|
Rofl
|
# ? Apr 16, 2023 05:51 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 18:16 |
|
Edit Not that’s Saruman I guess my bad
|
# ? Apr 18, 2023 23:56 |
|
Is it written anywhere how long Elf adolescence lasts? Do they grow up into adult form on a human scale and then cease to grow or are they more akin to Hobbits who still have their tweens in their thirties?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2023 22:57 |
|
Arc Hammer posted:Is it written anywhere how long Elf adolescence lasts? Do they grow up into adult form on a human scale and then cease to grow or are they more akin to Hobbits who still have their tweens in their thirties? IIRC it’s discussed in Laws and Customs, let me see if I can find Yeah here we go, right at the start. tldr: like hobbits, but more so quote:The Eldar grew in bodily form slower than Men, but in mind more swiftly. They learned to speak before they were one year old; and in the same time they learned to walk and to dance, for their wills came soon to the mastery of their bodies. Nonetheless there was less difference between the two Kindreds, Elves and Men, in early youth; and a man who watched elf-children at play might well have believed that they were the children of Men, of some fair and happy people. For in their early days elf-children delighted still in the world about them, and the fire of their spirit had not consumed them, and the burden of memory was still light upon them. If I happen to encounter a bunch of precocious elven infants I think I’m gonna be less wondering than freaking the gently caress out. Or imagine the 99 year old elf manchild. Our narrator (Aelfwine maybe?) goes on to talk about how they tended to marry young (age 50+). But then again all the elves we meet are millennia old virgins if/when they get hitched 🤔 skasion fucked around with this message at 23:13 on Apr 19, 2023 |
# ? Apr 19, 2023 22:59 |
Jumping the gun on the quote but as I recall, they grow to adulthood roughly at the same rate as humans do, but they can dance at like age 1
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2023 23:04 |
|
The Nature of Middle-Earth is a recent publication which collects all the random little non-narrative musings Tolkien wrote on things like elven aging, how they calculated time in the age of the trees, and stuff like that. It's all kind of boring and I couldn't get through it, but I did get far enough to know the answer to this question.quote:They reach maturity at about the age of 20, and remained in full physical vigour till about the age of 60, after which the fea and its interests began to assume command. After about the age of 90-96 one of the Quendi had reached a stage similar to that of a vigorous and hale Mortal of high age and wisdom. The normal period, therefore, for marriage and the begetting and bearing of children and their nurture (which were one of the greatest delights of the Quendi in Arda), was between about the ages of 20 and 60. So the short answer is that elves aged about the same way as humans right up until old age would start to take its toll, after which point, instead of suffering physical deterioration, their spirits/souls start becoming more and more dominant over the body and they become less and less interesting in sex and having children (which was the answer to why elves had normal numbers of kids). Tolkien also notes that these numbers vary from individual from individual, except the first one: Elves are fully grown by 20, the numbers of 60 and 90 might vary.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2023 23:15 |
|
A 1 year old elf dancing sure would be a sight.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2023 23:54 |
|
SHISHKABOB posted:A 1 year old elf dancing sure would be a sight. Just add elf ears to the dancing baby gif.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 00:02 |
|
Thanks for the answers. Even when The Silmarillion gets more specific with its timeframes it can still be daunting and it isn't helped when I'm wondering if Elrond and Elros at the third kinslaying are actually 50 year olds in children's bodies
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 00:17 |
|
In Children of Húrin at least, Túrin and Nellas are childhood friends, but Túrin becomes an adult while Nellas remains a child.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 12:18 |
Something I've always wondered about : One of the first jokes in Bored of the Rings (and a repeated one) is about how Tolkien apparently pronounced "alarm" as "alarum". quote:Though we cannot with complete candor state, as does Professor T., that ''the tale grew in the telling'', we can allow that this tale (or rather the necessity of hawking it at a bean a copy) grew in direct proportion to the ominous dwindling of our bank accounts at the Harvard Trust in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This loss of turgor in our already emaciated portfolio was not, in itself, cause for alarm (or ''alarum'' as Professor T. might aptly put it), but the resultant threats and cuffed ears received at the hands of creditors were. Thinking long on this, we retired to the reading lounge of our club to meditate on this vicissitude. What's the basis of this joke? I realize "alarum" is an archaic variant of the word, but was JRRT a public figure known for going on talk shows and pronouncing it that way to the consternation of American viewers or something? Did he use that spelling in writings I'm not aware of but those wacky Harvard kids knew about?
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 13:12 |
I think it's just that it's the archaic version. Bored of the Rings is brilliant but you can rarely accuse it of going for the deep cut joke. Dildo Bugger, etc.
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 13:15 |
|
I think the joke is probably just that Tolkien was an old-school kind of guy, so he might prefer archaic spellings and pronunciations?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 13:18 |
I mean, maybe? But if so it seems weird that they would pick on a word/spelling that appears nowhere in his writing that I’ve seen (“alarm” shows up a ton of times in LotR), rather than poking fun at his actual odd turns of phrase and spellings like “O!” or the dozens of archaic vocabulary words like oast and garner
Data Graham fucked around with this message at 13:34 on Apr 20, 2023 |
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 13:31 |
|
“Alarum” makes me think of like, Lewis Carroll before Tolkien
|
# ? Apr 20, 2023 13:46 |
|
Continuing my read of LOTR, I’m sad because my estimation of Jackson’s trilogy keeps falling the more I re-read the books. Still think they’re fabulous adaptations with all their faults but there are bits that really stray from the material for the worse. Just read the Voice of Saruman chapter and man… it is a shame that the theatrical editions just…ignore Saruman but it’s honestly better than the extended edition scene. Jackson lifts much of the dialogue from the book but the context is totally different. Tolkien really makes Saruman seem like a seductive character, and it’s a real struggle for the party to refuse him. In the film, Christopher Lee just impotently insults them until Wormtongue kills him and he falls on that weird big spike thing. Those kind of gratuitously violent deaths clash with the rest of the tone (Denethor gets one as well). Also forgot that Theoden basically routs the Isengard army before even Erkenbrand or the Hurons arrive, they just ensure the orcs are annihilated. A very different meaning to the battle. Can’t get enough of Gimli waxing poetic about the caves at Helm’s Deep - like 3 pages about how beautiful and awesome they are to Legolas. That’s that good Tolkien poo poo.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 19:22 |
On that note, Corey Olsen is covering this part of The Ring Goes South at present, and I had to burst out laughing at Legolas here, remembering how perfunctory the handling of this whole bit is in the movie:quote:Aragorn was the tallest of the Company, but Boromir, little less in height, was broader and heavier in build. He led the way, Just the whole "LOL BYEEE" framing of Legolas dashing off while Boromir and Aragorn are killing themselves wading down a slope in 4-foot snow. But then even beyond that point, what really struck me is how the details of how the snow works all fit together so visually, for anyone who's ever shoveled snow after a blizzard; it's gruelling, exhausting, bone-soaking work, and you can just imagine what it must have been like for them to run up against that ten-foot drift and have no idea how thick it is—they'd have just flopped down in it exhausted and lay there in despair and hypothermia for an hour until Legolas came back and told them they only had to push through another few inches. Tolkien had obviously done his share of shoveling in his time. The crazy thing is, all this takes place off-screen in the book! Almost literally—it's all happening just around the bend and out of sight, so not even the other characters can see them or have any idea what's going on. And yet you can imagine either a text treatment or a movie deciding to put that whole snow-shoveling sequence up front and center, making a big visual spectacle out of it, really immersing you directly in the wetness and cold and exhaustion, making you feel the despair, having Legolas suddenly poke his head up cheerfully over the edge and ask what the hell you think you're doing resting when you only have to push another armload of snow out of the way and you're out. But this all gets told to us third-hand, after the fact! It's so weird that it's done that way. And yet all the details we do get—and all the details we can infer from those, like about what it's like to ferry Pippin and Merry back down hanging from their shoulders while they shove more snow aside, or how tired and cold and wet they are, what kind of inadequate gloves and boots they must have on, how it all must have contributed to their feeling utterly spent and defeated when they ran up against the big drift... it's all perfectly consistent and vivid in the imagination. Yet this text is incredibly sparse. I know Tolkien famously would write way more in the first draft than he ended up keeping (Gandalf's initial rejoinder to Legolas suggesting that he could burn his way out of the snow with his staff was "why don't I just light YOU on fire and use you as a torch"), but it almost feels like this whole scene is a deliberate study in showing us as little as possible about one of the most graphic and visual scenes we'd ever yet seen described in the story, purely (presumably) to heighten the sense of unknowing, the whole atmosphere of misery and trepidation among the hobbits and Gandalf and Gimli who are left alone up under the snowy ledge, just waiting, with nothing else they can possibly do.
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 19:54 |
Tolkien is a genuinely weird writer by any modern "how to write well" professional standard. Eppur, si muove.
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 20:03 |
|
Mike N Eich posted:Continuing my read of LOTR, I’m sad because my estimation of Jackson’s trilogy keeps falling the more I re-read the books. Still think they’re fabulous adaptations with all their faults but there are bits that really stray from the material for the worse. Just read the Voice of Saruman chapter and man… it is a shame that the theatrical editions just…ignore Saruman but it’s honestly better than the extended edition scene. Jackson lifts much of the dialogue from the book but the context is totally different. Tolkien really makes Saruman seem like a seductive character, and it’s a real struggle for the party to refuse him. In the film, Christopher Lee just impotently insults them until Wormtongue kills him and he falls on that weird big spike thing. Those kind of gratuitously violent deaths clash with the rest of the tone (Denethor gets one as well). Yeah, Saruman (like Faramir and Denethor) gets done dirty by the adaptation as this "yes master"-ing lackey of Sauron rather than someone who's huffed enough of his own farts to think he's in with a chance of managing Sauron. His sheer mindboggling hubris gets completely lost along with his charm. I can see why they were all simplified, movie-plot-wise, but.. it would have been nice to have a bit more nuance, maybe?
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 20:41 |
|
The faramir changes still get me mad to this day. That and making Aragorn a reluctant leader, like the dude knows who he is in the book, he's all action.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 22:13 |
|
I like how a lot of times in lotr its characters telling stories to each other. Which is of course what the book is. So it's kinda wrapped up in layers that way. And to be fair to the forth eorlingas scene in the movie they do frame it as suicidal. I never got the impression they were fully routing the orcs. Just look at how many are waiting for Gandalf and Co.
|
# ? Apr 26, 2023 23:44 |
|
A lot of the huge dramatic moments in the books are told to the reader by characters telling each other about it. We don't "see" the Ents destroying Isengard, but we get the whole story from Merry and Pippin. And it still is dramatic and riveting. Sorry, wasn't clear on Theoden's cavalry charge - I was referring to how it is portrayed in the book, which presents it as a successful military maneuver and not a suicidal charge
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 00:03 |
|
Movie theodan is really good. Can’t complain. Although now I can’t remember what we’re extended edition scenes
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 00:05 |
|
keep punching joe posted:The faramir changes still get me mad to this day. That and making Aragorn a reluctant leader, like the dude knows who he is in the book, he's all action. Movie Faramir and Denethor are just awful, such a bummer because I love them both in the books. I like the ride of the Rohirrim in the movies but the scene in the books where Eomer thinks Eowyn is dead sends shivers down my spine: quote:...he looked at the slain, recalling their names. Then suddenly he beheld Kaysette fucked around with this message at 03:16 on Apr 27, 2023 |
# ? Apr 27, 2023 00:35 |
|
euphronius posted:Movie theodan is really good. Can’t complain. Although now I can’t remember what we’re extended edition scenes Movie Theoden is pretty much perfect and Bernard Hill is a severely underrated actor.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 00:49 |
|
Data Graham posted:it almost feels like this whole scene is a deliberate study in showing us as little as possible about one of the most graphic and visual scenes we'd ever yet seen described in the story, purely (presumably) to heighten the sense of unknowing, the whole atmosphere of misery and trepidation among the hobbits and Gandalf and Gimli who are left alone up under the snowy ledge, just waiting, with nothing else they can possibly do. Mike N Eich posted:A lot of the huge dramatic moments in the books are told to the reader by characters telling each other about it. We don't "see" the Ents destroying Isengard, but we get the whole story from Merry and Pippin. And it still is dramatic and riveting. "Show not tell" became a writing-advice catchphrase for a reason, but making it a catchphrase masks that sometimes things are better when told to you than if you see them yourself. Tolkien's war service meant that he knew what it was like for big things to be going on around him while all he could do was wait for them to be finished; and he also knew the special power of hearing about things that had happened elsewhere from a good storyteller (like Rob Gilson and Geoffrey Smith).
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 02:05 |
|
PJ's movies would definitely annoy me more if they were the only adaptations out there
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 04:59 |
|
Agreed, the world is better for having the LSD addled Gandalf from the Bakshi film.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 05:01 |
|
Arc Hammer posted:Movie Theoden is pretty much perfect and Bernard Hill is a severely underrated actor. He really is amazing. I rewatched TTT recently and his monologue at this son's grave brought me to tears. Dude just oozes pathos and quiet resolve. The Howard Shore track for the Ride of the Rohirrim at Pelennor Fields is also just like, one of my favorite pieces in a movie, it makes you want to jump out of your seat and throw a spear at an Oliphaunt
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 05:34 |
|
Yeah I think that is an added scene. Should have been in the original
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 13:38 |
|
Nah its in the theatrical cut. The extended cut only adds the part where Eowyn sings a lament as they're burying Theodred. Theoden's grief was in both cuts.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 13:48 |
|
That lament is seriously powerful stuff, honestly
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 16:05 |
|
Oh right it was the lament that was added. The movies are 20 years old now or older and still hold up. They are remarkable
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 16:17 |
|
As much as I dislike a few parts of them, the good parts are so good that I can't help loving the PJ movies.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 16:20 |
|
Winifred Madgers posted:As much as I dislike a few parts of them, the good parts are so good that I can't help loving the PJ movies. Its like 4-5 minor parts that suck and the rest is the best adaptation we are ever going to get because it was a labor of love for a bunch of those involved. The LOTR tv show is exactly the kind of soulless crap we are going to get where a few people knew the material and were overshadowed by idiots. Like yeah it's dope that the Dragon Helm of Dor-Lomin shows up or a sweet intro that is a reference to the Music, but those people clearly were not allowed in the writer's room.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 16:25 |
Whenever Jackson faltered, Howard Shore swooped in to rescue the moment. Much like Star Wars, I think the LOTR trilogy is made by the soundtrack. In my relatively uninformed opinion I feel like it's the only part that Tolkien would've unreservedly loved
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 20:33 |
|
Okay but how would Tolkien feel about Blind Guardian?
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 20:37 |
Arc Hammer posted:Okay but how would Tolkien feel about Blind Guardian? The same way any human being feels about Blind Guardian - totally stoked
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 20:49 |
|
far more importantly, how would he feel about Finrod the rock opera
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 20:53 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 18:16 |
|
Surely that would be Finrock, wouldn't it?
|
# ? Apr 27, 2023 21:03 |