Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-

OwlFancier posted:

Nominally, in practice I do not think the military would answer to the monarch over the government, and in fact this has been proven historically.
I know it's all supposedly ceremonial, the king has no real power, would have to sign his own death warrant etc. If all that's really true, then a) what's the purpose of the king?, and b) I'd like to see it proven.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

The monarch's role in British politics is to be the load-bearing nonce. Without Charles our already collapsing democracy would pop out of existence and we'd all suddenly find ourselves in work camps mining the dirt for the super rich.

Hallucinogenic Toreador
Nov 21, 2000

Whoooooahh I'd be
Nothin' without you
Baaaaaa-by

big scary monsters posted:

I know it's all supposedly ceremonial, the king has no real power, would have to sign his own death warrant etc. If all that's really true, then a) what's the purpose of the king?, and b) I'd like to see it proven.

Historically the king did not, in fact, have to sign his own death warrant.

Drone_Fragger
May 9, 2007


Dabir posted:

If anyone here still thinks 'tankie' is a meaningless word, this is one

I would describe myself as a "tankie" (I think tanks are cool and good and we should give more of them to Ukraine)

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

big scary monsters posted:

I know it's all supposedly ceremonial, the king has no real power, would have to sign his own death warrant etc. If all that's really true, then a) what's the purpose of the king?, and b) I'd like to see it proven.

Pageantry. Also a lot of countries have some legal fiction which gives the government legitimacy, because just saying "we have all the guns and tanks" makes the threat a bit too explicit for some people. The UK or its predecessor nations have been around for quite a while and so parliament has just never really changed from "we speak on behalf of magic god man" on the paperwork. Except for that brief time when it did.

Also I would not like to see it proven because while last time they did eventually kill the twat it took a while and got a lot of other people killed in the process because unfortunately, opinion on the matter was not universal.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 18:09 on Apr 11, 2023

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-
If you need a civil war to remove the king it sounds like he does have quite some real power.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
This goes back to the necessity of plucking the heirs again, because the next one just came back and immediately made a transatlantic slave trafficking company to employ his feckless relatives.

Josuke Higashikata
Mar 7, 2013


Green Wing posted:

Defined benefit is a little better but I'm terrified of getting too sick to work. last time I checked the civil service pension scheme pays 2.32% CARE, so if you are at average earnings (like 30k let's say) all of your career on average (salary curves don't work like this but sure) you'd need to be at that level for 45 years to hit £30k annual pension.

Which, like - OK, 45 years of employment before retiring sounds doable, but I'm 33 and I've managed 7, and the next period of illness might be the one that stops me worrying forever. At which point that "huge civil service pension" that sounded so good when I told myself it was worth spending sty much money living in London, turns out to be gently caress all

I had like a 2 day window between CS jobs where I was eligible to cash my CS pension out and I still think back to not doing it (It would have been about 6k) and think I'm a right loving moron.

It's all gambling on the not especially reliable chance that you'll ever be old enough to actually receive it.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

big scary monsters posted:

If you need a civil war to remove the king it sounds like he does have quite some real power.

I would like to think that we have improved on the process since 1650, but I would still prefer not to test it and just wait for them to inbreed to death or something.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010
Substantively, the HoC is the (political) power centre of the UK. I'm surprised this has to be stated.

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-
The death warrant part wasn't really what I was looking to see proven, that's just something you hear thrown around meant to illustrate the monarch's supposed lack of power. It was more the bit where the monarch doesn't influence government. It seems like whenever legislation might impinge on the monarch's interests in a more than ceremonial way, it either doesn't pass or has carve-outs included. If your government always acts in your interests anyway then there's no real need to do anything more.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I would file that as a variation of capitalist problems, because that's how government treats a lot of people.

The monarch has a lot of power but it is the power that a lot of people in elevated positions have.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

OwlFancier posted:

I would like to think that we have improved on the process since 1650, but I would still prefer not to test it and just wait for them to inbreed to death or something.

IDK, Brenda clocked in 96 years and so far the only result of the inbreeding is male pattern baldness, which is only comorbid with terrible political takes.

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

OwlFancier posted:

You need 10 years of NI contributions to get the state pension and 35 years to get the full one.

That 35 years is not as clear as it might be. I had to get 37 years in because I had a few years of "contracted out" so had to 'buy out' the COPE.

I am now into my 39th year (I suppose slightly in to 40 now as we're past 5th April!)

I recommend anyone over 50 (which I am sure there are a few on here ;) :corsair: checks their records online - unless you're in the security services and can't check online - waiving at those watching from GCHQ) and check regularly. And don't be too quick to buy back years of Class 3 because if you buy the wrong back years, you'll spend over £700 and get absolutely no benefit from it whatsoever. (I am not a financial adviser!)

Testro posted:

You can buy NI years to build up your state pension, although it requires you to have the money at hand. I think it's £800 for each full year - but you might have years that have partial payments if you did some work or signed on for a period.

It's worth looking into this asap because you can temporarily buy back as far as 2006. Martin Lewis had an article on it the other week: https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/savings/voluntary-national-insurance-contributions/

It only takes a couple of minutes to check.

About that... BE VERY CAREFUL about buying the right years of voluntary! Take advice from at least 3 different sources (you will get 3 different answers haha). Don't assume the body you speak to at the Pensions Forecast place will get it right either.

Jaeluni Asjil fucked around with this message at 18:25 on Apr 11, 2023

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Tesseraction posted:

IDK, Brenda clocked in 96 years and so far the only result of the inbreeding is male pattern baldness, which is only comorbid with terrible political takes.
And sausage fingers. And :pedo:

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

I think the sausage fingers is more nurture than nature. The nonce thing definitely nature.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010
King Charles banned from Crufts after dog eats his fingers.

Drone_Fragger
May 9, 2007


Jakabite posted:

King Charles banned from Crufts after dog eats his fingers.

Normally the touch if a king cures scrofula. In charles cade, distressingly, it causes it.

big scary monsters
Sep 2, 2011

-~Skullwave~-

Jakabite posted:

King Charles banned from Crufts after dog eats his fingers.

What else are you meant to feed your KC spaniel?

Jel Shaker
Apr 19, 2003

The Perfect Element posted:

So you're saying neither country is ruled over by a leader with total power? Lol OK then.

which number prime minister are we on without an election ?

sebzilla
Mar 17, 2009

Kid's blasting everything in sight with that new-fangled musket.


Jel Shaker posted:

which number prime minister are we on without an election ?

When I think total power, I think Liz Truss

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I would probably suggest that the UK being in a constant state of political collapse is evidence that we live in a democracy because it explains why everyone in power is a loving moron who could only reasonably have gotten there by winning a popularity contest.

Nuclear Spoon
Aug 18, 2010

I want to cry out
but I don’t scream and I don’t shout
And I feel so proud
to be alive
the UK has poorly maintained democratic mechanisms which are gummed up with the piss and poo poo of capital and newspapers owned by nazi freaks

this fact does not lend any legitimacy to the chinese or russian governments, nor their actions (especially in the last decade)

those governments being bad do not mean we should stop fighting for a more just world and a redistribution of wealth

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

So about all the marine deaths off of teeside:

https://twitter.com/LutsandDefoe/status/1645835518251237384

It's the dredging and dumping of soil from the site of the old chemical works (now a freeport site), with lots of nasty stuff buried in the soil that should have stayed buried forever.

https://twitter.com/quentinbudworth/status/1639163224527364097
https://twitter.com/g_gosden/status/1641309111764623360

fuctifino fucked around with this message at 20:04 on Apr 11, 2023

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Joe Biden is driving past my house in about an hours time. We’re going out to wave at him

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
i demand you make a sign about cornpop

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
loyalist counterprotest:

Nilbop
Jun 5, 2004

Looks like someone forgot his hardhat...

big scary monsters posted:

I know it's all supposedly ceremonial, the king has no real power, would have to sign his own death warrant etc. If all that's really true, then a) what's the purpose of the king?, and b) I'd like to see it proven.

The purpose of the King is to stop you asking why all the land in this country is owned by about 200 families by having you think that actually that's good.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

Guavanaut posted:

2022 is gonna be our year baybee!



Step 1: The Economy is dying, recommend that the government cuts public spending and lowers taxes on the wealthy
Step 2: Now that they've done what you told them everything will be back to normal, chart predicted productivity rises accordingly
Step 3: Go back to step 1.


And in keeping with this theme, the author for this is Janan Ganesh, one of George Osborne's biggest cheerleaders. Just a dumb fucker kept around because he tells the problems that they're not the problem.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Step 2.5 - recommend that the media blame the small woke trans boats

Bobby Deluxe
May 9, 2004

OwlFancier posted:

You need 10 years of NI contributions to get the state pension and 35 years to get the full one.
Well poo poo, so what, people just die I guess? Sounds about right for the UK.

I have been putting off trying to get full benefits but I feel like I might have to just because of what I keep hearing about elderly care. I might have a total of ten years if that includes university and jobs over 10 years ago, but it'd be scraping it.

My other half has always been the financially sensible one, I've kind of survived up to this point by being a sort of limpet trying not to use too much of the other person's money.

Cookie Cutter
Nov 29, 2020

Is there something else that's bothering you Mr. President?

Nuclear Spoon posted:

the UK has poorly maintained democratic mechanisms which are gummed up with the piss and poo poo of capital and newspapers owned by nazi freaks

this fact does not lend any legitimacy to the chinese or russian governments, nor their actions (especially in the last decade)

those governments being bad do not mean we should stop fighting for a more just world and a redistribution of wealth

The Chinese government recently lifted 800 million people out of rural poverty, provided high speed rail across the entire country, provide a consistent geopolitical obstacle to US-dominant global capitalism, actually punish their billionaires when they get out of line, have an actual future to offer their citizenry, teach marxism-leninism at school and have full acceptance of transgender people, everything that people go out and march for here is being achieved over there, I don't know what more supposed leftwing people would want from a government if not that. The revolution that feeds the children gets my support, and that's what's happening there, nothing is perfect but we in the UK are in no position to criticise a state that is demonstrably further along the road to socialism than us, especially a state that our state made great pains to oppress for hundreds of years and is playing catch-up to get to where it could have been already. All I'm saying is please don't disregard things as "bad" that we only hear about through media that is filtered down to us that has every interest in framing these things as "authoritarian" and "dictatorial", don't surrender to the thought stopping cliches.

Cookie Cutter fucked around with this message at 22:10 on Apr 11, 2023

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

I feel you can absolutely defend the PRC's state capitalist approach's achievements just as you can say that Lenin's NEP was also effective without having to ignore left-wing Chinese people who have legitimate criticisms of the current system. One can agree that Sinophobia is abundant and bad without having to therefore suggest the PRC is infallible.

Cookie Cutter
Nov 29, 2020

Is there something else that's bothering you Mr. President?

Of course, nothing is infallible. But similarly nothing should be dismissed out of hand, especially if that dismissal aligns with the interests of our own ruling classes.

Nuclear Spoon
Aug 18, 2010

I want to cry out
but I don’t scream and I don’t shout
And I feel so proud
to be alive

Cookie Cutter posted:

The Chinese government recently lifted 800 million people out of rural poverty, provided high speed rail across the entire country, provide a consistent geopolitical obstacle to US-dominant global capitalism, actually punish their billionaires when they get out of line, have an actual future to offer their citizenry, teach marxism-leninism at school and have full acceptance of transgender people, everything that people go out and march for here is being achieved over there, I don't know what more supposed leftwing people would want from a government if not that. The revolution that feeds the children gets my support, and that's what's happening there, nothing is perfect but we in the UK are in no position to criticise a state that is demonstrably further along the road to socialism than us, especially a state that our state made great pains to oppress for hundreds of years and is playing catch-up to get to where it could have been already. All I'm saying is please don't disregard things as "bad" that we only hear about through media that is filtered down to us that has every interest in framing these things as "authoritarian" and "dictatorial", don't surrender to the thought stopping cliches.

i would love for all these things to be as flatly true as you say they are. assuming they are, do you think the xinjiang camps are necessary for these benefits

Cookie Cutter
Nov 29, 2020

Is there something else that's bothering you Mr. President?

Nuclear Spoon posted:

i would love for all these things to be as flatly true as you say they are. assuming they are, do you think the xinjiang camps are necessary for these benefits

I've got good news for you.

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

Lmao. This is the gollywog pub landlords..

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
I was never a racist, I was just wearing this because, at the time, it was politically convenient.

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
surprised he was allowed in the nazi party with a single eyebrow tbh

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Scientastic
Mar 1, 2010

TRULY scientastic.
🔬🍒


Cookie Cutter posted:

have an actual future to offer their citizenry

As long as that citizenry doesn’t dissent or question authority in any way, the moment anyone steps out of line, they don’t have much of an actual future

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply