|
Don't worry, I'm sure they'll be another "omg gbs!" thread in SAD soon enough
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:07 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 22:48 |
|
some plague rats posted:Absolutely! Your comments on Tara Reade should have gotten you banned, in my opinion. But I assume that's not the abuse you're referring to, could you be specific please Lmao you made ethic and fat comments about teen witch in your safe space and everyone lol’d. Exemplary behavior for an IK. If Kit had made the same joke you’d all be calling for her head. Fuckin hypocrites, all of you.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:09 |
|
NEVERMIND
DeadFatDuckFat fucked around with this message at 23:13 on Mar 23, 2023 |
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:10 |
|
Btw SPR, this is what posting in SAD is like when you aren’t a regular. Is it fun?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:11 |
|
BAGS FLY AT NOON posted:Lmao you made ethic and fat comments about teen witch in your safe space and everyone lol’d. Exemplary behavior for an IK. If Kit had made the same joke you’d all be calling for her head. Fuckin hypocrites, all of you. If teen witch had ever successfully made a funny post everyone would have lolled as well, it's weird you don't get this
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:11 |
|
Oh its just some dumb poo poo I don't care about, nm standing down
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:11 |
|
Hi spr. Shut up and get out.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:11 |
Ok couple of things: 1) people who aren't regulars are allowed to comment on this provided they follow the rules 2) we're not doing forums exclusionary stuff and we're not hell dumping people If you have feedback, post it. If not, don't engage. Simple as that
|
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:13 |
|
some plague rats posted:If teen witch had ever successfully made a funny post everyone would have lolled as well, it's weird you don't get this So it’s ok when you attack someone personally? Got it.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:13 |
|
some plague rats posted:If teen witch had ever successfully made a funny post everyone would have lolled as well, it's weird you don't get this gently caress off already
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:13 |
|
Feedback: Maybe mods should consider punishing attempts to turn threads into Wimp-Lo's Dojo for Posting & Grudges a bit more harshly that just "Hey, guys, cut it out" because... Yeah, that never works. And punishing not just the ones perceived as trolls, but the ones going for the bait too. Thank you for your consideration. EDIT: Uuhh... I should probably point out that this was legitimate feedback. It happens in a lot of threads and sucks hard every time.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:13 |
Cthulu Carl posted:Feedback: Maybe mods should consider punishing attempts to turn threads into Wimp-Lo's Dojo for Posting & Grudges a bit more harshly that just "Hey, guys, cut it out" because... Yeah, that never works. This is exactly what will happen if everyone doesn't shut up about it after this post
|
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:14 |
|
some plague rats posted:Absolutely! Your comments on Tara Reade should have gotten you banned, in my opinion. But I assume that's not the abuse you're referring to, could you be specific please I suppose we could consider a situation (purely hypothetical, obviously) where a poster commented that female victims of abuse should just "post tits more" to gain acceptance. I mean that obviously would deserve some action.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:14 |
|
BAGS FLY AT NOON posted:Btw SPR, this is what posting in SAD is like when you aren’t a regular. Is it fun? If I wasn't having enjoying posting I would simply not do it. It's important to leave your comfort zone sometimes Rust Martialis posted:I suppose we could consider a situation (purely hypothetical, obviously) where a poster commented that female victims of abuse should just "post tits more" to gain acceptance. I'm not sure Nooner should be banned, but yeah something should be done there e: my policy of never reading Seth's posts is about to drop me in it I assume some plague rats fucked around with this message at 23:17 on Mar 23, 2023 |
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:14 |
|
i wonder what big bad steve thinks about a hated forums enemy deep striking into our territory and threatening to upend our way of life
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:19 |
|
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:19 |
|
Let me just say that I, Smugworth, candidate for GBS moderator, plan to take a "GBS posters first" position when it comes to interforums reconciliations. For too long the good posters of this forum has had to show to other lesser forums at the expense of having our voice heard and respected. Vote Smugworth for moderator in 2023!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:20 |
|
Drone_Fragger posted:It went from people posting claims she'd edited a post specifically to probe someone, to them editing the post after the fact, to then turning out to have not edited the post at all (so the claims made by posters were actually untrue in the first case), followed by a 5 page derail about how cringe and un-based her modding style was (from people who I believe weren't even subject to her modding them) followed by demands she be unmodded not because she hadn't actually done what she'd been accused of, but because people didn't like her moderation style. Honestly incredibly psychotic stuff and in the end she stepped down rather than let it go any more deranged. a post she had probated had been edited three days later by a mod/ik into a very weird message to the original poster. bcos somethingawful for no apparent reason anonymises mod edits (so it shows as "somebody" if its anyone but the person whos post it is. it shows their own name if they edited it) it was presumed the person who had pointlessly probated the post did it. ath then said it wasnt tw, at which point everyone blamed the other thread ik, because again a mod or ik edit is completely anonymous to everyone but admins so the only option is to try and guess who did it lol. i asked if this could be changed and if edits could always show who edited the post, because it appears to be entirely setup to cause this kind of misunderstanding, and was told it wouldnt be, for some reason. your ability to read words is astoundingly terrible.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:21 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:This is exactly what will happen if everyone doesn't shut up about it after this post https://thumbs.gfycat.com/QuestionableDesertedGreendarnerdragonfly-mobile.mp4 (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:22 |
|
I hope you are well plague rats
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:22 |
|
yeah that was not a good one considering the room, nooner.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:23 |
|
Stux posted:a post she had probated had been edited three days later by a mod/ik into a very weird message to the original poster. bcos somethingawful for no apparent reason anonymises mod edits (so it shows as "somebody" if its anyone but the person whos post it is. it shows their own name if they edited it) it was presumed the person who had pointlessly probated the post did it. ath then said it wasnt tw, at which point everyone blamed the other thread ik, because again a mod or ik edit is completely anonymous to everyone but admins so the only option is to try and guess who did it lol. i asked if this could be changed and if edits could always show who edited the post, because it appears to be entirely setup to cause this kind of misunderstanding, and was told it wouldnt be, for some reason. your ability to read words is astoundingly terrible.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:23 |
|
begun, the feedback wars have
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:23 |
|
16-bit Butt-Head posted:https://thumbs.gfycat.com/QuestionableDesertedGreendarnerdragonfly-mobile.mp4 Pro move by the GBS mods
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:24 |
|
i have to say i do feel a little bit starstruck to have not one, but two forums-wide superstars in GBS
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:24 |
|
Space Kablooey posted:yeah that was not a good one considering the room, nooner. Yeah, it wasn't, but it was also pretty clearly a somewhat convoluted but on-topic joke so I let it ride.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:25 |
|
Personally i thought it was funny but I'm also an idiot so
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:25 |
|
nooner is a favoured son
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:26 |
|
Stux posted:a post she had probated had been edited three days later by a mod/ik into a very weird message to the original poster. bcos somethingawful for no apparent reason anonymises mod edits (so it shows as "somebody" if its anyone but the person whos post it is. it shows their own name if they edited it) it was presumed the person who had pointlessly probated the post did it. ath then said it wasnt tw, at which point everyone blamed the other thread ik, because again a mod or ik edit is completely anonymous to everyone but admins so the only option is to try and guess who did it lol. i asked if this could be changed and if edits could always show who edited the post, because it appears to be entirely setup to cause this kind of misunderstanding, and was told it wouldnt be, for some reason. your ability to read words is astoundingly terrible. Yeah, which was essentially what I said. Teen witch was blamed at first but eventually people found it wasn't her. Thread should of stopped there, because frankly the claims made in the OP weren't true. Teen Witch hadn't edited the post as everyone had claimed, someone else had, and the thread then descended into people tearing into her post history to prove how cringe she was, rather than any kind of useful debate on, as you say, should edits to posts be visible. It was a garbage fire.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:26 |
|
does anyone want a kiss
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:27 |
|
Smugworth posted:Pro move by the GBS mods I heard 16BB has his own dedicated button
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:27 |
|
CaptainSarcastic posted:Yeah, it wasn't, but it was also pretty clearly a somewhat convoluted but on-topic joke so I let it ride. Yeah I also thought it was funny but if a little on the mrhmmm side, but your call.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:28 |
|
BAGS FLY AT NOON posted:I heard 16BB has his own dedicated button It's on sight when I'm mod
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:29 |
|
something made this thread worse, quite suddenly, i can’t quite put my finger on what hmm oh well
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:31 |
|
Smugworth posted:It's on sight when I'm mod Truly a mod of the people
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:31 |
|
Space Kablooey posted:Yeah I also thought it was funny but still a little on the 😬 side, but your call. I don't want to go into full joke-explainer sentence-diagramming mode, but I read it as what I could only describe as a parodic reverse No True Scotsman.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:32 |
|
Sid Vicious posted:does anyone want a kiss No thanks. It always starts with just one kiss. Then you're like "Ya know, two won't hurt." Then next you know know the bag's empty, you're surrounded by foil and those weird paper tags and your tummy is REALLY starting to hurt. And that's assuming you can at least tolerate Hershey's chocolate.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:33 |
|
Sid Vicious posted:I hope you are well plague rats I'm good thank you sid. People keep calling me a forums superstar, I had no idea I was so well regarded how are you today.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:33 |
|
Dixville posted:Personally i thought it was funny but I'm also an idiot so Obviously it was a joke (I assume), but really are "jokes" about how (female) abuse victims should try "posting tits" to earn acceptance from their abusers not way over the line nowadays? Posters could make similar "jokes" about how people with clinical depression should "just cheer up" and they would be probed for it. It's not acceptable.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:33 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 22:48 |
|
It was only a kiss
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:34 |