Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Neo marxism also means "the jews", I'm afraid.

Usually in the full format of "post-modern neo-marxism" which is another example of people who don't understand politics slapping terms that are mutually exclusive together, as postmodernism and marxism are pretty at odds with each other.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
"Why is everything gay?"

Because most young people either are or don't mind, old reactionaries who deliberately look at things to raise their blood pressure won't be around for long, and business forecasting looks to the future rather than the past.

Because that is the direction in which time goes.

In fascist rear end in a top hat world, this is presumably also the fault of a Jew.

Venomous
Nov 7, 2011





Panfilo posted:

:psyduck: What's Neo Marxism? I'm still trying to understand a Libertarians definition of Marxism and now they've moved on to Neo Marxism? I can't keep up! :negative:

so in sociological terms, neo-Marxism is a revisionist form of Marxism that applied different academic theoretical approaches to Marx's original works. Updating Marx for a post-1945 world, if you will.

however, to the fash,

OwlFancier posted:

Neo marxism also means "the jews", I'm afraid.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Panfilo posted:

Libertarians have been rather :tinfoil: about this lately. It's their ultimate gotcha to why we're not in a free market-nefarious WOKE government gatekeepers are pressuring companies into conforming to the leftist agenda! Also, according to this Libertarian, woke was was a term "Co opted from the black community by gender activists infected with Neo Marxism. " :psyduck: What's Neo Marxism? I'm still trying to understand a Libertarians definition of Marxism and now they've moved on to Neo Marxism? I can't keep up! :negative:
https://twitter.com/TRHLofficial/status/1662589467809529856?t=5ujEfT0mtyJDztKLq1sQQA&s=19

https://twitter.com/LathyrusB/status/1662589966944292867?t=kxT55vC8V97VdF0CUirryw&s=19

And in THOSE replies....
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1662735803150221313?t=4pDcu_kJCoikvfC3w-H-Mg&s=19

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.
The redheaded libertarian will soon become the new Grimes.

Agents are GO!
Dec 29, 2004

Panfilo posted:

Libertarians have been rather :tinfoil: about this lately. It's their ultimate gotcha to why we're not in a free market-nefarious WOKE government gatekeepers are pressuring companies into conforming to the leftist agenda! Also, according to this Libertarian, woke was was a term "Co opted from the black community by gender activists infected with Neo Marxism. " :psyduck: What's Neo Marxism? I'm still trying to understand a Libertarians definition of Marxism and now they've moved on to Neo Marxism? I can't keep up! :negative:
https://twitter.com/TRHLofficial/status/1662589467809529856?t=5ujEfT0mtyJDztKLq1sQQA&s=19

Neo-Marxism is Marx's final boss transformation.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Agents are GO! posted:

Neo-Marxism is Marx's final boss transformation.

No no that's the intermediate form. You're thinking of Marxism ZERO.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Neo-marxism is about to E.X.P.L.O.D.E.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin

Captain_Maclaine posted:

No no that's the intermediate form. You're thinking of Marxism ZERO.

That's the new sugar free version.

HootTheOwl
May 13, 2012

Hootin and shootin
Neo-Marxism is the country that built the People's Gundam for the g fighter tournament

hooman
Oct 11, 2007

This guy seems legit.
Fun Shoe

Panfilo posted:

Libertarians have been rather :tinfoil: about this lately. It's their ultimate gotcha to why we're not in a free market-nefarious WOKE government gatekeepers are pressuring companies into conforming to the leftist agenda! Also, according to this Libertarian, woke was was a term "Co opted from the black community by gender activists infected with Neo Marxism. " :psyduck: What's Neo Marxism? I'm still trying to understand a Libertarians definition of Marxism and now they've moved on to Neo Marxism? I can't keep up! :negative:
https://twitter.com/TRHLofficial/status/1662589467809529856?t=5ujEfT0mtyJDztKLq1sQQA&s=19

Interestingly the "marxism" and "woke" words were what helped me start the process of deradicalisation of a friend of mine. He's a nice guy and holds a lot of the same moral views that I do but he's big into crypto and through exposure to that community ended up very libertarian. Which was interesting because his desired goals were rather progressive he'd just been infected with a whole bunch of right wing talking points and propoganda. He's kind of the theoretical libertarian who believes in the principles rather than it being a convenient excuse for getting the things he wants.

I had been gently challenging him on those words asking him for clear definitions, when he used them. I tried not to be aggro about it and just said to him "I'm not quite undersatnding what you mean because when you use that word in that context it doesn't really make sense to me". When he finally provided them (through a link to a libertarian podcast, muddied as hell because words have no meanings to these assholes) I was able to compare and contrast what they said to some actual definitions. Gave him where "woke" originally came from and what "marxism" actually was. Linked him to a podcast from a self described Marxist economist who made a heap of points he strongly agreed with which kind of broke the spell and had him questioning what he was hearing about "marxism" and "wokeism".

He's a guy who I like and have known for quite a while and it was a lot of work to slowly try to break through the thought terminating cliches he had to try and pull him back from that radicalisation, so it's certainly not a fix all but I think just identifying that when they use these words it's a stand in for "bad thing" you can start to get people to see through the bullshit.

Sax Solo
Feb 18, 2011



Is there a good book or essay that attacks libertarianism?

The situation: I'm in this book club with some old friends. A couple of them have stated that they sorta consider themselves libertarians, ("small L, not like the big L ones who are loving insane"). They are smart and reasonable guys -- I think probably just kind of poisoned with individualism and cynicism and.. lack of empathy I guess. They are not edgelords or agressively-assholish or jrods... they seem genuinely open to discussion.

One of them recommended a book for the group, The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan (who seems to be a huge piece of poo poo; the existence of a GMU economics professor is itself kind of a case against education wakka wakka). My friend said he found the book convincing and would love to hear arguments against it. I've read a few pages in the book and the arguments are already stinky.

I am not sure if I am up for the torments of reading this book and processing it and making a counter case, in a way that is both effective and preserves these friendships. Honestly I'm not confident in my own abilities these days. Even when I win arguments I don't feel good about it.

I'd much rather point at someone else's general work against libertarianism. Where is our indoctrination literature lol...

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

If you want something horribly dense that also attacks the education system you could suggest pedagogy of the oppressed by paulo friere, which is written from a much more anarcho-communist perspective and argues that the model of education we use demeans the individual in its assumption that they can only be there to fill their empty heads with the wisdom of their betters, and trains them to be subservient to their masters rather than encouraging them to develop comradeship with their peers and forment revolution in the face of injustice done to them, and that only through that social organization that true liberation can be achieved.

It isn't an argument against libertarianism but it might be a better suggestion for somebody looking for faults in education and already sympathetic to anti-authority positions.

I did find it a difficult read though, ironically because the author demonstrates his argument very clearly by producing a book that has very little regard for the reader and is just a big idea dump that you have to take in on the author's terms, which I choose to interpret as a critique of the banking model of education via form rather than bad translation or it being written for an advanced audience :v:

Looking at the wikipedia synopsis for the caplan book, you might even find similar arguments about the failures of education, but with very different motivations and suggestions for what we should do instead.

OwlFancier fucked around with this message at 19:01 on Jun 10, 2023

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Sax Solo posted:

Is there a good book or essay that attacks libertarianism?

The situation: I'm in this book club with some old friends. A couple of them have stated that they sorta consider themselves libertarians, ("small L, not like the big L ones who are loving insane"). They are smart and reasonable guys -- I think probably just kind of poisoned with individualism and cynicism and.. lack of empathy I guess. They are not edgelords or agressively-assholish or jrods... they seem genuinely open to discussion.

One of them recommended a book for the group, The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan (who seems to be a huge piece of poo poo; the existence of a GMU economics professor is itself kind of a case against education wakka wakka). My friend said he found the book convincing and would love to hear arguments against it. I've read a few pages in the book and the arguments are already stinky.

I am not sure if I am up for the torments of reading this book and processing it and making a counter case, in a way that is both effective and preserves these friendships. Honestly I'm not confident in my own abilities these days. Even when I win arguments I don't feel good about it.

I'd much rather point at someone else's general work against libertarianism. Where is our indoctrination literature lol...

China Mielville's Floating Utopia is a good critique, though thematically somewhat dated to a specific flavor of libertarian nuttiness which isn't as current now as it was fifteen-twenty years ago.

A particularly choice bit I always like from it:

quote:

It is a libertarian dream. Hexagonal neighborhoods of square apartments bob sedately by tiny coiffed parks and tastefully featureless marinas, an Orange County of the soul. It is the ultimate gated community, designed not by the very rich and certainly not by the very powerful, but by the middlingly so. As a utopia, the Atlantis Project is pitiful. Beyond the single one-trick fact of its watery location, it is tragically non-ambitious, crippled with class anxiety, nostalgic not for mythic glory but for the anonymous sanctimony of an invented 1950s. This is no ruling class vision: it is the plaintive daydream of a petty bourgeoisie, whose sulky solution to perceived social problems is to run away – set sail into a tax-free sunset.

None of this is surprising. Libertarianism is not a ruling-class theory. It may be indulged, certainly, for the useful ideas it can throw up, and its prophets have at times influenced dominant ideologies – witness the cack-handed depredations of the ​“Chicago Boys” in Chile after Allende’s bloody overthrow. But untempered by the realpolitik of Reaganism and Thatcherism, the anti-statism of ​“pure” libertarianism is worse than useless to the ruling class.

Big capital will support tax-lowering measures, of course, but it does not need to piss and moan about taxes with the tedious relentlessness of the libertarian. Big capital, with its ranks of accountant-Houdinis, just gets on with not paying it. And why hate a state that pays so well? Big capital is big, after all, not only because of the generous contracts its state obligingly hands it, but because of the gun-ships with which its state opens up markets for it.

Libertarianism, by contrast, is a theory of those who find it hard to avoid their taxes, who are too small, incompetent or insufficiently connected to win Iraq-reconstruction contracts, or otherwise chow at the state trough. In its maundering about a mythical ideal-type capitalism, libertarianism betrays its fear of actually existing capitalism, at which it cannot quite succeed. It is a philosophy of capitalist inadequacy.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

OwlFancier posted:

If you want something horribly dense that also attacks the education system you could suggest pedagogy of the oppressed by paulo friere, which is written from a much more anarcho-communist perspective and argues that the model of education we use demeans the individual in its assumption that they can only be there to fill their empty heads with the wisdom of their betters, and trains them to be subservient to their masters rather than encouraging them to develop comradeship with their peers and forment revolution in the face of injustice done to them, and that only through that social organization that true liberation can be achieved.

It isn't an argument against libertarianism but it might be a better suggestion for somebody looking for faults in education and already sympathetic to anti-authority positions.

I did find it a difficult read though, ironically because the author demonstrates his argument very clearly by producing a book that has very little regard for the reader and is just a big idea dump that you have to take in on the author's terms, which I choose to interpret as a critique of the banking model of education via form rather than bad translation or it being written for an advanced audience :v:

Looking at the wikipedia synopsis for the caplan book, you might even find similar arguments about the failures of education, but with very different motivations and suggestions for what we should do instead.

bell hooks has written a few books that are in part a much more reader-friendly exposition of Freire’s model—they also go lighter on the communism. However, they’re written by a black woman, so I don’t know that a libertarian would ever pick one up.

Caros
May 14, 2008

Sax Solo posted:

Is there a good book or essay that attacks libertarianism?

The situation: I'm in this book club with some old friends. A couple of them have stated that they sorta consider themselves libertarians, ("small L, not like the big L ones who are loving insane"). They are smart and reasonable guys -- I think probably just kind of poisoned with individualism and cynicism and.. lack of empathy I guess. They are not edgelords or agressively-assholish or jrods... they seem genuinely open to discussion.

One of them recommended a book for the group, The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan (who seems to be a huge piece of poo poo; the existence of a GMU economics professor is itself kind of a case against education wakka wakka). My friend said he found the book convincing and would love to hear arguments against it. I've read a few pages in the book and the arguments are already stinky.

I am not sure if I am up for the torments of reading this book and processing it and making a counter case, in a way that is both effective and preserves these friendships. Honestly I'm not confident in my own abilities these days. Even when I win arguments I don't feel good about it.

I'd much rather point at someone else's general work against libertarianism. Where is our indoctrination literature lol...

Atlas shrugged?

Sax Solo
Feb 18, 2011



Caros posted:

Atlas shrugged?

How does this apply to what I said?

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Sax Solo posted:

How does this apply to what I said?

The joke is that the book is so god-awful that it counters its own point

That said, don't show it to your friends

Tom Clancy is Dead
Jul 13, 2011

There's the anti-libertarian FAQ but as you can maybe tell from the rebranding the dude who wrote it got brain poisoning from being in the "Rationalist" movement and has gotten continuously dipshit-ier over time

https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/02/22/repost-the-non-libertarian-faq/

If you use it, it's very important you rip it and DO NOT send them to slate star codex.

Panfilo
Aug 27, 2011

EXISTENCE IS PAIN😬
"I just don't care. Unless it involves kids."
https://twitter.com/TRHLofficial/status/1667561929882099713?t=CNREiXybEU5JHLkE1zz-sw&s=19

Caros
May 14, 2008

Rappaport posted:

The joke is that the book is so god-awful that it counters its own point

That said, don't show it to your friends

Just to be clear, this was indeed :thejoke:

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

I decided to have some stupid with my coffee and read the twitter replies to TRHL and like 10% of the replies are telling her she isn’t really a libertarian lol

Kaiju Cage Match
Nov 5, 2012




Sax Solo posted:

Is there a good book or essay that attacks libertarianism?

The situation: I'm in this book club with some old friends. A couple of them have stated that they sorta consider themselves libertarians, ("small L, not like the big L ones who are loving insane"). They are smart and reasonable guys -- I think probably just kind of poisoned with individualism and cynicism and.. lack of empathy I guess. They are not edgelords or agressively-assholish or jrods... they seem genuinely open to discussion.

One of them recommended a book for the group, The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan (who seems to be a huge piece of poo poo; the existence of a GMU economics professor is itself kind of a case against education wakka wakka). My friend said he found the book convincing and would love to hear arguments against it. I've read a few pages in the book and the arguments are already stinky.

I am not sure if I am up for the torments of reading this book and processing it and making a counter case, in a way that is both effective and preserves these friendships. Honestly I'm not confident in my own abilities these days. Even when I win arguments I don't feel good about it.

I'd much rather point at someone else's general work against libertarianism. Where is our indoctrination literature lol...

Show them the article where a libertarian town in New Hampshire was overrun by bears because they ignored the laws prohibiting the feeding of wildlife.

Professor Shark
May 22, 2012

Or the article about that guy’s trailer burning with his animals inside because his town had an optional fee for fire service (I will mention, however, since it seems to never come up when the story is told: the firefighters wanted to go in anyway (SOCIALISTS!) but their chief told them that they would not be insured were they to be injured, so they had to stand and watch it burn and it was traumatic for them).

Panfilo
Aug 27, 2011

EXISTENCE IS PAIN😬
Also I've mentioned this before but Libertarians almost always walk back some of the more egregious contradictions when pressed. For instance, Redheaded Libertarian distinguishes herself by considering herself to be a "constitutional libertarian" which suggests a flavor of libertarianism she assumes is derived from the framers of the constitution. While some of these types will have some law or history education under their belt, those of the ginger variety dispense with such arbitrary backgrounds. L

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Is she actually a redhead or does she dye her hair to better attract the divorced dads?

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004

коммунизм хранится в яичках

Panfilo posted:

Also I've mentioned this before but Libertarians almost always walk back some of the more egregious contradictions when pressed. For instance, Redheaded Libertarian distinguishes herself by considering herself to be a "constitutional libertarian" which suggests a flavor of libertarianism she assumes is derived from the framers of the constitution. While some of these types will have some law or history education under their belt, those of the ginger variety dispense with such arbitrary backgrounds. L

I've found it useful when discussing with friends who fell down that hole to ask if the people they've been listening to are against the state, or just upset that they're not the ones best positioned to exploit it.

They have a hard time rebutting that thought when their policy planks can generally be followed with 'and who, precisely, enforces that contract?' as a rebuttal, because invariably they treat contract law as sacrosanct despite it relying entirely on the state monopoly on force.

Clarste
Apr 15, 2013

Just how many mistakes have you suffered on the way here?

An uncountable number, to be sure.
It's strangely common for these sorts of people to think that pieces of paper have any power whatsoever.

KozmoNaut
Apr 23, 2008

Happiness is a warm
Turbo Plasma Rifle


In my experience, a lot of libertarians believe that enforcing contracts between private individuals should be the only function of the government.

Panfilo
Aug 27, 2011

EXISTENCE IS PAIN😬

Liquid Communism posted:

I've found it useful when discussing with friends who fell down that hole to ask if the people they've been listening to are against the state, or just upset that they're not the ones best positioned to exploit it.

They have a hard time rebutting that thought when their policy planks can generally be followed with 'and who, precisely, enforces that contract?' as a rebuttal, because invariably they treat contract law as sacrosanct despite it relying entirely on the state monopoly on force.

Don't forget also that these types hate direct democracy (ironic, you'd think these "individual rights" people would fight to the death to keep their right to vote), so the question of,

:v: "who gets to decide on how these contracts and property rights get enforced? "

:smug: "Certainly not you or anyone you'd have the agency to put in charge"

You're on to something with the whole wanting to be the ones best positioned to exploit it, because I mean cmon why would they project like this otherwise?
https://twitter.com/TRHLofficial/status/1667879020187230213?t=_vUPiREJKvdpL3RXWGu8xw&s=19

Panfilo fucked around with this message at 12:39 on Jun 12, 2023

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Panfilo posted:

Don't forget also that these types hate direct democracy (ironic, you'd think these "individual rights" people would fight to the death to keep their right to vote), so the question of,

:v: "who gets to decide on how these contracts and property rights get enforced? "

:smug: "Certainly not you or anyone you'd have the agency to put in charge"


The head of the Libertarian Party in New Hampshire called it a soft communism.

Tom Clancy is Dead
Jul 13, 2011

TRHL is a really boring target to keep mock-posting. She's a raw anti-justice warrior, there is no coherent worldview to create surprise or dissect, she's just whatever the lovely side of the culture war is at the moment taken to an outrageous pander-y extreme.

Panfilo
Aug 27, 2011

EXISTENCE IS PAIN😬

Tom Clancy is Dead posted:

TRHL is a really boring target to keep mock-posting. She's a raw anti-justice warrior, there is no coherent worldview to create surprise or dissect, she's just whatever the lovely side of the culture war is at the moment taken to an outrageous pander-y extreme.

If you've got another one in mind that also has the ear of the richest person in the world I'm all ears. How many other female libertarians you think agree that the 19th Amendment was a mistake?

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Tom Clancy is Dead posted:


If you use it, it's very important you rip it and DO NOT send them to slate star codex.

Why.

I've never heard of the site, the front page doesn't seem like crazy or anything

NGDBSS
Dec 30, 2009






VitalSigns posted:

Why.

I've never heard of the site, the front page doesn't seem like crazy or anything
He's a closet reactionary who hides his abhorrent views on topics like eugenics, race science, etc. behind verbal diarrhea. He's also part of Eliezer Yudkowsky's "rationalist" cult of personality/AI grift. I recommend this episode of I Don't Speak German and its links for more detail.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Oh ok.

I tried to read it to see why it's bad but aaaaa so boring.

I can definitely see hiding eugenics in that excruciating style.

I only read a little bit of the FAQ and now I'm surprised it wasn't dense or annoying to read (well at least as far in as I got anyway), maybe he got more pretentious over time.

Liquid Communism
Mar 9, 2004

коммунизм хранится в яичках

Panfilo posted:

You're on to something with the whole wanting to be the ones best positioned to exploit it, because I mean cmon why would they project like this otherwise?

I'll be honest, what most of the American libertarians I've talked to have been really into is neo-feudalism. They want regulation gone so capitalism can produce winners who pile up material wealth until they are effectively their own governments, and we lapse back into warlords enforcing their own laws and debt slavery that becomes chattel slavery.

VitalSigns posted:

Oh ok.

I tried to read it to see why it's bad but aaaaa so boring.

I can definitely see hiding eugenics in that excruciating style.

I only read a little bit of the FAQ and now I'm surprised it wasn't dense or annoying to read (well at least as far in as I got anyway), maybe he got more pretentious over time.

Exposure to Yudkowsky will do that. The man is Dunning-Kruger personified, with a belief that if he just dresses up his language enough people will accept his bullshit assertions as fact.

Sax Solo
Feb 18, 2011



The awful part about SlateStarCodex is that far too many smart people read it.

One of my favorite receipts of the dude Scott Siskind is when he's like, "*sigh* i hate fascists -- they are so incompetent at spreading eugenics w/ their video game idea!!"

quote:

What I want is a Harry Potter fanfic set in a world where blood purism is correct. ...

A good exploration of this topic would treat it as the morally complex issue it is - can we really exclude brilliant wizards like Hermione from the community on purely statistical grounds? Is it possible to believe that Voldemort’s methods were unspeakably evil, but that it would be ethical to pursue the same goals by more “nudge” style methods like incentivizing pureblood wizards to only breed with one another? ...

I wouldn’t expect the Metapedia folks to be able to do this correctly, but that they don’t even try is more evidence that fascists are utterly incompetent at everything.

Siskind claims to not be a libertarian but IMHO he kinda acts like one, including in how he's actually right wing at heart but lying about it. I suspect deep down he's just not totally sure what will be the best thing for his imagined tribe of high-IQ ubermencsh, but he's for whatever helps them.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Sax Solo posted:

Is there a good book or essay that attacks libertarianism?

The situation: I'm in this book club with some old friends. A couple of them have stated that they sorta consider themselves libertarians, ("small L, not like the big L ones who are loving insane"). They are smart and reasonable guys -- I think probably just kind of poisoned with individualism and cynicism and.. lack of empathy I guess. They are not edgelords or agressively-assholish or jrods... they seem genuinely open to discussion.

One of them recommended a book for the group, The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan (who seems to be a huge piece of poo poo; the existence of a GMU economics professor is itself kind of a case against education wakka wakka). My friend said he found the book convincing and would love to hear arguments against it. I've read a few pages in the book and the arguments are already stinky.

I am not sure if I am up for the torments of reading this book and processing it and making a counter case, in a way that is both effective and preserves these friendships. Honestly I'm not confident in my own abilities these days. Even when I win arguments I don't feel good about it.

I'd much rather point at someone else's general work against libertarianism. Where is our indoctrination literature lol...

If they can get past the title, "A Libertarian Walks Into a Bear" is a very funny and surprisingly deep investigative dive into a New Hampshire town that was taken over by libertarian activists who eventually dismantled the entire local government in "an experiment of radical self-governance" and it resulted in bears taking over the town for several months.

The guy who originally started the project in 2005 was ultimately driven out of power by the other libertarians because he wanted to organize a way to get rid of the bears and re-institute garbage services. The town eventually drove most of the bears out in 2016, but as of 2020, was still experiencing semi-regular bear attacks on residents with no real plan to prevent them altogether.

The town also had never had a murder in its history and then had two the year they implemented the project. And it became a haven for sex offenders who were also not prosecuted because they fired the entire police force except for one guy and wouldn't pay to fix the broken police cruiser, so he couldn't take domestic violence calls unless they came to the station. The residents eventually formed a tent city that attracted the bears because people would feed them and they eliminated all garbage services.

https://www.amazon.com/Libertarian-Walks-Into-Bear-Liberate-ebook/dp/B083J1FXY8

Leon Trotsky 2012 fucked around with this message at 04:01 on Jun 13, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

the ideology creates bear utopias? wtf I'm a libertarian now

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply