Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

Eason the Fifth posted:

I've occasionally seen Gender and Sexual Minority (GSM) advocated online in lieu of LGBTQIA+ as a broader umbrella term which covers the whole spectrum. Is there any negative connotation to it?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_minority

Yes, people with extreme and sometimes illegal paraphilias attempting to shelter under the term.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Discendo Vox posted:

None of the issues of the last feedback thread were addressed. The only difference since is you’re moderating even less and the forum is even more dominated by trolls and circular arguments.

shoeberto
Jun 13, 2020

which way to the MACHINES?
I can absolutely see why guys who were bullied and "queer" was thrown at them as a slur would reject it now. As a millennial, homosexuality was THE bullying vector of choice in my school. I was called gay more times than I can count by my bullies. It's not really triggering for me now specifically because I've never had issues with my sexuality, but it's not hard to see how it would be if you ever dealt with shame around it.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

World Famous W posted:

i don't know if it's still in schoolyard or whatnot since im pushing forty, but i remember in my childhood a "game" called 'smear the *****' (it very much a slur in this case) which was just an excuse to kick the poo poo out of anyone suspected. my brother grew up in that same environment so it probably has something to do with it for him

I remember about 15 years ago or so it finally sunk in to me what "queer" was referring to.

The version played where I grew up was like an informal version of rugby.

Fork of Unknown Origins
Oct 21, 2005
Gotta Herd On?
I’m 35 and queer and several of its derivatives were definitely used as an insult when I was a kid.

Oxyclean
Sep 23, 2007


In my 30s and I don't really remember queer being thrown around by kids a lot (gay, f*g and f****t plenty), but I do remember it having vibes of it being something adult homophobes would use. Like "the queers are corrupting our youth" stuff.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

shoeberto posted:

I can absolutely see why guys who were bullied and "queer" was thrown at them as a slur would reject it now. As a millennial, homosexuality was THE bullying vector of choice in my school. I was called gay more times than I can count by my bullies. It's not really triggering for me now specifically because I've never had issues with my sexuality, but it's not hard to see how it would be if you ever dealt with shame around it.

Late Gen-X here, and this was absolutely my experience as well. In school I got called queer and/or fag at least once virtually every single day from about sixth grade until graduating high school, as it was the main vector for abuse (other than physical, of which there was a non-trivial amount as well) of any and all weird kids who didn't fit expectations or made the evil rednecks I grew up with feel inadequate by doing well in class. I can't imagine how much worse it was for the actually gay kids, given I'm straight and it was a nightmare.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
Netanyahu seems to have leaked that the U.S. and Iran have been having secret talks about a "mini" nuclear deal, prisoner swap, lifting sanctions, and unfreezing Iranian military/government assets.

quote:

Scoop: Bibi says U.S. and Iran held indirect talks on "mini agreement"

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Knesset foreign relations and security committee that the Biden administration has held indirect talks with Iran on a “mini agreement” or “an understanding” related to Iran's nuclear program, according to five lawmakers who attended the meeting.

Why it matters: The Biden administration has so far not publicly confirmed that it recently held indirect talks with Iran in Oman, as Axios previously reported. The administration has also denied that it is working on an interim agreement with Tehran.

Netanyahu is opposed to a new deal with Iran. His remarks in a closed forum that often leaks to the press appear to be a way for him to indirectly increase pressure on the Biden administration.
Catch up quick: Axios last week reported that U.S. and Iranian officials held indirect talks in Oman last month with Omani officials shuttling between the two sides and passing messages.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson on Wednesday confirmed the talks took place.

According to sources briefed on the talks, one of the main messages from the U.S. focused on deterrence. The sources said the U.S. made it clear that Iran will pay a heavy price if it moves forward with 90% uranium enrichment — the level needed to produce a nuclear weapon.

Behind the scenes: Netanyahu said the “understanding” that is being discussed includes an Iranian commitment not to enrich uranium above the level of 60%, a U.S. willingness to allow for the release of billions of dollars in Iranian funds that are currently frozen, and a prisoner exchange deal, according to the five Israeli lawmakers who attended the Knesset meeting.

The WSJ seems to be confirming, so the talks aren't really "quiet" anymore.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1668950249149198336

This is less comprehensive than the original nuclear deal, but it seems to be a way to avoid triggering the law that they passed in 2018 that requires congress to approve any new nuclear deal by making it an unofficial "understanding."

The new hardline Iranian President pulled out of nuclear negotiations immediately after he won and promised to never sign a new treaty with the U.S., so it isn't a 100% clear that they will accept this.

Although, it isn't 100% binding and everyone is stressing it isn't a "deal" or "treaty" and is instead "an understanding," so perhaps they really are considering it. Iran has really wanted to get the billions in government and military money back and might be tempted to do it for a prisoner swap and a pinky promise to not enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels.

Nameless Pete
May 8, 2007

Get a load of those...
It's one of those where using the definite article makes it way more offensive. "John is queer" versus "John is a queer."

Mendrian
Jan 6, 2013

Fork of Unknown Origins posted:

I’m 35 and queer and several of its derivatives were definitely used as an insult when I was a kid.

I'm originally from the Boston area and queer was the preferred insult at several of the schools I attended, probably because it sounds very venomous when pronounced with maximum Boston. 'Gay' was also an insult but it had more of a flippant tone and was being used as an insult for everything back then, it was more of an indirect derision of the concept of gayness than a direct insult, which is the role queer filled.

I can definitely see people not being excited to relive that era.

EDIT: Maybe I'm showing my age here but (slur spoiled)fag had kind of died out by the time I was in school, at least in public forums. It was definitely uttered to me in closed environments but it wasn't shouted through the hallways at top volume. I'm an elder millennial.

Mendrian fucked around with this message at 16:02 on Jun 14, 2023

Darko
Dec 23, 2004

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Late Gen-X here, and this was absolutely my experience as well. In school I got called queer and/or fag at least once virtually every single day from about sixth grade until graduating high school, as it was the main vector for abuse (other than physical, of which there was a non-trivial amount as well) of any and all weird kids who didn't fit expectations or made the evil rednecks I grew up with feel inadequate by doing well in class. I can't imagine how much worse it was for the actually gay kids, given I'm straight and it was a nightmare.

Late GenX here that grew up in inner city Detroit schools. We just "didn't have any gay people" in our schools because nobody was coming out in that environment because they would literally get beaten up by kids trying to prove how not gay they were in doing so.

Queer wasn't a word used back then, but our parents and grandparents would use it when they would specifically otherwise or talk about how weird someone was. Often used when someone "acted gay" but might not have been, necessarily.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!
Thanks for all the explanations on what queer means. So in summary it seems like it's safe to safe it's an umbrella for all things LGBT, but individuals have their own preferences and notions on whether they like that word vs something else.

For anecdote, I don't think I ever heard the word queer being thrown around as an insult when I was growing up (I'm in my 30s), only gay and the f-word.

I can sympathize with people who don't like being called queer because it was used to bully them though. This is not comparable at all, but when I was younger I was called a nerd as an insult for many, many years. So even today, the word "nerd" for me is first and foremost an insult and it's just really loving weird for me to see people referring to themselves as nerds/nerdy or using it as a term of endearment.

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The new hardline Iranian President pulled out of nuclear negotiations immediately after he won and promised to never sign a new treaty with the U.S., so it isn't a 100% clear that they will accept this.

I thought it didn't matter what the so-called president wants, only what the supreme leader wants?

Eason the Fifth
Apr 9, 2020

Skippy McPants posted:

Yes, people with extreme and sometimes illegal paraphilias attempting to shelter under the term.

:tipshat: thanks for fielding this one

volts5000
Apr 7, 2009

It's electric. Boogie woogie woogie.

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Late Gen-X here, and this was absolutely my experience as well. In school I got called queer and/or fag at least once virtually every single day from about sixth grade until graduating high school, as it was the main vector for abuse (other than physical, of which there was a non-trivial amount as well) of any and all weird kids who didn't fit expectations or made the evil rednecks I grew up with feel inadequate by doing well in class. I can't imagine how much worse it was for the actually gay kids, given I'm straight and it was a nightmare.

Same here. Show any bit of weirdness or difference and they'll pounce on you.

Nameless Pete posted:

It's one of those where using the definite article makes it way more offensive. "John is queer" versus "John is a queer."

I always use "queer" when talking about academics or policy. I never use it when referring to groups or individuals.

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster

Boris Galerkin posted:

I thought it didn't matter what the so-called president wants, only what the supreme leader wants?

The Iranian President has some autonomy. They can just be completely overruled by the Supreme Leader.

The previous President was negotiating the nuclear deal and was being allowed to engage. The new President pulled out as soon as he was elected, though.

Allegedly, the Supreme Leader wants the money and sanctions lifted, but isn't crazy about a nuclear deal in general. He didn't mind letting them try to get a good deal, but isn't really passionate about it.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Darko posted:

Late GenX here that grew up in inner city Detroit schools. We just "didn't have any gay people" in our schools because nobody was coming out in that environment because they would literally get beaten up by kids trying to prove how not gay they were in doing so.

I was running through a mental checklist before I posted and confirmed that as best I can recall, there were no openly gay kids in my whole class, and I could only think of one total in my entire high school the four years I was there. He got away with it by being/playing the part of the flamboyant over-the-top-to-the-point-of-caricature gay guy who therefore was harmless and got laughs rather than beaten up, which now thinking about it makes me profoundly sad if that might not have been his personality but a shield he had to put up to survive.

Guy could and did do a perfect vogue, though.

volts5000 posted:

Same here. Show any bit of weirdness or difference and they'll pounce on you.

And nobody would ever help. Sure, if it was too blatant a teacher might intervene and they'd get detention or even suspended but like they loving cared; they got those all the time anyway, wasn't any kind of deterrent.

Judgy Fucker
Mar 24, 2006

Boris Galerkin posted:

I thought it didn't matter what the so-called president wants, only what the supreme leader wants?

Iran's political structure is complicated. In the end yes the Supreme Leader can rule by fiat but in practice actually allows the elected leadership to run things most of the time. The elected leaders are all vetted prior to election so they aren't likely to stray too far off the script, and like in other authoritarian regimes the elections are meant to legitimize the state so allowing the elected leadership the actual ability to lead helps to reinforce that legitimacy.

Fork of Unknown Origins
Oct 21, 2005
Gotta Herd On?
Oddly enough, in my bumblefuck highschool in West Virginia in the early 00s, the two openly gay guys never had any problems. I mean people would throw around homophobic and occasionally racial slurs all the time, so it wasn’t exactly an inclusive environment, but everyone liked the two gay Michaels. They probably got some stuff yelled at them at some point but they had a large accepting friend group and I think the worst thing was people always trying to get them to date each other.

I’m not sure that was the norm though, or if my school just had a good group of people.

volts5000
Apr 7, 2009

It's electric. Boogie woogie woogie.

Captain_Maclaine posted:

And nobody would ever help. Sure, if it was too blatant a teacher might intervene and they'd get detention or even suspended but like they loving cared; they got those all the time anyway, wasn't any kind of deterrent.

In my experience, the only thing that got them to stop was a roundhouse kick to the guy's kidneys followed by a complete withdrawal from social interaction forever stunting my already stunted social development.

Randalor
Sep 4, 2011



Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The Iranian President has some autonomy. They can just be completely overruled by the Supreme Leader.

The previous President was negotiating the nuclear deal and was being allowed to engage. The new President pulled out as soon as he was elected, though.

Allegedly, the Supreme Leader wants the money and sanctions lifted, but isn't crazy about a nuclear deal in general. He didn't mind letting them try to get a good deal, but isn't really passionate about it.

Considering how things went the last time they had a deal in place, I can't say I blame the Iranians for not really caring about a a deal.

The Lord of Hats
Aug 22, 2010

Hello, yes! Is being very good day for posting, no?

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

The Lincoln-Douglas debates actually famously ended with Douglas renouncing the idea of popular sovereignty, resigning from the Senate, and endorsing Lincoln.

