|
Vulture Culture posted:My unironic favorite thing about shared ownership is that sometimes people will really surprise you with what they're able to do. On one project alone, I watched a data scientist submit a feature to an AWS SDK to get something working in a low-lift way, and another data-centered software engineer with very little Linux domain experience investigate and fix an SSSD configuration embedded into a Kubernetes sidecar through several layers of config management glue. Hey thanks for your PR implementation of this feature but our team was not properly consulted, did not approve this design, your implementation breaks our component's undocumented design principles, and we're not even sure how you were able to get the component to run locally on your machine and execute its functional/integration/acceptance tests, since they all depend on secret magic system property string values which we don't ever share outside of our team. We don't have capacity to review your PR at this time, so please talk with our engineering manager to prioritize a consultation session so that we can align on a better path forward. We might be able to squeeze you in next year.
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 20:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:38 |
|
|
Sistergodiva posted:Is there any SA dev discord or am I missremembering? https://discord.gg/9NaBzpyNXT I'm not sure if you need to be approved by a mod there. I'll let them know I posted the invite. Edit: I am told you should join the discord and then check the #how-to-auth channel for instructions. Carbon dioxide fucked around with this message at 22:46 on Mar 17, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2023 21:12
|
|
|
Suprised there doesn't seem to be a git log option to limit how many merge commits to follow. We've got some messy upstream branch were merges branch out into more merges if you use git log --oneline --graph. I don't want to exclude all merge commits, just limit how many it follows when building the graph.
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 16:42
|
|
|
This guy at work messaged me his personal contact information after working hours yesterday, then passive aggressively admonished me for not replying to them at 8am this morning, stating that the upcoming demo (on the 29th) is extremely important. Buddy, I've been with the company since the founding - sorry for keeping strict working hours, and go gently caress yourself for telling me what I think is important? At least when I talked to my supervisor about it it seems like this isn't the first time this dude has rubbed folks the wrong way. Macichne Leainig fucked around with this message at 16:54 on Mar 23, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 16:51
|
|
|
"I keep normal office hours, and I won't be able to help you until late next week, good luck with your demo!"
|
|
#
?
Mar 23, 2023 16:54
|
|
|
Wibla posted:"I keep normal office hours, and I won't be able to help you until late next week, good luck with your demo!" You mean "late this week" because we don't send messages like this until Monday morning when we're back on working hours.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 00:29
|
|
|
Che Delilas posted:You mean "late this week" because we don't send messages like this until Monday morning when we're back on working hours. No, this week is already full 
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 00:36
|
|
|
Che Delilas posted:You mean "late this week" because we don't send messages like this until Monday morning when we're back on working hours. Yeah agreed, when you don’t want the sender to start expecting timely replies when they email you at 4:45pm on Friday, so you Schedule Send your reply for Monday at 9:15am, you’ve got to be careful about the timeline
epswing fucked around with this message at 03:56 on Mar 26, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 03:54
|
|
|
Let's say I was interviewing at company X and got turned down. I interview with company Y, that is in the same industry for a similar job, and get an offer. If I see company X still has open positions that I didn't interview for, should I go back to the recruiter from company X and say "I got this offer, let's do another interview."? E: The problem is, company X is more prestigious than company Y. America Inc. fucked around with this message at 08:37 on Mar 26, 2023 |
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 08:29
|
|
|
Work at Y for a year, then reapply to X
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 09:13
|
|
|
The company Y offer doesn't change anything in this scenario. (Well, except for giving you something else to do in the interim if you decide to wait and then interview with X again). Either they were always willing to interview you for alternative roles that you think might fit you better, or they have an interview process that isn't role-specific and they won't consider you at all for at least the next six months. (After which it might be worth interviewing you again, in case you've learned some new things).
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 10:09
|
|
|
America Inc. posted:Let's say I was interviewing at company X and got turned down. I interview with company Y, that is in the same industry for a similar job, and get an offer. If I see company X still has open positions that I didn't interview for, should I go back to the recruiter from company X and say "I got this offer, let's do another interview."?
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 14:30
|
|
|
Vulture Culture posted:I don't really understand what the play is that you're trying to make here by involving Company Y's offer. Are you trying to somehow convince recruiting at Company X that they made a mistake by passing on you? I think he's actually asking for advice about his X girlfriend but is disguising it to fit in with the thread theme
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 14:37
|
|
|
Happiness Commando posted:Work at Y for a year, then reapply to X
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 14:53
|
|
|
Vulture Culture posted:I don't really understand what the play is that you're trying to make here by involving Company Y's offer. Are you trying to somehow convince recruiting at Company X that they made a mistake by passing on you? I've seen this a couple of times in the last year with weird plays from candidates. 'I have an offer from Y so really you should be considering me for your position' . But usually not after failing the interview, there's no real coming back from that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 15:59
|
|
|
America Inc. posted:Let's say I was interviewing at company X and got turned down. I interview with company Y, that is in the same industry for a similar job, and get an offer. If I see company X still has open positions that I didn't interview for, should I go back to the recruiter from company X and say "I got this offer, let's do another interview."? don't do this
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 16:13
|
|
|
Competing offer leverage only works if you have an offer in the first place.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 16:17
|
|
|
“I know you turned me down because you’re not interested in me, but I got a date with another person recently. So, does that change anything?”
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 16:21
|
|
|
Love Stole the Day posted:I think he's actually asking for advice about his X girlfriend but is disguising it to fit in with the thread theme Don't give me any ideas now. Yeah I was about to shoot the recruiter an email but then I thought "this feels sleazy". Ngl the company I got an offer from was not my first pick, so hopefully this job can give me some career growth into a full stack developer and then I'll see where I can go from there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 26, 2023 19:38
|
|
|
America Inc. posted:Don't give me any ideas now.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 03:50
|
|
|
"your cut-rate competitor is hiring me" "Yeah sounds about right lmao good luck with that poo poo"
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 04:22
|
|
|
Ehh I'm not going to lay into it too because I was curious if somebody was going to say something interestingly different.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 05:19
|
|
|
Vulture Culture posted:If by "sleazy" you really meant "desperate and hopeless", then you're getting closer
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 08:46
|
|
|
I for one say you should do it OP. I mean, what could go wrong?
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 13:32
|
|
|
Gives recruiters more stupid poo poo to complain about on bloviating LinkedIn posts.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 18:20
|
|
|
Cup Runneth Over posted:I for one say you should do it OP. I mean, what could go wrong? You've convinced me, sending the email now. No but thanks goons.
|
|
#
?
Mar 27, 2023 19:43
|
|
|
My team transitioned to a new product and handed off our previous areas of ownership to another team about a year ago. They'll rarely come to us with questions that we're happy to answer as they've been relatively easy and not required much of anything from us. Recently, an inquiry came in about finding logs for a user who reported a crash on login attempt on one of the mobile platforms. Easy-peasy—we gave a quick refresher on how to go about that and left them to it. A day later, they came back indicating they didn't find logs and didn't get much useful info from direct outreach to the user, so they were going to close out the ticket as a transient failure. "Great!" I say, "but I looked at your ticket and your owner hasn't documented their attempt to reproduce the issue. The issue's not reproducible, right? Users can log in on iOS? On Android? Right?"  
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 03:14
|
|
|
I still don't understand why management types pretend that a company is hiring great and above average people, when they offer below average pay.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 07:08
|
|
|
They can just claim their total compensation is have higher and really stretch what they claim in there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 10:32
|
|
|
Cugel the Clever posted:My team transitioned to a new product and handed off our previous areas of ownership to another team about a year ago. They'll rarely come to us with questions that we're happy to answer as they've been relatively easy and not required much of anything from us. Recently, an inquiry came in about finding logs for a user who reported a crash on login attempt on one of the mobile platforms. Easy-peasy—we gave a quick refresher on how to go about that and left them to it. A day later, they came back indicating they didn't find logs and didn't get much useful info from direct outreach to the user, so they were going to close out the ticket as a transient failure.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 13:39
|
|
|
I found that when training new people just asking them what have they tried to find a solution before asking me for help will usually influence them to actually try something before just asking me first thing next time they need help…
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 18:42
|
|
|
I'm using ChatGPT more and more to look for help than searching google and stackoverflow. I just used it today to figure out an issue I was having with setting up Lighthouse CI in a github action, and it gave me an answer that worked the first time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 20:59
|
|
|
America Inc. posted:I'm using ChatGPT more and more to look for help than searching google and stackoverflow. I just used it today to figure out an issue I was having with setting up Lighthouse CI in a github action, and it gave me an answer that worked the first time. I was thrown on a low-level embedded project and used it as a refresher on some C stuff I forgot years ago. It works well until you get into (in my case) MISRA compliance issues.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 21:02
|
|
|
On the other hand, I had a colleague ask me in Slack why the SQL query he got from chatGPT wasn't working. That's when I felt it won't take my job away.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 21:08
|
|
|
I've heard it mentioned that at a high level ChatGPT is really just a specifically-tuned search engine. Rather than Google returning web links to content, ChatGPT just returns the I'm Feeling Lucky content directly.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 21:09
|
|
|
The "I'm feeling lucky" button can only return results that actually exist. Generative models can produce new content which may or may not be factual.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 21:55
|
|
|
ChatGPT can paraphrase existing content, including solutions to problems which have already been solved often. That has actual utility as a programming aid, just as long as you don't misunderstand what it's actually doing and assume it can program.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 22:01
|
|
|
Bongo Bill posted:ChatGPT can paraphrase existing content, including solutions to problems which have already been solved often. That has actual utility as a programming aid, just as long as you don't misunderstand what it's actually doing and assume it can program. This. It's good for setting up models and asking some questions, but it's not going to build a functional program for you.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 22:05
|
|
|
To be fair, neither am I
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 22:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 21:38 |
|
|
These AI coding helpers are also great for writing boilerplate and the boring parts of the code. Like point it at an example JSON file and ask it for the Go struct.
|
|
#
?
Mar 31, 2023 22:55
|
|