he by no means spoke with respect there was no trace of bitterness or savagery -- plenty acrid and dissolvent criticism but nothing of the Marat tone.

Of the horrible things that have been connected with the International he spoke as any respectable man would have done.
One thing which he mentioned showed the dangers to which exiles who have got a revolutionary name are exposed. The wretched man Nobiling, he had learned, had when in England intended to come to see him. If he had done so he said I should certainly have admitted him for he would have sent in his card as an employe of the Dresden Bureau of Statistics and as I occupy myself with Statistics it would have interested me to talk with him -- What a pleasant position I should have been in he added if he had come to see me!

Altogether my impression of Marx, allowing for his being at the opposite pole of opinion from oneself, was not at all unfavourable and I would gladly meet him again. It will not be he who whether he wishes it or not will turn the world upside down.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply