Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
repiv
Aug 13, 2009

does valve ever comment publicly on why a game was denied when the developer makes a scene like this?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Shastahanshah
Sep 12, 2022

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

The 7th Guest posted:

"rape is a motivation in our hero's journey" is such garbage writing that I wish Valve actually DID reject games for that poo poo but yeah

I think it can be a powerful message for survivors if it's done in a tasteful way, which is not the vibe I'm getting from a pixelated alien face-licking in a fast paced melee boom-shoot etc etc.

Endorph posted:

pictured: a video game you can purchase on steam



Imo, the question of what is acceptable in porn is a separate issue. Though, I think "no kinkshaming" has also been a meme longer than I've actually known what it meant.

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

Cyrano4747 posted:

Steam's verification process

The 7th Guest
Dec 17, 2003

i know it's not great to speculate in the industry thread, but i think it's possible that this game got a bit more scrutiny from review BECAUSE it's a game that has been in Next Fests, E3-type events like Guerilla Collective, Realms Deep, probably had a significant number of wishlists, etc. I wouldn't be surprised if Valve eyeballs these notable 4k-5k unit-pushing indie releases a bit more than "furry hentai jigsaw puzzle 4" that gets 100 purchases. because if they are negligent in checking the bigger stuff, it could bite them in the rear end later, like how they had to just straight up delist Arkham Knight at launch

that doesn't mean that they should allow many of the broken games that get on steam either, but if there's higher priority given to bigger releases that wouldn't surprise me at all

Randalor
Sep 4, 2011



YggiDee posted:

They finished recording VA 12 hours ago so I think there might be other production issues we aren't hearing about

Can I ask where you got this nugget of information from? Because if they're supposed to be releasing the game tomorrow and they just finished the VA less than a day ago... uh... I don't know a lot about game development, but that doesn't seem like a lot of time to make sure everything lines up and plays properly.

The 7th Guest
Dec 17, 2003

Randalor posted:

Can I ask where you got this nugget of information from? Because if they're supposed to be releasing the game tomorrow and they just finished the VA less than a day ago... uh... I don't know a lot about game development, but that doesn't seem like a lot of time to make sure everything lines up and plays properly.
https://twitter.com/FortunesRun/status/1706461146046169363

Mordiceius
Nov 10, 2007

If you think calling me names is gonna get a rise out me, think again. I like my life as an idiot!

The 7th Guest posted:

"rape is a motivation in our hero's journey" is such garbage writing that I wish Valve actually DID reject games for that poo poo but yeah, valve only cares that your poo poo can open and close, and isn't a virus. they don't care about sexual content in games until people complain loudly enough about a specific game

this dev is being sketchy about their explanation and they're also shittalking at the DUSK developer so idk. i don't like the vibes going on here

e: when asked why they're crunching so much when they can just delay their response is, "this is just how it is, shut up"

https://twitter.com/FortunesRun/status/1706729464275595459

Almost every single tweet by this dev come across as incredibly snippy and aggro. I feel okay not giving them the benefit of the doubt about their rape game.

Mr E
Sep 18, 2007

That game's demo seemed pretty great and fun and Steam's processes seem to be a complete mess but also holy poo poo that twitter statement and the replies by the dev to others are real bad.

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

Mordiceius posted:

Almost every single tweet by this dev come across as incredibly snippy and aggro. I feel okay not giving them the benefit of the doubt about their rape game.
the developers of heavenly badonkers, however

Mordiceius
Nov 10, 2007

If you think calling me names is gonna get a rise out me, think again. I like my life as an idiot!

Endorph posted:

the developers of heavenly badonkers, however

Probably also sucks!

RPATDO_LAMD
Mar 22, 2013

🐘🪠🍆

The 7th Guest posted:

regardless of whether rape can be depicted well in a game and be emotionally explored in its story without being exploitative, i don't trust this particular boomer shooter dev who apparently is making it one (graphic) second of a flashback cutscene, and is spending today primarily yelling at people random poo poo like "what about the manga Berserk??"

yea there have been a couple of games whose final build accidentally didn't have an EXE file and valve just straight up didn't check

it's not graphic though
or at least not graphic enough for valve to approve it

mycot
Oct 23, 2014

"It's okay. There are other Terminators! Just give us this one!"
Hell Gem
I think Endorph's argument is that there's this weird grey area where completely pornagraphic and fetishy games are okay, but games that try to broach the same subject matter in a more careful and nuanced way (even if they fail and it's bad) get bopped. But even if you take the dev's version of events, it seems that Valve is only having a semantic issue than a content/moral one.

Bifner McDoogle
Mar 31, 2006

"Life unworthy of life" (German: Lebensunwertes Leben) is a pragmatic liberal designation for the segments of the populace which they view as having no right to continue existing, due to the expense of extending them basic human dignity.

Endorph posted:

well, probably all the rape porn on steam

There is terrible poo poo on steam. Had an issue last year where I caught my half brother playing "Latex Dungeon" because he played it without turning off the freinds connection. He's 16 and Autistic, so I gave a heads up to mom asap because the situation could reach past 'he's veiwing some hosed up stuff' and into 'there's a chance someone could try and blackmail him with this so I'm blowing it up now since my mom will handle it in a mature way. Or at least go into offline mode first before playing the game herself, so I never, ever have to think about it'

All that said, the word salad tweet is really unprofessional and does not inspire confidence in this project. I totally sympathize with the dev, but this is absolutely not how to sell your game when dealing with this kind of set back.

To draw a direct comparison, when 30xx (excellent game, btw) got a unexpected delay on the switch release date, the dev gave an apology and took the opportunity to do some interviews on the process, inspiration and collaboration that defined the project. They didn't attack the platform because doing so didn't make any sense - their fans would attack the platform for them.

If this dev just put out a basic tweet saying 'hey, getting this through Valve's approval process is actually taking some time lol' the response would be universally supportive of the dev and negative to valve. That could lead into conversations about how exited the dev is about the game, what ispired it, ect. But now the conversation is about SA in videogames and a small dev team working in a crunch environment for no perceptible reason. So instead of positive buzz you have weird creeps making bizarre, nonsensical psychotic takes like the one below:

Mordiceius posted:

Almost every single tweet by this dev come across as incredibly snippy and aggro. I feel okay not giving them the benefit of the doubt about their rape game.

RPATDO_LAMD
Mar 22, 2013

🐘🪠🍆

mycot posted:

I think Endorph's argument is that there's this weird grey area where completely pornagraphic and fetishy games are okay, but games that try to broach the same subject matter in a more careful and nuanced way (even if they fail and it's bad) get bopped. But even if you take the dev's version of events, it seems that Valve is only having a semantic issue than a content/moral one.

they didn't get bopped for the scene
they got bopped for including content warnings in the store page which valve claims weren't warranted. because the scene wasn't bad enough. valve doesn't want them to remove the scene it wants them to remove the CW

Hwurmp
May 20, 2005

receiving a lot of questions about my "Rape Scenes Aren't Disgusting Enough" shirt

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

RPATDO_LAMD posted:

they didn't get bopped for the scene
they got bopped for including content warnings in the store page which valve claims weren't warranted. because the scene wasn't bad enough. valve doesn't want them to remove the scene it wants them to remove the CW

This particular bit makes no sense to me because like... if a developer wants to give a content warning they should be allowed to give a content warning.

RPATDO_LAMD
Mar 22, 2013

🐘🪠🍆
yeah that's an extremely stupid reason but as far as i understand valve's approvals are just "whatever programmers in the giant flat structure who currently feel like doing it today" with no structure or defined standards

Snake Maze
Jul 13, 2016

3.85 Billion years ago
  • Having seen the explosion on the moon, the Devil comes to Venus

ImpAtom posted:

This particular bit makes no sense to me because like... if a developer wants to give a content warning they should be allowed to give a content warning.

Maybe they just don't want inaccurate warnings diluting the system? In other tweets the dev says that the scene is on screen for less than a second as part of a rapid fire montage so it seems plausible the reviewer genuinely missed it.

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.
While this guy is being a total jerkwad outside of the gaming stuff, he's also admitted he's burning himself out on some insane 90+ hour workweek, he's not in a rational place, the thing to do would be to drop this for a week and come back when his brain isn't pickled in caffeine and frustration. Irrespective of all the other stuff, there's that.

HopperUK
Apr 29, 2007

Why would an ambulance be leaving the hospital?

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

While this guy is being a total jerkwad outside of the gaming stuff, he's also admitted he's burning himself out on some insane 90+ hour workweek, he's not in a rational place, the thing to do would be to drop this for a week and come back when his brain isn't pickled in caffeine and frustration. Irrespective of all the other stuff, there's that.

Yeah this is clearly the biggest issue.

Combat Lobster
Feb 18, 2013

https://twitter.com/FortunesRun/status/1706771462617518140

I guess it turned out fine in the end. Though this public display soured any desire to try it.

Kennel
May 1, 2008

BAWWW-UNH!
Can't wait to be licked by a bobbing wrinkled alien creature.

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

Combat Lobster posted:

I guess it turned out fine in the end. Though this public display soured any desire to try it.
idk. i cant blame someone for being frustrated and snippy when something you've worked on for years is randomly thrown against the wall by valve

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

https://twitter.com/FortunesRun/status/1706776485611110417

and also it seems like it really was just them warning for the SA in the steam description, if removing it got them through. Which is hosed up! Regardless of what you think of how he framed it or how he acted, he wanted to warn for a scene that was in the game and valve denied him for it.

ImpAtom
May 24, 2007

Endorph posted:

https://twitter.com/FortunesRun/status/1706776485611110417

and also it seems like it really was just them warning for the SA in the steam description, if removing it got them through. Which is hosed up! Regardless of what you think of how he framed it or how he acted, he wanted to warn for a scene that was in the game and valve denied him for it.

Yeah if that is the case it is incredibly loving dumb of Valve on multiple levels.

Mirificus
Oct 29, 2004

Kings need not raise their voices to be heard
Ars Technica: Unity dev group dissolves after 13 years over “completely eroded” company trust

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

Combat Lobster posted:

Though this public display soured any desire to try it.
incidentally that guy seems like a moron but also i cant blame him for being testy when theres poo poo like https://twitter.com/RWSstudios/status/1706696362765549739 the postal devs (of all people) accusing him of 'glorifying rape'

in general the post was goofy but also the moral condemnation people were rushing to for daring to question steam or daring to have a scene like that in his game when it seems like the situation was literally exactly as he portrayed it is incredible. everything he said in that post is basically accurate even if the phrasing was goofy so it owns that people were acting like they were the problem, not steam

haldolium
Oct 22, 2016



repiv posted:

does valve ever comment publicly on why a game was denied when the developer makes a scene like this?


Usually not, unless theres also media pressure on top of it like it's been the case with the recent generated content stuff from "AI" where also a dev complained on reddit and they later clarified (well, not entirely) in some statement to gi.biz or another site vaguely about the process. I think they never directly addressed a game or company in these.

But that's their entire thing. Secretive and not commenting on anything. Once a fun PR tactic for HL3 teasing, with steam a very questionable way to go. Although I think the goal is obvious enough.

Stux
Nov 17, 2006

Endorph posted:

the postal devs (of all people) accusing him of 'glorifying rape'

isnt thaht specifically one of the things they wouldnt put in the postal games? or was that later they decided that

Endorph
Jul 22, 2009

Stux posted:

isnt thaht specifically one of the things they wouldnt put in the postal games? or was that later they decided that
theres never been a scene of it in postal but there've been multiple jokes referencing it

cumpantry
Dec 18, 2020

Endorph posted:

incidentally that guy seems like a moron but also i cant blame him for being testy when theres poo poo like https://twitter.com/RWSstudios/status/1706696362765549739 the postal devs (of all people) accusing him of 'glorifying rape'

in general the post was goofy but also the moral condemnation people were rushing to for daring to question steam or daring to have a scene like that in his game when it seems like the situation was literally exactly as he portrayed it is incredible. everything he said in that post is basically accurate even if the phrasing was goofy so it owns that people were acting like they were the problem, not steam

running with scissors sure has a lot of talk while putting out unplayable pieces of poo poo, irregularly. a bottom 5 studio and lovely responses to a stressed out dev prove it

MechaCrash
Jan 1, 2013

Steam probably does not disclose the process to make sure people can't game it. Security through obscurity isn't great and usually doesn't work, but it'd at least be an understandable thing, since they may have too high a workload for a rule zero "we can reject it for any reason or no reason," which most terms of service have just to make sure you can nail the rules-lawyering little shits that do the "does this bug you, does this bug you, I'm not touching you" thing.

Cyrano4747
Sep 25, 2006

Yes, I know I'm old, get off my fucking lawn so I can yell at these clouds.

I wonder if valve might have a rule against non applicable content tags. I could see something like that happening if they had some dipshit tagging his flappy birds clone with everything from rape to torture to animal cruelty as a dumb poo poo “protest” against woke valve censoring video games or something.

Why yes I have been reading people complaining about nexus today why do you ask?

Note that I’m not saying that’s what these devs are doing but I could see that rule getting written for other, dumber reasons and then getting over-applied by whatever intern they have reviewing content tags on indies.

Regalingualius
Jan 7, 2012

We gazed into the eyes of madness... And all we found was horny.




Cyrano4747 posted:

I wonder if valve might have a rule against non applicable content tags. I could see something like that happening if they had some dipshit tagging his flappy birds clone with everything from rape to torture to animal cruelty as a dumb poo poo “protest” against woke valve censoring video games or something.

Why yes I have been reading people complaining about nexus today why do you ask?

Note that I’m not saying that’s what these devs are doing but I could see that rule getting written for other, dumber reasons and then getting over-applied by whatever intern they have reviewing content tags on indies.

What’s the deal with Nexus today?

Orv
May 4, 2011
I assume continuing idiocy over them banning a few more bigotry mods a bit ago.

Veotax
May 16, 2006


The two that I'm aware of is them banning the mods that replace the LGBT+ pride flags in Spider-Man with an American flag (or any other flag) and more recently banning mods that remove the pronoun selection from Starfield.

Has there been anything else since those?

YggiDee
Sep 12, 2007

WASP CREW
I just saw someone say it was Islamophobia to ban mods that remove LGBT content

Orv
May 4, 2011

Veotax posted:

The two that I'm aware of is them banning the mods that replace the LGBT+ pride flags in Spider-Man with an American flag (or any other flag) and more recently banning mods that remove the pronoun selection from Starfield.

Has there been anything else since those?

Those are the two big news item ones but from a very brief look it seems the Starfield one has brought the bigots to a full boil.

fez_machine
Nov 27, 2004

Cyrano4747 posted:

I wonder if valve might have a rule against non applicable content tags. I could see something like that happening if they had some dipshit tagging his flappy birds clone with everything from rape to torture to animal cruelty as a dumb poo poo “protest” against woke valve censoring video games or something.

Note that I’m not saying that’s what these devs are doing but I could see that rule getting written for other, dumber reasons and then getting over-applied by whatever intern they have reviewing content tags on indies.

It's 100% this, except replace intern with underpaid call centre style worker

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cyrano4747
Sep 25, 2006

Yes, I know I'm old, get off my fucking lawn so I can yell at these clouds.

Orv posted:

Those are the two big news item ones but from a very brief look it seems the Starfield one has brought the bigots to a full boil.

Yeah, it’s this. Just full out rage mode that nexus won’t let them be bigots and screaming everywhere that nexus is ruining modding by censoring creators.

By, you know, booting people who mod games to remove pronoun options on character creation.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply