|
post-apocalyptic erotica posted:Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo It greatly upsets me that I know immediately that you did this wrong. It’s “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo”, and yes I have wasted my life.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 18:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 06:35 |
|
Challenge accepted
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 18:42 |
|
Dewgy posted:It greatly upsets me that I know immediately that you did this wrong. The entire point of the exercise is that the string of Buffalo can be arbitrarily long from only two Buffalo up to many dozens
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 18:54 |
|
"A hat will give you at least some protection from the heat flash." Yes, because "virtually none" is technically an amount. lol at this Fallout poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 19:19 |
|
Railing Kill posted:"A hat will give you at least some protection from the heat flash." Yes, because "virtually none" is technically an amount. lol at this Fallout poo poo. Most of the instruction we laugh at is considering there are zones where casualties can go from "very bad and dead" to "a bit burnt and bruised" by the insane tips and tricks and you're not necessarily gonna try and figure out who's in those zones as much as teach everybody and wish for the best.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 19:28 |
|
Railing Kill posted:"A hat will give you at least some protection from the heat flash." Yes, because "virtually none" is technically an amount. lol at this Fallout poo poo. My favorite thing about Fallout is its vibe is only slightly exaggerated from real life.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 19:36 |
There's always this thing about how "duck and cover" is ludicrous because it purportedly suggests that ducking under your desk will keep a point-blank H-bomb from blowing you up. No dumbass, obviously not, but there's a whole lot of people in the secondary blast radius who might be able to survive flying debris by ducking around a corner as quickly as they can train their reflexes to
|
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 19:41 |
|
Pshh i don't see how "duck and cover" is going to pick all of this glass out of my face
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 19:43 |
|
Evilreaver posted:The entire point of the exercise is that the string of Buffalo can be arbitrarily long from only two Buffalo up to many dozens Right but you have to capitalize them correctly or it all falls apart and just becomes unintelligible nonsense.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 19:57 |
|
I would simply not look at the shockwave of glass flying at my eyeballs at mach 10
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:08 |
|
Just dodge it dummy https://i.imgur.com/71uTNAJ.gifv
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:11 |
|
What on earth is this from lmao. Is that nick cage?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:21 |
|
Milo and POTUS posted:What on earth is this from lmao. Is that nick cage? Identical to my reaction. What the hell movie is this....
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:22 |
|
Next, isn't it? Where he can see like sixty seconds into the future?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:23 |
|
credburn posted:Next, isn't it? Where he can see like sixty seconds into the future? I think so. Or is that Knowing? Who can know!?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:29 |
|
If you like Nic Cage movies, Next is a very good bad movie. There's a whole like 12 minute scene where he keeps trying pickup lines on a woman he has never met but is in love with.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:29 |
|
poo poo I should have recognized that. I watched it somewhat recently because of Rifftrax.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 20:32 |
|
Next is good Nic Cage trash, Knowing is terrible Nic Cage trash (and another notch in the mystery that is Alex Proyas, a director who somehow managed to make two genre-defining films in a row, then nothing but poo poo and piss after that).
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 21:10 |
|
Pfft. That's amateur bullet-dodging.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 21:12 |
|
"She breasted boobily around the bullet"
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 21:39 |
|
Stoatbringer posted:Pfft. That's amateur bullet-dodging. Required homework:
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 21:42 |
|
Dillbag posted:Next is good Nic Cage trash, Knowing is terrible Nic Cage trash (and another notch in the mystery that is Alex Proyas, a director who somehow managed to make two genre-defining films in a row, then nothing but poo poo and piss after that). I didn't *hate* I, Robot and thought Gods of Egypt was good Sunday morning fun, but yeah. Not what you'd expect after the one-two punch of The Crow and Dark City.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 21:45 |
|
Stoatbringer posted:Pfft. That's amateur bullet-dodging. lmfao
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 22:05 |
|
Stoatbringer posted:Pfft. That's amateur bullet-dodging. Can i learn this power?
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 22:48 |
|
Mr. Crow posted:Can i learn this power? *taps username* Your power will be... similar, but different.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 22:54 |
|
Mr. Crow posted:Can i learn this power? Sure. Do you have bewbs? If so, can they move at ? That's all it takes!
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 22:54 |
gbut posted:"She breasted boobily around the bullet" At last I can picture it
|
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:05 |
|
Keeping abreast of the latest bullet technology.
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:11 |
|
The miracle of the virgin milf
|
# ? Mar 23, 2023 23:17 |
|
Railing Kill posted:"A hat will give you at least some protection from the heat flash." Yes, because "virtually none" is technically an amount. lol at this Fallout poo poo. There were women at Hiroshima that ended up with their kimono's pattern burned into their flesh. Literally the dark parts gave them second and third degree burns, while under the light parts they just had much less serious burns. I guarantee you that was the basis of this particular piece of advice. Obviously it won't turn certain death into likely survival. But most of this kind of advice is about giving people who happen to be farther out from ground zero a better outcome, because if you're right under the bomb you're completely hosed regardless. And of course people like having something to control, even if it's a bit silly. Blue Footed Booby has a new favorite as of 00:05 on Mar 24, 2023 |
# ? Mar 24, 2023 00:00 |
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:There were women at Hiroshima that ended up with their kimono's pattern burned into their flesh. Literally the dark parts gave them second and third degree burns, while under the light parts they just had much less serious burns. I guarantee you that was the basis of this particular piece of advice. In a similar vein, there was a recent discussion in the SAL Spaceflight thread about the report from the Columbia shuttle disaster: slidebite posted:This is another fascinating report on Columbia although it is not nearly as widely read as the official accident board report. It more specifically deals with the crew and the aeromedical teachings from the disaster. Spoiled because it's what we did there and I don't know what the PYF sensitivities to these things are: One of the things that came out in that was that the astronauts were exposed to re-entry plasma both as it breached the spacecraft and as the ship disintegrated and they were catapulted into a cloud of mixed reentry plasma and vaporized metal. Their clothing protected some areas. Body parts that were uncovered or had only thin fabric suffered third degree burns, while parts covered in multiple layers or by sturdier materials suffered either 2nd degree burns or none at all. For example, the leather parts of their boots protected their feet, and the seat straps combined with their uniforms created a pronounced "shadowing" effect similar to what BFB described about Hiroshima. So is a brimmed hat going to protect you from a full heat flash at point blank range? gently caress no. But could it be enough to save your eyesight if you're far enough out that your exposed skin is getting second degree burns? That doesn't seem so far fetched.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 00:12 |
|
please don't post about sensitivities again dude
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 00:22 |
|
Reiche posted:Required homework: Pity the fool starting poo poo with her thinking she's unarmed. She will massacre you into orbit with a flurry of savage 1843m/s boob uppercuts. You're chopped liver buddy
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 00:22 |
|
I just can't cope with these complicated breast equations.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 02:06 |
|
Karate Bastard posted:Pity the fool starting poo poo with her thinking she's unarmed. She will massacre you into orbit with a flurry of savage 1843m/s boob uppercuts. You're chopped liver buddy I imagine it would go something along the lines of this https://youtu.be/KgLR9nYO65s?t=104 Regular Show was weird as hell
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 02:20 |
|
Unkempt posted:I just can't cope with these complicated breast equations. The answer is always 5318008.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 03:21 |
|
Snowy posted:The miracle of the virgin milf Mary, the biblical milf
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 03:31 |
|
don Jaime posted:The answer is always 5318008. Oh ya? Pamela anderson had 69 pound boobs and that was 222 much. She went to a doctor on 51st st and his name was dr. X. She had 8 surgeries that day. Solve that boob math, bud
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 04:08 |
|
My Spirit Otter posted:Oh ya? Pamela anderson had 69 pound boobs and that was 222 much. She went to a doctor on 51st st and his name was dr. X. She had 8 surgeries that day. Solve that boob math, bud Oh, that's easy. The answer is always 5318008.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 04:29 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 06:35 |
|
Her boobs travel the same speed as an SR-71A Blackbird at full burn
|
# ? Mar 24, 2023 06:54 |