Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
I mean in the 2020 election specifically, for the record. Genuinely wondering, I vaguely remember some significant demographic swings but can't recall the specifics.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Ghost Leviathan posted:

I mean in the 2020 election specifically, for the record. Genuinely wondering, I vaguely remember some significant demographic swings but can't recall the specifics.

College educated suburbs.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Ghost Leviathan posted:

I mean in the 2020 election specifically, for the record. Genuinely wondering, I vaguely remember some significant demographic swings but can't recall the specifics.

I was wrong. I said white women, turns out white men shifted more. Trump gained with White Women...

Here is a Pew Research report with the numbers.

quote:

Biden made gains with suburban voters. In 2020, Biden improved upon Clinton’s vote share with suburban voters: 45% supported Clinton in 2016 vs. 54% for Biden in 2020. This shift was also seen among White voters: Trump narrowly won White suburban voters by 4 points in 2020 (51%-47%); he carried this group by 16 points in 2016 (54%-38%). At the same time, Trump grew his vote share among rural voters. In 2016, Trump won 59% of rural voters, a number that rose to 65% in 2020.

After decades of constituting the majority of voters, Baby Boomers and members of the Silent Generation made up less than half of the electorate in 2020 (44%), falling below the 52% they constituted in both 2016 and 2018. Gen Z and Millennial voters favored Biden over Trump by margins of about 20 points, while Gen Xers and Boomers were more evenly split in their preferences. Gen Z voters, those ages 23 and younger, constituted 8% of the electorate, while Millennials and Gen Xers made up 47% of 2020 voters.

Mooseontheloose fucked around with this message at 12:29 on Apr 9, 2023

AlternateNu
May 5, 2005

ドーナツダメ!

Mooseontheloose posted:

I was wrong. I said white women, turns out white men shifted more. Trump gained with White Women...

Here is a Pew Research report with the numbers.

So, 2020 was the inflection point where our cohort can no longer hind behind boomer numbers to explain political losses. Good to know.

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

AlternateNu posted:

So, 2020 was the inflection point where our cohort can no longer hind behind boomer numbers to explain political losses. Good to know.

I mean, yes and no. They are still 48% of the vote but the number is declining. I mean, its interesting that the Democrats despite losing in 2022 are outperforming the last few midterms.

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

Mooseontheloose posted:

I mean, yes and no. They are still 48% of the vote but the number is declining. I mean, its interesting that the Democrats despite losing in 2022 are outperforming the last few midterms.

Well, 'losing' because things are gerrymandered so much the democrats need a +5 advantage just to have parity. If districts were zoned neutrally they would probably have a permanent house majority.

Bird in a Blender
Nov 17, 2005

It's amazing what they can do with computers these days.

The key will be to see if Millenials slide more Republican or stay hard Democrat. They moved from +25 for Clinton to +19 for Biden. Now that’s still a large margin, but it’ll be a problem if it keeps sliding. 2012 saw Millenials vote for Obama around +20, so right now there really isn’t a trend, and hopefully it stays that way. If Millenials stay +20, we’ll see Dems start winning by big numbers. Big If though.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

Bird in a Blender posted:

The key will be to see if Millenials slide more Republican or stay hard Democrat. They moved from +25 for Clinton to +19 for Biden. Now that’s still a large margin, but it’ll be a problem if it keeps sliding. 2012 saw Millenials vote for Obama around +20, so right now there really isn’t a trend, and hopefully it stays that way. If Millenials stay +20, we’ll see Dems start winning by big numbers. Big If though.

The issue with Millennials isn't that they'll slide more to the right, the issue is Democrats sliding more to the right and Millennials disengaging because of that. The Dems absolutely have to have a progressive platform in order to keep them.

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

Young Freud posted:

The issue with Millennials isn't that they'll slide more to the right, the issue is Democrats sliding more to the right and Millennials disengaging because of that. The Dems absolutely have to have a progressive platform in order to keep them.

I think that will happen eventually, as more and more Boomer dems leave and more and more gen-x and Millennials come into true power. The average age of the Senate is what...72? The house is a bit younger but there are a lot of structural issues involved that prevent progressive or even moderate dems from getting elected.

Also Biden was not exactly a very exciting candidate. I voted for him and worked for his campaign, but not out of any great excitement to get _him_ in, but more to get Trump out. I would have volunteered and voted for a cheese sandwich rather than Trump.

Cimber fucked around with this message at 14:11 on Apr 9, 2023

aBagorn
Aug 26, 2004

Cimber posted:

.... more and more gen-x ... come into true power.

i kept reading a bunch of think pieces saying Gen X has swung hard right over the last 10 years

Framboise
Sep 21, 2014

To make yourself feel better, you make it so you'll never give in to your forevers and live for always.


Lipstick Apathy

Young Freud posted:

The issue with Millennials isn't that they'll slide more to the right, the issue is Democrats sliding more to the right and Millennials disengaging because of that. The Dems absolutely have to have a progressive platform in order to keep them.

It's this.

I've never been more apathetic about going to vote and I've been able to do so since 2008. I do it out of bitter obligation just so I feel like I have my say against the Republican in the election at that time, but also knowing that even if the Democrat wins, there isn't going to be any significant change for the better when all they do is cave to any amount of conservative bluster. Unlike me, though, a lot of Millennials have just given up. I know quite a few people who just don't bother voting anymore, especially here in Indiana where left voices literally never get heard.

This is why my hopes are higher about Gen Z reaching voting age. At the very least, they're not bitter and jaded yet, and I feel like there will be a significant leftward shift as boomers drop off.

So long as they're allowed to vote in the upcoming election.

aBagorn posted:

i kept reading a bunch of think pieces saying Gen X has swung hard right over the last 10 years

This, too.

SpeedFreek
Jan 10, 2008
And Im Lobster Jesus!

Charlz Guybon posted:

There's been a 10 point pro-dem swing in most races since the Dobbs ruling.

The general attitude I have seen is both parties suck or it wont affect me so I'm not voting, now that the dog has caught the car its been chasing there is plain as can be proof that at least one republican policy goal will negatively impact them or someone they care about. Thats why many including myself thought the republicans would keep Roe V Wade while campaigning against it as a wedge issue, because they knew how much it would motivate people against them if they did get it struck down.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Bird in a Blender posted:

The key will be to see if Millenials slide more Republican or stay hard Democrat. They moved from +25 for Clinton to +19 for Biden. Now that’s still a large margin, but it’ll be a problem if it keeps sliding. 2012 saw Millenials vote for Obama around +20, so right now there really isn’t a trend, and hopefully it stays that way. If Millenials stay +20, we’ll see Dems start winning by big numbers. Big If though.

Don't seem to be moving that way.
https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jan/03/millennials-radicalism-not-getting-more-rightwing-with-age

Generations that went through a lot of poo poo when young becomr pretty fixed in place. Greatest Generation voted dem from the 40s until they died.

Cimber
Feb 3, 2014

aBagorn posted:

i kept reading a bunch of think pieces saying Gen X has swung hard right over the last 10 years

That makes me ill, but considering what we saw when we were growing up I'm not terribly surprised.

Levitate
Sep 30, 2005

randy newman voice

YOU'VE GOT A LAFRENIÈRE IN ME
I could be wrong because I’m just guessing here but with republicans leaning in culture wars poo poo I feel like you’ll get fewer people voting solely for them for lower taxes etc as they get older since they see the other bullshit that’s the real agenda
But maybe that supposed shift never really existed to begin with and has always just been excuse for people who favored republican policies from the beginning

Bird in a Blender
Nov 17, 2005

It's amazing what they can do with computers these days.

aBagorn posted:

i kept reading a bunch of think pieces saying Gen X has swung hard right over the last 10 years

Is there any data to back this up? When I look at presidential elections, gen x has always hung around the 50/50 mark, and that wasn’t any different in 2020 when they just barely favored Biden.

aBagorn
Aug 26, 2004
IMO the shift isn't "you get more conservative as you get older (with the assumption that age=wisdom or some other nonsense) it's that you tend to get more conservative the richer/wealthier you get and that typically happens as you age almost by default.

Or rather, it did. The reason you see Silents and Boomer and Xers racing republican as they age is because they were able to take advantage of the postwar economic conditions and amass wealth as they aged, becoming more in line with right wing issues on fiscal policy. Some of them even ended up drinking the social issues kool aid.

Millennials aren't amassing wealth. As we age into our 40s a lot of us are struggling the same way we were in our 20s (and posting on the same dead gay comedy forums) and so the fiscal policies of the Republicans aren't the "foot in the door" they used to be for right wing talking points to take hold.

Bird in a Blender posted:

Is there any data to back this up? When I look at presidential elections, gen x has always hung around the 50/50 mark, and that wasn’t any different in 2020 when they just barely favored Biden.

the main thing i saw was poll numbers from NBC news (not as good as actual votes but it's something)

aBagorn fucked around with this message at 15:24 on Apr 9, 2023

Gerund
Sep 12, 2007

He push a man


Levitate posted:

I could be wrong because I’m just guessing here but with republicans leaning in culture wars poo poo I feel like you’ll get fewer people voting solely for them for lower taxes etc as they get older since they see the other bullshit that’s the real agenda
But maybe that supposed shift never really existed to begin with and has always just been excuse for people who favored republican policies from the beginning

There was a whole plague in the 80s-90s that focused on killing younger men with a likelyhood based mostly on being cool. Survivor bias is one hell of a trick when you can policy-outcome who survives.

Zeron
Oct 23, 2010

aBagorn posted:

IMO the shift isn't "you get more conservative as you get older (with the assumption that age=wisdom or some other nonsense) it's that you tend to get more conservative the richer/wealthier you get and that typically happens as you age almost by default.

Or rather, it did. The reason you see Silents and Boomer and Xers racing republican as they age is because they were able to take advantage of the postwar economic conditions and amass wealth as they aged, becoming more in line with right wing issues on fiscal policy. Some of them even ended up drinking the social issues kool aid.

Millennials aren't amassing wealth. As we age into our 40s a lot of us are struggling the same way we were in our 20s (and posting on the same dead gay comedy forums) and so the fiscal policies of the Republicans aren't the "foot in the door" they used to be for right wing talking points to take hold.

Yep this is how I see it. Home ownership is a big one, owning a home basically helps tie you into the entire economic system and pushes people into seeing everything through the lens of well all these other things are important, but how can my vote most help ensure that I can sell my home at an inflated value to ensure my retirement/pass some on to my kids. If I vote Democrat, they might push for policies that could lower my home value!

Quorum
Sep 24, 2014

REMIND ME AGAIN HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED ONES MOVE?

Zeron posted:

Yep this is how I see it. Home ownership is a big one, owning a home basically helps tie you into the entire economic system and pushes people into seeing everything through the lens of well all these other things are important, but how can my vote most help ensure that I can sell my home at an inflated value to ensure my retirement/pass some on to my kids. If I vote Democrat, they might push for policies that could lower my home value!

That may be true, but when you attain homeownership likely also matters. There's a fair bit of research showing that a cohort's political opinions solidify pretty early in life based on current events at the time. I expect that as a result, a cohort becoming homeowners at 25 has a much larger effect than the same cohort becoming homeowners at 40. Anecdotally, the only thing that changed when my husband and I (both very late millennials) bought a house is that we got to start our crazed emails to the board of supervisors about defunding the police and building train communism with "as a homeowner..."

Velocity Raptor
Jul 27, 2007

I MADE A PROMISE
I'LL DO ANYTHING

Framboise posted:

It's this.

I've never been more apathetic about going to vote and I've been able to do so since 2008. I do it out of bitter obligation just so I feel like I have my say against the Republican in the election at that time, but also knowing that even if the Democrat wins, there isn't going to be any significant change for the better when all they do is cave to any amount of conservative bluster.


SpeedFreek posted:

The general attitude I have seen is both parties suck or it wont affect me so I'm not voting, now that the dog has caught the car its been chasing there is plain as can be proof that at least one republican policy goal will negatively impact them or someone they care about. Thats why many including myself thought the republicans would keep Roe V Wade while campaigning against it as a wedge issue, because they knew how much it would motivate people against them if they did get it struck down.

The bolded parts pretty much describe me, a millennial who graduated college towards the beginning of the recession, 2009.

I feel things need to change, and fast, but one side actively wants to make things worse, and the other is reluctant to make things better.

Couple this with the fact that I live in Rhode Island, I genuinely feel like my vote has no value at the federal level because of the electrical college. Without the EC I could at least take comfort on knowing that my dem vote could counter some chud's vote in the south. But thanks to EC the only way my vote means anything is if my vote is the one that is needed to send RI's 4 EC votes to the federal level, and then, it only matters is if those 4 are enough to tip the vote to the majority. And since RI tends to go Dem each election anyway, that makes my vote mean even less. I still voted for Biden, but that was more a vote against Trump.

Hell, I wanted to vote for Bernie, but because of super Tuesday and the way the primary is structured, by the time it came for RI to vote, it was pretty much just Biden (if there was even something to vote on by the time it came to us. Dunno if there is still a vote held if everyone else drops out.)

E: to be clear, I still vote (definitely for state stuff), it just feels like my vote doesn't actually mean anything at the federal level.

Velocity Raptor fucked around with this message at 16:06 on Apr 9, 2023

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
I'd be interested to see the effect that becoming a parent has on political alignment.

One thing that's going on with Gen X in the stats is that, with some millennial exceptions, the parents who are freaking the gently caress out about their kids' schools turning them into gay trans homos are largely Gen X.

Irrational parental freakouts, over the years -

Greatest - Communists
Silents - Satan
Boomers - Gays
Gen X - Trans
Millennial - Uhhh... screen time? Can't wait to find out!

Mellow Seas fucked around with this message at 16:18 on Apr 9, 2023

BRAKE FOR MOOSE
Jun 6, 2001

Mellow Seas posted:


Irrational parental freakouts, over the years -

Greatest - Communists
Silents - Satan
Boomers - Gays
Gen X - Trans
Millennial - Uhhh... screen time? Can't wait to find out!

Hopefully communists again, it'd mean we're actually a threat.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Mellow Seas posted:

I'd be interested to see the effect that becoming a parent has on political alignment.

One thing that's going on with Gen X in the stats is that, with some millennial exceptions, the parents who are freaking the gently caress out about their kids' schools turning them into gay trans homos are largely Gen X.

Irrational parental freakouts, over the years -

Greatest - Communists
Silents - Satan
Boomers - Gays
Gen X - Trans
Millennial - Uhhh... screen time? Can't wait to find out!

Furries. We're already seeing that freakout, although for now it's more just a branchoff from the general anti-LGBT hysteria.

Also don't be fooled into thinking that we can't go backwards on this.

the_steve
Nov 9, 2005

We're always hiring!

Fister Roboto posted:

Furries. We're already seeing that freakout, although for now it's more just a branchoff from the general anti-LGBT hysteria.

Also don't be fooled into thinking that we can't go backwards on this.

I don't think furries were ever seen as the bullet in the head of all that is good and decent like the other things were.
I think that at worst, they're seen as creepy perverts, but I don't think they generally get lumped into the Groomers category like the main LGBTQ+ body.

They usually stop the furry comparisons at the "They put a litterbox in the classroom because someone said they identify as Garfield" lie.

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

the_steve posted:

I think that at worst, they're seen as creepy perverts, but I don't think they generally get lumped into the Groomers category like the main LGBTQ+ body.
Not yet, but they are adults who dress in colorful animal costumes for often sex-related reasons; seems like kind of a minefield if the RWM wanted to start pushing it. It's weird to think that would be a political issue but people probably thought the same thing about trans people in the 90s.

Also, unlike trans people, Disney actually is responsible for furries! :v:

Yawgmoft
Nov 15, 2004
All the millennial parents I know are freaking out about Charter Schools being a drain on our public school system.

Admittedly a pool of two is too small for charting any broad trends.

Young Freud
Nov 26, 2006

Mellow Seas posted:

I'd be interested to see the effect that becoming a parent has on political alignment.

One thing that's going on with Gen X in the stats is that, with some millennial exceptions, the parents who are freaking the gently caress out about their kids' schools turning them into gay trans homos are largely Gen X.

Irrational parental freakouts, over the years -

Greatest - Communists
Silents - Satan
Boomers - Gays
Gen X - Trans
Millennial - Uhhh... screen time? Can't wait to find out!

The Greatest Generation's freak-out was Nazis and Fascists. The Silents would be Communists, the Boomers would be Satanic Panic. Gen X feels like it's more the Government than Trans people.

Yawgmoft posted:

All the millennial parents I know are freaking out about Charter Schools being a drain on our public school system.

Honestly, this is the best thing to be freaked out at. Charter Schools are a plight and just a reintroduction to school segregation.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
We already had the furry panic, it happened across the internet and on these very forums in the 00s

Then the furries learned that they should keep their sex lives in the bedroom like everyone else and it died down

Unlike most LGBT identities, only a very small subset of furries wants to be openly furry in public 24/7, so it's harder to point at them and scream

Papercut
Aug 24, 2005
Millennials will probably be freaking out about polyamory

Killer robot
Sep 6, 2010

I was having the most wonderful dream. I think you were in it!
Pillbug
The fact that Millennial voting rates have increased predictably with age, and in fact in the last few generations even faster than age would predict, suggests that people in that cohort giving up on voting are serious outliers. It's not just that they're voting at higher rates as time passes, but since 2016 they've been voting at higher rates than Gen X did at that age and generally showing a lot of enthusiasm about it.

Age-related voting rates explain lots of other shifts too. Gen X, even more than most generations, is transitional. The older half, mostly in their 50s, is politically closer to boomers and came of age when Reagan was the hot new thing, and the younger half, mostly in their 40s, are closer to millennials and came of age when the political choice was between "both parties are the same, why should I get involved" and "both sides are just equally extreme, why should I get involved" and the first could still pass the laugh test. It's not really surprising that they have their most conservative on the leading edge of voting rates for multiple reasons.

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Young Freud posted:

The Greatest Generation's freak-out was Nazis and Fascists. The Silents would be Communists, the Boomers would be Satanic Panic. Gen X feels like it's more the Government than Trans people.
Nah Nazis and fascists were the actual threat the Greatest faced as young people, and beat the poo poo out of to earn their name. Then they came home and had babies and spent 20 years scared of their kids either becoming communists or being nuked by communists while treating their PTSD with alcoholism.

Satanic Panic started in the 80s, so figure the concerned parents tended to be 30-50 years old (usually parents start freaking out about these things when their kids are a bit older and they feel like they're losing control over them, so somewhere around 6-16 depending on the family.) That means they would've been mostly born between the early 30s and mid-50s, so boomers definitely got in on that action, yeah.

But I do think the late 90s gay acceptance backlash was the main event for boomer parents, peaking in the 2000 election (top exit poll issue was "moral values") and 2004 election, when boomers were in their 40s and 50s and their kids were teenagers or entering young adulthood.

White Gen Xers were also the first generation to not grow up being explicitly told that they were inherently better than darker skinned people, but they were still implicitly told that, and I think some of them grew very resentful of that eventually.

It's never really gone away (largely because there's so much truth to it) but the 90s were kind of the peak of the "black people are cooler than white people" cultural meme, and I think a lot of Gen X took that poo poo the wrong way.



Obviously generational classification is a bunch of hooey but it's fun to play with the numbers.

Papercut posted:

Millennials will probably be freaking out about polyamory
Oooh, good prediction! I wonder if millennial parents are going on about "rainbow parties" yet.

Mellow Seas fucked around with this message at 17:10 on Apr 9, 2023

bird food bathtub
Aug 9, 2003

College Slice
The Furry community had a serious internal reckoning a few years back where the hard-right was trying to recruit them as a group and they ended up fighting back hard. There was a whole time period with Nazi furries. Recruiting isolated outcasts based on their anger is kinda the right's thing.

Fortunately for us all, furries policed their own and told fascists to get hosed coming down hard on non-inclusive ideologies. My thoughts are they realized they would be allies of convenience and the first against the wall when push came to shove.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Velocity Raptor posted:

The bolded parts pretty much describe me, a millennial who graduated college towards the beginning of the recession, 2009.

I feel things need to change, and fast, but one side actively wants to make things worse, and the other is reluctant to make things better.

Couple this with the fact that I live in Rhode Island, I genuinely feel like my vote has no value at the federal level because of the electrical college. Without the EC I could at least take comfort on knowing that my dem vote could counter some chud's vote in the south. But thanks to EC the only way my vote means anything is if my vote is the one that is needed to send RI's 4 EC votes to the federal level, and then, it only matters is if those 4 are enough to tip the vote to the majority. And since RI tends to go Dem each election anyway, that makes my vote mean even less. I still voted for Biden, but that was more a vote against Trump.

Hell, I wanted to vote for Bernie, but because of super Tuesday and the way the primary is structured, by the time it came for RI to vote, it was pretty much just Biden (if there was even something to vote on by the time it came to us. Dunno if there is still a vote held if everyone else drops out.)

E: to be clear, I still vote (definitely for state stuff), it just feels like my vote doesn't actually mean anything at the federal level.

You have a reduced say in president, perhaps, but you have an outsized vote on Senate makeup, which is far more important. You're also in the top five states of how much say you as an individual have at the state level. Your political goals as a Rhode Islander should really be focused on those elements, especially the Senate if you are interested in federal level political importance - you have 39x as much voting power in terms of influencing federal legislation as a Californian, don't act like that's nothing!

Oxyclean
Sep 23, 2007


haveblue posted:

We already had the furry panic, it happened across the internet and on these very forums in the 00s

Then the furries learned that they should keep their sex lives in the bedroom like everyone else and it died down

Unlike most LGBT identities, only a very small subset of furries wants to be openly furry in public 24/7, so it's harder to point at them and scream
There's something sort of funny about this to me because furry-hate has often been tangential to or outright masked queerphobia, and "keep it to yourself" has been a very frequent criticism of queer people. By no means am I launching an accusation, but hearing "no-one bothers furries now because they keep weirdness to themselves" feels like a weird echo of the old justifications of why people harassed furries.

Not to say there hasn't been furries who don't understand appropriate social boundaries, but that's really been more of a "online people" problem / is not really uniquely furry.

Personally I think it's more because a lot of people have moved on - either because there just isn't a ton of material there - a lot of furries embrace their weirdness, such as taking pride in the fandom/identity being something a lot of advertisers don't want to touch because of the sexual/kink/weird elements, or there isn't really a big audience for furry hate (there's a bigger audience in just hating queer people) or, humorously, a fair amount of people found appeal in vague concepts of "furry." Or at least, I've seen a fair share of non-furry online persons joke about "well what would be my fursona be" only to get a bunch of fan art and have like a "oh, okay, I kind of get the appeal now" moment.

bird food bathtub posted:

The Furry community had a serious internal reckoning a few years back where the hard-right was trying to recruit them as a group and they ended up fighting back hard. There was a whole time period with Nazi furries. Recruiting isolated outcasts based on their anger is kinda the right's thing.

Fortunately for us all, furries policed their own and told fascists to get hosed coming down hard on non-inclusive ideologies. My thoughts are they realized they would be allies of convenience and the first against the wall when push came to shove.
It's interesting because I feel like it's not terribly unlike these forums in terms of the journey from edgy early internet to progressive. But I get the impression furries aren't a monolith and they definitely have their share of edgelords and people who aren't progressive, or just generally have bad opinions. I don't think it's really a "theyd be first up against the wall because furry" but because furry overlaps heavily with various queer identities (it's almost like creating avatar characters is a good way to self-discover) and what also feels like a good deal of neuro-divergence. Also, it's probably a good chunk of younger folks who already tend to lean progressive.

Rogue AI Goddess
May 10, 2012

I enjoy the sight of humans on their knees.
That was a joke... unless..?

Mellow Seas posted:

Millennial - Uhhh... screen time? Can't wait to find out!
AIs, surely.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!
I honestly thought furries were just people who liked My Little Pony a bit too much and thought people were kinkshaming with all the hate. I legit wasn't aware that they were lumped in with LGBT?

Oxyclean
Sep 23, 2007


Boris Galerkin posted:

I honestly thought furries were just people who liked My Little Pony a bit too much and thought people were kinkshaming with all the hate. I legit wasn't aware that they were lumped in with LGBT?
I feel like furry is comically broad with what it encompasses in the same way that "anime" kind if just describes an aesthetic.

It's not really "lumped in" with LGBT. There's just a lot of queer furries / furries tend to be fairly queer friendly and sex-positive.

"bronies" might be the people you were thinking about that liked MLP "a bit too much." (But even then, that's arguably just a term fans adopted like "Trekkie" for Star Trek fans)

World Famous W
May 25, 2007

BAAAAAAAAAAAA
i can only speak for early internet furries, but it was a safe place for various lgbt people because it was such an open and accepting group. knew/know a lot of people who used furries as a social group because they grew up in an oppressive environment

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Fister Roboto posted:

Furries. We're already seeing that freakout, although for now it's more just a branchoff from the general anti-LGBT hysteria.

Also don't be fooled into thinking that we can't go backwards on this.

Climate refugees, domestic and asylum-seeking.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply