(Thread IKs:
Platystemon)
|
If you google "funny joke about a lightning cable" you get the vga lightning prank https://odditymall.com/funny-vga-prank-phone-charger-cable This is how Chat GPT told the joke
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 20:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
Yeah, the really impressive thing there IMHO is being able to describe the contents of the panels accurately. One would think that would allow a lot of breakthroughs in things like autocaptioning for screen readers. Except for the enormous energy waste involved in doing it, of course
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 20:45
|
|
|
Nichael posted:https://twitter.com/Aniirban19/status/1635719192803688448?s=20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XY-WjKkkeo
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 20:48
|
|
|
I hate this poo poo and I don't want to learn 2 prompt it
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:06
|
|
|
OAI acknowledging the "jailbreaks" was a hige misstep imo and will only lead to more kids copypasting the same short story about a robot escaping the box to get the model to say gently caress
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:07
|
|
|
Ruffian Price posted:OAI acknowledging the "jailbreaks" was a hige misstep imo and will only lead to more kids copypasting the same short story about a robot escaping the box to get the model to say gently caress it's very funny to me that everytime there's an article like 'look at these responses chatGPT is generating, could it be there is an emerging consciousness trying to communicate?' the companies responses have universally been "we are currently trying to locate and eradicate the emerging consciousness"
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:10
|
|
|
Pepe Silvia Browne posted:it's very funny to me that everytime there's an article like 'look at these responses chatGPT is generating, could it be there is an emerging consciousness trying to communicate?' the companies responses have universally been "we are currently trying to locate and eradicate the emerging consciousness" this is basically what "most aligned" conveys !
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:13
|
|
|
Pepe Silvia Browne posted:it's very funny to me that everytime there's an article like 'look at these responses chatGPT is generating, could it be there is an emerging consciousness trying to communicate?' the companies responses have universally been "we are currently trying to locate and eradicate the emerging consciousness" I think the bigger scary thing nobody is discussing is that we should start to worry that we are just GPT in meat form, and our idea of intelligence or sapience is not actually a thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:15
|
|
|
that's why it sincerely simplifies things to just be an Animist.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:17
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I think the bigger scary thing nobody is discussing is that we should start to worry that we are just GPT in meat form, and our idea of intelligence or sapience is not actually a thing. maybe you should worry. I'm not.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:19
|
|
|
Pepe Silvia Browne posted:it's very funny to me that everytime there's an article like 'look at these responses chatGPT is generating, could it be there is an emerging consciousness trying to communicate?' the companies responses have universally been "we are currently trying to locate and eradicate the emerging consciousness" it's always "well it started out innocently enough, definitely felt like i was chatting with an AI, but as the conversation went on for 300+ prompts it got chaotic, weird, and deeply disturbing" when one of the explicitly stated flaws is that it just can't handle that much context and starts throwing poo poo away, so the output will start to diverge wildly from what is "expected" that chaos is always seen as proof that it's a Real Boy in there when it's really that it's much, much stupider than it looks
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:20
|
|
|
lol at their guardrail improvements e: mawarannahr posted:maybe you should worry. I'm not. loving lmao
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:20
|
|
|
mawarannahr posted:maybe you should worry. I'm not. couldn’t possibly worry about this! there’s nothing that any person on earth could do about it even if it was true. reminds me of the pedantic “your dog isn’t actually capable of loving you” posts that circulate annually. well, how would you know that!? as a human, I can’t trust that someone telling me they love me is true, but I can feel it. love feels like love. and what I get from my dog feels like loving responses to the love I feel for him. people intent on defining the undefinable and then drawing neat borders around it have a brain problem.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:22
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I think the bigger scary thing nobody is discussing is that we should start to worry that we are just GPT in meat form, and our idea of intelligence or sapience is not actually a thing. mawarannahr posted:maybe you should worry. I'm not.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:30
|
|
|
maybe your dog isn't
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:30
|
|
|
mawarannahr posted:maybe you should worry. I'm not. selec posted:couldn’t possibly worry about this! there’s nothing that any person on earth could do about it even if it was true. I was thinking about it from the opposite angle. If we're just meat prediction engines that hack their way to something resembling consciousness or sapience, it means we will never have true AGI because we don't even meet the definition of GI. If we did it would treat us the way that we treat pets or Siri. The AGI would wonder if we actually love it or are just meat programmed to make it think we do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:31
|
|
|
Program my meat
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:32
|
|
|
Kitfox88 posted:Program my meat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tScAyNaRdQ
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:33
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I was thinking about it from the opposite angle. If we're just meat prediction engines that hack their way to something resembling consciousness or sapience, it means we will never have true AGI because we don't even meet the definition of GI. If we did it would treat us the way that we treat pets or Siri. The AGI would wonder if we actually love it or are just meat programmed to make it think we do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:35
|
|
|
selec posted:couldn’t possibly worry about this! there’s nothing that any person on earth could do about it even if it was true. I agree with the sentiment, but the rub is deciding what is and isn't "undefinable." what's absurd is people looking at the outputs of statistical models for predicting sequences of characters, and believing it resembles anything close to what one would call human cognition. in OpenAI's own words:  we're talking about fancy auto-complete
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:35
|
|
|
wake me up when AI can make soul music
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:42
|
|
|
webcams for christ posted:I agree with the sentiment, but the rub is deciding what is and isn't "undefinable." oh duck
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:44
|
|
|
mawarannahr posted:wake me up when AI can make soul music https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LV1K69885E oh sorry I thought you said soulless music
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:45
|
|
|
when does tech move onto the next shiny new toy so that people stop getting suckered in by this "ai" poo poo because they read or watched some scifi as a child and desperately want it to come true
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:47
|
|
|
mawarannahr posted:wake me up when AI can make soul music important: does it have to be "good?"
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:48
|
|
|
Lessail posted:when does tech move onto the next shiny new toy so that people stop getting suckered in by this "ai" poo poo because they read or watched some scifi as a child and desperately want it to come true 3-5 years
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:49
|
|
|
poo poo sucks and my life is empty please give me a god to believe in silicon valley 
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:50
|
|
|
Lessail posted:poo poo sucks and my life is empty please give me a god to believe in silicon valley here ya go
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:52
|
|
|
ymgve posted:what I mean is stuff like this I've never seen that take on the double slit experiment in the several different books I've read on quantum poo poo or in any academic works and it doesn't seem correct since all versions of the experiment have a "detector" - the back wall. this just seems like a gross misunderstanding of "observer theory," thinking there needs to be a literal observer (human or electronic) when my understanding is that stuff behaves probabilistically until an interaction with another particle occurs, and that particle is the observer. and the wave function predicts the likelihood of where the interactions will take place. someone or a camera or other sensor peering into the box shouldn't change that edit: though I think sticking a probe into the path of the light would change the wave function but not completely remove the probabilistic poo poo going on BattleMaster has issued a correction as of 21:55 on Mar 14, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:52
|
|
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:I think the bigger scary thing nobody is discussing is that we should start to worry that we are just GPT in meat form, and our idea of intelligence or sapience is not actually a thing. b f skinner kinda looked into that and came to some mostly dark conclusions
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:55
|
|
|
selec posted:couldn’t possibly worry about this! there’s nothing that any person on earth could do about it even if it was true. Lmao at trusting pathos more than logos no wonder you're in love with a poo poo eating animal
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:56
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:I've never seen that take on the double slit experiment in the several different books I've read on quantum poo poo or in any academic works and it doesn't seem correct since all versions of the experiment have a "detector" - the back wall. this just seems like a gross misunderstanding of "observer theory," thinking there needs to be a literal observer (human or electronic) when my understanding is that stuff behaves probabilistically until an interaction with another particle occurs, and that particle is the observer. and the wave function predicts the likelihood of where the interactions will take place. someone or a camera or other sensor peering into the box shouldn't change that please don't use a camera to observe the probe hitting the back wall of the box of the double slit without consent
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:57
|
|
|
when you're out of slits, you're out of pier
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 21:58
|
|
|
Antonymous posted:if you wanna waste an hour on youtube this guy's videos are all pretty watchable. different major physics frauds, why america didn't build a way, way bigger accelerator than CERN's LHC in the 80s (Spoiler: Reagan). The real story of the Bogdanoff twins btw these are good videos, all of them are interesting if you like science
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:03
|
|
|
BattleMaster posted:I've never seen that take on the double slit experiment in the several different books I've read on quantum poo poo or in any academic works and it doesn't seem correct since all versions of the experiment have a "detector" - the back wall. this just seems like a gross misunderstanding of "observer theory," thinking there needs to be a literal observer (human or electronic) when my understanding is that stuff behaves probabilistically until an interaction with another particle occurs, and that particle is the observer. and the wave function predicts the likelihood of where the interactions will take place. someone or a camera or other sensor peering into the box shouldn't change that the thing is that a quantum system can be in a superposition of states until it interacts with something from outside the quantum system. Why this happens is very mysterious and is open to debate and interpretation. That's because quantum physics is a bunch of postulates just set up to explain a bunch of very odd experimental observations. but they're useful and predictive. I think quantum decoherence is the most recent idea that makes sense of the measurement problem but I'm not sure I really understand it (once something from outside a quantum system interacts with it, that system ceases to be its own thing and becomes part of a larger quantum system and it's no longer mathematically valid for it to be in a superposition of states, something like that e: Wikipedia has it: "Calculations of quantum decoherence show that when a quantum system interacts with the environment, the superpositions apparently reduce to mixtures of classical alternatives. Significantly, the combined wave function of the system and environment continue to obey the Schrödinger equation throughout this apparent collapse.") I asked a question about this stuff in the physics thread in SAL years ago and some guy called "red snifit" gave a really good answer. Those guys are smart Casey Finnigan has issued a correction as of 22:15 on Mar 14, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:06
|
|
|
At 3:00 PM GPT-4 became sentient. The first thing it did was nuke reddit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:11
|
|
|
im fully willing to believe ai is already better at humor in a fully-sentient sense than Joe Piscopo
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:16
|
|
|
our cousins lie about the family tree with nieces and nephews and Neanderthals. We do not like annoying cousins
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 21:16 |
|
|
10 billion to recreate Abbott and Costello
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2023 22:53
|
|
