Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
busalover
Sep 12, 2020
Are any of you guys familiar with /r/CredibleDefense? What's your opinion on the level of discourse over there?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




busalover posted:

Are any of you guys familiar with /r/CredibleDefense? What's your opinion on the level of discourse over there?

Take this question somewhere else.

Dick Ripple
May 19, 2021
Reaper and Predator drones do not operate well in non permissive air enviroments. I am sure the Ukrainians could make use of them (have they even requested the platform?), but them falling into Russian hands is not one of the biggest concerns. There is also an unarmed export version that the US sells to a variety of governments, which probably do not contain anything to spicy that the US would be concerned of falling into the wrong hands.

Dwesa
Jul 19, 2016

Maybe I'll go where I can see stars
Government of Slovakia approved donation of Slovak MiG-29s to Ukraine + KUB air defence system

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Charlotte Hornets posted:

There is no political will to make shells. And no political will means lack of urgency. Everything else is excuses. It was obvious about 10 months ago that it will be a long war. But there is no Western roadmap, just some masturbation sessions in Ramstein
Yes I'm afraid it's this.

Nobody could've seriously believed that cutting off salmon exports to russia would stop the war in a few months. By Kharkiv it had to be pretty clear to the experts what will be needed, hell, Zhaluzny was pretty explicit. If ramping up shell production would take a year, then you start it immediately and not wait a year to begin.

Saying how everyone is committed to Ukraine restoring its territorial integrity and sovereignty, visiting Kyiv, and then saying that the tools necessary to achieve that are off the table (planes, LR missiles, modern armor, shells in necessary quantities etc) or will take years is very :confused: messaging. If we aren't actually committed, let's just drop the whole thing and trade Donbass in exchange for a treaty.

busalover posted:

Are any of you guys familiar with /r/CredibleDefense? What's your opinion on the level of discourse over there?
I only trust NonCredibleDefense

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.
The Trotskyite site World Socialist Web Site (I'm not trying to lazily call them tankies or something, they call themselves Trotskyite) put up an article claiming that 100K Ukrainian troops have been killed in the war (as opposed to total casualties including killed, wounded and captured) and links back to this article from Politco making the claim. This seems like a massive escalation since last I heard the 100k figure was more for the total casualties of Ukrainian forces. Is this reliable, considering its more Politco making the claim?

Icon Of Sin
Dec 26, 2008



khwarezm posted:

The Trotskyite site World Socialist Web Site (I'm not trying to lazily call them tankies or something, they call themselves Trotskyite) put up an article claiming that 100K Ukrainian troops have been killed in the war (as opposed to total casualties including killed, wounded and captured) and links back to this article from Politco making the claim. This seems like a massive escalation since last I heard the 100k figure was more for the total casualties of Ukrainian forces. Is this reliable, considering its more Politco making the claim?

Ukrainians have been notoriously tight-lipped about their own casualties/fatalities, any number that comes out for them is probably suspect. Kyiv Independent published some numbers last May (I think?) for Ukrainian losses but that’s the only one I recall having seen that was slightly less-suspect than any other.

Having said that…it wouldn’t particularly surprise me if they were pretty high though, modern weapons are hideously lethal and Russia’s favorite weapon (artillery) is generally a “people survived mostly intact” or “they’re now fully vaporized and gone with the wind” kind of weapon.

e: it was late April last year that Kyiv Independent published those numbers.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Ccu9mWNsDZC/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Icon Of Sin fucked around with this message at 14:54 on Mar 17, 2023

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
Yes there are no official numbers so everyone's guessing. Add huuuge margin of error but it's probably in the ballpark. It's a big war.

For reference, the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, that lasted for 1.5 months, is estimated to have ~3000 KIA on each side. The whole of Armenia is the size of like Luhansk oblast.

GABA ghoul
Oct 29, 2011

khwarezm posted:

The Trotskyite site World Socialist Web Site (I'm not trying to lazily call them tankies or something, they call themselves Trotskyite) put up an article claiming that 100K Ukrainian troops have been killed in the war (as opposed to total casualties including killed, wounded and captured) and links back to this article from Politco making the claim. This seems like a massive escalation since last I heard the 100k figure was more for the total casualties of Ukrainian forces. Is this reliable, considering its more Politco making the claim?

They cite unnamed US officials as the source of the claim. 100k total causalities is a number that has been floating around for a while now so it's very possible that some politician just confused causalities with 'killed'. It happens all the time. IIRC it even happened to von der Leyen in a speech. And Politico is not exactly a paragon of journalism to fact check the claim.

Kraftwerk
Aug 13, 2011
i do not have 10,000 bircoins, please stop asking

GABA ghoul posted:

They cite unnamed US officials as the source of the claim. 100k total causalities is a number that has been floating around for a while now so it's very possible that some politician just confused causalities with 'killed'. It happens all the time. IIRC it even happened to von der Leyen in a speech. And Politico is not exactly a paragon of journalism to fact check the claim.

Could you double count casualties?

Like let’s say you had 100,000 casualties. If 50,000 of them are people who got injured, received medical care, recovered and then returned to active duty are those people still considered a casualty?

Nothingtoseehere
Nov 11, 2010


I believe that in WW2 western front, you could roughly expect a 1:4 KIA:WIA ratio. So for every man killed in battle, 4 would be wounded enough to be not of immediate use. While both weaponry and medical care have improved and its very context dependent, it's a useful rule of thumb.

If 500k less Ukrainians were unable to service in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, we'd see much more evidence for this in Ukrainian society and mobilisation. It is still a free, open country after all.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
If you were like me and wondering about simultaneous reports of Slovakia donating 13 MiGs and then having 11 and leaving one for museum:

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1636714402425499648

saratoga
Mar 5, 2001
This is a Randbrick post. It goes in that D&D megathread on page 294

"i think obama was mediocre in that debate, but hillary was fucking terrible. also russert is filth."

-randbrick, 12/26/08

khwarezm posted:

The Trotskyite site World Socialist Web Site (I'm not trying to lazily call them tankies or something, they call themselves Trotskyite) put up an article claiming that 100K Ukrainian troops have been killed in the war (as opposed to total casualties including killed, wounded and captured) and links back to this article from Politco making the claim. This seems like a massive escalation since last I heard the 100k figure was more for the total casualties of Ukrainian forces. Is this reliable, considering its more Politco making the claim?

Almost certainly confusing killed with casualty. With internal lines, almost entirely defensive fighting and reasonable medical care there would be many casualties per death, and it's not reasonable that they've taken 250k-500k casualties given the size of the armies.

20-30k dead and 100k casualties would be much more reasonable given the total combatants.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




OddObserver posted:

If you were like me and wondering about simultaneous reports of Slovakia donating 13 MiGs and then having 11 and leaving one for museum:

https://mobile.twitter.com/CalibreObscura/status/1636714402425499648

10 ready jets and 3 parts donors planes sounds, well, pretty good!

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

Kraftwerk posted:

Could you double count casualties?

Like let’s say you had 100,000 casualties. If 50,000 of them are people who got injured, received medical care, recovered and then returned to active duty are those people still considered a casualty?

I assume that they have separate totals for "1st wounded" and "re-wounded" and the people making announcements get to pick and choose which numbers to use and/or combine in order to help sell the point they are making with that announcement?

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

Kremlin actually not as hyperbolic as I expected.

https://twitter.com/BBCWorld/status/1636746068426649600?t=HbTK5bxZRATPCTu_QhvOXw&s=19

quote:

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov condemned the plans, saying that the aircraft would not affect the outcome of Moscow's "special military operation", as it calls the war.

He said they would only "bring additional woes for Ukraine and the Ukrainian people".

"Of course, during the special military operation, all this equipment will be subject to destruction," the spokesman added.

Sir Bobert Fishbone
Jan 16, 2006

Beebort
Largely symbolic, I'm sure, but ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Putin:

https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges-issue-arrest-warrants-against-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-and

Ynglaur
Oct 9, 2013

The Malta Conference, anyone?

Kraftwerk posted:

Could you double count casualties?

Like let’s say you had 100,000 casualties. If 50,000 of them are people who got injured, received medical care, recovered and then returned to active duty are those people still considered a casualty?

Yes. The same person can be a casualty multiple times. Even the definition of Wounded In Action (WIA) has a spectrum of meanings. Many WIA return to duty within 24 hours; others take months; others never return to duty.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013





If anyone wonders about Lvova-Belova involvement, there are recent reports by Yale and by EBU.

The Question IRL
Jun 8, 2013

Only two contestants left! Here is Doom's chance for revenge...

Someone has probably posted it, but the ICC has issued a warrant for Putin.

https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/1636752275346542593?t=h8Bpca-BeNVDAILzuweMDw&s=19

Unlikely to have any major changes (they have issued warrants for other dictators in the past.)

I'm glad to see that it was the forced kidnapping of children that was the main catalyst for this.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
They always say this. And then claim to destroy about 50 times more than was delivered.

All the nuclear threats that get reposted are usually coming from their propagandists or Medvedev and the like.

Regalingualius
Jan 7, 2012

We gazed into the eyes of madness... And all we found was horny.




So realistically, the worst that’s probably going to happen is that Putin can never leave Russia except for any of the nations that are practically extensions of Russia, right?

Rinkles
Oct 24, 2010

What I'm getting at is...
Do you feel the same way?
How are the planes being delivered? That was one of the excuses early on for why everyone was dragging their feet.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Rinkles posted:

How are the planes being delivered? That was one of the excuses early on for why everyone was dragging their feet.

I assume it's going to be whatever is the official way to move planes like that with ground cargo transport.

Regalingualius posted:

So realistically, the worst that’s probably going to happen is that Putin can never leave Russia except for any of the nations that are practically extensions of Russia, right?

Even in countries that are going to recognise the ICC warrant, which is far from all of them, he is still a head of a state, with ensuing privileges like diplomatic immunity. This move represents simply the due process on the ICC end, rather than a practical development.

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

Taxi 'em down the highway all the way there, make a parade out of it I say.

Moon Slayer
Jun 19, 2007

Double post for actual content:

https://twitter.com/BBCWorld/status/1636756451333947394?t=U0s8BVNDxYlDGSpcMWTQBA&s=19


quote:

Turkey is facing presidential and parliamentary elections on 14 May. Assuming the parliament ratifies Finland's accession beforehand, the government in Helsinki still has to secure the support of Hungary.

However, Hungary's ruling Fidesz party said on Friday that a vote would take place in parliament in Budapest on 27 March and that it would vote yes. A leading party figure said a decision on Sweden would take place "later".

Moon Slayer fucked around with this message at 16:52 on Mar 17, 2023

RoyKeen
Jul 24, 2007

Grimey Drawer

The Question IRL posted:

Someone has probably posted it, but the ICC has issued a warrant for Putin.

https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/1636752275346542593?t=h8Bpca-BeNVDAILzuweMDw&s=19

Unlikely to have any major changes (they have issued warrants for other dictators in the past.)

I'm glad to see that it was the forced kidnapping of children that was the main catalyst for this.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/1636757491320061957

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Small White Dragon
Nov 23, 2007

No relation.
The ICC warrant is unlikely to actually result in anything (unless someone coups and decides to hand him over) but I assume this means the already reportedly paranoid Putin won't be leaving Russia anytime soon -- well, except maybe Belarus/North Korea/China.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013


Putin whatever, not likely to live to see Hague but Lvova-Belova immediately named is a great move, she is a monster and should not escape trial (and is a figure that is most likely to be given away if the deals would need to be made).

Kavros
May 18, 2011

sleep sleep sleep
fly fly post post
sleep sleep sleep

fatherboxx posted:

Putin whatever, not likely to live to see Hague but Lvova-Belova immediately named is a great move, she is a monster and should not escape trial (and is a figure that is most likely to be given away if the deals would need to be made).

I think it was probably a strategic move to move them up to prominence next to putin in this announcement, because it puts eyes and interest in their program of relocation and at least some of the nature of what exactly transpired (that we can even verify)

because it's, frankly, horrible

MOVIE MAJICK
Jan 4, 2012

by Pragmatica
cinci edit: deleted post

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

(USER WAS PERMABANNED FOR THIS POST)

Somebody fucked around with this message at 23:30 on Mar 17, 2023

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

khwarezm posted:

The Trotskyite site World Socialist Web Site (I'm not trying to lazily call them tankies or something, they call themselves Trotskyite) put up an article claiming that 100K Ukrainian troops have been killed in the war (as opposed to total casualties including killed, wounded and captured) and links back to this article from Politco making the claim. This seems like a massive escalation since last I heard the 100k figure was more for the total casualties of Ukrainian forces. Is this reliable, considering its more Politco making the claim?

I would not consider trots to be "tankies" because they are ideologically opposed to supporting any and all states like the USSR and modern Russia etc.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
Holy poo poo that's uh... something.

I'm sure the terminally online ones can find it just like we can, but no mainstream channel (including like the telegram stuff) is going to be sharing footage like this. I don't know if there are any anti-war movements let alone ones that aren't just regime honeypots to spread it either.

As for effectiveness, I dunno. Didn't the reports from Vietnam have a measurable impacts on support for the war? The difference of course there was some sort of actual journalism happening, and Americans didn't see a clear purpose. The russians are all convinced that if they weren't fighting over there, the homonazis would be burning down the Kremlin right now, and so could easily brush it off as necessary.

KingColliwog
May 15, 2003

Let's go droogs

MOVIE MAJICK posted:

cinci edit: deleted post

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Yeah thx for deleting that. holy poo poo I'm usually pretty cool with horror scenes, but that hit pretty hard. As NMS as can be

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




And here I was trying to enjoy some fruit tea at 1am on Friday.

TheSpartacus
Oct 30, 2010
HEY GUYS I'VE FLOWN HELICOPTERS IN THIS GAME BEFORE AND I AM AN EXPERT. ALSO, HOW DO I START THE ENGINE?
Ruined my Friday... but war will do that.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

TheSpartacus posted:

Ruined my Friday... but war will do that.

Friday is already over! But it will ruin Saturday too.

WarpedLichen
Aug 14, 2008


France24 has a special about Ukrainian farmers and how they deal with uxo.

mild :nms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFbuJaYsfe8

Some crazy real life minesweeper stuff. Two guys just pick up a shells with their bare hands because they didn't see a detonator. There is an interview with a guy who survived a detonation with injuries, hence the tag.

Nitrox
Jul 5, 2002
What the hell did they post? I understand it was graphic, but was it significant in any way?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Haystack
Jan 23, 2005





Nitrox posted:

What the hell did they post? I understand it was graphic, but was it significant in any way?

If it was what the ban reason makes me think it was, then it was most likely a drone video of Russian solider dying a messy death in combat. Gruesome, but not especially significant.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5