Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: weg, Toxic Mental)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher

mobby_6kl posted:

I'm pretty surprised they're pushing there instead of a more strategic location though, clearing out Soledar or Bakhmut won't do beyond a small morale boost perhaps

Russia has an illogical wish to keep those bombed out holes, they keep throwing in far too many personnel and equipment they cant afford to lose into it. So whynot just keep makignthem lose those resources?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

EorayMel
May 30, 2015

WE GET IT. YOU LOVE GUN JESUS. Toujours des fusils Bullpup Français.
I just hope Ukraine doesn't take too long or lose too many soldiers for Bakhmut round 2

EorayMel fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Jun 30, 2023

pro starcraft loser
Jan 23, 2006

Stand back, this could get messy.

god please help me posted:

What is an American reporter doing being very public in Moscow? I thought foreign journalists weren't allowed.

Whatever Putin tells them to do.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

EorayMel posted:

I just hope Ukraine doesn't take too long or lose too many soldiers for Bakhmut round 2

As it appears they are doing the smart, good military thing of NOT walking directly into prepared fortifications and instead enveloping it, I think there's a good chance of low casualties.

Starsfan
Sep 29, 2007

This is what happens when you disrespect Cam Neely
I figured that Ukraine might try to push for Bakhmut, makes a ton of sense from the perspective of hunting a "win" because Russia likely hasn't been able to consolidate the capture of the city into it's network of prepared defensive lines - both because of the relative recency of the ending of the Bakhmut campaign as well as the fact that the city has been under Ukrainian artillery.

The huge "gently caress off" prepared defense network runs behind the current Russian front in Bakhmut - closer to Popasna is my understanding from the maps that have been posted. Russia may be induced to fall back out of Bakhmut to that line if Ukraine puts enough pressure on them. Again probably the most obvious place to attack out of anywhere on the front if the goal is to force Russia to fall back and re-capture territory. Makes double sense since apparently Russia is starting to advance on Sivers'k so if Ukraine can re-take Bakhmut that helps keep Sivers'k in their possession.

Tai
Mar 8, 2006

Starsfan posted:

I figured that Ukraine might try to push for Bakhmut, makes a ton of sense from the perspective of hunting a "win" because Russia likely hasn't been able to consolidate the capture of the city into it's network of prepared defensive lines - both because of the relative recency of the ending of the Bakhmut campaign as well as the fact that the city has been under Ukrainian artillery.

The huge "gently caress off" prepared defense network runs behind the current Russian front in Bakhmut - closer to Popasna is my understanding from the maps that have been posted. Russia may be induced to fall back out of Bakhmut to that line if Ukraine puts enough pressure on them. Again probably the most obvious place to attack out of anywhere on the front if the goal is to force Russia to fall back and re-capture territory. Makes double sense since apparently Russia is starting to advance on Sivers'k so if Ukraine can re-take Bakhmut that helps keep Sivers'k in their possession.

gently caress off back to your crayon eating thread

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

the holy poopacy
May 16, 2009

hey! check this out
Fun Shoe

Tai posted:

gently caress off back to your crayon eating thread

what the poo poo dude

EasilyConfused
Nov 21, 2009


one strong toad

Starsfan posted:

I figured that Ukraine might try to push for Bakhmut, makes a ton of sense from the perspective of hunting a "win" because Russia likely hasn't been able to consolidate the capture of the city into it's network of prepared defensive lines - both because of the relative recency of the ending of the Bakhmut campaign as well as the fact that the city has been under Ukrainian artillery.

The huge "gently caress off" prepared defense network runs behind the current Russian front in Bakhmut - closer to Popasna is my understanding from the maps that have been posted. Russia may be induced to fall back out of Bakhmut to that line if Ukraine puts enough pressure on them. Again probably the most obvious place to attack out of anywhere on the front if the goal is to force Russia to fall back and re-capture territory. Makes double sense since apparently Russia is starting to advance on Sivers'k so if Ukraine can re-take Bakhmut that helps keep Sivers'k in their possession.

That's a fair point. It would also draw a lot of Russian attention given the embarrassment a loss would cause.

BigRoman
Jun 19, 2005

Tai posted:

gently caress off back to your crayon eating thread

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Don't be an rear end. He was posting in good faith.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
Grab a snickers tai

Wistful of Dollars
Aug 25, 2009

https://twitter.com/oryxspioenkop/status/1674491705431584776?s=46&t=6HOSYVrXffESMo0NlyR0Lg

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

You know I think it's going to strengthen Russian lines not to have Wagner running around sledgehammering people to death

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1674550868455178240?t=z3KTdT7dzxjUSIQATdufhQ&s=19

Zelenskyy puts another quarter in the US Military Industrial Claw-machine and out pops...

...

...

...

CLUSTER BOMBS GET!

tiaz
Jul 1, 2004

PICK UP THAT PRESENT.


Zelensky's Zealots

HonorableTB posted:

https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1674550868455178240?t=z3KTdT7dzxjUSIQATdufhQ&s=19

Zelenskyy puts another quarter in the US Military Industrial Claw-machine and out pops...

...

...

...

CLUSTER BOMBS GET!

:stare: the M46 these apparently drop are simultaneously an antivehicle shaped charge and an antipersonnel frag? area denial indeed

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Nothing like cluster munitions to prepare trench assaults. Those may be just as impactful as ATACMS, if they get those.

Runa
Feb 13, 2011

HonorableTB posted:

fun fact, did you know the Soviets almost invented the internet 7 years before ARPANET went online? The National Automated System for Computation and Information Processing (abbreviating OGAS) was a Soviet project attempting to create a nationwide linked information network that began in 1962 but got funding denied in 1970 and the idea was abandoned because the second the Soviet government had in its possession the means to actually optimize their centrally planned economy and make socialism work in a way much closer to how it was intended to work, they promptly lost all interest in the idea and abandoned the system because:

:v:

OGAS was really loving cool too. This is what it was intended to do, had it been properly funded and built out:

The US considered it a massive national security threat because they saw the Soviet economy receiveing tremendous increases in economic productivity which would disrupt the global market and pose a threat to competing market economies.

Arhur Schlesinger Jr, a historian and special assistant to JFK, said:

There was a good chance that if that system had been built as intended, the Cold War would have been very very different than how it turned out IRL

The followup system to OGAS was Akademset, the All-Union Academic Network, established in 1978. It was the Soviet forerunner to the Internet and connected scientific and civil institutions across the USSR. It even connected to ARPANET using the X.25 standard.

lmao

the Soviets never got over the concept of ownership because they were too busy owning themselves

Pine Cone Jones
Dec 6, 2009

You throw me the acorn, I throw you the whip!

the popes toes posted:

Nothing like cluster munitions to prepare trench assaults. Those may be just as impactful as ATACMS, if they get those.

https://youtu.be/Ipr_hPAcR_Q

Don't forget dpicm atacms

tiaz
Jul 1, 2004

PICK UP THAT PRESENT.


Zelensky's Zealots

this calls out M74 bomblets so I guess my link above is out of date and it's purely fragmentation now? either way, terrifying

OAquinas
Jan 27, 2008

Biden has sat immobile on the Iron Throne of America. He is the Master of Malarkey by the will of the gods, and master of a million votes by the might of his inexhaustible calamari.
Could cluster munitions also serve as a makeshift mine clearance tool?

appropriatemetaphor
Jan 26, 2006

OAquinas posted:

Could cluster munitions also serve as a makeshift mine clearance tool?

Yeah my first thought as well since mine clearing was just called out as a pretty huge issue for Ukraine.

Makes sense that loads of little bomb would set off other bomb.

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


Seems like a great way to randomly clear 80% of the mines in front of you.

parthenocarpy
Dec 18, 2003

Like what I would presume is a lot of people, I've only heard horrible things about cluster munitions. They seem like an okay defensive weapon, though? Like, when your targets are 100% military? Like a trench? I really want to understand this and I know very little about it.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

parthenocarpy posted:

Like what I would presume is a lot of people, I've only heard horrible things about cluster munitions. They seem like an okay defensive weapon, though? Like, when your targets are 100% military? Like a trench? I really want to understand this and I know very little about it.

Cluster munitions are horrifying. I'm not saying they wouldn't be helpful in mine clearing but they are absolutely horrifying weapons.

tiaz
Jul 1, 2004

PICK UP THAT PRESENT.


Zelensky's Zealots

parthenocarpy posted:

Like what I would presume is a lot of people, I've only heard horrible things about cluster munitions. They seem like an okay defensive weapon, though? Like, when your targets are 100% military? Like a trench? I really want to understand this and I know very little about it.

the problems with them are problems however they're used - leaving small munitions more likely to be disturbed unnoticed, etc. The US chose to stop using them (for example developing the M30A1 for the HIMARS which is the tungsten shotgun thing, because those pellets are inert) for a reason.

They can be quite effective, though I'd be getting out over my skis if I started talking about how they are best applied. By the same token as the above many countries invented them for a reason.

Gnoman
Feb 12, 2014

Come, all you fair and tender maids
Who flourish in your pri-ime
Beware, take care, keep your garden fair
Let Gnoman steal your thy-y-me
Le-et Gnoman steal your thyme




parthenocarpy posted:

Like what I would presume is a lot of people, I've only heard horrible things about cluster munitions. They seem like an okay defensive weapon, though? Like, when your targets are 100% military? Like a trench? I really want to understand this and I know very little about it.

The Bad Thing about cluster munitions is the dud rate. Not only are there flaws in any manufacturing process, the detonators can't be too sensitive or air buffeting on the way down will set them off. For munitions of that size, hitting the ground isn't that much lighter than the forces in the air, especially when the ground they're hitting has been disturbed by other explosions. This creates what amounts to an unmarked and untraceable anti-personnel minefield.

This is the entire reason for the Ottawa Convention.

For any military purpose, they're ludicrously effective.

Runa
Feb 13, 2011

let's replace a minefield with a much deadlier, and also harder to clear, minefield.

CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher

WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Cluster munitions are horrifying. I'm not saying they wouldn't be helpful in mine clearing but they are absolutely horrifying weapons.

Given they clear out anything/anyone close that could prevent de-mining ops, I'd say they can be helpful.

tiaz
Jul 1, 2004

PICK UP THAT PRESENT.


Zelensky's Zealots

Runa posted:

let's replace a minefield with a much deadlier, and also harder to clear, minefield.

deadlier to personnel. if it lets me get through a minefield obstacle with however many vehicles I want at a place of my choosing in exchange for a later tedious and difficult but not-under-fire demining effort, uh, deal.
e: assuming they're even used this way, I really don't know, but I would make that trade.

parthenocarpy
Dec 18, 2003

would something like this clear out cluster munitions from a field? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu6GV8BQwJs

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

In this war, at least for Ukraine's use of mines, they have a good record of the battlefield allowing mine removal to be deliberate on their part. And they'll have a sufficient de-mining budget. And the US is the largest funder of these sort of operations, worldwide. Plus the US has already committed a 100 strong team for mine removal when this ends.

A GIANT PARSNIP
Apr 13, 2010

Too much fuckin' eggnog


parthenocarpy posted:

would something like this clear out cluster munitions from a field? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu6GV8BQwJs

Ukraine has military versions of this - the problem is the Russians keep hitting them with anti tank weapons.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
If Russia hadn't invaded there wouldn't be a need for cluster munitions, but as long as they're being offered, might as well take them to liquidate entire trenchlines at a time.

ChickenHeart
Nov 28, 2007

Take me at your own risk.

Kiss From a Hog

parthenocarpy posted:

would something like this clear out cluster munitions from a field? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu6GV8BQwJs

Remote vehicles are indeed a solution, though they come with their own issues with cost, lack of precision, and potential communications issues if you're in a non-permissive environment. For others you only have enough time and resources to throw a bunch of sandbags on the crew cabin of a front-end loader and go to town.

"How to get rid of a fuckton of unexploded bomblets from an important area" has been a huge concern for governments/militaries since at least the Cold War.

Coolguye
Jul 6, 2011

Required by his programming!
there's lots of OPTIONS for handling cluster munitions but you can say the same thing about a minefield. what never changes in either context is that it's brutal, dangerous work that can never conclusively be proven to be done completely and correctly. you will always leave the work site wondering if you're gonna hear about some kid having their leg blown off 9 months from now.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
To put this in context, people in France and Belgium are still dying every year (particularly around plowing season) to unexploded munitions from World War 1

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Russia circulated a letter in the UN Security Council that it does not plan to blow up Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant

Soooo what does it mean?


Doe it mean negotiations are soon? Or that they are about to blow up the power plant?


I mean it's a 50/50 that it's good or bad with Russia.

Aoi
Sep 12, 2017

Perpetually a Pain.
This makes me more concerned that they're planning to blow up the power plant.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006
Gigolo come on man. You've been in this long enough that you should know by now that you should take the exact opposite meaning from whatever Russia says officially. if they say they don't plan to blow it up, well, Ukraine's response:

https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-authorities-start-training-to-prepare-for-possible-russian-attack-on-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-plant/

In other news:

GENERAL COPEGEDDON WAS A SECRET WAGNER MEMBER LMAO

https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-06-29-23/h_f3cb66107686a173d74307a8cb8775b8

quote:

Documents shared exclusively with CNN suggest that Russian Gen. Sergey Surovikin was a secret VIP member of the Wagner private military company.

The documents, obtained by the Russian investigative Dossier Center, showed that Surovikin had a personal registration number with Wagner. Surovikin is listed along with at least 30 other senior Russian military and intelligence officials, who the Dossier Center said are also VIP Wagner members.

Surovikin has not been seen in public since last Saturday, when he released a video pleading for Wagner boss Yevgeny Prigozhin to stop his insurrection. His whereabouts have since remained unknown.

Surovikin is a decorated commander of the Russian Air Force and became nicknamed “General Armageddon” for his ruthless tactics bombing cities in Syria.

Wagner has not answered CNN’s request for a response. It is unclear what Wagner’s VIP membership entails, including whether there is a financial benefit.

Surovikin was known to have links with the mercenary group, but the documents raise questions about the closeness of senior members of the Russian military and Wagner.

During Prigozhin’s short-lived rebellion, Wagner fighters were able to take over the southern Russian city of Rostov-on-Don, facing virtually no resistance from the Russian army.

VIP MEMBER LMAO

Burning_Monk
Jan 11, 2005
Mad, Bad, and Dangerous to know

HonorableTB posted:

To put this in context, people in France and Belgium are still dying every year (particularly around plowing season) to unexploded munitions from World War 1

Have they tried more cluster munitions?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

shadow puppet of a
Jan 10, 2007

NO TENGO SCORPIO


WAR CRIME GIGOLO posted:

Doe it mean negotiations are soon? Or that they are about to blow up the power plant?

It means its time to take careful inventory of your most incriminating single boots

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply