Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Grimnarsson
Sep 4, 2018

galagazombie posted:

This is why I always take doomposting about US/Western military capabilities with a big grain of salt. There is a rich history of the MIC saying that the 1991 Soviet Union is poised to overrun Europe if we don’t cancel all social programs and give them lots of money.

Kinda like what's going on with the leaks now being disseminated by WaPo that seem to suggest that America's allies should buy more American weapons.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cerebral Bore
Apr 21, 2010


Fun Shoe
the fact that the mic and their assorted thinktanks will always predict doom and gloom to drive arms sales doesn't necessarily mean that they're always wrong about the facts, tho

borgnar
Dec 30, 2018

galagazombie posted:

This is why I always take doomposting about US/Western military capabilities with a big grain of salt. There is a rich history of the MIC saying that the 1991 Soviet Union is poised to overrun Europe if we don’t cancel all social programs and give them lots of money.

you can definitely rely on the big contractors and their ghoul mouthpieces to be all chicken little about this stuff, it makes sense for them to clamor for more cash no matter what, but i think it's important to remember the government spent basically half a trillion dollars on a fighter jet that doesn't work. that ain't even an outlier either aside from the scale of it, the MIC is raking in more money than they ever have to make stupid bullshit that doesn't work, instead of manufacturing stuff that's less lucrative but is actually useful. just because the worst people are saying something doesn't necessarily mean it isn't true (but when it is true it's never for the reasons they say, which i think is the important bit)

Mantis42
Jul 26, 2010

Cerebral Bore posted:

the fact that the mic and their assorted thinktanks will always predict doom and gloom to drive arms sales doesn't necessarily mean that they're always wrong about the facts, tho

yea they couldn't even beat the Taliban, they're losers that have lost almost every war since 1945

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

galagazombie posted:

This is why I always take doomposting about US/Western military capabilities with a big grain of salt. There is a rich history of the MIC saying that the 1991 Soviet Union is poised to overrun Europe if we don’t cancel all social programs and give them lots of money.

They could have and should have if Gorbachev wasn’t naïve and Yeltsin wasn’t a traitor.

Isentropy
Dec 12, 2010

Zhukov should’ve stopped at Paris Lisboa

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Isentropy posted:

Zhukov should’ve stopped at Paris Lisboa

Admittedly, it would have been kind of a fun what if, if the Soviets had kept Japan in the war by delaying August storm (and giving some assurances after Nagasaki) and in turn just completely push everything into Germany in late summer after the supply lines started to catch up. It wasn't going to happen but that was probably the only opening.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 13:41 on Apr 20, 2023

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

I am more and more convinced they just needed to assign one state design bureau to blue jeans and another to rock and roll, while buying bananas from Angola.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Frosted Flake posted:

I am more and more convinced they just needed to assign one state design bureau to blue jeans and another to rock and roll, while buying bananas from Angola.

this
and maybe also buy pineapples from somehwere

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

the soviet union could have won the culture wars if they had simply nationalized kino and grazhdanskaya oborona

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
In all honesty, the Soviets could have held things together if parts of the country wasn’t running out of even bread and even Moscow had a very beet heavy diet. It not really about rock and roll or blue jeans, people were literally going hungry by 1990. By 1991, they only had about 5-5.5b of gold reserves left.

It wasn't all a lie, the question is how it got there.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 17:04 on Apr 20, 2023

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

lobster shirt posted:

the soviet union could have won the culture wars if they had simply nationalized kino and grazhdanskaya oborona
socialism with psychedelic characteristics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvMDJvlRKC4

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

Lostconfused posted:

socialism with psychedelic characteristics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvMDJvlRKC4

feel like pure poo poo just want him back x

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

I think the main difference is just how obviously far into decline Western societies are compared to where they at the end of the Cold War. These think tanks were over estimating Soviet Capabilities in the late 80s. But now we are in that spot the Soviets were between 1986-91. So I wonder if these reports sometime arent down playing just how bad things out of denialism while still trying to do the make it look bad so LockMart gets more contracts.

Like if were talkong about replenishing stocks of artillery we've sent to Ukraine and Javelins in the time frame of maybe a decade and we're doing things like ordering replacement missiles at boutique numbers instead mass numbers you would expect for expenditure both in use and for training I think demonstrates that yeah there is a rot here. Its just the last 20 years has seen an explosion in the propaganda to paper over the obvious rot and people went a long with it because Americans have convinced themsleves it can't be that bad, or it must be worse somewhere else. I think COVID really did a number on just highlighting every single crisis and failure of Late Capitalism, like I didn't even know till recently that last year there was a paper stock shortage and maybe has cleared up by now, but no one is really talking or covering it, because oh yeah theres a paper ahortage sounds like sometbjnf people would say about something in the Soviet Union in 1988

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

Not war related but I've seen more homeless people in the past few months than in the past five years, and the cold/flu shelves at the drug market are still empty.

The societal rot is obvious, it's there for everyone to see. We're just choosing to ignore it in hopes that it sorts its self out somehow.

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Lostconfused posted:

socialism with psychedelic characteristics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvMDJvlRKC4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThmaGMgWRlY

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

paper stock shortage is still a thing and likely to persist or just become baked in because russia is a major supplier of timber, paper stock, and paper, and also paper production is very energy intensive so lol for europe

the us ought to be fine because it is also a major exporter of timber, manufacturer of paper, and has abundant energy supplies but with everything so globalized i have no idea if "ought to be fine" means "is actually fine". like iirc our toilet paper shortage cleared pretty easily because manufacturers just had to switch from commercial to residential stock.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

KomradeX posted:

I think the main difference is just how obviously far into decline Western societies are compared to where they at the end of the Cold War. These think tanks were over estimating Soviet Capabilities in the late 80s. But now we are in that spot the Soviets were between 1986-91. So I wonder if these reports sometime arent down playing just how bad things out of denialism while still trying to do the make it look bad so LockMart gets more contracts.

Like if were talkong about replenishing stocks of artillery we've sent to Ukraine and Javelins in the time frame of maybe a decade and we're doing things like ordering replacement missiles at boutique numbers instead mass numbers you would expect for expenditure both in use and for training I think demonstrates that yeah there is a rot here. Its just the last 20 years has seen an explosion in the propaganda to paper over the obvious rot and people went a long with it because Americans have convinced themsleves it can't be that bad, or it must be worse somewhere else. I think COVID really did a number on just highlighting every single crisis and failure of Late Capitalism, like I didn't even know till recently that last year there was a paper stock shortage and maybe has cleared up by now, but no one is really talking or covering it, because oh yeah theres a paper ahortage sounds like sometbjnf people would say about something in the Soviet Union in 1988

I would say the West has perhaps a slower burning but larger systemic issue. The Soviets put themselves in a position where they ran out of cash, but if they had worked out a deal with OPEC (theoretically) it may have stopped a collapse. The system (beyond the post 1985 leadership) wasn’t the problem but the pressure being placed on it was too much for it to handle. The Soviets were obviously way too pumped up as a threat but I don’t actually think the Soviet military was a shell either but the economy sustaining it simply couldn’t function without trade inputs.

The West’s issues are a lot deeper and I don’t think are easily fixable, successive generations made the system like this for a reason. You can’t really throw cash at it, trillions can flow through it like nothing. We don’t really know the conclusion at this point but the system is running how it is suppose to.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 16:13 on Apr 20, 2023

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

I assume paper shortages are good for Canada, because we've got lots of empty land with trees and our entire economy is based on providing raw materials to USA.

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

Lostconfused posted:

I assume paper shortages are good for Canada, because we've got lots of empty land with trees and our entire economy is based on providing raw materials to USA.

What about your vital 'providing real estate to Chinese millionaires' sector?

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

Ardennes posted:

It really about rock and roll or blue jeans, people were literally going hungry by 1990. By 1991, they only had about 5-5.5b of gold reserves left.

It wasn't all a lie, the question is how it got there.

I remember reading a 1986 CIA report (it might have been in the WorldBook, this was in college) stating that the average Russian/Soviet (I forget which specifically) consumed more calories daily than the average American. how did things get so bad so quickly? how did they not have the food situation together in the fuckin 80s?

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

Lostconfused posted:

Not war related but I've seen more homeless people in the past few months than in the past five years, and the cold/flu shelves at the drug market are still empty.

The societal rot is obvious, it's there for everyone to see. We're just choosing to ignore it in hopes that it sorts its self out somehow.

I don't think it's that simple. you really only go to the store for flu/cold medicine what, twice a year? a bit more if you have young kids and don't stock up. otherwise you're not even registering that section of the aisle. you drive to a couple stores til you get what you need and myopically extrapolate "wow I guess everyone's sick." it's hard to realize a pattern in a place you rarely visit, and nobody's taught us to pick up on cues like that, so I’m not sure it's a choice as much as obliviousness

the cascading amphetamine shortage, though, is loving bonkers and a big red flag. it's been like 8 months and they forecast a resolution in "a few more weeks"

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

indigi posted:

I remember reading a 1986 CIA report (it might have been in the WorldBook, this was in college) stating that the average Russian/Soviet (I forget which specifically) consumed more calories daily than the average American. how did things get so bad so quickly? how did they not have the food situation together in the fuckin 80s?

you know all that b-roll footage of empty of stores and breadlines that is always shown in documentaries and on tv about russia? all of that stuff was shot after Gorby did his reforms.

How did the food situation get so hosed? Neoliberalism.

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

lobster shirt posted:

paper stock shortage is still a thing and likely to persist or just become baked in because russia is a major supplier of timber, paper stock, and paper, and also paper production is very energy intensive so lol for europe

the us ought to be fine because it is also a major exporter of timber, manufacturer of paper, and has abundant energy supplies but with everything so globalized i have no idea if "ought to be fine" means "is actually fine". like iirc our toilet paper shortage cleared pretty easily because manufacturers just had to switch from commercial to residential stock.

Ahh, that makes sense. I thought it was just weird I had not heard about it before till I backed a kickstarter the other day that said that fulfillment might be delayed thanks to the paper shortage. This is based in the UK so lolz but I figured the printing would be done in China like everything else


Ardennes posted:

I would say the West has perhaps a slower burning but larger systemic issue. The Soviets put themselves in a position where they ran out of cash, but if they had worked out a deal with OPEC (theoretically) it may have stopped a collapse. The system (beyond the post 1985 leadership) wasn’t the problem but the pressure being placed on it was too much for it to handle. The Soviets were obviously way too pumped up as a threat but I don’t actually think the Soviet military was a shell either but the economy sustaining it simply couldn’t function without trade inputs.

The West’s issues are a lot deeper and I don’t think are easily fixable, successive generations made the system like this for a reason. You can’t really throw cash at it, trillions can flow through it like nothing. We don’t really know the conclusion at this point but the system is running how it is suppose to.

Well yeah thats the difference the Soviets mismanaged themselves to destruction, though I don't know how much of a deal with OPEC they could have cut with how close the US was to many of the OPEC countries in the 80s. It really shows how people can sense the blood in the water that they didn't go with our plan to do it to Russia again at the start of the war we provoked. But yes the big difference is the Soviet system fell apart from mismanagement, while Western Capitalism is in full free fall because its functioning the way it was ment to

ro5s
Dec 27, 2012

A happy little mouse!

What’s a good book to read on the decline/fall of the Soviet Union? It feels like something I should know about but I don’t even know where to start.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

ro5s posted:

What’s a good book to read on the decline/fall of the Soviet Union? It feels like something I should know about but I don’t even know where to start.

Haven't read it yet, but Collapse is supposed to be good.
https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300268171/collapse/

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

Ardennes posted:

I would say the West has perhaps a slower burning but larger systemic issue. The Soviets put themselves in a position where they ran out of cash, but if they had worked out a deal with OPEC (theoretically) it may have stopped a collapse. The system (beyond the post 1985 leadership) wasn’t the problem but the pressure being placed on it was too much for it to handle. The Soviets were obviously way too pumped up as a threat but I don’t actually think the Soviet military was a shell either but the economy sustaining it simply couldn’t function without trade inputs.

The West’s issues are a lot deeper and I don’t think are easily fixable, successive generations made the system like this for a reason. You can’t really throw cash at it, trillions can flow through it like nothing. We don’t really know the conclusion at this point but the system is running how it is suppose to.

Also IIRC OPEC was flooding the market with oil in order to screw over the Iranians, but that also had a (completely intended) side effect of screwing over the Soviets and making the Iraqis dependent on gulf financing. So it's hard to see OPEC cutting a deal to drive up prices for the benefit of the Soviets without some major pushback from the US.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

sullat posted:

Also IIRC OPEC was flooding the market with oil in order to screw over the Iranians, but that also had a (completely intended) side effect of screwing over the Soviets and making the Iraqis dependent on gulf financing. So it's hard to see OPEC cutting a deal to drive up prices for the benefit of the Soviets without some major pushback from the US.

That why I was saying theoretically, as unlikely as it was, it pretty much would be the only thing that could save them at that point. They were simply running out of their reserves too quickly.

That said, there are some oddities about the 1990-91, while immense pressure was being placed on the Soviet Union as a whole, the 1990 harvest was actually pretty good. The Western press wrote off it as “inefficient” Soviet distribution but they hadn’t had that issue to that degree at that point.

The LA Times claimed there were train cars filled with rotting meat around Moscow and that simply they couldn’t get it into stores. On paper, there shouldn’t have been the hunger that was going on, but nevertheless it happened.

Overall, their fiscal situation was miserable but there are some lingering questions of what was exactly happening at that time.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 17:06 on Apr 20, 2023

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

ro5s posted:

What’s a good book to read on the decline/fall of the Soviet Union? It feels like something I should know about but I don’t even know where to start.

Kotkin's Armageddon Averted

ro5s
Dec 27, 2012

A happy little mouse!

gradenko_2000 posted:

Kotkin's Armageddon Averted

genericnick posted:

Haven't read it yet, but Collapse is supposed to be good.
https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300268171/collapse/

Thanks, I'll take a look at both of these.

skooma512
Feb 8, 2012

You couldn't grok my race car, but you dug the roadside blur.

Mantis42 posted:

yea they couldn't even beat the Taliban, they're losers that have lost almost every war since 1945

If they beat the Taliban and win the war that means the budget gets cut. Victory is bad for business.

[Leaving aside the greater concern that this isn't possible.]

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

not going to read the details of this but: owned. https://news.usni.org/2023/04/20/ra...cs-construction

Mister Bates
Aug 4, 2010

galagazombie posted:

This is why I always take doomposting about US/Western military capabilities with a big grain of salt. There is a rich history of the MIC saying that the 1991 Soviet Union is poised to overrun Europe if we don’t cancel all social programs and give them lots of money.

the Soviet military would have absolutely won a conventional war in Europe pretty much right up to the point the Berlin Wall came down, which is why the West's plans for fighting the Soviets involved deploying nukes early and often

lobster shirt
Jun 14, 2021

Mister Bates posted:

the Soviet military would have absolutely won a conventional war in Europe pretty much right up to the point the Berlin Wall came down, which is why the West's plans for fighting the Soviets involved deploying nukes early and often

yes indeed this is a major reason why the usa never articulated a no first use policy, it would be tantamount to saying "we will not defend our nato allies in a conventional war with nukes" which is tantamount to saying "we will lose a war in europe"

im_sorry
Jan 15, 2006

(9999)
Ultra Carp

ro5s posted:

What’s a good book to read on the decline/fall of the Soviet Union? It feels like something I should know about but I don’t even know where to start.

http://en.kremlingames.com/ has made a couple games about the topic that are apparently quite good, although I haven't figured out how to play them yet. "Crisis in the Kremlin" is a remake of a game from the early 90s (originally by a Reaganite, but the remake was done by communists).

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021

skooma512 posted:

If they beat the Taliban and win the war that means the budget gets cut. Victory is bad for business.

[Leaving aside the greater concern that this isn't possible.]

idk, the sikhs managed to beat up the afghans black and blue and they had to make do with dumbasses. Maybe ranjit singh was just built different.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006

Ardennes posted:

The LA Times claimed there were train cars filled with rotting meat around Moscow and that simply they couldn’t get it into stores. On paper, there shouldn’t have been the hunger that was going on, but nevertheless it happened.

yeah that happens when a rail system isn’t functioning properly. the reefers don’t get maintained or the reefer fuel tanks don’t get refilled when trains get stuck and delayed.

they’re super gross. usually they can refreeze them before unloading them.

how much it fucks up the economy depends on the effectiveness of the country’s marine insurance system. even one rail car is an awful lot of meat and would be a big loss for an uninsured shipper.

that’s why we aren’t reading about it here in the US.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Mister Bates posted:

the Soviet military would have absolutely won a conventional war in Europe pretty much right up to the point the Berlin Wall came down, which is why the West's plans for fighting the Soviets involved deploying nukes early and often


lobster shirt posted:

yes indeed this is a major reason why the usa never articulated a no first use policy, it would be tantamount to saying "we will not defend our nato allies in a conventional war with nukes" which is tantamount to saying "we will lose a war in europe"

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy
No, first use!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Bar Ran Dun posted:

yeah that happens when a rail system isn’t functioning properly. the reefers don’t get maintained or the reefer fuel tanks don’t get refilled when trains get stuck and delayed.

they’re super gross. usually they can refreeze them before unloading them.

how much it fucks up the economy depends on the effectiveness of the country’s marine insurance system. even one rail car is an awful lot of meat and would be a big loss for an uninsured shipper.

that’s why we aren’t reading about it here in the US.

It probably didn't have anything to do physically with the trains or marine shipping, that wasn't reportedly an issue. Trains were moving across the Soviet Union, it was when they physically got to destinations but it was the offloading that was being held up.

There is an argument to be made in 1991 at least that the massive increase in retail prices may have been part of it as food was being shipped but the citizenry couldn't afford it. That said, there was issue prior to that point.

Essentially, the Soviet central planned economy was designed to operate a certain way and in the late 1980s/early 90s as they experimented there does seem more weird issues that seem to crop up. In the West they were just blaming central planning period, but it is clear the situation hadn't gotten that bad until liberalization took place.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 07:42 on Apr 21, 2023

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply