Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Cimber posted:

Well no more trips to Scotland for Trump any time soon, since he has to surrender his passport. No more trips overseas at all.

unironically more personal consequences than he's suffered since he became Fred's evil Igor at 18 or so, lol

e: this might be a good opportunity for malenia to suddenly rediscover her love for central europe

Goatse James Bond fucked around with this message at 03:17 on Mar 31, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

virtualboyCOLOR posted:

So which state DA is going to be the first to indict Biden?

Let's say Texas.

Angry_Ed
Mar 30, 2010




Grimey Drawer

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Mike Pence is somehow unable to answer a question about abortion and wobbling around. I have no idea if he is nervous, surprised, or trying to seem to moderate. But, he's coming off incredibly bad and it is bizarre to see Mike Pence of all people hedge on abortion.

"Would you support a 6-week abortion ban nationwide?"

"I'm pro-life."

"If you were President, and a support a 6-week abortion ban came across your desk, then would sign it?"

"Look, I'm pro-life."

"Would you sign it?"

"Wolf, look, I'm pro-life. I'm not gonna apologize for it."

"So, you would support it?"

"If legislation... in that regard... came around, then I would surely... I would surely take a look at it. But, to be honest, I think that this will take place at the state-level."

"But, would you sign a bill?"

"I'd support federal legislation that is pro-life if I were in congress... or any other job in that town. But, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe. v. Wade, they returned the issue to the states. But, look, I will always stand for life."

imagine getting backed into a corner via questions by Wolf Blitzer of all people.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



Angry_Ed posted:

imagine getting backed into a corner via questions by Wolf Blitzer of all people.
And on abortion of all issues?? He's a conservative evangelical, we all know he wants abortion to be totally illegal.

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

FlamingLiberal posted:

You know, I used to think that Ted Cruz bending the knee for Trump in 2016 was the most pathetic thing I've seen in politics, but this weird Pence defense of Trump has to be worse

He's still under the delusion that he can claim the Trump/maga mantle should Trump go away. He doesn't understand that the florida rear end in a top hat is the real threat.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
They all know where their bread is buttered. There is no future for an anti-Trump Republican.

STAC Goat
Mar 12, 2008

Watching you sleep.

Butt first, let's
check the feeds.

RBA Starblade posted:

Let's say Texas.

The real game is “guess the state crime”. Because I guarantee every guy who would do it has been debating this poo poo for well before today. They do it publicly all the time. Starr, Gowdy, Comey, Rudy, Jordan. They want a crime sooooo bad. If they had one they would have been first.

STAC Goat fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Mar 31, 2023

Nelson Mandingo
Mar 27, 2005




Here is my question, when will we the public know the 30 counts of charges?

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Nelson Mandingo posted:

Here is my question, when will we the public know the 30 counts of charges?

It's sealed for now, but will be public by his booking. So, sometime between tomorrow and Tuesday.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Nelson Mandingo posted:

Here is my question, when will we the public know the 30 counts of charges?

Probably Monday or Tuesday when Trump gets booked.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
Genuinely think it's still dumb to get your hopes up considering, and at best hope to be pleasantly surprised if anything actually sticks.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

nine-gear crow posted:

It's literally Waylon Smithers level poo poo. Trump straight up went "If he dies, he dies" after siccing a mob on the building he was currently in, and Pence's response has almost word for word been "It would have been an honor to have been beaten and strangled to death for you, sir :patriot:"

That reference is going to stick in my mind for a while.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
CNN is putting out clips from the Pence interview now.

His solution to mass shootings: Implement the death penalty at the federal level for shootings that take place in states without the death penalty.

For bonus points: This question came right after his abortion/ "I'll always side on the side of life" question.

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1641622311890481152

Ringo Star Get
Sep 18, 2006

JUST FUCKING TAKE OFF ALREADY, SHIT
Pence still siding with Trump most likely means that he fears Trump will send J6’ers after Mother.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Don’t most school shooters already get the death penalty in that they’re shot dead by police or kill themselves once they get bored? Aren’t most mass shootings a variation on suicide where the shooter wants to die? I know shooters are sometimes taken alive and given Wendy’s, but not that often. The script set by columbine ends with the shooter’s suicide, after all. I don’t know that it’s been replaced by a new script yet.

Ravenfood
Nov 4, 2011

I AM GRANDO posted:

Don’t most school shooters already get the death penalty in that they’re shot dead by police or kill themselves once they get bored? Aren’t most mass shootings a variation on suicide where the shooter wants to die? I know shooters are sometimes taken alive and given Wendy’s, but not that often. The script set by columbine ends with the shooter’s suicide, after all. I don’t know that it’s been replaced by a new script yet.

Yes. Mass shootings are effectively the US' cultural version of a suicide bombing.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

Mike Pence is somehow unable to answer a question about abortion and wobbling around. I have no idea if he is nervous, surprised, or trying to seem to moderate. But, he's coming off incredibly bad and it is bizarre to see Mike Pence of all people hedge on abortion.

"Would you support a 6-week abortion ban nationwide?"

"I'm pro-life."

"If you were President, and a support a 6-week abortion ban came across your desk, then would sign it?"

"Look, I'm pro-life."

"Would you sign it?"

"Wolf, look, I'm pro-life. I'm not gonna apologize for it."

"So, you would support it?"

"If legislation... in that regard... came around, then I would surely... I would surely take a look at it. But, to be honest, I think that this will take place at the state-level."

"But, would you sign a bill?"

"I'd support federal legislation that is pro-life if I were in congress... or any other job in that town. But, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe. v. Wade, they returned the issue to the states. But, look, I will always stand for life."

Is it that surprising? I feel like "yes, but you and I both know I'll never be president if I admit it on camera, so can we please pretend my answer is something else" is a common enough response from anti-abortion politicians above the House.

FlamingLiberal posted:

You know, I used to think that Ted Cruz bending the knee for Trump in 2016 was the most pathetic thing I've seen in politics, but this weird Pence defense of Trump has to be worse

It's understandable. If he turns against Trump now, spending four whole years as Trump's VP was for nothing.

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Angry_Ed posted:

imagine getting backed into a corner via questions by Wolf Blitzer of all people.

This really is what is funniest to me. He's the perfect distillation of the Indiana Republican.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
It's gonna get buried in the Trump stuff now, but the FBI released their investigative report about Stephen Paddock, the Las Vegas mass shooter from 2017, for whom no motive was ever conclusively determined.

The whole thing's like three hundred pages and unsearchable, so I'm just gonna rely on a press report to summarize the results, though I'm going to add my own emphasis to a couple of points that seem important yet were never publicly mentioned before.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/us/las-vegas-shooting-gunman.html

quote:

The man who fatally shot 60 people at an outdoor music festival in Las Vegas in 2017 had been angry over what he saw as casinos scaling back on perks for V.I.P. gamblers like himself, according to an account provided to the F.B.I.

The newly released F.B.I. records fall short of answering the lingering question of why the gunman, Stephen Paddock, opened fire on a country music concert crowd on the Las Vegas Strip from his perch on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino. By the time the authorities arrived at his suite, Mr. Paddock, 64, had killed himself, leaving no suicide note or any other indication of a motive.

The attack on Oct. 1, 2017, killed 60 people and injured hundreds more in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

Investigators have long scoured the case for explanations, but a few years ago Las Vegas police concluded their investigation by saying that he had no clear motive.

Investigators and behavioral analysts at the F.B.I. similarly concluded in 2019 that they could not determine a “single or clear motivating factor” behind the attack. Investigators said it appeared that Mr. Paddock had wanted to die by suicide, after experiencing a decline in physical and mental health.

The newly released reports of F.B.I. interviews with people who knew or interacted with Mr. Paddock, made public in recent days, shed some new light on what has long been known about his obsessive, high-roller gambling habits and his state of mind before he unleashed a barrage of gunfire from his hotel window.

Mr. Paddock, who sometimes spent up to 18 hours a day gambling in various hotels, “was very upset at the way casinos were treating him and other high rollers,” one gambler told the F.B.I.

“The stress could easily be what caused Paddock to ‘snap,’” he said.

The fellow gambler said that Mr. Paddock and gamblers like him would frequently carry around $100,000 in cash and “had a bankroll of approximately $2 to $3 million.” He described Mr. Paddock as personable and intelligent and said that like “all professional gamblers,” Mr. Paddock “frequently kept to himself.”

He explained that casinos had long treated high-rollers with free cruises, penthouse suites and tours but that those perks had been scaled back in recent years.

A woman who worked at the Tropicana Las Vegas told the F.B.I. that Mr. Paddock visited there about once every three months and was a “prolific” video poker player. The woman said that he did not talk about anything personal with her, but he appeared to like rock ’n’ roll and had attended some concerts at the Tropicana.

According to the documents, he stayed at the Tropicana beginning a couple weeks before the shootings and lost $38,000 during that visit.

The documents revealed that a different interviewee told the F.B.I. that over dinner at Applebee’s, Mr. Paddock shared with him that gambling had been his main source of income and that he had bought a handgun for protection because he was earning a lot of money.

Mr. Paddock’s planning for the attack appeared to have been methodical, law enforcement investigations have shown. He had been stockpiling weapons for about a year, all purchased legally, and researching event venues, with internet searches such as “biggest open air concert venues in USA.” He had a hotel reservation in August, two months before the attack, in a room that overlooked the Lollapalooza music festival in Chicago. After settling on Las Vegas as his target, he spent days carrying an arsenal of guns into the hotel across the street from the Route 91 Harvest music festival.

Mr. Paddock had grown wealthy over the years from buying and selling apartment complexes around the country, the agents wrote, information that was also previously known. He and his family sold a complex in Texas in 2012, the F.B.I. said in one document, and Mr. Paddock used the proceeds to “buy dozens of weapons that were ultimately used in the shooting.”

The F.B.I. reported scrutinizing a series of letters involving Mr. Paddock that were said to have been found in a vacant office building in Texas. The details of the letters were not disclosed, and while F.B.I. agents worked to authenticate them, the new documents do not detail their conclusions.

One person who reported being a business acquaintance of Mr. Paddock told agents that in 2016, about a year before the shooting, Mr. Paddock was stockpiling money and was “mad at the system.” While large portions of this and other sections of the interview notes were redacted, the former acquaintance reported that :siren:Mr. Paddock had been fascinated by the Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people in 1995 and “thought ADOLF HITLER was a good man.”:siren:

The man, who spoke to agents in the days after the attacks, described apparent “threats” of some kind from Mr. Paddock — the nature of which is not detailed in the documents — but he did not take them seriously until May 2017, a few months before the Las Vegas shooting. It was unclear from the records what the man did after that or how agents handled the information.

Investigators have said that Mr. Paddock had no connections to terrorist or hate groups, and no criminal record. They found that while his wealth had diminished before the attacks, he was not in debt.

As far as I can tell, this is the first time that any hint of his political leanings have been revealed, and woof, it sure is a doozy. Guess we'll just never know why the guy who admired McVeigh and Hitler shot a bunch of people! :thunk:

FLIPADELPHIA
Apr 27, 2007

Heavy Shit
Grimey Drawer

Ghost Leviathan posted:

Genuinely think it's still dumb to get your hopes up considering, and at best hope to be pleasantly surprised if anything actually sticks.

You can keep this to yourself just FYI

Tempest_56
Mar 14, 2009

I AM GRANDO posted:

Don’t most school shooters already get the death penalty in that they’re shot dead by police or kill themselves once they get bored? Aren’t most mass shootings a variation on suicide where the shooter wants to die? I know shooters are sometimes taken alive and given Wendy’s, but not that often. The script set by columbine ends with the shooter’s suicide, after all. I don’t know that it’s been replaced by a new script yet.

The data here is spotty - most of the studies I can find are pretty old. The only recent one I can locate is by the Times (which is of course looking at an entirely different topic) - out of the 433 incidents they tracked, the shooter only died about half the time (230). Another older one by the Washington Post got similar results (108 out of 202.)

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/06/22/us/shootings-police-response-uvalde-buffalo.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20230329171909/https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/national/mass-shootings-in-america/

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Main Paineframe posted:

It's gonna get buried in the Trump stuff now, but the FBI released their investigative report about Stephen Paddock, the Las Vegas mass shooter from 2017, for whom no motive was ever conclusively determined.

The whole thing's like three hundred pages and unsearchable, so I'm just gonna rely on a press report to summarize the results, though I'm going to add my own emphasis to a couple of points that seem important yet were never publicly mentioned before.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/us/las-vegas-shooting-gunman.html

As far as I can tell, this is the first time that any hint of his political leanings have been revealed, and woof, it sure is a doozy. Guess we'll just never know why the guy who admired McVeigh and Hitler shot a bunch of people! :thunk:

Can you find an actual link to the document set? I've not immediately had any luck.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Discendo Vox posted:

Can you find an actual link to the document set? I've not immediately had any luck.

It's here, split into two parts:
https://vault.fbi.gov/stephen-paddock

Utter pain in the rear end to go through, though. 600+ pages combined, heavily redacted, it's not OCRed so it can't be searched easily, and stuff like webpage printouts and evidence spreadsheets are mixed in haphazardly with the rest of the report.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.

Main Paineframe posted:

It's here, split into two parts:
https://vault.fbi.gov/stephen-paddock

Utter pain in the rear end to go through, though. 600+ pages combined, heavily redacted, it's not OCRed so it can't be searched easily, and stuff like webpage printouts and evidence spreadsheets are mixed in haphazardly with the rest of the report.

Thanks. Note the document at page 241 of the second set and subsequent, describing the sourcing of the individual who found or "found" the letters in the office sent to the FBI, and discussion of the work that went into identifying the sender. The redaction gaps are quite interesting. I can't tell if the reference to an ongoing case just refers to the investigation of Paddock or something else.

...from the later redacted material (p. 266 of the second set), it appears likely that the person who mentions ADOLF HITLER was involved in selling Paddock guns. Other gaps suggest a common activity with some of the interviewees such as a militia or shooting group, but it's hard to distinguish valid sources of information from cranks.

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Tempest_56 posted:

The data here is spotty - most of the studies I can find are pretty old. The only recent one I can locate is by the Times (which is of course looking at an entirely different topic) - out of the 433 incidents they tracked, the shooter only died about half the time (230). Another older one by the Washington Post got similar results (108 out of 202.)

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/06/22/us/shootings-police-response-uvalde-buffalo.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20230329171909/https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/national/mass-shootings-in-america/

Well, then we can infer that the death penalty would totally work as a deterrent half the time. Which is why nobody is going around mass shooting in strong death penalty states like Florida, Texas, or Tennessee.

Wizard Master
Mar 25, 2008

What are your guys thoughts on the news today about Donald Trump being indicted

Ataxerxes
Dec 2, 2011

What is a soldier but a miserable pile of eaten cats and strange language?

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

It's sealed for now, but will be public by his booking. So, sometime between tomorrow and Tuesday.

Stupid question from a non-American: can these be declared secret or otherwise hidden from the public?

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Wizard Master posted:

What are your guys thoughts on the news today about Donald Trump being indicted

The front page looks good

https://mobile.twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1641636148920602624

lil poopendorfer
Nov 13, 2014

by the sex ghost
If this is about the campaign finance stuff, hasn’t the statute of limitations long since passed? It would have had to have taken place in 2016, and I had read that the statute of limitations for those things is 3-5 years

E: source for the statute of limitations thing
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/trump-indictment-bragg-legal-case/

quote:

The first issue that Bragg has is time. Trump committed the underlying campaign finance offense in 2016, and the statute of limitations on bookkeeping fraud and campaign finance violations is five years. That brings you to 2021. The statute of limitations for tax evasion is three years. Even if you don’t start the clock on that until the story breaks in the news in 2018, that brings you, once again, to 2021. To get to 2023, Bragg appears to be arguing that the statute of limitations paused while Trump was president and living out of state. That’s… a theory, but not necessarily a good one, and certainly not one that has been tested enough to know how it’s going to hold up in the courts. Remember, the alleged immunity Trump had from prosecutions applied only at the federal level. Local prosecutors, like Bragg’s predecessor Cyrus Vance, who was the Manhattan DA during Trump’s presidency, could have charged him with this crime at any time.

lil poopendorfer fucked around with this message at 10:59 on Mar 31, 2023

lil poopendorfer
Nov 13, 2014

by the sex ghost

Main Paineframe posted:

It's gonna get buried in the Trump stuff now, but the FBI released their investigative report about Stephen Paddock, the Las Vegas mass shooter from 2017, for whom no motive was ever conclusively determined.

The whole thing's like three hundred pages and unsearchable, so I'm just gonna rely on a press report to summarize the results, though I'm going to add my own emphasis to a couple of points that seem important yet were never publicly mentioned before.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/us/las-vegas-shooting-gunman.html

As far as I can tell, this is the first time that any hint of his political leanings have been revealed, and woof, it sure is a doozy. Guess we'll just never know why the guy who admired McVeigh and Hitler shot a bunch of people! :thunk:

The man responsible for the largest mass shooting in US history did it because he wasn’t getting enough perks from the casino? This is the dumbest poo poo I ever read. although I suppose the type of person who is gonna believe the findings from the Warren commission is credulous enough to believe this

lil poopendorfer fucked around with this message at 11:56 on Mar 31, 2023

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

Fritz the Horse posted:

I read somewhere that the trial for this would likely occur sometime in mid-2024, likely around summer time, so it'll be a whole Thing in the middle of the election. Defendants usually show up for their trials I believe? Hard to say how it all goes down.

Trump will demand the trial be televised, babble endlessly about the huge ratings and attempt to turn the entire thing into re-election campaign speech. He'll insist that the court has to play that Jan 6th song then stand up and recite the pledge before every proceeding.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

lil poopendorfer posted:

The man responsible for the largest mass shooting in US history did it because he wasn’t getting enough perks from the casino? This is the dumbest poo poo I ever read. although I suppose the type of person who is gonna believe the findings from the Warren commission is credible enough to believe this

We have had used car salesmen and real estate agents fly into Washington D.C. in private planes and attempt to overthrow the government because they were scared that the next president would raise taxes and introduce regulations.

History is loaded with people who have committed unspeakable atrocities for extremely petty reasons. Adolf Eichmann signed off on the Holocaust for a promotion, for God sakes!

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Ataxerxes posted:

Stupid question from a non-American: can these be declared secret or otherwise hidden from the public?

As soon as he's actually arraigned the charges will be public. I don't even think our terrible terrorism trials from Guantanamo had secret charges. We reserved that for evidence.

Cheesus
Oct 17, 2002

Let us retract the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wirebrush of enlightenment.
Yam Slacker

Ringo Star Get posted:

Pence still siding with Trump most likely means that he fears Trump will send J6’ers after Mother.
It's smart if Mother really did have a foal last week.

You have to protect what you love, folks.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Ataxerxes posted:

Stupid question from a non-American: can these be declared secret or otherwise hidden from the public?

No. Once you are arraigned on a charge you have a constitutional right that you must be read the list of charges against you. They will be entered into the record at the point.

Honestly, given that the number of charges already leaked before the indictment had actually been technically announced, I think the charges will probably be public before his arraignment.

lil poopendorfer
Nov 13, 2014

by the sex ghost

Young Freud posted:

We have had used car salesmen and real estate agents fly into Washington D.C. in private planes and attempt to overthrow the government because they were scared that the next president would raise taxes and introduce regulations.

History is loaded with people who have committed unspeakable atrocities for extremely petty reasons. Adolf Eichmann signed off on the Holocaust for a promotion, for God sakes!

I’ll counter and say that the individuals in your example acted as part of a mass movement, planned and orchestrated by others. They were pawns, mere cogs in a much larger machine, and I’d venture to say that none of them would have done it if they WERE on their own

Stephen Paddock conceiving, planning, and orchestrating the shooting all by himself—over a perceived slight at the hands of the casinos, at that—is certainly possible, but rather unlikely in my opinion. I suppose it depends on the amount of trust one has in our fabled institutions like the FBI or CIA.

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

lil poopendorfer posted:

I’ll counter and say that the individuals in your example acted as part of a mass movement, planned and orchestrated by others. They were pawns, mere cogs in a much larger machine, and I’d venture to say that none of them would have done it if they WERE on their own

Stephen Paddock conceiving, planning, and orchestrating the shooting all by himself—over a perceived slight at the hands of the casinos, at that—is certainly possible, but rather unlikely in my opinion. I suppose it depends on the amount of trust one has in our fabled institutions like the FBI or CIA.

Have you not experienced people flipping the gently caress out in public over extremely petty things in, say, retail or fast food settings? It’s very believable to me, unfortunately, that someone would go on a shooting rampage because Vegas wasn’t offering him the comps he thought he deserved. This doesn’t have to be twisted into some hamfisted “heh. Sheeple believing the feds :smug:” poo poo

Name Change
Oct 9, 2005


nine-gear crow posted:

It's literally Waylon Smithers level poo poo. Trump straight up went "If he dies, he dies" after siccing a mob on the building he was currently in, and Pence's response has almost word for word been "It would have been an honor to have been beaten and strangled to death for you, sir :patriot:"

Pence harbors ambitions to run for president and if both DeSantis and Trump flame out, everything's coming up Milhouse

Tiny Timbs
Sep 6, 2008

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

CNN is putting out clips from the Pence interview now.

His solution to mass shootings: Implement the death penalty at the federal level for shootings that take place in states without the death penalty.

For bonus points: This question came right after his abortion/ "I'll always side on the side of life" question.

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1641622311890481152

Thank god, bringing the shooter to justice will finally end this long national nightmare. What are they up to right now?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

lil poopendorfer
Nov 13, 2014

by the sex ghost

Judgy Fucker posted:

Have you not experienced people flipping the gently caress out in public over extremely petty things in, say, retail or fast food settings? It’s very believable to me, unfortunately, that someone would go on a shooting rampage because Vegas wasn’t offering him the comps he thought he deserved. This doesn’t have to be twisted into some hamfisted “heh. Sheeple believing the feds :smug:” poo poo

Losing one’s temper is quite different from planning and executing the largest mass shooting—by a considerable margin—in US history. It’s not like this guy got denied a comped room and then immediately pulled an AR15 out at the hotel front desk.

You’re free to believe what you want. Given the history of the FBI, CIA, and other US alphabet agencies, i view their statements with a high degree of skepticism.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply