|
has reynal laid claim to anything yet? everything was written or created or done by someone else. "i was there that counts as work pay me" oh gently caress terrible snipe: https://twitter.com/MoString/status/1643662924966133765?cxt=HHwWioCw0Ziuu88tAAAA
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 18:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 20:31 |
|
|
Piell posted:The sanctions hearing for Reynaul (Alex's Texas lawyer) is happening now, livestream is here Currently on break until 1:45 central time. Bankston getting Reynal's extravagant rate of pay on the record at the end was very nicely done imo edit: aw dang, I must have got to it before they pulled down the recording. sorry guys KitConstantine fucked around with this message at 19:33 on Apr 5, 2023 |
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 19:17
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:Currently on break until 1:45 central time. If you follow the above link it takes you to a video of the complete morning's arguments. I only listened to the last hour or so and if anything Morgan Stringer is underselling how bad Reynal's responses were. God I fuckin missed this
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 19:20
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:Currently on break until 1:45 central time. If you follow the above link it takes you to a video of the complete morning's arguments. I only listened to the last hour or so and if anything Morgan Stringer is underselling how bad Reynal's responses were. The video was only available live, to avoid getting anyone's hopes up
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 19:21
|
|
|
KitConstantine posted:Currently on break until 1:45 central time. edit: aw dang, I must have got to it before they pulled down the recording. sorry guys Real Edit: Quote is not edit
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 19:32
|
|
|
teen witch posted:God I fuckin missed this  So it's opening back up at 1:45 central?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 19:48
|
|
|
we're back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F908RjCmijU
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 19:50
|
|
|
UCS Hellmaker posted:I know that it's never going to happen because like doctors the bar basically never strips a license, but either of these would be ground for possible losing the ability to practice wouldn't it? This is generally one of the few reasons someone may actually get a license stripped. You can be a bad attorney. You can go on massive benders. But you don't intentionally gently caress with money and charge clients for services you didn't provide. Bankston is making the case about taking advantage of the estate and money because he knows that is what will get Reynal suspended or stripped. Saltpowered fucked around with this message at 20:21 on Apr 5, 2023 |
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:18
|
|
|
forgetting the apostrophe to make "defendants" possessive 17 times. he's literally pointing to mistakes on every single page. i love that the citation for "it was an unfair trial" is dadario testifying that she thinks the trial is staged
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:21
|
|
|
My citation is that Alexander said it's a first amendment issue!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:23
|
|
|
Just for reference... sanction hearings never, ever go like this. Generally they are short and very fact based. This is potentially more insane than the trial itself.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:24
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MoString/status/1643695204254220289
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:26
|
|
|
Oh my god, Bankston is walking them through how the record of a case works and evidence/discovery. This is just so loving embarrassing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:27
|
|
|
"the quotation is accurate except for that one part" "That's not accurate then!" -da judge
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:38
|
|
|
man this is so loving funny to watch as someone that's currently in law school and taking legal writing and poo poo edit: lmao the BLOG jesus christ
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:39
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, this section is so bad. No citation and also they transposed the motion with a quotation. Edit: Oh my god, it is a blog from a random dude.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:39
|
|
|
It seems bad to paste an article supporting your brief but the part of the article supporting your brief is just a copy/paste of your own argument in the middle of a barely-related blog
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:40
|
|
|
Christ dude You cited a loving blog take the L
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:41
|
|
|
Jesus Christ He's just stunting on him now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:41
|
|
|
As someone in the legal field this is amazing. We poo poo ourselves if a comma is out of place.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:42
|
|
|
So at this point, is it just the "Stop it, stop it, he's already dead!" meme? God drat I hope this is available to watch after work...
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:43
|
|
|
Scipiotik posted:As someone in the legal field this is amazing. We poo poo ourselves if a comma is out of place. When I was still practicing, I could not imagine even having one of these issues in my briefs. So much of this is CivPro 1 and 2. Just basic fundamental poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:44
|
|
|
Scipiotik posted:As someone in the legal field this is amazing. We poo poo ourselves if a comma is out of place. i know I'm loving poring over papers looking for 5 ids in a row or id. as the first on a page or punctuation outside a quotation mark instead of inside and this guy is turning in this poo poo lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:45
|
|
|
Stefan Prodan posted:i know I'm loving poring over papers looking for 5 ids in a row or id. as the first on a page or punctuation outside a quotation mark instead of inside and this guy is turning in this poo poo lmao Sounds like you should just put "..." and say yolo from now on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:46
|
|
|
From the way y’all talk, Shao Khan has already announced “FLAWLESS VICTORY” and “BRUTALITY”, and yet the beating continues.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:47
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:From the way y’all talk, Shao Khan has already announced “FLAWLESS VICTORY” and “BRUTALITY”, and yet the beating continues. Yeah, well, he's earned this poo poo. Let the beating go on.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:48
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:From the way y’all talk, Shao Khan has already announced “FLAWLESS VICTORY” and “BRUTALITY”, and yet the beating continues. I've never seen a motion for sanctions with more than a handful of items in it. ~50 is loving insane. I've also never seen a hearing on sanctions where the the defending attorney has no coherent argument against each line item.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:49
|
|
|
Saltpowered posted:Sounds like you should just put "..." and say yolo from now on. just gonna put "Saltpowered, The Something Awful Forums, ...." as a cite when I justify this
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:49
|
|
|
I’m sad you called me a first year law student after filing a brief filled typos and a random blog from 2006
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:50
|
|
|
Saltpowered posted:I've never seen a motion for sanctions with more than a handful of items in it. ~50 is loving insane. I've also never seen a hearing on sanctions where the the defending attorney has no coherent argument against each line item. So what's going to happen to him? Does something matter here?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:50
|
|
|
No he stopped kicking him!
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:50
|
|
|
Outrail posted:So what's going to happen to him? Does something matter here? I honestly cannot envision a situation where they don't get a stack of sanctions for this motion alone. This isn't a situation where the judge is going to say "this sucks, go revise it and bring it back." Getting Martin to admit on record that he stands by the entire motion was good. He should have express some sort of remorse for the conduct and admitted it was a bad motion.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:51
|
|
|
Saltpowered posted:I've never seen a motion for sanctions with more than a handful of items in it. ~50 is loving insane. I've also never seen a hearing on sanctions where the the defending attorney has no coherent argument against each line item. I mean the one coherent argument I thought he was making was just "We aren't saying that the law is that these judgments should be counted as liabilities, we're just arguing that it should be" and therefore if they're just making an argument, then it really doesn't matter if they cite a blog because the only point is just to make an argument and anyone can do that That part I did follow, I don't know if he actually did that in his brief but if that's what they were attempting to do even though it was unlikely to work I guess at least it made sense to me doesn't excuse uhh anything else that was going on like not even citing the blog properly though or pasting in your own rhetoric into the quote lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:53
|
|
|
I could never be a lawyer because I would cry if opposing counsel was mean to me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:56
|
|
|
Saltpowered posted:I honestly cannot envision a situation where they don't get a stack of sanctions for this motion alone. This isn't a situation where the judge is going to say "this sucks, go revise it and bring it back." it was great when he blamed the secretary, the head of appellate, and a partner for issues earlier too
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:59
|
|
|
it's like watching a law class *click click* and what's wrong on THIS slide? edit: lol though i don't think law classes go over basic punctuation?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 20:59
|
|
|
I think maybe this lawyer isn't very good.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 21:03
|
|
|
InsertPotPun posted:it's like watching a law class in my experience they assume you know that and go over really annoying stuff like saying "which" when you should say "that," punctuation inside quotes, citation, when to spell out numbers as words, poo poo like that I mean obviously there's stuff on what to actually write but I mean in terms of grammar or spelling or whatever
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 21:04
|
|
|
I bet legal eagle will do a video on this and it will be very funny
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 21:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 20:31 |
|
|
Stefan Prodan posted:I mean the one coherent argument I thought he was making was just "We aren't saying that the law is that these judgments should be counted as liabilities, we're just arguing that it should be" and therefore if they're just making an argument, then it really doesn't matter if they cite a blog because the only point is just to make an argument and anyone can do that I don’t think Martin knows whether he did that in his brief either. He clearly farmed all the out to others and did absolutely no review even before this hearing. He’s just so offended that someone would come after a lawyer of his caliber and standing that he couldn’t be bothered to look at the facts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2023 21:10
|
|