Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
ozmunkeh
Feb 28, 2008

hey guys what is happening in this thread

sebmojo posted:

Have the newbies met Mr morden yet? Is he s1?

Signs and Portents I think.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sebmojo
Oct 23, 2010


Legit Cyberpunk









ozmunkeh posted:

Signs and Portents I think.

Ah right.

ultrafilter
Aug 23, 2007

It's okay if you have any questions.


And the finale as well.

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit

ozmunkeh posted:

Signs and Portents I think.

Yeah, I'm not quite sure he's registered yet with my roommate, who looked away when you see the shadows for the first time, so I had to rewind it :argh:

FISHMANPET
Mar 3, 2007

Sweet 'N Sour
Can't
Melt
Steel Beams
It can be weird watching with someone for the first time. You know something's coming up that's gonna be important later, but often that payoff comes from how insignificant it seems at first. So do you draw attention to it and ensure they get the payoff, even if a little diminished because they're expecting it, or just let things go, and hope they get interested enough to do rewatches every couple of years and start catching these things themselves?

Open Source Idiom
Jan 4, 2013
I'm watching the show through now with friends who've never seen it before, and I can't see any reason to shape their experience by pointing stuff out or underlining ideas, structures, patterns, etc. I'd rather people form their own connections with the show rather than mediate that connection.

Like, I just watched Eyes, and watching it I remembered that this is one of the few times the show hinted at Ivanova being attracted to Winters, or that Bester was originally meant to be in this story (he was, wasn't he?) but there were actor scheduling problems, but I think it'd more interesting to let people come to their own conclusions.

I wonder if there was some version of Eyes where Talia replaces the guest star psychic, was that ever a thing?

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

Open Source Idiom posted:

or that Bester was originally meant to be in this story (he was, wasn't he?)

He was not. Knight 2 from And the Sky Full of Stars was written with Koenig in mind, which may be what you're thinking of. Also, Talia wouldn't have worked in the Harriman Grey role in the plot, because she knows Sinclair already and is sympathetic to him.

MrL_JaKiri fucked around with this message at 15:50 on Mar 17, 2023

Open Source Idiom
Jan 4, 2013
Ah, yeah, that makes sense.

It's such an odd episode from modern sensibilities, since it draws on a lot of continuity and references a lot of past characters (everyone loves DEATHWALKER*) but it doesn't have any of them show up, even regulars who you'd think would be more involved.

*actually everyone loves Na'toth shouting at her.

Habibi
Dec 8, 2004

We have the capability to make San Jose's first Cup Champion.

The Sharks could be that Champion.

Open Source Idiom posted:

Like, I just watched Eyes, and watching it I remembered that this is one of the few times the show hinted at Ivanova being attracted to Winters

I'm in the latter stages of a rewatch to introduce my gf to the show, and after Ivanovna and Talia's very first onscreen interaction (which I think must be before Eyes), she turned to me and said, "Those two are gonna do it, aren't they?"

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

Open Source Idiom posted:

Ah, yeah, that makes sense.

It's such an odd episode from modern sensibilities, since it draws on a lot of continuity and references a lot of past characters (everyone loves DEATHWALKER*) but it doesn't have any of them show up, even regulars who you'd think would be more involved.

*actually everyone loves Na'toth shouting at her.

It's basically a clip show in terms of getting people up to speed for the back end of the season

Paradoxish
Dec 19, 2003

Will you stop going crazy in there?
It's kind of funny how insanely well-suited Babylon 5 fits into the post-Lost obsession with poring over and discussing every detail of a show, while also being so obviously dated in ways that would make it pretty unappealing to that crowd. Or maybe I'm wrong and things actually, properly foreshadowing future events and having concrete answers makes it less suitable for that kind of internet obsession.

Either way, I don't think you can really force someone to be a detail-obsessed watcher so imo pointing out little details and clues to first-time watchers isn't really productive. You can enjoy the show just fine without noticing how much everything is plotted out right from the beginning.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos
I think you have it backwards: there was a lot of internet obsession at the time. It initiated this kind of poring and obsessiveness. The Lurker's Guide was the first "media wiki".

Qwertycoatl
Dec 31, 2008

Having concrete answers to most of the big questions means that although you could have obsessive theorycrafting as it aired, at this point there isn't a community of people who are watching it but haven't seen the whole thing. It's fun reading someone in the blind watch thread speculating about what the Shadows want or what happened to Babylons 1-4 or whatever, but we can't really have a detailed conversation with them about it.

Paradoxish
Dec 19, 2003

Will you stop going crazy in there?

Absurd Alhazred posted:

I think you have it backwards: there was a lot of internet obsession at the time. It initiated this kind of poring and obsessiveness. The Lurker's Guide was the first "media wiki".

I know, but what I'm saying is that nothing on the internet at the time that B5 aired could even remotely be called mainstream. B5 pre-dated the phenomena being something that was a part of popular culture instead of a nerd obsession.

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

So what you're saying is, Babylon 5 should've had more cute kittens? :hmmyes:

Alhazred
Feb 16, 2011




Rappaport posted:

So what you're saying is, Babylon 5 should've had more cute kittens? :hmmyes:

You mean the ones that goes "quack"?

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

They had a dude guarding a flower, surely there could've been a cat somewhere, quacking away merrily!

Iron Crowned
May 6, 2003

by Hand Knit
I forgot about Londo and Lennier bonding at the Dark Star :3:

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Tom Guycot posted:

s2e19

Man, gently caress then centauri, if they don't get a fully sufficient (and I do mean fully) comeuppance by the end of this series, i'm writing this off as my most hated show ever.

What does the centauri do in this episode? I remember it as being the whole psychic password Winters sendoff thing.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

CainFortea posted:

What does the centauri do in this episode? I remember it as being the whole psychic password Winters sendoff thing.

I think Tom Guycot is using HBO Max ordering, which makes that episode The Long, Twilight Struggle -- so, the bombardment and fall of the Narn homeworld.

sebmojo
Oct 23, 2010


Legit Cyberpunk









I hope the centauri comeuppance is sufficient for him

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Powered Descent posted:

I think Tom Guycot is using HBO Max ordering, which makes that episode The Long, Twilight Struggle -- so, the bombardment and fall of the Narn homeworld.

That would make a lot more sense

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

sebmojo posted:

I hope the centauri comeuppance is sufficient for him

I think that it would be, but Tom may not get that far. He'd need to get at least to War Without End, and even that shows a future that Sheridan wants to avert. I think it also comes after G'Kar saying that he now pities the Centauri because they are lost, which might give him some "nice German" vibes.

e X
Feb 23, 2013

cool but crude
I don't want to add needlessly to the conversation in the blind watch thread, but, brought on by the tone question from Tom Guycot , I do find es interesting how much B5 almost feels like a serialized modern day prestige drama, even though its not. I think that's relevant to the tone question, because it results in many of the episodes having a very standard three act structure, which means you often get some amount of (positive) emotional closure at the end, while the modern format allows for episodes, or even seasons, that are just entirely bleak without any catharsis at all.

It's a product of hindsight of course, but it is utterly fascinating how the show clearly has a well defined overarching arc, that is clearly the focus of the story, but the Zeitgeist just wasn't there yet and though it's still told through the conventional episode format, with the occasional multiparter, even though it really strains against it.It's an interesting comparison to DS9, which fits much more conformable into the episodic format.

sebmojo
Oct 23, 2010


Legit Cyberpunk









The purely serialized format can also lead to some deeply tedious tv tbh. I actually think buffy and b5 got a really good balance.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

sebmojo posted:

The purely serialized format can also lead to some deeply tedious tv tbh. I actually think buffy and b5 got a really good balance.

Agreed. I've used B5 as an example of getting the long-story-arc thing right, especially when compared to modern TV that treats a season as a single 10-hour movie and so specific episodes tend not to have an identity of their own.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.
Was 24 the first prime-time/non soap opera show to set itself up that way, or was there an earlier arc-only show?

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

Lemniscate Blue posted:

Was 24 the first prime-time/non soap opera show to set itself up that way, or was there an earlier arc-only show?

Dallas comes to mind.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

e X posted:

I don't want to add needlessly to the conversation in the blind watch thread, but, brought on by the tone question from Tom Guycot , I do find es interesting how much B5 almost feels like a serialized modern day prestige drama, even though its not. I think that's relevant to the tone question, because it results in many of the episodes having a very standard three act structure, which means you often get some amount of (positive) emotional closure at the end, while the modern format allows for episodes, or even seasons, that are just entirely bleak without any catharsis at all.

It's a product of hindsight of course, but it is utterly fascinating how the show clearly has a well defined overarching arc, that is clearly the focus of the story, but the Zeitgeist just wasn't there yet and though it's still told through the conventional episode format, with the occasional multiparter, even though it really strains against it.It's an interesting comparison to DS9, which fits much more conformable into the episodic format.

Even though it's not strictly spoilery, my take would be that Tom is coming at B5 with a Star Trek mindset. He was watching 2X18 and saying the Centauri had best get a comeuppance by series end. In Trek that would happen; sometimes things would occur over a few episodes, but mostly there'd be a return to status quo very quickly. But as the opening narrations suggest, B5 is a future history. Things change, but they usually change slowly and have ramifications that lead to other events.

After The War
Apr 12, 2005

to all of my Architects
let me be traitor
I think a modern viewer this side of the Prestige TV thing is also likely to be worried about grimdark misery porn, even for an older show. They called it "make you feel like poo poo TV," so I suspect they're worried it might turn into that genre.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

After The War posted:

I think a modern viewer this side of the Prestige TV thing is also likely to be worried about grimdark misery porn, even for an older show. They called it "make you feel like poo poo TV," so I suspect they're worried it might turn into that genre.

Yeah. But again: it's history, isn't it? I had a post composed to reply to Tom that I chose not to hit send on. In that post I analogised Trek and B5 with people in the Blitz. Everyone was scared, but they dealt with it in different ways. Some people drew strength from the knowledge that things were bad now but in the morning they'd go outside in the sun. That's Trek - times may be bad, but there's a light at the end of the tunnel and the tunnel isn't long even if you're never really far away from the next tunnel. Meanwhile, other people were loving in the bomb shelters because hey! a bomb might land on us! And that's B5 - times may be bad, but they're the times you've got so don't stop living. Yes, they rock straight from crisis to crisis. Yes, it's grim and a little hopeless sometimes. But there's always room for a moment of humour, love, kindness or strength. (And of course, B5 absolutely fucks.)

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

Babylon 5 is definitely serialized in a way that most mainstream TV wouldn't really be for decades. To a lesser degree, so was the X-Men animated series, by being built around linear plotlines with lots of multi-episode arcs. I'm not sure if there were any other 90s shows with that sort of structure.

I think it was probably the idea that between the availability of VCRs and maybe scheduled rerun timeslots, and then the fact that they could do official home media releases fairly quickly, they could be reasonably sure that people could go catch up on the earlier bits to view the whole show linearly instead of just catching episodes as they come on.

I know that Japan was especially into home media in the 80s and 90s, which may have influenced anime being more linear, but I don't really know much about classic anime. I know some stuff was even dtv ovas instead of being on air, and I think japan's strong manga industry might've even helped things since narrative anime stories would be mirrored in comic form that could more easily be distributed in cheap collected volumes.

sebmojo posted:

I hope the centauri comeuppance is sufficient for him

I don't think there's ever really a "comeuppance" for the Centauri. For Londo, maybe, but the Centauri aren't grandly defeated, they just pull back from Narn and go back into anew form of decline as the story mostly loses sight on the Centauri as a whole.

Winifred Madgers
Feb 12, 2002

SlothfulCobra posted:

I don't think there's ever really a "comeuppance" for the Centauri. For Londo, maybe, but the Centauri aren't grandly defeated, they just pull back from Narn and go back into anew form of decline as the story mostly loses sight on the Centauri as a whole.



CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


I think the season 3 intro sums it up very well.

"In the year of the Shadow War it became something greater. Our last best hope for victory"

ultrafilter
Aug 23, 2007

It's okay if you have any questions.


SlothfulCobra posted:

I don't think there's ever really a "comeuppance" for the Centauri. For Londo, maybe, but the Centauri aren't grandly defeated, they just pull back from Narn and go back into anew form of decline as the story mostly loses sight on the Centauri as a whole.

Episode 519 is titled "The Fall of Centauri Prime" and it's about exactly what you might think it is from the title.

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008

e X posted:

I don't want to add needlessly to the conversation in the blind watch thread, but, brought on by the tone question from Tom Guycot , I do find es interesting how much B5 almost feels like a serialized modern day prestige drama, even though its not. I think that's relevant to the tone question, because it results in many of the episodes having a very standard three act structure, which means you often get some amount of (positive) emotional closure at the end, while the modern format allows for episodes, or even seasons, that are just entirely bleak without any catharsis at all.

It's a product of hindsight of course, but it is utterly fascinating how the show clearly has a well defined overarching arc, that is clearly the focus of the story, but the Zeitgeist just wasn't there yet and though it's still told through the conventional episode format, with the occasional multiparter, even though it really strains against it.It's an interesting comparison to DS9, which fits much more conformable into the episodic format.

B5 can be amazingly bleak for serialized TV of its era, even if it doesn't hit the unrelenting qualities of the BSG reboot. The end of S1, for example, or multiple ending episodes for S2. (Believers and Passing through Gethsemene are also grim.) Even the final episode manages to hit an air of optimism coupled with mourning the past yet recognizing how it shapes the people who build the future. I still can't think of very many shows that would have the guts to do something like Confessions and Lamentations.

It's hard to set the episodic episodes against the arc episodes properly, because the arc episodes are almost all JMS-written and lots of the episodic ones aren't. And there's often something arc-specific buried in the episodic stories. I suspect S3 & S4's reputation is so strong partly because so many more episodes are arc-focused and it's easy to forget the non-arc stories being told alongside them (with a few embarrassing exceptions like Grey 17 is Missing).

Horizon Burning
Oct 23, 2019
:discourse:

sebmojo posted:

The purely serialized format can also lead to some deeply tedious tv tbh. I actually think buffy and b5 got a really good balance.

absolutely. b5's combination of 'arc episodes' and stand-alones is something i really miss.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos
They were a serial navigating an episodic world.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Tom Guycot posted:

s2e6 dust to dust

Seems like they're straight up tipping their hand that they have something to hide by putting on a big show for chekov like that. All they have to do is send someone undercover back to probe them, knowing they're hiding something.


I'm also not liking one bit this seeming g'kar turn at the end of "you have to forgive the nazis and stop the violence, or everyone loses", no they're god drat nazis, and g'kar and the rest have every justification to kill as many centauri as they can until they're stopped for good! The show can't take the position that the fascists are always around the corner and can take hold everywhere, but also you must never lower yourself to actually doing anything about the fascists except take it lying down and hoping the system works or something. I feel like the show is better than that.

Oh man they're *really* not going to like Lochley if they get that far. Did we ever know if the whole "you left we were stuck behind and closed our ears because it was all we could do" was a planned part or was it just making do with having to replace Ivonava and cramming someone in?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




Horizon Burning posted:

absolutely. b5's combination of 'arc episodes' and stand-alones is something i really miss.

Star Trek: Prodigy has a really nice balance between standalone episodes and long story arcs. It's areally good show and is now my standard "I'd like to get into Star Trek" recommendation. See, the main characters start off never having even heard of the Federation or Starfleet, or even dreamed that a society with those values could exist. The audience learns about Federation values along with the main characters making it an excellent starting point.

Highly recommended on its own merits, as well as for being a really good Star Trek show.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply