|
https://twitter.com/Super70sSports/status/1708889216531173880
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
Dang
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:22
|
|
|
Riven posted:Oh right. The poison. The poison for my friend. The poison chosen specially to kill my friend. My friend’s poison. He just had a little bit as a treat
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:29
|
|
|
Lobok posted:Pollocks don't have much power on a computer monitor. The size and the textures are totally gone in a JPG. Sounds like the most basic advice ever but most great paintings should be experienced first-hand (except the Mona Lisa). Hollandia has a new favorite as of 03:42 on Oct 3, 2023 |
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:31
|
|
|
Jackson Pollock's splatter paintings are like relief sculptures when you see them in person. They're gigantic and deeply layered and textured. Saying that you don't like one based on a jpg is like looking at a picture of food and saying that you don't like how it tastes. Well, off to the AFP thread for me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:40
|
|
|
CommonShore posted:Jackson Pollock's splatter paintings are like relief sculptures when you see them in person. They're gigantic and deeply layered and textured. The what thread?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:42
|
|
|
Always fuckin’ partying thread.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 03:43
|
|
|
This is not a Maryland thing
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:02
|
|
|
Frank Frank posted:This is not a Maryland thing Sounds exactly like what someone all hopped up on Sippin Cream would say
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:07
|
|
|
Lobok posted:Pollocks don't have much power on a computer monitor. The size and the textures are totally gone in a JPG. Sounds like the most basic advice ever but most great paintings should be experienced first-hand (except the Mona Lisa). It"s 6 feet 10 inches high by 10 feet 1 inch wide. ( 207.5 × 308.1 cm) It's huge. It looms over you. You have no idea how hard it hits until you've been to the Art Institute of Chicago. I haven't seen a Rothko in person, but I understand the same thing's going on: you can't understand it without seeing how the light pours over it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:09
|
|
|
freeedr posted:Always fuckin’ partying thread. thats the only way you can enjoy a jackson pollock painting oh ho ho
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:14
|
|
|
Maybe you can't understand it but I'm different
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:15
|
|
|
Girl with a pearl earring is interesting in pictures and astonishing in person
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:21
|
|
|
Kei Technical posted:Girl with a pearl earring is interesting in pictures and astonishing in person I can imagine. The sheer skill required to get it around the earlobe when compared to the more pedestrian necklace is astounding.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 04:44
|
|
|
Leon Sumbitches posted:The what thread? anti food porn. The thread where we look at pictures of food and say it looks gross.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 05:00
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:A Sunday on La Grande Jatte, 1884? The one you've seen in every history textbook that wants to give one page to something pretty? Pointillism? It's not just a little different either, there's a bunch all staged at a chapel in Houston and it's absurdly different to see them in person all arranged and together like they are than it is to see some jpgs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 05:24
|
|
|
Yngwie Mangosteen posted:It's not just a little different either, there's a bunch all staged at a chapel in Houston and it's absurdly different to see them in person all arranged and together like they are than it is to see some jpgs. I've seen them in person many times. Across different stages of my life. They've always been somewhere between eh and meh.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 05:37
|
|
|
I like to call fine art fart for short because it STINKS.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 05:39
|
|
|
To the argument that AI art is bad because the AI is basing it's pictures of of other people's pictures that it's seen before... Isn't that what artists do too? They're brain is processing ideas about "art" bad on things it's seen in the past.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 05:58
|
|
|
Diamonds On MY Fish posted:To the argument that AI art is bad because the AI is basing it's pictures of of other people's pictures that it's seen before...
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 06:01
|
|
|
Diamonds On MY Fish posted:To the argument that AI art is bad because the AI is basing it's pictures of of other people's pictures that it's seen before... Interesting question! Shut up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 06:04
|
|
|
Artists and writers: this technology is harmful and will be used to drive wages down while producing the blandest vomit of rehashed culture Journalists: this technology is harmful and will be used to make truth unknowable Women: this technology is harmful and will be used to make nonconsensual pornography You: what about the laziest thought-terminating analogy ever scraped from the bowels of reddit
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 06:26
|
|
|
Diamonds On MY Fish posted:To the argument that AI art is bad because the AI is basing it's pictures of of other people's pictures that it's seen before... gently caress offffffff
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 06:28
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:small bart's sister is mona lisa
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 06:34
|
|
|
Diamonds On MY Fish posted:To the argument that AI art is bad because the AI is basing it's pictures of of other people's pictures that it's seen before... You bring up an interesting comparison. I think it's similar to the technological leap of moving from cassettes to CDs, specifically CDeez nuts.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 06:50
|
|
|
Diamonds On MY Fish posted:To the argument that AI art is bad because the AI is basing it's pictures of of other people's pictures that it's seen before... This argument works, or is at least nuanced, if "AI art" is being generated by artificial persons, at their whim, for their own profit. Except it's not, it's a tool used to automatically harvest, scramble and regurgitate other peoples' work to profit the folks who made or use the tool. Because it's not people or intelligent, it's just called "AI" as a marketing branding. It is to plagiarism what the combine harvester is to picking crops. That's all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 08:36
|
|
|
I think that makes it analogous to doing art for a job then. There's a perfectly good objection to be made about AI art just based on the practical consequences but I don't honestly find the more metaphysical arguments about the nature of creativity to be very compelling. If I do literally anything all my brain is doing is being a machine that takes in things I have been previously exposed to and regurgitates a mixture of that based on some function of the way the brain is structured. I don't really see it as being that much different to a computer in terms of the nature of its function.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 08:40
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:I think that makes it analogous to doing art for a job then. tell me you have no idea about doing art for a job without telling me etc Yes, artists reference other art, but they also produce art for a specific time, place and purpose. This requires a level of knowledge, perception and skill that can't be replicated by an algorithm flinging poo poo at the wall until someone on minimum wage can pick out something that fits the brief. greazeball has a new favorite as of 08:48 on Oct 3, 2023 |
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 08:46
|
|
|
Just because we use computers as metaphors for the mind doesn't mean they're the same thing dummy
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 08:51
|
|
|
AI art itself is devoid of process and meaning and intent, and is therefore not real art. The concept of AI art has come about through massive amounts of work and inspires a great deal of thought and emotion in those who interact with it, and therefore is art.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 08:57
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:I think that makes it analogous to doing art for a job then. The key issue is that these tools do not know they are creating art. In the same way as Stockfish doesn't know it's playing chess. It's not an AI that plays chess, it's an algorithm that produces a series of the best chess moves. Mid journey is the same, it's not an AI that makes art. It's an algorithm that creates an image which is most probably like what you wanted. Aramoro has a new favorite as of 09:14 on Oct 3, 2023 |
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:08
|
|
|
greazeball posted:tell me you have no idea about doing art for a job without telling me etc Tell me you think painting for money is a different job than shoemaking for money. You aren't protesting anything else being made by mechanisation except somehow the nice jobs, the ones people aspire to, those are a crime against humanity and an inherent evil of capitalism. Oh, there's bad biases of class and ethnicity about who gets the nice jobs? Well that doesn't bother me. Wonder why Besides, the machines couldn't be used any other way after all. Machines are only capitalist you say. Only for hurting good people by the bad people. Better to stay as we were. Were nothing changes. No one moves, no mobility. Where the problems aren't addressed or spoken about and not fixed Art's got nothing to do with large language models.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:18
|
|
|
Ai write me a script to delete all ai chat from this thread 
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:22
|
|
|
Wasn't this thread for tweets at some point?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:23
|
|
|
ThisIsJohnWayne posted:Tell me you think painting for money is a different job than shoemaking for money. You aren't protesting anything else being made by mechanisation except somehow the nice jobs, the ones people aspire to, those are a crime against humanity and an inherent evil of capitalism. Oh, there's bad biases of class and ethnicity about who gets the nice jobs? Well that doesn't bother me. Wonder why Lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:24
|
|
|
syntaxfunction posted:Wasn't this thread for tweets at some point? Twitter died though. We're just shitposting in the ruins.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:47
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/CatWorkers/status/1708826638987743264
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 09:57
|
|
|
Aramoro posted:The key issue is that these tools do not know they are creating art. In the same way as Stockfish doesn't know it's playing chess. It's not an AI that plays chess, it's an algorithm that produces a series of the best chess moves. Mid journey is the same, it's not an AI that makes art. It's an algorithm that creates an image which is most probably like what you wanted. I suppose I don't really believe that I am capable of "knowing" that I am doing something as opposed to being a stochastic process that from moment to moment appears to be conscious. Certainly you couldn't tell from my posting that I am conscious  (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 10:31
|
|
|
Good luck copyrighting that movie bud. Relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WXvfeTPujU Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK_EUFwsDu0 Hippocrass has a new favorite as of 11:16 on Oct 3, 2023 |
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 11:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 11:21 |
|
|
Yngwie Mangosteen posted:It's not just a little different either, there's a bunch all staged at a chapel in Houston and it's absurdly different to see them in person all arranged and together like they are than it is to see some jpgs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2023 13:54
|
|
