|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRCKIP5paEU
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 18:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
All I know is that the Transformer movie will be a failure if "The Touch" doesn't play when Unicron is defeated.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 18:41
|
|
|
I've been to Venice and its nothing like that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 18:49
|
|
|
This was probably the least bad of all the trailers for this and it still looks like dogshit. At least DMX's estate is getting a check I guess. Wasn't there supposed to be another movie between this and Bumblebee as part of the series reboot? Seems like there's some connective tissue missing here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 19:42
|
|
|
The latest from Taika.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRH5u5lpArQ
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 19:49
|
|
|
Fassbender’s back baby!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 19:56
|
|
|
That's a great trailer. Taika knows or at least knows how to delegate a good trailer
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 20:06
|
|
|
When did CinemaCon become a huge event that major films showcase stuff at? Is this recent? I feel like every anticipated movie coming out this year has a presence there and is showing stuff off.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 20:16
|
|
|
Shageletic posted:That's a great trailer. Taika knows or at least knows how to delegate a good trailer Yeah, I've soured on Taika lately, but this looks great.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 20:37
|
|
|
It looks a little cloying, but I love him plus Ted Lasso so I'm down for more of the same!
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 20:39
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:When did CinemaCon become a huge event that major films showcase stuff at? Is this recent? I feel like every anticipated movie coming out this year has a presence there and is showing stuff off. I'm kind of glad movies that wouldn't really fit at a Comic Con or aren't going to be at an award-bait film festival have something like this. About time imo
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 20:50
|
|
|
edogawa rando posted:The latest from Taika. what is with the weird title at 1:18.... odd choice.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 20:55
|
|
|
Jewmanji posted:When did CinemaCon become a huge event that major films showcase stuff at? Is this recent? I feel like every anticipated movie coming out this year has a presence there and is showing stuff off. It's been around forever but I think the timing has as much to do with it as anything. Lots of summer flicks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 21:33
|
|
|
edogawa rando posted:The latest from Taika. this was originally filmed pre-COVID, which is not usually a good sign. that said, this might be the rare case where the delays had little to do with the film's quality--Will Arnett replaced Armie Hammer for reshoots which probably took some time to pull together given the cast's schedules and Taika's Marvel commitments JazzFlight posted:Anyone know why it says "A Story a Century in the Making?" it's supposed to be "the origin of the wishing star from Disney films" (no, I can't think of any other than Pinocchio that feature one)
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 21:35
|
|
|
JazzFlight posted:Anyone know why it says "A Story a Century in the Making?" This year is Disney's 100th anniversary. "Disney Magic" is wishing on a star. Therefore this is the movie about "Disney Magic" which has been around for 100 years. Just marketing to tie into the anniversary.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 22:13
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9BwB3SBPOg Trailer for the Hunger Games prequel, The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes. The story takes place 60 years before the original books/movies and is about young Coriolanus Snow (Donald Sutherland's character) and how he took the first steps in his rise to power. The trailer actually gives away quite a bit of the story, especially how the actual Hunger Games ends like halfway through the story.
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2023 23:37
|
|
|
muscles like this! posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9BwB3SBPOg Maybe I'm just a hater, but who gives a poo poo about a film like this? Like, why is this necessary? What is this film adding to the overall story? IDK. I also just generally hate prequel stories in general. They are rarely, if ever, done well and they are almost always completely loving pointless.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 00:09
|
|
|
It’s to make money
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 00:30
|
|
|
Mordiceius posted:IDK. I also just generally hate prequel stories in general. They are rarely, if ever, done well and they are almost always completely loving pointless. Pearl
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 00:34
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:It’s to make money Granted, but there are so many people that I see get excited whenever any prequel films/shows get revealed. Maybe I'm just broken in the brain, but I literally cannot think of a time when I've gotten excited to watch anything considered a prequel to something existing. Snooze Cruise posted:Pearl I don't watch slashers, so I wouldn't be able to comment on this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 00:40
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:Pearl Wasn't Pearl shot immediately after X? I feel like if you have a prequel planned from the get go, it doesn't count since the bad ones are usually cash grabs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 00:50
|
|
|
The sequel to bumblebee is, uh, way bigger in scale than I expected. i wonder how much of it is based on notes from whatever sequel to the last knight they didn't do, but earth was unicron in that one?? aren't these still in the same continuity?? michelle yeoh bird robot??
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 00:56
|
|
|
I've been using my moviepass as much as I can before it implodes and if I have to see that flash trailer onemore time THERE MIGHT NOT BE A FUTURE
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 01:39
|
|
|
Mordiceius posted:Maybe I'm just a hater, but who gives a poo poo about a film like this? Like, why is this necessary? What is this film adding to the overall story? Hunger Game$
|
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2023 05:47
|
|
|
Mordiceius posted:Granted, but there are so many people that I see get excited whenever any prequel films/shows get revealed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 13:50
|
|
|
AceOfFlames posted:Wasn't Pearl shot immediately after X? I feel like if you have a prequel planned from the get go, it doesn't count since the bad ones are usually cash grabs. They were shot at the same time, on the same sets in NZ and Ti West and Mia Goth conceived of and wrote Pearl while quarantined before shooting X.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 14:46
|
|
|
Charlz Guybon posted:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is one of the greatest westerns of all time and it's a prequel for A Fistful of Dollars and A Few Dollars More. Que
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 15:08
|
|
|
So I guess no one's going in to bat for Temple of Doom??  I'll toss a contender into the ring: Kong: Skull Island was a pretty good prequel to the Monsterverse movies
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 15:45
|
|
|
Temple of Doom is a terrific model for a prequel. It gives the character a proper arc, it expands his world without everything having to be a direct tie-in into Raiders, and it feels like Just Another Adventure. It's the exact opposite approach of Solo. The film has its problems, but it avoids most prequel issues. Even Last Crusade, which leans too hard into giving an unnecessary origin story for a bunch of nonsense, also couched it all in terrific pathos. The only issue with Doom as a prequel is that nobody paid attention to the exact date of Raiders, so when the date card comes up it doesn't register as a prequel. feedmyleg fucked around with this message at 17:45 on Apr 30, 2023 |
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 17:15
|
|
|
The Good the Bad the Ugly is basically pure poetry in Western form. Easily my favorite Western.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 19:02
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:Temple of Doom is a terrific model for a prequel. It gives the character a proper arc, it expands his world without everything having to be a direct tie-in into Raiders, and it feels like Just Another Adventure. It's the exact opposite approach of Solo. The film has its problems, but it avoids most prequel issues. Even Last Crusade, which leans too hard into giving an unnecessary origin story for a bunch of nonsense, also couched it all in terrific pathos. Everyone who loves and appreciates Temple of Doom is my brother. Speaking of great prequels, we had Rogue One which was a great Star War (and I would argue The Best Star War), and this very year we got Andor as a prequel to the prequel and that is *unarguably* the greatest think to have ever happened to the franchise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 30, 2023 19:10
|
|
|
Samovar posted:Que https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollars_Trilogy#Development quote:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is considered a prequel,[4] since it depicts Eastwood's character gradually acquiring the clothing he wears throughout the first two films and because it takes place during the American Civil War (1861–1865), whereas the other two films feature comparatively more modern firearms and other props. EDIT: Woah, I didn't realize they were completely in reverse order https://screenrant.com/dollars-trilogy-movies-order-connections-explained/ quote:Given its expansive reliance and commentary on the American Civil War, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly is chronologically the earliest movie, despite being produced last. Leone implemented the infamous American conflict into his film in order to deliver some stark commentary against the brutality of war, primarily using Eastwood's character. In terms of events, Blondie slowly picks up the pieces of his iconic outfit throughout before finally donning the whole get-up in the ending of Clint Eastwood's movie. Charlz Guybon fucked around with this message at 01:19 on May 1, 2023 |
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 01:15
|
|
|
So, best watched in release order or chronological order? I haven't seen those films since I was a kid an have a hankering for some old school westerns.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 08:07
|
|
|
The production value gets exponentially better with every one, I’d watch in release order.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 08:16
|
|
|
Continuity doesn’t particularly matter that much between the films, so order make a huge difference narratively. The above posters point about production quality is good though.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 10:33
|
|
|
Thanks. It might seem like a daft question, as release order is always the default. But always nice to check if it's one of those situations where rejigging things makes it better.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 10:50
|
|
|
But also Eastwood's character has different names/nicknames throughout the trilogy. And there's two Lee Van Cleefs.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 20:12
|
|
|
I read somewhere about the theory that the man with no name is a fallen angel cursed to walk the earth that was pretty compelling
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2023 20:19
|
|
|
kiimo posted:I read somewhere about the theory that the man with no name is a fallen angel cursed to walk the earth that was pretty compelling Link?
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2023 09:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
kiimo posted:I read somewhere about the theory that the man with no name is a fallen angel cursed to walk the earth that was pretty compelling Well yeah he's the devil round these parts. Makes gunpowder out of his piss and everything. Regardless of wether you could actually do that or not, not an old timey West Chemist, pretty develish
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2023 11:53
|
|