Do you... have a source on this? Because a cursory googling is making it look like this is all made up bullshit--he was still a senator when he died, ran against Lincoln in the presidential election (and won two states), and seems to have supported Popular Sovereignty up through his death.

Unless :thejoke:, I guess.

EDIT: This already got pointed out, sorry.

Digamma-F-Wau
Mar 22, 2016

It is curious and wants to accept all kinds of challenges
I've seen on Tumblr that there was a push to stop using queer and saying it's a slur... which got a ton of pushback because said "dont use it" push was a terf-led thing

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

Digamma-F-Wau posted:

I've seen on Tumblr that there was a push to stop using queer and saying it's a slur... which got a ton of pushback because said "dont use it" push was a terf-led thing

Debates around nomenclature are always contentious, especially for self-descriptors within minority groups, and especially when talking about reclaimed words.

It's basically a guarantee that bad-faith actors will be in the mix, pushing on one and sometimes both sides of the issue.

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
Seems like based on the cumulative anecdotes here that using “queer” as an insult was probably pretty regional, and it makes sense that people who were exposed to it that way would feel more negatively about it. But ugh - the acronym fuckin’ sucks, guys. “Queer” seems like a good alternative to me but I’ve only ever been attracted to a handful of guys (some of whom actually turned out to be women :v:) and am married to a woman so it’s not really my call.

(I remember that my university’s campus support group in 2002-2005 used “GLBT.” I didn’t hear the now-standard acronym until later. Anybody else remember ever seeing the letters in that order?)

DeadlyMuffin posted:

In my experience, the people I have met who have trouble with/still see queer as a slur are older, 60+ now. I don't think they have a big presence online compared to younger generations. I suspect that's why you see growing acceptance of reclaiming the slur.

When I was growing up, the slur of choice started with an f, and I would have a hard time with reclaiming it to the point where people outside the community can use it. Queer is reclaimed to the point that I heard an NPR newsreader say "queer" the other day.
I think once it got into the acronym, and with a kind of inchoate definition at that, it may have started a process towards “queer” becoming the dominant term. It seems unlikely to happen anytime soon though, based on a sizable minority still objecting to it.

Eason the Fifth posted:

I've occasionally seen Gender and Sexual Minority (GSM) advocated online in lieu of LGBTQIA+ as a broader umbrella term which covers the whole spectrum. Is there any negative connotation to it?
On the right track, and I don’t want to be crude, but uh, I don’t know about “jism.”

volts5000 posted:

I always use "queer" when talking about academics or policy. I never use it when referring to groups or individuals.
So it’s like “oriental” :v:

Mellow Seas fucked around with this message at 17:12 on Jun 14, 2023

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Mellow Seas posted:


(I remember that my university’s campus support group in 2002-2005 used “GLBT.” I didn’t hear the now-standard acronym until later. Anybody else remember ever seeing the letters in that order?)

Everyone loves a good guacamole, lettuce, bacon, and tomato sandwich.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.
Of note, the new hotness for the past couple of years from bigots has been to refer queer folks as "alphabet people". Also it's probably not new.

Really drives home how mad they are about diversity.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Nameless Pete posted:

It's one of those where using the definite article makes it way more offensive. "John is queer" versus "John is a queer."

Kind of like the difference between "people of color" and "colored people".

Civilized Fishbot
Apr 3, 2011
Yeah GLBT used to be more common which is how you get stuff like:

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.
https://twitter.com/thewarzonewire/status/1668690374020448257

The F-35 continues to be a giant embarassing farce/grift. As it says, these planes are going into storage until the Technology Refresh 3 upgrades are ironed out.

quote:

Next month, the Pentagon plans to stop accepting some newly built F-35s as they come off the production line at Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth facility in Texas, in a development first reported by Breaking Defense. The reason given is the immaturity of the TR-3 hardware. Instead of being delivered to their units, “dozens” of the jets will be stored, temporarily, at Fort Worth. It could take until spring 2024 before issues with TR-3 are ironed out and the jets can finally be handed over.

Related to this, the F-35's engine has been under-specced since the beginning. The main issue there is the need for a lot of bleed air to cool avionics, but this extra demand causes the engine to run too hot. That induces premature wear and reliability problems - which is a big deal when you only have one engine. The TR-3 upgrades will exacerbate this problem.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/f-35-engine-running-too-hot-due-to-under-speccing-upgrade-now-vital

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

volts5000 posted:

In my experience, the only thing that got them to stop was a roundhouse kick to the guy's kidneys followed by a complete withdrawal from social interaction forever stunting my already stunted social development.

In mine, fighting back bought you a little breathing space, then you got hauled in for fighting and sanctimoniously lectured about "how it takes two to tango" and other such boomer bullshit.

the_steve
Nov 9, 2005

We're always hiring!

Captain_Maclaine posted:

In mine, fighting back bought you a little breathing space, then you got hauled in for fighting and sanctimoniously lectured about "how it takes two to tango" and other such boomer bullshit.

Gods, yeah, I hated that poo poo.
Back when I was in high school, the official policy straight up said that if you defended yourself from someone attacking you, then you were just as much on the hook as the attacker would be.

ZZT the Fifth
Dec 6, 2006
I shot the invisible swordsman.

Captain_Maclaine posted:

In mine, fighting back bought you a little breathing space, then you got hauled in for fighting and sanctimoniously lectured about "how it takes two to tango" and other such boomer bullshit.

My middle school was loving absurd. I would get beaten up and then get hauled in for 'violently assaulting another student unprovoked' while they got off scot-free, even in the instances where I was obviously injured and the other studing was unharmed.

Ither
Jan 30, 2010

The way kids are allowed to abuse each other in US schools baffles me.

Take the "classic" stuffing someone in a locker.

If that happened with adults, that would be assault.

But because its kids, its often treated as a joke.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

the_steve posted:

Gods, yeah, I hated that poo poo.
Back when I was in high school, the official policy straight up said that if you defended yourself from someone attacking you, then you were just as much on the hook as the attacker would be.

:same: Seemed to be a boomer thing that victims were expected to accept their part and take the abuse, not fight back and disturb the natural order of things.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

https://twitter.com/carlquintanilla/status/1669003628848336899

Next weeks polls: Americans Say Economy "Worse Than Weimar Germany", Rate Own Situation as "Insanely Excellent"

karthun
Nov 16, 2006

I forgot to post my food for USPOL Thanksgiving but that's okay too!

the_steve posted:

Gods, yeah, I hated that poo poo.
Back when I was in high school, the official policy straight up said that if you defended yourself from someone attacking you, then you were just as much on the hook as the attacker would be.

We had one guy get suspended from school for a week because he got mugged.

Bellmaker
Oct 18, 2008

Chapter DOOF



Ither posted:

The way kids are allowed to abuse each other in US schools baffles me.

Take the "classic" stuffing someone in a locker.

If that happened with adults, that would be assault.

But because its kids, its often treated as a joke.

Kids don’t produce money for capitalism (they will later but lol at later in a capitalistic mindview)

Mellow Seas
Oct 9, 2012
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

zoux posted:

https://twitter.com/carlquintanilla/status/1669003628848336899

Next weeks polls: Americans Say Economy "Worse Than Weimar Germany", Rate Own Situation as "Insanely Excellent"
Sometimes I think that in the current media environment people are literally incapable of absorbing and processing good news.

Ither posted:

The way kids are allowed to abuse each other in US schools baffles me.
You don’t want the kids to be unprepared when they get to the other side of the school-to-prison pipeline!

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Captain_Maclaine posted:

:same: Seemed to be a boomer thing that victims were expected to accept their part and take the abuse, not fight back and disturb the natural order of things.

It's more a cycle-of-abuse thing from boomers having been raised with severe corporal punishment at home, imo.

Every subsequent generation tends to do better than the ones before it bc mores change & what was cool to do to your kids 60, 50, 40 and even 30 years ago is not only not cool anymore but could probably get you arrested today.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009

Mellow Seas posted:

Sometimes I think that in the current media environment people are literally incapable of absorbing and processing good news.

It's a Pavlovian response. The past twenty years have taught us all to cushion ourselves with cynicism in anticipation of an impending sucker punch.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply