Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Vulpes Vulpes
Apr 28, 2013

"...for you, it is all over...!"
After my kitbash Rogue Trader kill team project, I've got an itch to do the Gellarpox as another faction of the trader's crew, like his heavy deck-clearers and boarding action mad-science monsters. What would be a similar size to nightmare hulks- penitent engine? Slave ogryn?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cease to Hope
Dec 12, 2011

Vulpes Vulpes posted:

After my kitbash Rogue Trader kill team project, I've got an itch to do the Gellarpox as another faction of the trader's crew, like his heavy deck-clearers and boarding action mad-science monsters. What would be a similar size to nightmare hulks- penitent engine? Slave ogryn?

40mm bases, ogryn size.

SuperKlaus
Oct 20, 2005


Fun Shoe
Idle curiosity: is there an official list of what Chapter Tactics sets the big name marine chapters would use on Intercession Squad?

Legit Businessman
Sep 2, 2007


SuperKlaus posted:

Idle curiosity: is there an official list of what Chapter Tactics sets the big name marine chapters would use on Intercession Squad?

There is not, and that's probably on purpose.

Fans have created their own lists, but nothing official from James Workshop. I can't imagine anything GW would list would be satisfying to the player base. In addition, I think the team fluff encourages people to pick tactics that might be against the grain of the chapter at large.

TheDiceMustRoll
Jul 23, 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx3KKDQ_wEU

If this is true, they killed the old world at launch. What the hell lol

Spanish Manlove
Aug 31, 2008

HAILGAYSATAN

TheDiceMustRoll posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx3KKDQ_wEU

If this is true, they killed the old world at launch. What the hell lol

what's the tldw of the video?

Lovely Joe Stalin
Jun 12, 2007

Our Lovely Wang
That it'll launch with two box sets, one for Brettonians, one for Tomb Kings. I think he said 70-90 models in each box, along with the core rules. But old models apart from the HQs.

I'm not sure what the drama is meant to be here. They've already said it'll be primarily old models to start with, and doing it this way would let them do a bigger boxes at a potentially decent price to bring people in. Assuming it's true, I'm more surprised it's split boxes instead of a starter than I am that they would use the old models to pack numbers.

And yeah, it would be nice if when posting a video you could bother to post a summary instead of a dire but meaningless comment.

Lovely Joe Stalin fucked around with this message at 05:02 on Sep 19, 2023

Ristolaz
Sep 29, 2005

By completely blowing off my BS you have passed the first trial
If I was told there were going to be separate bret and TK boxes featuring mostly old models, Id assume it was in addition to the actual launch box. I cant imagine gw would release a launch box that didnt include opposing models of some kind

Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

As a tomb kings player, a lot of the "old" models is stuff they worked on at the launch of 8th edition and for the year following, since TKs were one of the launch armies. Many of the sculpts are very good. Some were only available in perfect-cast, which was awful at launch but they eventually worked the kinks out. I'm hopeful that this is an opportunity for me to maybe play without having to buy anything, if the rules don't require a bunch of extra crap like custom rulers or something.

One thing that was... not good, about TKs, was the multipart skeleton models. You needed a lot, and while skeltons are easy to paint, those old ones were a pain in the rear end to put a lot of them together and it was also really easy to not be able to rank them properly on the small square bases. Making skeletal cavalry was also not much fun.

But the big monsters, aside from the ancient skelton giant guy, were mostly really cool and fun and good kits.

Atlas Hugged
Mar 12, 2007


Put your arms around me,
fiddly digits, itchy britches
I love you all
I just wish they'd scan their old lines and make them downloadable as STLs. I'm like the one weirdo who likes the 5e look over the revamped Bretonnians.

Sure the models themselves aren't as nice, but they are good enough for me.

Lovely Joe Stalin
Jun 12, 2007

Our Lovely Wang
I have no idea how reliable, if at all, this Valrak guy is, but I will hand it to him that as far as buy-in points go, releasing a big (presumably discount) core army in a box + rules is probably the smartest way to address the main show-stopping problem WFB had. I could see them doing it for each faction.

IncredibleIgloo
Feb 17, 2011





Atlas Hugged posted:

I just wish they'd scan their old lines and make them downloadable as STLs. I'm like the one weirdo who likes the 5e look over the revamped Bretonnians.

Sure the models themselves aren't as nice, but they are good enough for me.

You should look at Titan Forges release this month, they are Bretonnian proxies. I really like them.

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



Ristolaz posted:

I cant imagine gw would release a launch box that didnt include opposing models of some kind

GW has said that there won't be a "starter box" but there will be boxes.

This is most likely just an extrapolation of that unless there's any new info out, I'm super weary of ToW clickbait.

TheDiceMustRoll
Jul 23, 2018

Lovely Joe Stalin posted:

I have no idea how reliable, if at all, this Valrak guy is, but I will hand it to him that as far as buy-in points go, releasing a big (presumably discount) core army in a box + rules is probably the smartest way to address the main show-stopping problem WFB had. I could see them doing it for each faction.


He's decently reliable to the point I assume he likely just gets fed info to "leak" since he's a fairly big warhammer youtuber who doesn't aggressively poo poo on the company or uh, minority groups.

LashLightning
Feb 20, 2010

You know you didn't have to go post that, right?
But it's fine, I guess...

You just keep being you!

Leperflesh posted:

One thing that was... not good, about TKs, was the multipart skeleton models. You needed a lot, and while skeltons are easy to paint, those old ones were a pain in the rear end to put a lot of them together and it was also really easy to not be able to rank them properly on the small square bases.

Those skellies will be going on 25mm bases now, so should hopefully be easier to position to rank up.

Count Thrashula
Jun 1, 2003

Death is nothing compared to vindication.
Buglord

Atlas Hugged posted:

I just wish they'd scan their old lines and make them downloadable as STLs. I'm like the one weirdo who likes the 5e look over the revamped Bretonnians.

Sure the models themselves aren't as nice, but they are good enough for me.

There's a guy on Cults who's basically been doing exactly that, though mostly specialist games as opposed to WHFB. Though there are a bunch of Chaos Dwarf scans.

edit-- I didn't post the link: [redacted by Leperflesh :filez:]

Somebody fucked around with this message at 17:31 on Sep 19, 2023

berzerkmonkey
Jul 23, 2003
Two separate army boxes makes sense - WHFB isn't geared to new players, it's geared to old grogs who can't move on. If you already have an army, buying a full starter with two armies you either have or don't care about is silly.

FWIW, GW can't win with this - there's always going to be a vocal group who is going to hate whatever direction GW takes with WFB. And as for Valrak, his comment on "I'm really disappointed that they're not putting out new models" is the height of that grog bullshit - it's been known for a long, long time that WFB is going to be majority old kits with a few FW characters. I'm firmly in the "gimme old models" camp - I can finish off old collections and still play 6th/7th ed.

Could GW have done better with the time they've had on this? Probably. Would they see a financial return on that investment though? Probably not. AOS is doing just fine, and has likely made more money for GW than Fantasy did in its last decade.

goodness
Jan 3, 2012

just keep swimming

Count Thrashula posted:

There's a guy on Cults who's basically been doing exactly that, though mostly specialist games as opposed to WHFB. Though there are a bunch of Chaos Dwarf scans.

edit-- I didn't post the link: [redacted by Leperflesh :filez:]

A bit ballsy to be charging for scans of official miniatures. Those look great though.

Somebody fucked around with this message at 17:31 on Sep 19, 2023

Talas
Aug 27, 2005

berzerkmonkey posted:

FWIW, GW can't win with this - there's always going to be a vocal group who is going to hate whatever direction GW takes with WFB. And as for Valrak, his comment on "I'm really disappointed that they're not putting out new models" is the height of that grog bullshit - it's been known for a long, long time that WFB is going to be majority old kits with a few FW characters...
That's the kind of people who comment on YouTube saying that TOW was going to replace AoS any minute now since three or four years ago.

Macdeo Lurjtux
Jul 5, 2011

BRRREADSTOOORRM!

TheDiceMustRoll posted:

He's decently reliable to the point I assume he likely just gets fed info to "leak" since he's a fairly big warhammer youtuber who doesn't aggressively poo poo on the company or uh, minority groups.

From what I've seen he's just pretty good at mental gymnastics to prove his leaks and predictions were right. (And by his I mean the stuff he grabs off of reddit to amplify)


Like in the lead up the 10th, he was saying in his videos that the contest was rigged and they were going to announce a tie and show off both armies. When tyranids won he started shouting 'I told you it was rigged, nobody that voted actually played a game. They didn't want the tyranids to win, they only cared about space marines losing. '

Lucinice
Feb 15, 2012

You look tired. Maybe you should stop posting.

berzerkmonkey posted:

FWIW, GW can't win with this - there's always going to be a vocal group who is going to hate whatever direction GW takes with WFB. And as for Valrak, his comment on "I'm really disappointed that they're not putting out new models" is the height of that grog bullshit - it's been known for a long, long time that WFB is going to be majority old kits with a few FW characters. I'm firmly in the "gimme old models" camp - I can finish off old collections and still play 6th/7th ed.

I think what sucks about the no new models thing is that they heavily implied early on that Kislev would be a new army, they even showed off concept designs with the old world branding on them. Now those designs were used for Total War Warhammer 3 but it still feels like they had bigger plans they had to scale back.

I'll still buy TOW anyway because I missed out on WFB and I want those models but personally I wish they were doing more.

Lucinice fucked around with this message at 16:20 on Sep 19, 2023

goodness
Jan 3, 2012

just keep swimming
I remember hearing, which could be total bs, that because of the rights TotalWarhammer had, GW couldn't release new old world models like the ones in the game until the last dlc is released. Maybe that's why the release has been so slow in coming. Or its bs.

Muir
Sep 27, 2005

that's Doctor Brain to you

Macdeo Lurjtux posted:

From what I've seen he's just pretty good at mental gymnastics to prove his leaks and predictions were right. (And by his I mean the stuff he grabs off of reddit to amplify)

Yeah, I don't think he's particularly reliable, just loud.

Leperflesh
May 17, 2007

Count Thrashula posted:

There's a guy on Cults who's basically been doing exactly that, though mostly specialist games as opposed to WHFB. Though there are a bunch of Chaos Dwarf scans.

[edited out]

this looks like scans of official GW minis, which is pretty blatant copyright violation, and we don't link to this sort of thing on the forums, sorry. I'll have to remove that link, too.

e. wait am I wrong? Are these custom non-GW figs? I feel like I recognize them.

e2. yeah they're official minis. Out-of-print stuff is kinda borderline but GW keeps every single mold forever and is especially litigious, so let's be super careful here.

Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 17:32 on Sep 19, 2023

Covermeinsunshine
Sep 15, 2021

Why would you want scans of old garbage when there are people doing their 3d sculpts that are clear upgrades over older gw minis? Like highland miniatures has a lot of decent stuff

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



It's this or scalpers, and I'd rather pay the scanner for their time and work. If GW wants me to buy their OOP Mordheim sculpts, they can sell them to me.

That formerly linked guy doesn't do a lot of cleanup or prep, though. I got his vampire mercenary which had a bent sword and barely a face.

Desfore
Jun 8, 2011

Confirmed at least one furry on the Smash team

Macdeo Lurjtux posted:

Like in the lead up the 10th, he was saying in his videos that the contest was rigged and they were going to announce a tie and show off both armies. When tyranids won he started shouting 'I told you it was rigged, nobody that voted actually played a game. They didn't want the tyranids to win, they only cared about space marines losing. '

To be fair, I am one of those guys that just took my code and voted for Tyranids without playing. But, I wanted to see cool new bugs, instead of marine #257.

moths
Aug 25, 2004

I would also still appreciate some danger.



There's generally going to be a lot of that on both sides and it typically cancels out.

Lucinice
Feb 15, 2012

You look tired. Maybe you should stop posting.

goodness posted:

I remember hearing, which could be total bs, that because of the rights TotalWarhammer had, GW couldn't release new old world models like the ones in the game until the last dlc is released. Maybe that's why the release has been so slow in coming. Or its bs.

I mean GW makes weird business decisions so it's possible but that's sounds like they worst way to go about it especially if the game gets multiple years of support.

Covermeinsunshine posted:

Why would you want scans of old garbage when there are people doing their 3d sculpts that are clear upgrades over older gw minis? Like highland miniatures has a lot of decent stuff

You know where I can get some chorfs? I wanna play chorfs.

Lucinice fucked around with this message at 18:41 on Sep 19, 2023

Count Thrashula
Jun 1, 2003

Death is nothing compared to vindication.
Buglord

Leperflesh posted:

this looks like scans of official GW minis, which is pretty blatant copyright violation, and we don't link to this sort of thing on the forums, sorry. I'll have to remove that link, too.

e. wait am I wrong? Are these custom non-GW figs? I feel like I recognize them.

e2. yeah they're official minis. Out-of-print stuff is kinda borderline but GW keeps every single mold forever and is especially litigious, so let's be super careful here.

That's fair! I thought they'd be okay because they're like 20 years out of print, but I totally respect your decision.

Covermeinsunshine
Sep 15, 2021

Lucinice posted:

I mean GW makes weird business decisions so it's possible but that's sounds like they worst way to go about it especially if the game gets multiple years of support.

You know where I can get some chorfs? I wanna play chorfs.

of the top of my head https://www.patreon.com/LostKingdomMiniatures/posts?fbclid=IwAR1K-_XJU5Oo-f5v9_uJPHP6vrrZxx1OUOrkpCdCQ8jjro7busrgUfOJrgE has multiple units and nice designs

berzerkmonkey
Jul 23, 2003

Covermeinsunshine posted:

Why would you want scans of old garbage when there are people doing their 3d sculpts that are clear upgrades over older gw minis? Like highland miniatures has a lot of decent stuff
Highlands has great stuff, but there is a charm to the old stuff, whether you like the original models or not. Also, Highlands don't look right next to a full 6th ed army, for instance. Scans are a great way for people to fill gaps in their collections without having to pay outrageous Ebay collector's pricing.


moths posted:

It's this or scalpers, and I'd rather pay the scanner for their time and work. If GW wants me to buy their OOP Mordheim sculpts, they can sell them to me.

That formerly linked guy doesn't do a lot of cleanup or prep, though. I got his vampire mercenary which had a bent sword and barely a face.

Haha yeah. I got a scan of the Felix (of Gotrek fame) and the sword was twisted almost a full 90 degrees. It's metal man... just bend it back into shape or tweak your scan for god's sake.

Angry Lobster
May 16, 2011

Served with honor
and some clarified butter.

berzerkmonkey posted:

Highlands has great stuff, but there is a charm to the old stuff, whether you like the original models or not. Also, Highlands don't look right next to a full 6th ed army, for instance. Scans are a great way for people to fill gaps in their collections without having to pay outrageous Ebay collector's pricing.

Haha yeah. I got a scan of the Felix (of Gotrek fame) and the sword was twisted almost a full 90 degrees. It's metal man... just bend it back into shape or tweak your scan for god's sake.

Check a designer called Monstruous Encounters, his designs have a decent old/retro vibe.

berzerkmonkey
Jul 23, 2003

Angry Lobster posted:

Check a designer called Monstruous Encounters, his designs have a decent old/retro vibe.

Yeah, they are good. I just finished a metal Sisters of Sigmar warband for Mordheim, and am tempted to do another with the ME models that I picked up during the sale. Of course, Heresy Labs has a kickass set too, and had I known about them during the sale, I would have snapped up those files as well.

And for anyone looking, Avatars of War has good modern fantasy models with a retro GW feel. Their orc/goblin/beastmen skeletons are fantastic and would make a great Cursed Company.

Hedningen
May 4, 2013

Enough sideburns to last a lifetime.

Lucinice posted:

You know where I can get some chorfs? I wanna play chorfs.

Fabelzel does amazing work for Big Hat chorfs.

Lucinice
Feb 15, 2012

You look tired. Maybe you should stop posting.

Hedningen posted:

Fabelzel does amazing work for Big Hat chorfs.

These two sources combined should get me what I need. Thanks much

Atlas Hugged
Mar 12, 2007


Put your arms around me,
fiddly digits, itchy britches
I love you all
I like the 90s sculpts because they're what I wanted as a kid and couldn't afford. It's not really anything deeper than that. I don't really like the shields on the barding in the newer Bretonnian sculpts and I like the faux-Arthurian characters from 5e which now are frankly impossible to get.

Cease to Hope
Dec 12, 2011

berzerkmonkey posted:

FWIW, GW can't win with this - there's always going to be a vocal group who is going to hate whatever direction GW takes with WFB. And as for Valrak, his comment on "I'm really disappointed that they're not putting out new models" is the height of that grog bullshit - it's been known for a long, long time that WFB is going to be majority old kits with a few FW characters.

wanting new shiny toys is the least grog opinion i can imagine a fan ever having tbh

i admit, i had not considered the possibility that old world was gonna just be a one-and-done thing

Lovely Joe Stalin
Jun 12, 2007

Our Lovely Wang
Unless I missed it, there's no reason to think it will be one and done. Well, if it turns out to not be viable I guess, but otherwise they seem pretty intent on trying to bring it back as a living system.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Atlas Hugged
Mar 12, 2007


Put your arms around me,
fiddly digits, itchy britches
I love you all
I will almost certainly never play a game of it, but I will probably buy at the very least a couple of Combat Patrol equivalents.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply