|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2023 06:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 20:48 |
|
|
BonHair posted:This is another reason to post the classic Look if you want to prove that world wars cause left handedness there's really no need, that's already been very well established. Thank god the cold war never went hot. Who knows how many left handed people there would be around today!
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2023 06:04
|
|
|
dr_rat posted:Look if you want to prove that world wars cause left handedness there's really no need, that's already been very well established. I think you're reading it wrong. The sinisters came first, so clearly they caused the wars. And how many years is it America has been not at war since 1943?
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2023 07:21
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2023 07:47
|
|
|
DontMockMySmock posted:
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2023 23:00
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 03:48
|
|
|
Ah man, as heavy rock player, there was like two thousand eight hundred and twenty one years where I would of been really owning that game. Unlike know where I normally just lose all the time as everyone knows I mostly just play rock. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 04:10
|
|
|
Wait, what were people cutting with scissors for 2800 years?
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 07:17
|
|
|
Adhemar posted:Wait, what were people cutting with scissors for 2800 years? leather, fabric
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 07:18
|
|
|
also chopping up dank nugs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 07:31
|
|
|
hair
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 07:38
|
|
|
 I’m playing leather from now on.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 09:19
|
|
|
Adhemar posted:Wait, what were people cutting with scissors for 2800 years? Remarks against the OP rock players
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 09:31
|
|
|
Paper has the last laugh. While the paper may be cut, the scissors are never the same.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 13:31
|
|
|
zedprime posted:Paper has the last laugh. While the paper may be cut, the scissors are never the same. There were three men came out of the West, Their fortunes for to try, And these three men made a solemn vow paper must die.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 14:51
|
|
|
zedprime posted:Paper has the last laugh. While the paper may be cut, the scissors are never the same. Don't cut paper with fabric scissors
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 16:02
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Don't cut paper with fabric scissors
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 16:37
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Don't cut paper with fabric scissors Duh, obviously. Fabric isn't even sharp!
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 16:44
|
|
|
zedprime posted:Paper has the last laugh. While the paper may be cut, the scissors are never the same. But Paper alone changes fundamentally, win or lose. Scissors remains fine if it wins and Rock neither notices nor cares in either scenario. Really makes u think
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 21:53
|
|
|
zedprime posted:While we're setting some lesser known rules to play rock paper scissors safely, it's also apparently frowned upon to destroy scissors by trying to cut David's marble dick off. They should let you take off a little. Circumcision would make it more historically accurate.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 22:08
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:They should let you take off a little.  David is partially circumcised, as per the practice of the time
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 23:01
|
|
|
credburn posted:
explain how
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 23:35
|
|
|
Secret strat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5Z6FXcPGFc
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 23:44
|
|
|
Mescal posted:explain how Well now I am not so sure. Looking around on the Internet, I see a lot of claims like this quote:Circumcision was different in the time of David and is actually correctly noted in the statue with just the tip of the foreskin removed. It wouldn't become a more common practice to completely remove the skin until roman times. Michelangelo, by all accounts, is accurate to David's time. But they're all from commenters or quotes. I can't find a better source... yet! So maybe this is just one of those things I "learned" just for the sake of dropping mad fact bombs but never checked up on it :|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2023 23:52
|
|
|
credburn posted:Well now I am not so sure. Looking around on the Internet, I see a lot of claims like this In the book Breaking Their Will, by Janet Heimlich, I recall the assertion that the requirement of the covenant is basically that the penis look visibly different from non-Jews' penises. This doesn't require removing much tissue. I don't know what Heimlich's source was for the claim and don't actually own a copy of the book to check. It was something I grabbed off the shelf at my university library because I was bored out of my mind with whatever I was trying to study and the visual design of the spine was striking. The full removal of the foreskin is something I associate more with late 19th / early 20th century American health reformers (like Kellogg), but now that I think about it, it's more that I associate that movement with circumcision becoming widespread for non-religious reasons. I have no idea what religious practitioners were doing at the time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 03:17
|
|
|
credburn posted:Well now I am not so sure. Looking around on the Internet, I see a lot of claims like this It can happen in modern times too, just ask my penis!
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 04:56
|
|
|
Isn't David more of a myth than a historical guy though?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 09:46
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Isn't David more of a myth than a historical guy though? That's not really relevant to whether a Jewish king would be circumcised.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 14:06
|
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:That's not really relevant to whether a Jewish king would be circumcised. Probably too long for a thread title but still
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 15:14
|
|
|
BonHair posted:Isn't David more of a myth than a historical guy though? real statue, real guy, that's the rules
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 15:52
|
|
|
Blue Footed Booby posted:That's not really relevant to whether a Jewish king would be circumcised. The David story many times calls the Philistines "uncircumcised." This is to forge an identity around that marker. This is before "the Jews." It's probably after this point where it becomes a given. quote:Who is this uncircumcised Philistine that he should defy the armies of the living God?'"
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 18:54
|
|
|
But it's only the later authors who reference circumcision. The oldest author is only concerned with the drama, no piety, no goliath.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 18:57
|
|
|
PYF awful/funny graphs and charts: Who is this uncircumcised Philistine?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 18:58
|
|
|
For twelve years you have been asking:
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 19:00
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:real statue, real guy, that's the rules statues are limited to real people, that's why its called the statue of limitations
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 21:36
|
|
|
Surely that'd be the limitation of statues?
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2023 22:28
|
|
|
Kantesu posted:Surely that'd be the limitation of statues? The statue of limitations is the statue that makes the limitation of statues real, by being a statue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2023 04:56
|
|
|
I'm gonna start calling my enemies "uncircumcised".
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2023 05:20
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:real statue, real guy, that's the rules Well gently caress
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2023 06:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 20:48 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2023 17:10
|
|