Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: weg, Toxic Mental)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Pablo Bluth
Sep 7, 2007

I've made a huge mistake.
Coverage from Leopard 2 school in Poland, nothing particularly revelatory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtawNwACOv8

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

zone
Dec 6, 2016

https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1633367949061791744
It appears even Solovyov and friends don't appear too optimistic about Russian chances when Ukraine gathers its strength to strike back.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

Tarquinn posted:

Okay, Russians are Romans now. Finally this war is justified!

:psyduck:

Tarquinn
Jul 3, 2007

I know I’ve made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you
my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal.
Hell Gem

Oh, I remember that one. I hope it’s still there. :3:

Dumb Sex-Parrot
Dec 25, 2020

 
Absurd Pox Term
Rad Buxom Strep
     
Retard Ox Bumps
Borax Dumpster
     
Dares Box Trump
Half joking here, but I thought the Romanians were the proper Romans?

Punkinhead
Apr 2, 2015

Dumb Sex-Parrot posted:

Half joking here, but I thought the Romanians were the proper Romans?

Half of me is laughing at your joke, the other half of me is laughing even harder

fizzy
Dec 2, 2022

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

zone posted:

https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1633367949061791744
It appears even Solovyov and friends don't appear too optimistic about Russian chances when Ukraine gathers its strength to strike back.

Couldn't the Russians also be down-playing their successes / over-exaggerating their setbacks to lure the Ukrainian into over-extending their forces? Why take Russian propaganda at face value, when they are known to be habitual liars?

Punkinhead
Apr 2, 2015

fizzy posted:

Couldn't the Russians also be down-playing their successes / over-exaggerating their setbacks to lure the Ukrainian into over-extending their forces?

Based on how much land they control versus earlier on in the war? No. You'd have to be working backwards from the position that Russia is inherently more reliable to think otherwise. Or incredibly ignorant, or both. I don't know your life.

Punkinhead fucked around with this message at 10:26 on Mar 8, 2023

zone
Dec 6, 2016

fizzy posted:

Couldn't the Russians also be down-playing their successes / over-exaggerating their setbacks to lure the Ukrainian into over-extending their forces? Why take Russian propaganda at face value, when they are known to be habitual liars?

Because their crude attempts at maskirovka, which they boasted as being the best in the world, have so far failed to yield any results. Ukrainian leadership, and intelligence officers, along with the help of Western intelligence data, have proven already under field conditions that they can out-think and outmaneuver the Russians. The reason they're even saying what they're saying in this clip, for example, is that they were allowed to say it by the higher authorities. Nothing is said on that channel that isn't permitted to be said, and that sometimes includes a few truths as well. Of course I do agree that none of this should be taken *exactly* at face value, but usually the tone of the propagandists and the topics they speak about are usually enough to get a general idea of the accepted narrative, while comparing it to what independent analysts have to say to weed out the more bald faced lies or propaganda points.

Punkinhead
Apr 2, 2015

"How can we be sure Russia hasn't destroyed more HIMARS than have been reported delivered? Ukraine must be near or completely out of HIMARS if Russia is to be trusted at all, surely?????? Thus Russia must be advancing evenly and with constant supporting artillery! Wait, they're not? This is a real brain teaser and I'm gonna need some SA posters to help me figure it out..."

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD

fizzy posted:

Couldn't the Russians also be down-playing their successes / over-exaggerating their setbacks to lure the Ukrainian into over-extending their forces? Why take Russian propaganda at face value, when they are known to be habitual liars?

They might be but literally everything on that channel is for internal consumption. It's who they're lying to that matters in this context and it's not for Ukraine. I also think they'd have a hard time bullshitting Ukraine about the actual situation since they know exactly how many vehicles they've destroyed, how many shells have been fired at them, roughly how many soldiers they've killed, and that's fairly easily checkable against known Russian capabilities. The Russians can hide a little bit but not enough for anyone to drastically underestimate what they've got. With all the eyes they have on them at the moment if they're somehow concealing a significant force somewhere then it's been one of the most brilliantly executed military operations ever. It's up there with the inflatable tanks and disinformation campaign before D-day.

Earlier in the war I'd see these and ask "How does them saying than help keep Putin in power?" and usually the answer would be pretty obvious.

These days I have no idea, but I don't bother watching them much. I think maybe they're trying to reinforce the sense of helplessness and nihilism in Russia?

Somaen
Nov 19, 2007

by vyelkin

fizzy posted:

Couldn't the Russians also be down-playing their successes / over-exaggerating their setbacks to lure the Ukrainian into over-extending their forces? Why take Russian propaganda at face value, when they are known to be habitual liars?


Putin desperately needs successes to boost morale and stop looking like the war is going very badly. The failures are not 5D chess, it's genuinely going badly, it's harder and harder to hide

Somaen fucked around with this message at 10:38 on Mar 8, 2023

CSM
Jan 29, 2014

56th Motorized Infantry 'Mariupol' Brigade
Seh' die Welt in Trummern liegen

HonorableTB posted:

Your point is valid for sure. The location and such didn't change. What changed in this case was Ukraine realizing the Russian military was willing to pay an utterly insane butcher's bill to take the city and the Ukrainian army seems to be more than happy to let them do that since it's also taking all of their strategic initiative out of the picture for this offensive. I also still believe that Bakhmut's value was artificially inflated to distract from a Ukrainian counteroffensive in Zaporizhzhia. Blowing up Bakhmut's value into something it isn't is a great way to get a whole bunch of Russian troops moving over there to try and take it, meaning they aren't in the south.
There's no conclusive evidence however that the losses Ukraine is incurring are less severe than Russia's though.

Even if we believe the claim about much higher Russian casualties. Five Russians for every Ukrainian isn't a good deal, if it's a seasoned Ukrainian soldier versus five Wagner prisoner mobiks.

Most media are talking about heavy Ukrainian losses that are potentially endangering future counter offensives. So it remains to be seen who will come out of the Battle of Bakhmut in a better position.

Hopefully it'll play out something like Severodonetsk.

Punkinhead
Apr 2, 2015

CSM posted:

There's no conclusive evidence however that the losses Ukraine is incurring are less severe than Russia's though.

Even if we believe the claim about much higher Russian casualties. Five Russians for every Ukrainian isn't a good deal, if it's a seasoned Ukrainian soldier versus five Wagner prisoner mobiks.

Most media are talking about heavy Ukrainian losses that are potentially endangering future counter offensives. So it remains to be seen who will come out of the Battle of Bakhmut in a better position.

Hopefully it'll play out something like Severodonetsk.

This is the real question. Even though Ukraine has held this town for over half a year that doesn't necessarily mean things are moving towards a Ukrainian victory. Tactical successes do not 1:1 translate to strategic successes.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

Somaen posted:

Putin desperately need successes to boost morale and stop looking like the war is going very badly. The failures are not 5D chess, it's genuinely going badly

This is basically why Putin ordered the Russian army and Wagner to capture at least the Donbass by March 31 so he could have something he could sell to the masses at home as a kind of 'victory'. Capturing Soledar by itself, despite being a pyrrhic victory at best, and the current precarious but still relatively stable situation near Bakhmut are basically all they have to show for it at present. And at the current pace of gains, it's evident that they'll be unable to meet these stated goals, while keeping a one track mind on the objectives they were ordered to fulfill, which will lead to either a premature culmination at Bakhmut, the depletion of offensive and defensive resources on other parts of the front line, or both. This one track, stupid, single minded attempt to fulfill these orders has the seeds of a second disastrous collapse of Russian defenses sown all over it.

Samovar
Jun 4, 2011

When I want to relax, I read an essay by Engels. When I want something more serious, I read Corto Maltese.

Tarquinn posted:

Okay, Russians are Romans now. Finally this war is justified!

:psyduck:

Russani eunt domnes!

zone
Dec 6, 2016

CSM posted:

There's no conclusive evidence however that the losses Ukraine is incurring are less severe than Russia's though.

Even if we believe the claim about much higher Russian casualties. Five Russians for every Ukrainian isn't a good deal, if it's a seasoned Ukrainian soldier versus five Wagner prisoner mobiks.

Most media are talking about heavy Ukrainian losses that are potentially endangering future counter offensives. So it remains to be seen who will come out of the Battle of Bakhmut in a better position.

Hopefully it'll play out something like Severodonetsk.

The units that are currently fighting on the front are primarily those that have already been fighting after being rotated in and out of combat to replenish losses or TDF who are only expected to hold the territory as long as possible despite the losses. Pro-Russian bloggers have already said that Ukraine's reserve troops for the new offensives are primarily going to be their new mechanized brigades which are being formed with the donated Western equipment and staffed with those soldiers trained abroad as their core. The brigades which are already doing the fighting are likely not going to be direct participants in whatever upcoming offensives Ukraine has planned, except themselves as support/holding/reserves role.

Karate Bastard
Jul 31, 2007

Soiled Meat

CSM posted:

There's no conclusive evidence however that the losses Ukraine is incurring are less severe than Russia's though.

Even if we believe the claim about much higher Russian casualties. Five Russians for every Ukrainian isn't a good deal, if it's a seasoned Ukrainian soldier versus five Wagner prisoner mobiks.

Most media are talking about heavy Ukrainian losses that are potentially endangering future counter offensives. So it remains to be seen who will come out of the Battle of Bakhmut in a better position.

Hopefully it'll play out something like Severodonetsk.

This is precisely what has been bugging me as well.

I hope the destruction of kit is what is going to matter, because Russia will have a much harder time replacing that.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

Funky See Funky Do posted:

They might be but literally everything on that channel is for internal consumption. It's who they're lying to that matters in this context and it's not for Ukraine. I also think they'd have a hard time bullshitting Ukraine about the actual situation since they know exactly how many vehicles they've destroyed, how many shells have been fired at them, roughly how many soldiers they've killed, and that's fairly easily checkable against known Russian capabilities. The Russians can hide a little bit but not enough for anyone to drastically underestimate what they've got. With all the eyes they have on them at the moment if they're somehow concealing a significant force somewhere then it's been one of the most brilliantly executed military operations ever. It's up there with the inflatable tanks and disinformation campaign before D-day.

Earlier in the war I'd see these and ask "How does them saying than help keep Putin in power?" and usually the answer would be pretty obvious.

These days I have no idea, but I don't bother watching them much. I think maybe they're trying to reinforce the sense of helplessness and nihilism in Russia?

I think RUSI were on to the answer here: from the tactical level upwards the Russian system punishes any admission of failure, so everyone reports massive success. Because this remains true at every step in the chain upwards there's every incentive to repeat the story of massive success while failures are mysterious and unavoidable surprises that are Nobody's Fault.

The result is a system where everyone knows that the stats they have are nonsense and they can't possibly have destroyed 50 HIMARS last week, but there's no person in the system who can call that out so the number keeps getting repeated as 'true' all the way to the point where its published.

zone
Dec 6, 2016

The same system also encourages some truly bogus claims to be made, like Bradleys being destroyed in September and the Abrams destroyed near "Bakhmut" which was an old loss from the Iraq war. They didn't even bother that there was a palm tree in the image they used for that claim. Just posted it as is so that their useful idiots and unthinking masses can rejoice in another Mighty Russian victory.

Tree Bucket
Apr 1, 2016

R.I.P.idura leucophrys
Where does the word "mobik" come from btw?

CSM
Jan 29, 2014

56th Motorized Infantry 'Mariupol' Brigade
Seh' die Welt in Trummern liegen

Tree Bucket posted:

Where does the word "mobik" come from btw?

Borrowed from Russian мо́бик (móbik), from моб(илизо́ванный) (mob(ilizóvannyj), “mobilized”) +‎ -ик (-ik, diminutive suffix).

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mobik

szary
Mar 12, 2014

HonorableTB posted:

do we have any poles in here? I stopped by the beer store and wanted to try some new beer so I got a couple pint bottles of Okocim based solely on their slogan "O.K. Beer", it's p good IMO. Kurwa!

I'm no beer connoisseur but Okocim is pretty poo poo, like most beers by big brewers.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008

Pablo Bluth posted:

Coverage from Leopard 2 school in Poland, nothing particularly revelatory.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtawNwACOv8

Why are there turrets pointing backwards alot?

zone
Dec 6, 2016

https://twitter.com/wartranslated/status/1633410034951438339
Latest Strelkov screed. All it amounts to are sarcastic congratulations aimed at Prigozhin and Shoigu for capturing half a small city, a note on how there have been more defense lines prepared while it was held, and that apart from inflicting losses on Ukraine in the process, their big winter offensive became a big flop.

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD

Alchenar posted:

I think RUSI were on to the answer here: from the tactical level upwards the Russian system punishes any admission of failure, so everyone reports massive success. Because this remains true at every step in the chain upwards there's every incentive to repeat the story of massive success while failures are mysterious and unavoidable surprises that are Nobody's Fault.

The result is a system where everyone knows that the stats they have are nonsense and they can't possibly have destroyed 50 HIMARS last week, but there's no person in the system who can call that out so the number keeps getting repeated as 'true' all the way to the point where its published.

That's obvious but sometimes you have segments like the one in the clip where the actors seem despondent and melancholy about the way things are going.

I don't speak Russian so I can't (and don't want to) watch that show in full to see the context it's in. It might be that they're being set up as the gutless sad sack for every other person on the show to argue against. Or it might be that their purpose is to get through to the people that know that things are going terribly for Russia and instil a sense of nihilism in them so they don't try to change things.

I don't have a point. It's just one the things about Russian society that I don't get.

Jasper Tin Neck
Nov 14, 2008


"Scientifically proven, rich and creamy."

Tree Bucket posted:

Where does the word "mobik" come from btw?

It's an contracted agent noun composed of the word мобилизовать and the suffix -ник.

Pablo Bluth
Sep 7, 2007

I've made a huge mistake.

I would blow Dane Cook posted:

Why are there turrets pointing backwards alot?
I've never driven a tank so I can only guess: sometimes you have to drive with the turret backwards, be it aiming at the enemy while you retreat or to avoid spearing the ground on steep slopes, and this video just happens to be on the day when getting familiar with driving backwards is the lesson?

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

https://twitter.com/PaulJawin/status/1633357286226767872?t=ZZ1R46tma-DkuwAYLgk7vg&s=19

Lol

Neddy Seagoon
Oct 12, 2012

"Hi Everybody!"

Ah yes; the Soviet Military Train Sergei Shoigu insisted on restoring to it's proper glory circa 1970 with no modernized weaponry, logistics, or detection equipment.

It will be no match for... *checks notes*

Drone strikes.

Or Tanks.

Or HIMARS.

Or opportunistic sappers damaging the tracks along its route in advance followed by ambushing the train itself with the above options.

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:

I would blow Dane Cook posted:

Why are there turrets pointing backwards alot?

Makes the tank shorter. The axis of rotation of the turret is offset to the front. Having a shorter tank is good if you are trying to park it somewhere.

Philonius
Jun 12, 2005


Ceterum censeo Imperium Romanum esse delendam.

Sashimi
Dec 26, 2008


College Slice
Time to mark another square on the WWI bingo card.

Potrzebie
Apr 6, 2010

I may not know what I'm talking about, but I sure love cops! ^^ Boy, but that boot is just yummy!
Lipstick Apathy

Dumb Sex-Parrot posted:

Half joking here, but I thought the Romani were the proper Romans?

KirbyKhan
Mar 20, 2009



Soiled Meat
Peace is good, war is bad

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Funky See Funky Do
Aug 20, 2013
STILL TRYING HARD
We all want peace, but it's always just out of reach.

So, what's the best to get peace?

armpit_enjoyer
Jan 25, 2023

my god. it's full of posts

HonorableTB posted:

do we have any poles in here? I stopped by the beer store and wanted to try some new beer so I got a couple pint bottles of Okocim based solely on their slogan "O.K. Beer", it's p good IMO. Kurwa!

Okocim is decent as far as mass-produced swill goes. If you go back for more, here's some brands to avoid: Lech, Harnaś, Tyskie, Tatra, Ciechan. Brands to get: Perła, Łomża, Brackie, Specjal.

Roblo
Dec 10, 2007

I posted my food for USPOL Thanksgiving!

some plague rats posted:

Cool. what is it

Tymofiy Shadura. You could have looked that up if you needed to know but I guess a snarky post is more your style.

Slugworth
Feb 18, 2001

If two grown men can't make a pervert happy for a few minutes in order to watch a film about zombies, then maybe we should all just move to Iran!

CSM posted:

There's no conclusive evidence however that the losses Ukraine is incurring are less severe than Russia's though.

Even if we believe the claim about much higher Russian casualties. Five Russians for every Ukrainian isn't a good deal, if it's a seasoned Ukrainian soldier versus five Wagner prisoner mobiks.

Most media are talking about heavy Ukrainian losses that are potentially endangering future counter offensives. So it remains to be seen who will come out of the Battle of Bakhmut in a better position.

Hopefully it'll play out something like Severodonetsk.
Fwiw, there was a recent article claiming that Ukraine was also sending a lot of barely trained soldiers to Bakhmut, so I'm not sure they're losing a large amount of seasoned soldiers. Bleak truth might end up being that Bakhmut is where both sides send their cannon fodder.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Karate Bastard
Jul 31, 2007

Soiled Meat

KirbyKhan posted:

Peace is good, war is bad

It would be helpful or at least interesting if you could go beyond repeatedly stating the obvious, and maybe share a thought on how in your opinion peace could most effectively be achieved, based on the current situation, and what an acceptable resulting situation would be.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply