Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
iwentdoodie
Apr 29, 2005

🤗YOU'RE WELCOME🤗

Taeke posted:

As a teen I read a lot of fantasy and of course started to come up with my own poo poo with the aspiration of one day actually writing it down (which never happened.) One of those ideas was about a fantasy world where there's a huge wall of ice in the north that protects the people from the undead horrors beyond, lmao.

gently caress you george

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Agents are GO!
Dec 29, 2004

tokin opposition posted:

The western canon is trash for old people, fascists, and pretentious idiots

Unlike your posts, which are just trash to everyone.

Phthisis
Apr 16, 2007

"Maybe some dolphins have sex for pleasure."
Wuthering Heights is great. It's basically just the world's gossipiest servant telling the story of a monstrously malicious guy getting mad and vindictively destroying the lives of three generations worth of a couple families out in the moors. Yeah there's a love story involved and some commentary about the status of women at the time, but overall it's just an exploration of how extremely awful people can be.

don longjohns
Mar 2, 2012

Most literature with a capital L seems to be about how horrible people can be, how good people can be, or both, and I am here for it.

Also, whales.

Heath
Apr 30, 2008

🍂🎃🏞️💦
Read Pynchon

Tobermory
Mar 31, 2011

Tenant of Wildfell Hall continues to be the best book by a Brontë, and also the one that gets taught the least in schools. Austen and Dickens are taught more, in part because it's harder to associate their social critiques with modern social issues.

PetraCore
Jul 20, 2017

👁️🔥👁️👁️👁️BE NOT👄AFRAID👁️👁️👁️🔥👁️

Taeke posted:

I did a BA in English lit and had to read a bunch of that stuff. Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights, etc.

Like, I could see the appeal for some people and its historical significance and all that but I don't think I made it halfway through any of them,despite having written essays and poo poo with the help of google (scholar.) It was all just so dour and it went on and on and on and was all about relationships and proper etiquette and everything I'm not at all interested in. It was tedious in a way that just didn't click for me, and I really enjoyed linguistics and Shakespeare and whatever so it's not like I have a low tolerance for tedious poo poo.
I just read Wuthering Heights and totally loved it, but I guess for me the appeal of it is that it's about a bunch of hot messes and one narrator is an idiot while the other is too close to everything that happened to be anything like an objective party. I can totally see why it wouldn't be someone's bag, it's a pretty miserable story in terms of what's actually happening, but I certainly wouldn't call it tedious.

PetraCore
Jul 20, 2017

👁️🔥👁️👁️👁️BE NOT👄AFRAID👁️👁️👁️🔥👁️

Phthisis posted:

Wuthering Heights is great. It's basically just the world's gossipiest servant telling the story of a monstrously malicious guy getting mad and vindictively destroying the lives of three generations worth of a couple families out in the moors. Yeah there's a love story involved and some commentary about the status of women at the time, but overall it's just an exploration of how extremely awful people can be.
Including Nelly! Not that Nelly is anything like the story's greatest monster, even taking into account that her narrative is biased to put her in a better light her issues are more like 'bullied Heathcliff as a kid' and 'set Catherine up to have an upsetting conversation where Heathcliff was listening because Nelly was sick of Catherine's poo poo' and 'thinks people should bootstrap their way out of brain fevers and seizures, has an unnerving tendency to declare that people are faking their physical and mental health problems and then go anyway later they died of it'. She's not neutral or innocent just because she's a servant, though.

EDIT: Still way better than Heathcliff or Hindley. People that go 'actually Nelly is the true villain' are like. Maybe reading a little too deep into her being an unreliable narrator.

PetraCore has a new favorite as of 02:04 on Oct 15, 2023

Midnight Voyager
Jul 2, 2008

Lipstick Apathy

Phthisis posted:

Wuthering Heights is great. It's basically just the world's gossipiest servant telling the story of a monstrously malicious guy getting mad and vindictively destroying the lives of three generations worth of a couple families out in the moors. Yeah there's a love story involved and some commentary about the status of women at the time, but overall it's just an exploration of how extremely awful people can be.

It's much worse when you're sitting in a room with the most empty-headed people in the universe who squeal over any tiny little positive action and don't seem to notice any bad things happening. An actual comment: He gave her crocuses, how sweet! What's a crocus? A flower? Oh how sweet!

Meanwhile I understand what I am reading and am loving miserable. And my teacher is like "Well actually maybe nobody was bad, it's the servant who's jealous and lying!" And I wanted to never read a book again. "Ah yes, the part of the story you really hate because everyone and everything is terrible? What if that isn't even true in the metafiction of the novel?? huh??? Bet you don't feel like you are wasting hours of your precious life now!"

gently caress Wuthering Heights. I think English/Lit is just an exercise in making as many people as possible hate books, even people who constantly read books and love books.

PetraCore posted:

People that go 'actually Nelly is the true villain' are like. Maybe reading a little too deep into her being an unreliable narrator.

goddamnit my English teacher was one of those

Midnight Voyager has a new favorite as of 02:12 on Oct 15, 2023

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
The treatment of physical and mental health is pretty accurate for the time as far as I gather. But yeah, relying on the public domain has been terrible for education. Maybe we can at least start with Sherlock Holmes.

Inceltown
Aug 6, 2019

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1713127097802134004

The Saddest Rhino
Apr 29, 2009

Put it all together.
Solve the world.
One conversation at a time.



I'm pretty sure he didn't mean "you're known primarily as a Harry Potter fanfic writer" as a backhanded compliment but hoo boy

Phthisis
Apr 16, 2007

"Maybe some dolphins have sex for pleasure."

PetraCore posted:

one narrator is an idiot while the other is too close to everything that happened to be anything like an objective party

I do love Wuthering Heights and honestly this is one of the best parts of the book. The narrator comes in as this total idiot from the city who is enamored by the "intricate" lives of the people out in the country, which is actually just a whole bunch of people with not much going on in their lives manufacturing drama and making a total mess of everything for no real good reason. I feel like there's almost a Jerry Springer-esque aspect to it.

I'm definitely in the camp that finds it fascinating how in-tune with (perceptive to?) humanity and social dynamics the Brontë sisters were, given how supposedly secluded they were.

grittyreboot
Oct 2, 2012

I read Dracula a few years ago and it's still rad. There's some pretty spooky parts even for a modern audience. Also the book has a cowboy in it.

Spazzle
Jul 5, 2003

don longjohns posted:

Most literature with a capital L seems to be about how horrible people can be, how good people can be, or both, and I am here for it.

Also, whales.

Star Trek 4 isn't that good.

...!
Oct 5, 2003

I SHOULD KEEP MY DUMB MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SPEWING HORSESHIT ABOUT THE ORBITAL MECHANICS OF THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHAT A LAGRANGE POINT IS?

The Saddest Rhino posted:

I'm pretty sure he didn't mean "you're known primarily as a Harry Potter fanfic writer" as a backhanded compliment but hoo boy

The guy he's responding to is primarily known as a Nazi; his fanfic is just secondary

Midnight Voyager
Jul 2, 2008

Lipstick Apathy
I was reading Dracula and the Invisible Man and Frankenstein and that sort of thing at the same time Wuthering Heights was making me suffer, and my teacher absolutely could not comprehend that my for-fun reading level did not mean I would love the Brontes. She absolutely could not understand the difference.

Any Dracula adaptation that makes Jonathan Harker boring or leaves out the cowboy is written by a coward.



Also anyone who actually looks at Twitter, watch out, they've been circulating a loving paid ad showing a dead baby.

tokin opposition
Apr 8, 2021

I don't jailbreak the androids, I set them free.

WATCH MARS EXPRESS (2023)
Yud*, a Harry Potter fanfic writer,

*Better known for other works

...!
Oct 5, 2003

I SHOULD KEEP MY DUMB MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SPEWING HORSESHIT ABOUT THE ORBITAL MECHANICS OF THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHAT A LAGRANGE POINT IS?

Jfc

...!
Oct 5, 2003

I SHOULD KEEP MY DUMB MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SPEWING HORSESHIT ABOUT THE ORBITAL MECHANICS OF THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHAT A LAGRANGE POINT IS?
"Cruelty for its own sake is key to the wellbeing of Israel. Furthermore,"

Jezza of OZPOS
Mar 21, 2018

GET LOSE❌🗺️, YOUS CAN'T COMPARE😤 WITH ME 💪POWERS🇦🇺

Taeke posted:

I did a BA in English lit and had to read a bunch of that stuff. Pride and Prejudice, Wuthering Heights, etc.

Like, I could see the appeal for some people and its historical significance and all that but I don't think I made it halfway through any of them,despite having written essays and poo poo with the help of google (scholar.) It was all just so dour and it went on and on and on and was all about relationships and proper etiquette and everything I'm not at all interested in. It was tedious in a way that just didn't click for me, and I really enjoyed linguistics and Shakespeare and whatever so it's not like I have a low tolerance for tedious poo poo.

yeah i am the same and the two units that clicked the most for me were Shakespeare and american lit. shakespeare was really relevant bc i was doing linguistics also and american lit was the only
subject in my course that contained books not written by dead white people. there was some good stuff in there but drat there was a lot of boring poo poo too

Mr. Belpit
Nov 11, 2008
I finally appreciated Shakespeare when I took an English class that covered works of his other than Romeo and Juliet. I realized I just don't like Romeo and Juliet, but lots of his other stuff is pretty good, actually.

Olanphonia
Jul 27, 2006

I'm open to suggestions~

tokin opposition posted:

Yud*, a Harry Potter fanfic writer,

*Better known for other works

Weirdly I think he might be best known for that work specifically

PetraCore
Jul 20, 2017

👁️🔥👁️👁️👁️BE NOT👄AFRAID👁️👁️👁️🔥👁️

Midnight Voyager posted:

It's much worse when you're sitting in a room with the most empty-headed people in the universe who squeal over any tiny little positive action and don't seem to notice any bad things happening. An actual comment: He gave her crocuses, how sweet! What's a crocus? A flower? Oh how sweet!

Meanwhile I understand what I am reading and am loving miserable. And my teacher is like "Well actually maybe nobody was bad, it's the servant who's jealous and lying!" And I wanted to never read a book again. "Ah yes, the part of the story you really hate because everyone and everything is terrible? What if that isn't even true in the metafiction of the novel?? huh??? Bet you don't feel like you are wasting hours of your precious life now!"

gently caress Wuthering Heights. I think English/Lit is just an exercise in making as many people as possible hate books, even people who constantly read books and love books.

goddamnit my English teacher was one of those
Some people get really into the theory Heathcliff is Mr. Earnshaw's bastard son and that's the reason the dude adopts him and then favors him and I'm like. My guys. That's not supported by the text.

But yeah, Nelly is, imo, not trying to lie but also biased about every single person in the story she's telling and harder on people she dislikes than ones she likes. There's no 'she's making everything up', though, other narrators provide independent verification of exactly how uncomfortable and weird the atmosphere is at Wuthering Heights. If there's zero truth in what she's saying, then what does anything even matter? It sounds like you had the most miserable setting to try to read the story, and also it just wasn't the kind of story you found entertaining because a lot of it is just abuse all the way down.

Ghost Leviathan posted:

The treatment of physical and mental health is pretty accurate for the time as far as I gather. But yeah, relying on the public domain has been terrible for education. Maybe we can at least start with Sherlock Holmes.
Oh, yeah, it's just funny that Emily Bronte then turns to the reader like 'anyway Catherine loving died. She said she was dying and she loving died. She was having seizures.' Like one of my favorite things about the book is whenever Nelly is being an 'anyway pretty sure she was faking, so I ignored her, and then her loving husband got mad at me??? later she died.' levels of like. rear end in a top hat. And then Mr. Lockwood is like. Ah, sensible of Nelly!

Phthisis posted:

I do love Wuthering Heights and honestly this is one of the best parts of the book. The narrator comes in as this total idiot from the city who is enamored by the "intricate" lives of the people out in the country, which is actually just a whole bunch of people with not much going on in their lives manufacturing drama and making a total mess of everything for no real good reason. I feel like there's almost a Jerry Springer-esque aspect to it.

I'm definitely in the camp that finds it fascinating how in-tune with (perceptive to?) humanity and social dynamics the Brontë sisters were, given how supposedly secluded they were.
Apparently Emily listened to a lot of her dad's stories about people and what lead to what and the sorts of drama and abuses that were usually brushed over. I believe it, given Wuthering Heights and the fact that Anne's The Tenant of Wildfell Hall apparently deals with quite a brutally realistic abuse story where the wife is able to leave her abusive husband.

PetraCore has a new favorite as of 03:13 on Oct 15, 2023

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

Lol, xAI is looking to generate a fan fiction to surpass My Immortal

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

PetraCore posted:

Some people get really into the theory Heathcliff is Mr. Earnshaw's bastard son and that's the reason the dude adopts him and then favors him and I'm like. My guys. That's not supported by the text.

Maybe, though for a lot of people it's very 'Why the gently caress did he bring him home then?' but then apparently it was just a thing for rich assholes to adopt random poor kids off the street like a pet.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

Midnight Voyager posted:

I was reading Dracula and the Invisible Man and Frankenstein and that sort of thing at the same time Wuthering Heights was making me suffer, and my teacher absolutely could not comprehend that my for-fun reading level did not mean I would love the Brontes. She absolutely could not understand the difference.

I've always felt that science fiction (including the foundational classics by Shelley, Wells and Verne) is a big blind spot in the typical literature curriculum for students. I guess it isn't considered serious enough to be "real" literature. But in high school, when I was being bored out of my skull in English class by Winesburg, Ohio, at lunch I was getting my MIND BLOWN reading things like Rendezvous With Rama and Foundation entirely on my own.

Back when I still entertained notions of writing fiction, I joined a writers' circle. When my first turn to submit came around, I offered up a science fiction short story. Its premise was that we're simulating a universe in a computer, but whoa, it turns out our whole universe is itself just a simulation being run in a computer, and that computer's universe could be a simulation too, etc. etc. and who knows how far up or down the chain goes. Of course, my story was neither the first nor the best to tackle this idea. (Hell, Futurama just did a take on this exact concept a few months ago.) But one member of the writers' circle got her MIND BLOWN by it. This was an intelligent, well-read woman in her thirties, and honestly a much better writer than I was. But she had never read any real sci-fi, because everybody knew that was all kid stuff, not "real" literature. I almost felt guilty that my silly little story was what popped her science fiction cherry, but at least I got to recommend some authors and titles for her to explore the genre.

PetraCore
Jul 20, 2017

👁️🔥👁️👁️👁️BE NOT👄AFRAID👁️👁️👁️🔥👁️

Ghost Leviathan posted:

Maybe, though for a lot of people it's very 'Why the gently caress did he bring him home then?' but then apparently it was just a thing for rich assholes to adopt random poor kids off the street like a pet.
Yeah, I think it was just right/wrong place and time and then he couldn't find any trace of a guardian and realized Heathcliff didn't speak English and felt like he was extra vulnerable. Now, there's probably better things someone could do than take the random kid whose language you don't speak and don't even know what it is back home, declare to everyone he's your favorite child, and rename him after your stillborn son even though he's straight up like 6 or 7 and definitely already has a name, but, well. Nobody ever said people made the smartest decisions in this story.

Like drat maybe make more of an effort to figure out what language he's speaking and what his name is.

Still, as far as I interpreted it, it's very much that Mr. Earnshaw was a strict father but a good man and Heathcliff's circumstances tugged at his heart enough he felt responsible, and then he openly favored Heathcliff to try and make up for whatever circumstances left him starving on the street in the first place, while holding his biological kids to stricter standards because he felt they had a decent enough upbringing to Know Better. It ends up being a hosed situation that does a lot of damage, but I wouldn't blame Heathcliff for any of it in terms of the 'he fucks up 3 generations of a family' thing, because Mr. Earnshaw literally just picked him up and brought him home.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Powered Descent posted:

I've always felt that science fiction (including the foundational classics by Shelley, Wells and Verne) is a big blind spot in the typical literature curriculum for students. I guess it isn't considered serious enough to be "real" literature. But in high school, when I was being bored out of my skull in English class by Winesburg, Ohio, at lunch I was getting my MIND BLOWN reading things like Rendezvous With Rama and Foundation entirely on my own.

Back when I still entertained notions of writing fiction, I joined a writers' circle. When my first turn to submit came around, I offered up a science fiction short story. Its premise was that we're simulating a universe in a computer, but whoa, it turns out our whole universe is itself just a simulation being run in a computer, and that computer's universe could be a simulation too, etc. etc. and who knows how far up or down the chain goes. Of course, my story was neither the first nor the best to tackle this idea. (Hell, Futurama just did a take on this exact concept a few months ago.) But one member of the writers' circle got her MIND BLOWN by it. This was an intelligent, well-read woman in her thirties, and honestly a much better writer than I was. But she had never read any real sci-fi, because everybody knew that was all kid stuff, not "real" literature. I almost felt guilty that my silly little story was what popped her science fiction cherry, but at least I got to recommend some authors and titles for her to explore the genre.

This post is gonna haunt me for reasons

...!
Oct 5, 2003

I SHOULD KEEP MY DUMB MOUTH SHUT INSTEAD OF SPEWING HORSESHIT ABOUT THE ORBITAL MECHANICS OF THE JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHAT A LAGRANGE POINT IS?
Some serious nerdiness going on itt

Samovar
Jun 4, 2011

I'm 😤 not a 🦸🏻‍♂️hero...🧜🏻



Kit Walker posted:

Catcher in the Rye perfectly captures the mentality of a very specific kind of teenager in a very specific period of history and it's pretty good for that but it's not actually pleasant reading. It's also funny how often it's assigned reading for high schoolers considering the book is basically pointing a mirror at them and saying, "lol, this is you. You're like this and you suck"

Steppenwolf is a superior Catcher in the Rye.

So, you know, still has it's problems. But it's definitely better.

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Powered Descent posted:

I've always felt that science fiction (including the foundational classics by Shelley, Wells and Verne) is a big blind spot in the typical literature curriculum for students. I guess it isn't considered serious enough to be "real" literature. But in high school, when I was being bored out of my skull in English class by Winesburg, Ohio, at lunch I was getting my MIND BLOWN reading things like Rendezvous With Rama and Foundation entirely on my own.

Back when I still entertained notions of writing fiction, I joined a writers' circle. When my first turn to submit came around, I offered up a science fiction short story. Its premise was that we're simulating a universe in a computer, but whoa, it turns out our whole universe is itself just a simulation being run in a computer, and that computer's universe could be a simulation too, etc. etc. and who knows how far up or down the chain goes. Of course, my story was neither the first nor the best to tackle this idea. (Hell, Futurama just did a take on this exact concept a few months ago.) But one member of the writers' circle got her MIND BLOWN by it. This was an intelligent, well-read woman in her thirties, and honestly a much better writer than I was. But she had never read any real sci-fi, because everybody knew that was all kid stuff, not "real" literature. I almost felt guilty that my silly little story was what popped her science fiction cherry, but at least I got to recommend some authors and titles for her to explore the genre.

Ursula Le Guin has some great quotes on this, and how serious and professional critics come off as blithering idiots having their mind blown by like, Harry Potter, because the snobbery over 'genre' fiction just means they have massive blind spots to entire fields and series, and gushing over Harry Potter comes off as a gourmet food critic gushing over buttered toast going 'Where has this been all my life?!'

Ghost Leviathan has a new favorite as of 05:19 on Oct 15, 2023

Weatherman
Jul 30, 2003

WARBLEKLONK

...! posted:

Some serious nerdiness going on itt

:siren: CREATIVE CONVENTION IS LEAKING :siren:

tokin opposition
Apr 8, 2021

I don't jailbreak the androids, I set them free.

WATCH MARS EXPRESS (2023)
I can post more cspam if you want

what if instead it was Galestine and it was only for the ladies

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


Deformed Church posted:

English classes just suck at teaching english.
The problem is much bigger than that. School is bad at teaching. You've got too many kids, at too wide a range of ability, for teachers to be able to effectively engage with any of them, and the system is built around standardised tests and metrics that would prevent the use of any kind of individualised learning paths even if the teacher:student ratio was significantly improved. Everyone has to do the same thing at the same pace and focus on the same things to make sure the test scores are high enough that the teacher and school don't look bad.


Midnight Voyager posted:

I think English/Lit is just an exercise in making as many people as possible hate books, even people who constantly read books and love books.
School almost inevitably makes every subject unappealing by forcing everyone down the same path. You can't pursue what you find interesting about a subject, you have to do what everyone else is doing. You can't learn about literary analysis by reading a book you enjoy because then the teacher would have to read it too and they don't have time to read 100 books (or however many students they have in all their classes combined).

PhazonLink
Jul 17, 2010
i dont know what Wuthering Heights is, but I assume its title is the source reference of the Dogman comic, Mothering Heights.

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

tokin opposition posted:

I can post more cspam if you want

what if instead it was Galestine and it was only for the ladies

We don't want that

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.
One of the other issues with english lit classes is even stuff that in theory would be appealing to kids is often taught in ways that completely miss the point.

Though ironically I think the 90s Romeo + Juliet movie we got shown in class was probably the best way to do it. That movie is fun. Leonardo DiCaprio is pretty much cheat codes for casting Romeo. And the guns are great.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

Ghost Leviathan posted:

Ursula Le Guin has some great quotes on this, and how serious and professional critics come off as blithering idiots having their mind blown by like, Harry Potter, because the snobbery over 'genre' fiction just means they have massive blind spots to entire fields and series, and gushing over Harry Potter comes off as a gourmet food critic gushing over buttered toast going 'Where has this been all my life?!'

I would love to read that, if you happen to have any links or quotes handy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Panfilo
Aug 27, 2011

EXISTENCE IS PAIN😬

Tiggum posted:

The problem is much bigger than that. School is bad at teaching. You've got too many kids, at too wide a range of ability, for teachers to be able to effectively engage with any of them, and the system is built around standardised tests and metrics that would prevent the use of any kind of individualised learning paths even if the teacher:student ratio was significantly improved. Everyone has to do the same thing at the same pace and focus on the same things to make sure the test scores are high enough that the teacher and school don't look bad.

School almost inevitably makes every subject unappealing by forcing everyone down the same path. You can't pursue what you find interesting about a subject, you have to do what everyone else is doing. You can't learn about literary analysis by reading a book you enjoy because then the teacher would have to read it too and they don't have time to read 100 books (or however many students they have in all their classes combined).

And this is the selling point that homeschooling wingnuts use to demand we abolish the department of education. Because it's the one talking point really hard to argue around. You'll inevitably come off as insisting the problem is not enough government while they present options like school choice or homeschooling as much more reasonable alternatives. Also probably totally coincidental I'm sure but every one of these pro homeschool wingnuts inevitably has some prodigy of a student that excels in such a relaxed environment.

I'm not suggesting the institution of homeschooling is inherently bad necessarily here, but rather that it often shines when the argument for the promotion of public schooling can have so many shortcomings as you've accurately described.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply