|
John F Bennett posted:Good for her and you. It has been proven scientifically that people who invert Y have massive IQ. This but unironically.
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 15:07 |
|
|
Pwnstar posted:Yeah but you couldn't clear away EVERYTHING which was my issue. I can spend a bazillion hours building the perfect base but I'll go crazy if theres some random loving bush clipping through a wall or if the slanted ground means I have to put my base on stilts, but at a height that isn't aesthetically pleasing to me. I'm aware this is me being overly fussy and delicate but I think those are the traits you need to go hard into base building/home decorating maybe? There was/is a mod for that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:06
|
|
|
AirRaid posted:Inverted Y axis for life, I don’t give a gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:10
|
|
|
dr_rat posted:I'm going to be head space wizard at the space wizards academy after I heroically wander in and make some people some space coffee or something. I mean becoming leader of the space wizard academy because the space crystal ball says it likes you and you’re a very special little guy appears to be the tutorial mission, so I think we’re all gonna do that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:19
|
|
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:do you invert y axis for flight sims thankfully they usually come with the correct setting by default
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:23
|
|
|
AirRaid posted:Inverted Y axis for life, I don’t give a gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:35
|
|
|
Chillmatic posted:This but unironically. I wasn't being ironic! Invert Y for life.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:38
|
|
|
Folks that don’t invert are failed gamers
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:46
|
|
|
Inverted Y for life I don't care if you personally invert Y or not, but if you invert X - straight to the gulags with you!
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 13:51
|
|
|
The next DSM should include people who invert any axis
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:01
|
|
|
Beware, posts on leak sites are starting to advertise that they have details of the ending of the main quest. I'm done reading about Starfield until the game is in my hands.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:01
|
|
|
William Bear posted:Beware, posts on leak sites are starting to advertise that they have details of the ending of the main quest. I'm done reading about Starfield until the game is in my hands. [spoller] You talking about when Vasco has your children that immediately slaughter the human you picked for the romance option? [/spoiler]
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:06
|
|
|
the ending is that you talk to the ETs and unlock teleportation at any distance and they allow you to travel to billions of procgen planets, with literally nothing to do but radiant quests and mineral mining (not the actual ending)
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:12
|
|
|
I invert both X and Y axis and then hold the controller upside down
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:17
|
|
|
William Bear posted:Beware, posts on leak sites are starting to advertise that they have details of the ending of the main quest. I'm done reading about Starfield until the game is in my hands. You mean this genius? 
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:18
|
|
|
you fight aliens who are
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:22
|
|
|
Chillmatic posted:you fight aliens who are place your bets -dinosaurs -gay -interdimensional vampires -morbidly obese
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:24
|
|
|
Chillmatic posted:you fight aliens who are - The Thalmor! 
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:25
|
|
|
invert y axis for life. Now, regarding the past discussion about procgen/boundary limits/tiles, I think there is a fundamental disconnect between two groups. 1. Normal people who want to play a Bethesda RPG. This time in space. Do quests, explore, loot everything isn't nailed down, kill poo poo, climb up the ranks of guil... I mean factions, see the game end. 2. People who actually wants a 'space life simulator', and they believe or hope that Starfield will be the ultimate space life sim, and that includes ultimate immersion. They seem to believe planets were going to be real sized? (lol). I read some weirdos saying how they plan to get a job (like, in game) to get money to be able to pay for a house and live the alt scifi life in Starfield, or how some other people have a incredibly detailed plan to be a space pirate that reads like fanfiction (yes, we know you can do contraband, and you can attack people with your ship, and that there is a pirate faction, but I suspect the game won't have all the systems to properly be a 'real' fullfledged space pirate). Obviously it's the latter the people who can be disappointed with the game.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:26
|
|
|
It's rare at my age, but all this inverted y axis talk has made me feel young. Thanks for that. Inverted y axis age group also tends to have weird keyboard mappings they settled on around 1992 and can't cope with WASD.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:29
|
|
|
I hope there is more than four (five) large-ish cities in the game, but then again I liked Fallout 4 and that technically just has one city
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:31
|
|
|
five cities seems about right for the galaxy
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:36
|
|
|
i looked at the leaks on reddit and it seems to just be a lot of idiots upset that there are loading screens? and that you can't walk the entire planet in one landing? do they not know what company is making this game? honestly confused
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:41
|
|
|
smoobles posted:five cities seems about right for the galaxy Having traveled to a few different galaxies in my time, this is pretty much the average amount of cities you can expect to see in any random galaxy. I'll be honest anymore than that and a galaxy starts to feel really crowded. There's a reason aliens avoid earth. 10'000 plus cities just on one planet, how absurd.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:42
|
|
|
lobsterminator posted:
Build engine games were best with keyboard only. And frankly folks, things just never got better than Build
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:42
|
|
|
Mad Wack posted:i looked at the leaks on reddit and it seems to just be a lot of idiots upset that there are loading screens? and that you can't walk the entire planet in one landing? do they not know what company is making this game? honestly confused There are other games to compare it to and I think Bethesda should prooobably have been more straightforward about it being Space Fallout 4 instead of an entire new paradigm. I am sure people eill be fine once they play it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:43
|
|
|
I just want to turn off fast travel and spend 6 years traveling from Earth to Neptune
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:45
|
|
|
smoobles posted:place your bets please don't doxx me
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:47
|
|
|
smoobles posted:I just want to turn off fast travel and spend 6 years traveling from Earth to Neptune Agreed, it's not a true space sim game unless you can fly long enough for space madness to set in.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:49
|
|
|
i think part of the disappointment with the proc gen chunks on planets is that multiple space games have successfully pulled off this trick now. Off the top of my head, you have No Mans Sky, Elite, and hell, even Star Citizen can do this. Its a bit disappointing that one of the biggest AAA studios, known for their large open-worlds, cant pull off a seamless planet in their space game obviously, in terms of gameplay, its not a big deal, because each chunk will barely have anything to do in it anyways, and the only way to navigate on planet is by foot so a seamless planet would only draw more attention to that massive drawback. People that want a full planet dont really know what theyre asking for and how terrible it would be to play that with the current systems that Starfield has Now, if there were drivable ground vehicles and in-atmosphere flight with landing anywhere, this would be a different conversation imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:55
|
|
|
Can you ride dragons in this
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:58
|
|
|
ScootsMcSkirt posted:i think part of the disappointment with the proc gen chunks on planets is that multiple space games have successfully pulled off this trick now. Off the top of my head, you have No Mans Sky, Elite, and hell, even Star Citizen can do this. Its a bit disappointing that one of the biggest AAA studios, known for their large open-worlds, cant pull off a seamless planet in their space game I'd argue the reason they didn't do ground vehicles is specifically because they can't or won't do a seamless planet.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:58
|
|
|
I am going to play Starf
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 14:58
|
|
|
This is one of those things where if the game and stuff in the game is actually fun or "good", that no one but the biggest haters will bring up or care about. if it's bad then yeah it's another thing for the pile on. Also probably something that could be hacked together via mods. Like all those exterior cities mods for Skyrim and Oblivion.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:00
|
|
|
ScootsMcSkirt posted:i think part of the disappointment with the proc gen chunks on planets is that multiple space games have successfully pulled off this trick now. Off the top of my head, you have No Mans Sky, Elite, and hell, even Star Citizen can do this. Its a bit disappointing that one of the biggest AAA studios, known for their large open-worlds, cant pull off a seamless planet in their space game Again, seems pretty important to acknowledge that each of those games that you mention make significant trade-offs to enable this one cool feature. If you want to play games that allow you to walk around a big planet that’s great - they exist! Unfortunately (particularly in the case of NMS), there are few compelling reasons to engage with the sandbox other than just wanting to tool around in the sandbox. Starfield is pretty explicitly trying to be a Bethesda RPG first, and so they compromise in other areas to make that happen. Also people keep saying Star Citizen but it seems disingenuous to compare a real game to the fever dream that is SC in theory, rather than the husk of a game they’ve built that they continue to charge large amounts of money for while promising that nirvana is coming just a few more years of development from now. Like we all understand that Mark Hamill will be long dead before Squadron 42 sees the light of day, right? VanillaGorilla fucked around with this message at 15:06 on Aug 29, 2023 |
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:04
|
|
|
ymgve posted:I hope there is more than four (five) large-ish cities in the game, but then again I liked Fallout 4 and that technically just has one city Base Fallout 4 has, in my mind, two major settlements. Neither really feel like cities, even though one is in the name. Unless you're talking about Boston
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:08
|
|
|
Hot take : cities and dialogue are the worst parts of every RPG. Bethesda games are popular in large part because they minimize how much time you waste on the parts everyone says they like but actually don't enjoy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:11
|
|
|
K8.0 posted:Hot take : cities and dialogue are the worst parts of every RPG. Bethesda games are popular in large part because they minimize how much time you waste on the parts everyone says they like but actually don't enjoy. This is the thinking that led to Fallout 76 lol. Insane
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:13
|
|
|
ScootsMcSkirt posted:i think part of the disappointment with the proc gen chunks on planets is that multiple space games have successfully pulled off this trick now. Off the top of my head, you have No Mans Sky, Elite, and hell, even Star Citizen can do this. Its a bit disappointing that one of the biggest AAA studios, known for their large open-worlds, cant pull off a seamless planet in their space game It's not just possible but probable that texture streaming et al simply couldn't be retrofitted like they were hoping.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 15:07 |
|
|
K8.0 posted:Hot take : cities and dialogue are the worst parts of every RPG. Bethesda games are popular in large part because they minimize how much time you waste on the parts everyone says they like but actually don't enjoy. Kind of sounds like you just want a generic action game, and not an actual RPG?
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2023 15:17
|
|