|
Bank man is going to
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 04:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 02:23 |
|
Thesaurus posted:is sbf an ape? slurp it and find out
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 04:33 |
|
https://twitter.com/unusual_whales/status/1650703990429204482?t=-hUg09v3jxfT8yUnIdYXfA&s=19 One Weird Trick to BEAT the SEC! The government hates it!
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 04:36 |
|
Parkingtigers posted:slurp it and find out no you don't slurp the ape the ape slurps the juice! too many have died making this error
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 04:36 |
|
HootTheOwl posted:GME has physically copies of games something you can't get online (or at release day). I don't know if that niche is big enough, but I'm real tired of downloading games only to have the market turn off and bricking my purchase Embrace piracy and gently caress Nintendo. Your games also tend to not have much if any data on them. Hard copies just end up being your license key. I have no qualms with anyone that prefers owning a physical version of their game and you have the advantage of being able to trade, sell, or lend them out.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 04:39 |
|
Star Man posted:Embrace piracy and gently caress Nintendo. Buddy, they don't even let me gently caress Nintendo.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 05:19 |
|
Horseshoe theory posted:https://twitter.com/unusual_whales/status/1650703990429204482?t=-hUg09v3jxfT8yUnIdYXfA&s=19 looking at it, the suit is to compel the sec to draft rules on cryptocurrency markets. seems performative. first off coinbase petitioned for the creation of rules a year ago, and maybe the sec moves faster than other federal entities, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to take longer than a year to craft rules for an emerging security/commodity/currency/scam. secondly, the sec could also say "fine, the new rule is that cryptos are securities"
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 05:57 |
|
notwithoutmyanus posted:It's implied from the article, pretty clearly that he hadn't done this poo poo with vpn and all that *on his own phone* if it was a dumbphone as you note - and that he used his parents phones to do it. Especially if Sam already has a basic brick phone then where the hell else did it come from? I guess it can be seen as grasping at straws but it doesn't seem that tenuous to me. ohhhh okay this explains why it took so long for you to stop gleefully eating poo poo in the make fun of people who gleefully eat poo poo thread, your reading comprehension and sense of linear time is utterly hosed, here let me help back in late january
FAQ Did Sam use either of his parents' smartphones to contact a potential witness over signal? No, Sam used his own smartphone to contact a potential witness over signal back in january How did Sam use a dumbphone to contact a potential witness over signal? Contacting a witness over signal happened back when he still had a smartphone; his currently having a dumbphone is a direct result of him contacting a witness over signal So if Sam has his own smartphone, why did he use his parent's phone to contact a potential witness over signal? He didn- it doesn- wh- what? dude seriously what the gently caress is wrong with you
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 06:36 |
|
hi sam, hope you've been eating plenty of shrimp
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 06:39 |
|
You can buy physical games from Amazon too, and I'm pretty sure other places even in the USA. Hell, down here JB Hi-Fi usually has them at least ten bucks cheaper than EB. The BBBY thing is basically a cargo cult of a cargo cult.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 06:48 |
|
Taking the stance of "sbf didn't do this crime" seems like a poor choice no matter what the crime
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 10:38 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:They don't. There's no valuable asset there. If there was a part of the company that, freed of the anchor of the under-performing parts, could be profitable today then it would continue being. It would be owned by the creditors, it would be restructured into something new, but it would trundle forward. It'll also never not be funny that Ryan Cohen (and Carl loving Icahn) is seen by this group as messiahs - when one of them literally dumped his bag on them at the peak and very clearly knows how to work these morons into a frenzy to pump his poo poo whenever he wants (see: Nordstrom).
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 11:42 |
|
gently caress the hedge fund vulture capitalists! loving scum Save us Carl Icahn!
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 12:05 |
|
clearly Bed Bath and Beyond just had too much, they need to cut out one of those. Probably just limit yourselves to Bed and Bath, cut out the Beyond. cost-reduction, it's smart.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 12:41 |
|
But then where will we get our reality altering remotes?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 12:44 |
|
Finally, an Iraqi Dinar scam that can still get me an Air Fryer!
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 12:46 |
|
Blade Runner posted:Taking the stance of "sbf didn't do this crime" seems like a poor choice no matter what the crime So that's who Jack the Ripper actually was!
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 13:14 |
|
ellie the beep posted:ohhhh okay this explains why it took so long for you to stop gleefully eating poo poo in the make fun of people who gleefully eat poo poo thread, your reading comprehension and sense of linear time is utterly hosed, here let me help You could have said "you got the timeframe wrong and came to the wrong conclusion" with a lot less words, you know. I was wrong. It's not complicated. If you think I'm not eating poo poo every day for deciding to have touched crypto in the first place, I just remind you that I don't live for somethingawful so I'm not exactly posting all the time. I just post when I see dumb poo poo come up in crypto circles.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:23 |
|
sbf, while on a vegan diet, ate several shrimp a day for a year and a half, by accident
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:31 |
|
Boxturret posted:sbf, while on a vegan diet, ate several shrimp a day for a year and a half, by accident W- wh- hhhhhhh? How the gently caress do you eat shrimp "by accident"?
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:36 |
|
he thought they were vegan
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:39 |
|
he thought the shimp just fried the rice
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:41 |
|
Shrimp are vegetables.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:50 |
|
PurpleXVI posted:W- wh- hhhhhhh? How the gently caress do you eat shrimp "by accident"? amphetamines are a hell of a drug
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 17:57 |
|
No vegan diet, no vegan powers!
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 18:04 |
|
Foo Diddley posted:he thought they were vegan they eat worms/larvae
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 18:20 |
|
I'm going to start placing a $25 bet on a Total Market Index Fund every time I see bitcoin news and then i'm going to HODL for the next 40 years, just to prove how stupid people who invest in the stock market are I hope that opens everyone's eyes to how very stupid fiat money is when I withdraw that cash and can only buy myself a comfortable retirement instead of a bunch of cool Bored Apes
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 18:27 |
|
notwithoutmyanus posted:You could have said "you got the timeframe wrong and came to the wrong conclusion" with a lot less words, you know. I was wrong. It's not complicated. If you think I'm not eating poo poo every day for deciding to have touched crypto in the first place, I just remind you that I don't live for somethingawful so I'm not exactly posting all the time. I just post when I see dumb poo poo come up in crypto circles. i did say that in my initial response you then doubled down in saying you werent wrong and that you had great reading comprehension, then picked out two quotes from the article that didnt support your allegations
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 18:40 |
|
PurpleXVI posted:W- wh- hhhhhhh? How the gently caress do you eat shrimp "by accident"? Misunderstood someone posting about bitcoin whales, started filter feeding
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 19:12 |
|
mistook the shrimp for pastries
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 19:14 |
|
GhostofJohnMuir posted:looking at it, the suit is to compel the sec to draft rules on cryptocurrency markets. seems performative. first off coinbase petitioned for the creation of rules a year ago, and maybe the sec moves faster than other federal entities, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to take longer than a year to craft rules for an emerging security/commodity/currency/scam. secondly, the sec could also say "fine, the new rule is that cryptos are securities" Coinbase's chief legal officer (who is still sporting a NFT profile pic and .eth handle in April of 2023) has a passive-aggressive blogpost up over it, which links to their July 2022 petition to the SEC, and after glancing that it for the first time... yeah, you'd have to get a court order to force me to waste the time it would take to write a response to that overly long pile of misdirection. i'm no lawyer but it remains painfully obvious that all this whining about "lack of clarity" is an attempt to demand new rules because they simply don't like the old rules. This all feels like the tech company equivalent of sovereign citizen bullshit, they're more or less arguing that securities regulations don't apply because their securities
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 20:49 |
|
The lack of clarity and asking for new rules to be drafted is for them to position that their ongoing fraud wasn't fraud when they did it because at the time cryptocurrency rules hadn't been drafted. If a judge or the SEC were to say that cryptocoins are securities, that's loving hard as poo poo to weasel out of, whereas if they say crypto was always something else they can both be absolved of their ongoing fraud and pivot to a different/legitimate legal position where they can use their ill-gotten gains to lobby in favor of whatever they want. It's loving hard to, at this point, change securities laws. It's never been about being free from government or whatever, they just wanted to be the guys that have everything before the rules are established. Like bankers in the 1900s. They see no issue with government regulation, etc., their only problem is that they don't currently control everything.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 21:02 |
|
I skimmed through their petition, and yeah it seems like their whole argument is "hey these tokens cant be securities because it would be bad for our business model". The SEC already outlined why they think several tokens that Coinbase currently lists are securities in the Bittrex complaint a few weeks ago. Mostly they use the howey test, so when a group of people 1) sells a token to raise money 2) to be used to develop a cypto-thing 3) with the expectation that token will raise in value following the development work.... buddy, you've got a security. Coinbase naturally finds this inconvient, but it seems pretty straightforward. I dont think their lawsuit is going to go the way they hope.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 22:12 |
|
drk posted:their petition Lol that it opens with "It's extremely unfair that the SEC has given us no notice that they plan to categorize digital assets as securities" followed immediately by "the SEC gave us formal written notice that they plan to categorize digital assets as securities, but that's not fair."
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 22:23 |
|
drk posted:I dont think their lawsuit is going to go the way they hope. This can be said of basically everything in crypto-world. The only people who will make money on crypto already made money on crypto by selling their crypto.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 23:06 |
|
I have to wonder if they would even bother with the SEC lawsuit if they weren't already publicly traded, and thus subject to shareholder lawsuits. At some point, even for the most dedicated scammer, it's time to roll it up and move on to the next scam. Of course, making a big public spectacle out of "sticking it to the man" and appearing to defend the rapidly declining shareholder value is an important part of these guys preparing their landing spots for the next scam.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 23:19 |
|
jokes posted:It's never been about being free from government or whatever, they just wanted to be the guys that have everything before the rules are established. Like bankers in the 1900s. They see no issue with government regulation, etc., their only problem is that they don't currently control everything. "The continued existence of crypto as we know it" and "good government policy/regulations" are mutually exclusive, is what I'm getting at, I think.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 23:21 |
|
Alienating the original suckers isn't anywhere as important in a ponzi scheme as pulling in new ones. If the government creates regulation, that creates an illusion of safety, something that prompts people who were on the sidelines to jump in, something that brings in fresh blood. Ponzi schemes need fresh blood, the old blood don't cut it no more-- they're about tapped out on finding new dumbfuck techbros and libertarians on TikTok or whatever.The SEC not regulating it is actually very effective in killing crypto. Ideally, crypto wants a lot of regulation that it steers because it allows them to take fresh suckers' money while also not having to work very hard. And if you're curious how in the gently caress crypto can survive if its highly regulated, casinos makes more money operating as "legitimate businesses" under the watchful eye of gaming commissions and regulators than they ever did running back-room deals. They used to only appeal to gamblers, now everyone gambles. Banks make more money today fixing the market with high costs of entry and ongoing regulation/compliance than they ever did buying scratchers in the 20s. Losing the message of the con that it's about privacy/deregulation/banking the unbanked will do absolutely nothing to kill enthusiasm for a ponzi scheme. This is because, at its core, crypto is a game about finding suckers-- full stop.
|
# ? Apr 25, 2023 23:51 |
|
the sbf ate shrimp while on a vegan diet was a hoax headline.... edit: https://www.thedailybeast.com/ftx-founder-sam-bankman-fried-admits-he-gave-dark-money-to-the-gop-and-has-one-credit-card-left quote:Adding to the mystery was a viral photo of what looked like a New York Times headline, declaring that SBF “‘May Not Have Been Vegan’ for at Least Last 17 Months.” (“Emails and text messages reveal the 30-year-old entrepreneur may have ‘accidentally’ eaten as many as 3,000 shrimp,” the purported subhead read.) https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...p-idUSL1N32W19B quote:A fabricated headline matching the style of The New York Times claiming that the FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried mistakenly ate 3,000 shrimp duped some online. Strong Sauce fucked around with this message at 00:15 on Apr 26, 2023 |
# ? Apr 26, 2023 00:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 4, 2024 02:23 |
|
jokes posted:Alienating the original suckers isn't anywhere as important in a ponzi scheme as pulling in new ones. If the government creates regulation, that creates an illusion of safety, something that prompts people who were on the sidelines to jump in, something that brings in fresh blood. Ponzi schemes need fresh blood, the old blood don't cut it no more-- they're about tapped out on finding new dumbfuck techbros and libertarians on TikTok or whatever.The SEC not regulating it is actually very effective in killing crypto.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 00:39 |