Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mendrian
Jan 6, 2013

The "nothing important ever happens/nothing matters" sentiment that pervades a lot of American politics seems like it's that way because people can't afford it not to be (including me). If, for instance, you believe that Trump organized an insurrection whose goal was the overturning of an election and the declaration that he was, in fact, president, than it follows you believe he committed treason, that he tried to overturn American democracy (such as it is) and that he was performing a sort of coup. In turn, this means there is really nothing more dangerous to the continuation of American democracy than Trump and his co-conspirators. If you believe this, it stands to reason you need to be organizing, protesting, sending angry letters and verging on riot every day these people go free. I'm not doing this, I believe a lot of people aren't doing this. So you can rationalize why you're not doing it. I'm not doing it because I don't have the time or energy; and I'm sure a lot of people rationalize it by saying it wasn't that big of a deal or that nothing they do has an impact.

I feel immense guilt that I don't have the freedom to stage a walkout or a march on the capital or whatever other extreme action this scenario justified. "I didn't matter that much" is (I believe) a defense against that feeling of guilt.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Alkydere posted:

Yup, they were all looking for blood, but they were also waiting for someone else to start it because they're all cowards.


I think it's more that they didn't have the opportunity, less everyone was waiting for someone else to start the carnage.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Gyges posted:

I think it's more that they didn't have the opportunity, less everyone was waiting for someone else to start the carnage.

Well, I think the momentum was halted because a woman got shot in the head and died and big strong daddy trump didn't swoop in with his shadow military to enact The Plan

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

Professor Beetus posted:

Well, I think the momentum was halted because a woman got shot in the head and died and big strong daddy trump didn't swoop in with his shadow military to enact The Plan

She was shot long before people were roaming the halls, yelling for Pelosi to come out.

A big flaming stink
Apr 26, 2010
https://twitter.com/ohshidt/status/1652753881137397760

this is a deeply, deeply sick country. I just cannot begin to imagine the mindset that would lead you to taking shots at someone fishing hundreds of feet away

And bullshit " we've had things go missing " even if that was true you're going to deprive someone of their life for that?

Honestly I'm not even anti-gun, but I have no idea how you deal with the insanely psychotic mindset of conservatives that every second of real life is kill or be killed

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK
I think he was just shooting into the air for warning shots. Still psychotic as all gently caress, but slightly less than everyone being lucky that Gary is a bad shot.

Still, his good friend Ron is right there, everyone is holding fishing poles, and everyone seems to know who he is. Maybe Gary has some vision issues to go along with his mental issues.

Oxyclean
Sep 23, 2007


Americans have kind of proven not to be responsible enough to be allowed to own guns.

That goes double for cops.

Professor Beetus
Apr 12, 2007

They can fight us
But they'll never Beetus

Gyges posted:

She was shot long before people were roaming the halls, yelling for Pelosi to come out.

Oh that's right. Sorry, I had the events out of order in my mind. I still think the lack of support they were likely expecting still had an impact. Once everyone was evacuated and they were just trashing sit and taking selfies, it was apparent that they were the dog that caught the car. They had no further ideas once they realized they weren't going to get their hands on any congress critters.

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

Don't forget that Trump tried to go to the Capitol to back the riot but the Secret Service refused to take him.

GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

A big flaming stink posted:

https://twitter.com/ohshidt/status/1652753881137397760

this is a deeply, deeply sick country. I just cannot begin to imagine the mindset that would lead you to taking shots at someone fishing hundreds of feet away

And bullshit " we've had things go missing " even if that was true you're going to deprive someone of their life for that?

Honestly I'm not even anti-gun, but I have no idea how you deal with the insanely psychotic mindset of conservatives that every second of real life is kill or be killed

in my personal experience, if you're in a rural area and folks are getting trigger happy like this more often than not there's a drug habit and/or illicit stuff happening on their property. that's just my neck of the woods though. america offers a vast array of delusional paranoia which can immediately leap to deadly gun violence

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

BiggerBoat posted:

If anyone thinks that someone wouldn't have executed Nancy Pelosi or any other Democrat they got their hands on over a live stream that day, if given the chance, they're delusional and don't truly understand the true, hardened mindset of these maniacs.

On the other hand, even if they'd caught and summarily executed Nancy Pelosi and AOC, that wouldn't be the end of American democracy. It'd just be a couple more political murders.

In order to be an outright catastrophe, it would have needed to be part of a larger scheme requiring the cooperation and assistance of a significant amount of the existing political or military leadership. It would have to be more than just Trump himself showing up to rally them.

Regardless of the intentions of the actual Jan 6 rioters, it seems that the GOP wasn't quite able to pull together the planning or determination to actually exploit the events and turn them into a coup.

Archonex
May 2, 2012

MY OPINION IS SEERS OF THE THRONE PROPAGANDA IGNORE MY GNOSIS-IMPAIRED RAMBLINGS

Main Paineframe posted:

On the other hand, even if they'd caught and summarily executed Nancy Pelosi and AOC, that wouldn't be the end of American democracy. It'd just be a couple more political murders.

In order to be an outright catastrophe, it would have needed to be part of a larger scheme requiring the cooperation and assistance of a significant amount of the existing political or military leadership. It would have to be more than just Trump himself showing up to rally them.

Regardless of the intentions of the actual Jan 6 rioters, it seems that the GOP wasn't quite able to pull together the planning or determination to actually exploit the events and turn them into a coup.

Not so sure about that. Multiple people appear to have had a plan of passing the decision on the election to a republican friendly committee or scotus after delegitimizing the process in one way or another. Then have them hand the presidency to trump outside control of the electoral process.

Basically, they appeared to be more expansive and flagrant attempts to pull a Florida presidential election recount deal on a federal level then claim it wasn't a coup because it was "legitimate" and use their propaganda outlets and supporters to do an end run around democracy by suppressing dissent and muddying the waters. It didn't work because they didn't manage to get a representative killed in the case of J6 and people like MTG and Cruz couldn't weasel their way into decertifying the election through official means. But if someone had died at J6, even Pence, they definitely would have been treasonous enough to pull a stunt like that.

Regarde Aduck
Oct 19, 2012

c l o u d k i t t e n
Grimey Drawer

DarkCrawler posted:

Nothing that came before is any different from what any leftist group that succeeded in the past. Stop acting like American leftists are historically shat upon any more than the leftists anywhere else. Leftists somewhere else have it easier? That is built upon leftists that didn't engage in pretending the fascists are potential allies for one. Or pretending that fascism is not evil.

If you believe electoral politics are the way to power, act like it.

If you don't believe electoral politics are the way to power, act like it.

That's all I demand of my leftist representatives and that is what you all should be demanding as well. American electoral leftists are still trying to find out the right way to appeal to fascists for their material needs, because they can't condemn poor fascists for the pieces of poo poo they are and use that, and militant leftists don't seem to exist other but for unorganized local spontaneous actions.

Pick a loving lane.

your definition of fascist seems unworkably broad

susan b buffering
Nov 14, 2016

A big flaming stink posted:

https://twitter.com/ohshidt/status/1652753881137397760

this is a deeply, deeply sick country. I just cannot begin to imagine the mindset that would lead you to taking shots at someone fishing hundreds of feet away

And bullshit " we've had things go missing " even if that was true you're going to deprive someone of their life for that?

Honestly I'm not even anti-gun, but I have no idea how you deal with the insanely psychotic mindset of conservatives that every second of real life is kill or be killed

This happened to my friend several years ago. She was at the beach and some dude taking pot shots grazed her head.

tristeham
Jul 31, 2022

Kalit posted:

Seriously. It also blows my mind that some people ITT already forgot that they did kill someone that day.

no one seems to care about ashli babbitt sadly

A big flaming stink
Apr 26, 2010

Gyges posted:

I think he was just shooting into the air for warning shots. Still psychotic as all gently caress, but slightly less than everyone being lucky that Gary is a bad shot.

Still, his good friend Ron is right there, everyone is holding fishing poles, and everyone seems to know who he is. Maybe Gary has some vision issues to go along with his mental issues.

"warning shots" in and of themselves are profoundly unsafe and proof of a complete lack of familiarity with firearm safety

Cool NIN Shirt
Nov 26, 2007

by vyelkin

Jarmak posted:

The "mostly" here is doing a lot of heavy lifting. There were armed, organized militia groups intentionally stoking that riot, and coordinating attacks on any security that was holding the mob back. They did this with the full intent of making use of the cover caused by the chaos.

Did we forget that at least the initial perimeter breach was caused by coordinated action by the proud boys?

This FBI Informant testified that the Proud Boys were not organized.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/29/fbi-informant-proud-boys-testimony-trial-enrique-tarrio

quote:

An FBI informant who marched to the US Capitol with fellow Proud Boys on January 6 testified on Wednesday that he did not know of any plans for the far-right extremist group to invade the building and didn’t think they inspired violence that day.

The informant, who identified himself in court only as “Aaron”, was a defense witness at the trial of the former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and four lieutenants charged with seditious conspiracy for what prosecutors say was a plot to keep Donald Trump in the White House after the 2020 election.

The informant was communicating with his FBI handler as a mob breached police barricades at the Capitol on 6 January 2021.

The Proud Boys “did not do it, nor inspire”, the informant texted his handler. “The crowd did as herd mentality. Not organized.

Do you have any evidence that he was lying under oath?

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010

A big flaming stink posted:

"warning shots" in and of themselves are profoundly unsafe and proof of a complete lack of familiarity with firearm safety

but in bideo games bullets just vanish after X feet.

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.
I meant this to be clear, but I was talking about unstable situations that rise to level of an existential crisis for the reigning political-economic system.

Fell Fire posted:

Churchill would like a word with you.
Britain was not seriously threatened by revolution, so it made more sense for conservatives and the capitalists to maintain the status quo.

quote:

Less tritely, what you are claiming is seriously disproven by the actual history. Frequently, capitalists aligned with communists (or at least some kind of further left liberal democracy) whenever they felt a larger threat from fascism.
This is wildly false, even from a restricted reading. When there is a large threat from communism, capitalists have uniformly sided with fascists. This has been a critical factor in the emergence of every fascist regime that has ever existed. Fascism arises from a synergy of the motivations of the capitalist class and reactionary elements. Every time, whether Italy, Germany, Spain, or Taisho Japan, it has always the same. If fascism emerges in America, it will be with the cooperation of the capitalist class.

quote:

There are a lot of stories from the Manhattan Project, Hollywood, and elsewhere of left-leaning intellectuals working within a capitalist system and only suffering for it much later, when fascism was defeated as a global threat and, rhetorically at least, replaced by communism.
This isn't a great example. In the 1950s, capital-F Fascism was defeated on the global stage, whereas small-f fascist tendencies were on the rise with McCarthyism and the Cold War. Capital was split on McCarthyism, but with an asymmetry: the incipient military-industrial complex favored paranoia for obvious reasons, whereas most capital was indifferent or slightly opposed. This let it go on for quite a while until it got out of hand.

Edit: cut off sentence

cat botherer fucked around with this message at 03:00 on May 1, 2023

Jarmak
Jan 24, 2005

Cool NIN Shirt posted:

This FBI Informant testified that the Proud Boys were not organized.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/29/fbi-informant-proud-boys-testimony-trial-enrique-tarrio

Do you have any evidence that he was lying under oath?

Yeah, he's a far-right militia associate testifying for the defense in a seditious conspiracy trial of the proud boys leaders.

He doesn't have poo poo for credibility to begin with, isn't someone established to know poo poo, and if that isn't adequate there's the the entire case the feds have put on to prove otherwise.

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

Fell Fire posted:

Churchill would like a word with you.

Less tritely, what you are claiming is seriously disproven by the actual history. Frequently, capitalists aligned with communists (or at least some kind of further left liberal democracy) whenever they felt a larger threat from fascism.

There are a lot of stories from the Manhattan Project, Hollywood, and elsewhere of left-leaning intellectuals working within a capitalist system and only suffering for it much later, when fascism was defeated as a global threat and, rhetorically at least, replaced by communism.

With Germany in the 1930's being a rather significant exception.

Hitler's millionaire backers: how Germany's elite facilitated the rise of the Nazis

Gyges
Aug 4, 2004

NOW NO ONE
RECOGNIZE HULK

A big flaming stink posted:

"warning shots" in and of themselves are profoundly unsafe and proof of a complete lack of familiarity with firearm safety

Absolutely, but firing into the air away from the people he saw is less dangerous for the fishing guys than him just being a bad shot when trying to shoot them. There's no scenario where Gary isn't an unhinged lunatic, but dumbass warning shots are the less terrible option here.

Still real bad for anyone down range of where he actually shot at, which thankfully appears to be no one.

Tayter Swift
Nov 18, 2002

Pillbug

Cool NIN Shirt posted:

Do you have any evidence that he was lying under oath?

NYT has a very good, 40-minute video on how things went down. The crowd by and large was not a huge army of Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, but there were key members of those groups who riled up and guided the mob towards weak points in the perimeter.

Proud Boys members worked as a group to lead the Jan 6 mob to do what it did. They were able to work as a group because they were members of the Proud Boys. That seems like solid evidence to me.

Space Cadet Omoly
Jan 15, 2014

~Groovy~


Cool NIN Shirt posted:

This FBI Informant testified that the Proud Boys were not organized.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/29/fbi-informant-proud-boys-testimony-trial-enrique-tarrio

Do you have any evidence that he was lying under oath?

You don't have to be super organized to kill people. If you have a gun, and that gun has bullets, and you take that gun with you to a place with another person that's the only preplanning you need to cause a murder.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Fell Fire posted:

Churchill would like a word with you.

Less tritely, what you are claiming is seriously disproven by the actual history. Frequently, capitalists aligned with communists (or at least some kind of further left liberal democracy) whenever they felt a larger threat from fascism.

There are a lot of stories from the Manhattan Project, Hollywood, and elsewhere of left-leaning intellectuals working within a capitalist system and only suffering for it much later, when fascism was defeated as a global threat and, rhetorically at least, replaced by communism.

You might investigate the US relationship with Francoist Spain or the Estado Novo regime in Portugal, or the history of US intervention in democracies in South America during the second half of the twentieth century. Capitalists are definitely very friendly with fascists when doing so protects profits. You’ll only see them fighting fascists when the fascists threaten production.

GlyphGryph
Jun 23, 2013

Down came the glitches and burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead.

Main Paineframe posted:

On the other hand, even if they'd caught and summarily executed Nancy Pelosi and AOC, that wouldn't be the end of American democracy. It'd just be a couple more political murders.

In order to be an outright catastrophe, it would have needed to be part of a larger scheme requiring the cooperation and assistance of a significant amount of the existing political or military leadership. It would have to be more than just Trump himself showing up to rally them.

Regardless of the intentions of the actual Jan 6 rioters, it seems that the GOP wasn't quite able to pull together the planning or determination to actually exploit the events and turn them into a coup.

Wasn't the larger scheme in place and one of the key players just... walked away and refused to do what Trump had told him to do? Unfortunately I don't remember much in the way of details, some sort of security head Trump wanted there and he just said hell no?

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

GlyphGryph posted:

Wasn't the larger scheme in place and one of the key players just... walked away and refused to do what Trump had told him to do? Unfortunately I don't remember much in the way of details, some sort of security head Trump wanted there and he just said hell no?
There was some other people, but at no point was it a serious threat to where it could have toppled our political system. The US is too stable, with too many power bases happy enough with the status quo. This is different from, say, Weimar Germany. The Weimar Republic was stable as well, but enough elements saw the Nazis as preferable to the status quo so that Mr. Hitler was able to transition the country into authoritarianism legally.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




cat botherer posted:

There was some other people, but at no point was it a serious threat to where it could have toppled our political system. The US is too stable, with too many power bases happy enough with the status quo. This is different from, say, Weimar Germany. The Weimar Republic was stable as well, but enough elements saw the Nazis as preferable to the status quo so that Mr. Hitler was able to transition the country into authoritarianism legally.

The President attempting to invalidate the election is a serious threat to the system and if it had been successful it would have been a toppling of the system and a transition into authoritarianism.

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Bar Ran Dun posted:

The President attempting to invalidate the election is a serious threat to the system and if it had been successful it would have been a toppling of the system and a transition into authoritarianism.
Had it been successful, it would have been a toppling of the system. That’s just the definition of a coup. There was never a chance of that happening. It wouldn’t have mattered if Pence went along with it or whatever. Trump is charismatic and has a very specific type of instinctual low cunning. However, he is still dumb as poo poo as was never anywhere close to planning or executing a successful coup.

cat botherer fucked around with this message at 04:01 on May 1, 2023

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




cat botherer posted:

However, he is still dumb as poo poo as was never anywhere close to planning or executing a successful coup.

These guys would never be able to come up with a plan to successfully steal an election.



Definitely too dumb to do that successfully.

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Bar Ran Dun posted:

These guys would never be able to come up with a plan to successfully steal an election.



Definitely too dumb to do that successfully.
He’s not been anywhere near power since the 90s, until he got lucky with his association to Trump. Trump has a mostly petty boug power base. It’s not nothing, it’s a lot. However, it’s far more fractured and overall less powerful than the elite bourgeoisie. They would not benefit from an unpredictable populist coup when their current situation is so good. When the coup happened there was not any serious power base that supported it, aside from the White House.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Archonex posted:

Not so sure about that. Multiple people appear to have had a plan of passing the decision on the election to a republican friendly committee or scotus after delegitimizing the process in one way or another. Then have them hand the presidency to trump outside control of the electoral process.

Basically, they appeared to be more expansive and flagrant attempts to pull a Florida presidential election recount deal on a federal level then claim it wasn't a coup because it was "legitimate" and use their propaganda outlets and supporters to do an end run around democracy by suppressing dissent and muddying the waters. It didn't work because they didn't manage to get a representative killed in the case of J6 and people like MTG and Cruz couldn't weasel their way into decertifying the election through official means. But if someone had died at J6, even Pence, they definitely would have been treasonous enough to pull a stunt like that.

There may have been some thoughts along those lines, but it's not really clear to me how the storming of the Capitol would have helped them achieve that. A few dead Representatives aren't gonna cause Congress to chuck out the entire Electoral College Act and invent some new body to hand the election to Trump. Especially considering that neither Pence, the Senate, nor SCOTUS seemed interested in the increasingly desperate Trumpist attempts to overturn or seize control of the counting process.

To pull a full-on coup, you need two things:
  1. a set of reasons for why basically everyone who wasn't involved in the conspiracy should play along with the scheme
  2. a concrete plan of action that everyone is committed to, because the window to make use of #1 is extremely tight and the slightest mistake can blow it

Although an angry mob can provide item #1, it's usually in the form of allowing the would-be authoritarian an excuse to request emergency powers and/or military involvement in order to restore order and suppress the civil unrest. Then the aspiring dictator could use that mandate to mercilessly suppress any opposition to their political movement. For example, how Hitler claimed that the Reichstag Fire was the opening shot of a Communist revolution, and convinced the legislature to allow him emergency powers to crush the left in order to undermine that supposed uprising.

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.
Yeah, any talk of these specific legal procedures or committees or whatever is just on the same level of sovereign citizen legal spells. They don’t have power on their own, and can never be the critical factor in a coup. Coups always have enough support in the right places. It’s abut actual power, not legal maneuvers. Legal maneuvers can be used as a fig leaf, but coups happen because of the junk that fig leaf is covering up.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




cat botherer posted:

aside from the White House.

The White House not a “serious power base”.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Fell Fire posted:

Churchill would like a word with you.

Less tritely, what you are claiming is seriously disproven by the actual history. Frequently, capitalists aligned with communists (or at least some kind of further left liberal democracy) whenever they felt a larger threat from fascism.

There are a lot of stories from the Manhattan Project, Hollywood, and elsewhere of left-leaning intellectuals working within a capitalist system and only suffering for it much later, when fascism was defeated as a global threat and, rhetorically at least, replaced by communism.

India and many other nations once under the boot of the British empire would like a word with you over how much of a fascist Churchill was.

Other than WW2, when have capitalists ever allied with communists for anything? You're going to need to provide some evidence for that claim. Meanwhile, I can point to the entire Cold War and all of the little proxy wars that were part of it as examples of capitalists propping up fascist regimes to crush the communists. Salvador Allende would also like a word with you.

And yes, many leftists work within a capitalist system. This is because they have no other choice.

Fister Roboto fucked around with this message at 05:19 on May 1, 2023

Fell Fire
Jan 30, 2012


cat botherer posted:

I meant this to be clear, but I was talking about unstable situations that rise to level of an existential crisis for the reigning political-economic system.

Britain was not seriously threatened by revolution, so it made more sense for conservatives and the capitalists to maintain the status quo.

This is wildly false, even from a restricted reading. When there is a large threat from communism, capitalists have uniformly sided with fascists. This has been a critical factor in the emergence of every fascist regime that has ever existed. Fascism arises from a synergy of the motivations of the capitalist class and reactionary elements. Every time, whether Italy, Germany, Spain, or Taisho Japan, it has always the same. If fascism emerges in America, it will be with the cooperation of the capitalist class.

This isn't a great example. In the 1950s, capital-F Fascism was defeated on the global stage, whereas small-f fascist tendencies were on the rise with McCarthyism and the Cold War. Capital was split on McCarthyism, but with an asymmetry: the incipient military-industrial complex favored paranoia for obvious reasons, whereas most capital was indifferent or slightly opposed. This let it go on for quite a while until it got out of hand.


It wasn't clear, you stated as an absolute that capital sides with fascism, now you're moving that statement to a different standard.

Fascism also arises in part from socialist and nationalist elements. This happened in both Italy and Germany, it's just that the more reactionary parts of the party won out.

Your claim that capitalism always sides with fascism is not only untrue, but it paints an incomplete picture. There are examples of left leaning capitalist forces choosing to expand government services. There are other factors in play.

I'm not sure what your last paragraph is supposed to mean? That's literally my point, that instead of allying with fascism, capitalism instead decided to partner with communism to defeat it.

I AM GRANDO posted:

You might investigate the US relationship with Francoist Spain or the Estado Novo regime in Portugal, or the history of US intervention in democracies in South America during the second half of the twentieth century. Capitalists are definitely very friendly with fascists when doing so protects profits. You’ll only see them fighting fascists when the fascists threaten production.

I'm pretty well aware of some of those things, in particular the history of U.S. intervention. I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me? Because your sentence about how capitalists will fight fascism agrees with what I said, but the rest sounds like you disagree.

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!

Fister Roboto posted:

Other than WW2, when have capitalists ever allied with communists for anything? You're going to need to provide some evidence for that claim. Meanwhile, I can point to the entire Cold War and all of the little proxy wars that were part of it as examples of capitalists propping up fascist regimes to crush the communists. Salvador Allende would also like a word with you.

It would help if you would define what it means for capitalists to ally with communists before asking for examples, but the main US partner in Syria is an anarchist movement.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Fell Fire posted:

It wasn't clear, you stated as an absolute that capital sides with fascism, now you're moving that statement to a different standard.

Fascism also arises in part from socialist and nationalist elements. This happened in both Italy and Germany, it's just that the more reactionary parts of the party won out.

Your claim that capitalism always sides with fascism is not only untrue, but it paints an incomplete picture. There are examples of left leaning capitalist forces choosing to expand government services. There are other factors in play.

I'm not sure what your last paragraph is supposed to mean? That's literally my point, that instead of allying with fascism, capitalism instead decided to partner with communism to defeat it.

I'm pretty well aware of some of those things, in particular the history of U.S. intervention. I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me? Because your sentence about how capitalists will fight fascism agrees with what I said, but the rest sounds like you disagree.

It’s very rare for fascism to be less desirable to capitalists than communism because fascists will leave capitalism in place while communists won’t. Communism represents an existential threat to the bourgeoisie.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

I AM GRANDO posted:

It’s very rare for fascism to be less desirable to capitalists than communism because fascists will leave capitalism in place while communists won’t. Communism represents an existential threat to the bourgeoisie.

Yep. Fascism is essentially the capitalist response to socialism.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

mawarannahr
May 21, 2019

A big flaming stink posted:

"warning shots" in and of themselves are profoundly unsafe and proof of a complete lack of familiarity with firearm safety

What makes you say this? I believe this is an American dogma. Official policy in many countries, including Turkey, is to fire warning shots. Turkish police kill far fewer people than American ones (roughly 400 from 2007 through 2020, compare to over 1000 in the USA in the last 12 months).

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply