|
Anyone who doesn't give specific examples of the things they are outraged about is embarrassed about being outraged about those specific things
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 06:25 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 21:55 |
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:Anyone who doesn't give specific examples of the things they are outraged about is embarrassed about being outraged about those specific things It's a really bad attempt at a dogwhistle. If they outright say what their specific examples are, they know they'll get (rightly) ratio'd to hell and back. It's literally just their version of "certain people."
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 06:53 |
|
the_steve posted:It's a really bad attempt at a dogwhistle. "They're cancelling conservative political views?" "Oh, they're getting cancelled for wanting lower taxes?" "No." "Canceled for wanting to cut spending?" "No" "Then what views are getting canceled?" "Oh, you know the ones..."
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 12:19 |
|
Okuteru posted:Same reason why DragonBall is so popular with Black and Latino communities. This has now wrapped around to being a right wing gotcha against representation in media. "It's important that people see representation in media so they can relate to the character better" "Oh yeah? Plenty of black and Latino kids love Goku without needing him to be a person of color!" (would we consider Sayans poc? I'm not sure)
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 12:51 |
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:Anyone who doesn't give specific examples of the things they are outraged about is embarrassed about being outraged about those specific things Nah, they're pretty shameless about it these days and will just post right through it. If you press them about how TV commercials are "woke" they'll just point blank claim every single commercial depicts a biracial (black man+white woman of course) couple which is way more unrealistic to them since it's wildly disproportionate to the number of actual biracial couples in the US.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 12:55 |
Guavanaut posted:
It should be legal to punch people who say "I think with my brain, not my heart".
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 14:36 |
|
Devorum posted:It should be legal to punch people who say "I think with my brain, not my heart". He who thinks with his brain has forgotten the face of his father.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 14:41 |
|
I like that he's going with "76% of the population isn't woke so the game doesn't appeal to them" rather than "20% of the population are right wing wackos who are offended by every little thing"
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 14:42 |
|
Panfilo posted:Nah, they're pretty shameless about it these days and will just post right through it. If you press them about how TV commercials are "woke" they'll just point blank claim every single commercial depicts a biracial (black man+white woman of course) couple which is way more unrealistic to them since it's wildly disproportionate to the number of actual biracial couples in the US. The people who say "you don't see white people in commercials anymore" are the same exact people saying that every show has a major trans character and commercials are "shoving the gay agenda down our throats". It's all demonstrably not true but that doesn't stop them in the least because it feels correct to them.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 16:14 |
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:that doesn't stop them in the least because it feels correct to them. But facts don't care about our feelings, don'tcha know.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 16:17 |
|
Devorum posted:It should be legal to punch people who say "I think with my brain, not my heart". "I think with both, and they agree on whoopin' your centrist rear end."
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 16:18 |
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:The people who say "you don't see white people in commercials anymore" are the same exact people saying that every show has a major trans character and commercials are "shoving the gay agenda down our throats". It's all demonstrably not true but that doesn't stop them in the least because it feels correct to them. They never actually provide any examples either, which is annoying. And it makes me genuinely curious about the actual breakdown I'm sure some think tank out there has bothered to look it up. Contrast this with how you can argue "nearly all mass shooters are white cis men" and they'll immediately post a collage of 30+ examples of poc/queer mass shooters.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 20:38 |
|
Brawnfire posted:"I think with both, and they agree on whoopin' your centrist rear end." Psh, they're not even centrist. They're libertarian at best, they just say they're in the center because they think that spouting that "both sides are the same" crap gives them some sort of extra debate cred.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 20:42 |
|
Panfilo posted:They never actually provide any examples either, which is annoying. And it makes me genuinely curious about the actual breakdown I'm sure some think tank out there has bothered to look it up. It's straight up that study from a while ago (a few years, I think?) where white guys feel like they've been "outnumbered" when the group they're in hits a certain percentage of Not White Guys, and it's a small percentage. I think it was like 30%? (Google is being very unhelpful in finding this again, no surprise.) But basically as soon as the population of a group hits a relatively low threshold, the dominant group thinks they're suddenly outnumbered, and for many of them that includes feeling like they're being assailed somehow. Absolutely zero surprise that the same phenomenon happens on a low incidence of minority people appearing at all in any kind of mass media.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 21:04 |
|
Medullah posted:I like that he's going with "76% of the population isn't woke so the game doesn't appeal to them" rather than "20% of the population are right wing wackos who are offended by every little thing" How does that look for the main market countries? How does that look for the main player demographic in those countries? Also why a slider from Pride flag to US flag? What's at 25 or 50 or 75% on that slider?* And how does a Pride flag to US flag slider appeal to a right wing wacko in Argentina or Hungary? *e: I assume he's the sort of 'centrist' where 50% is the US flag and it's like Nazi Flag, Confed Flag, US Flag, Canada Flag, Pride Flag, but if not that Guavanaut fucked around with this message at 21:29 on Oct 26, 2023 |
# ? Oct 26, 2023 21:26 |
Guavanaut posted:Also it's the world population, so (generously) assuming that the source isn't his rear end: Far right: Nazi flag Mid right: No flag Center right: Pride flag but it's over an evil building Centrist: Pride flag Center left: Progress Flag Mid left: Pink triangle Far left: Hammer and Sickle flag, there is no minority, only the Worker
|
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 21:42 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Also it's the world population, so (generously) assuming that the source isn't his rear end: The slider goes from Pepe to Pride flag, simple. The center is Shrek and his wife Sonic's wedding portrait.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 21:43 |
|
disposablewords posted:It's straight up that study from a while ago (a few years, I think?) where white guys feel like they've been "outnumbered" when the group they're in hits a certain percentage of Not White Guys, and it's a small percentage. I think it was like 30%? (Google is being very unhelpful in finding this again, no surprise.) But basically as soon as the population of a group hits a relatively low threshold, the dominant group thinks they're suddenly outnumbered, and for many of them that includes feeling like they're being assailed somehow. Absolutely zero surprise that the same phenomenon happens on a low incidence of minority people appearing at all in any kind of mass media. Interesting, that makes sense! I'm betting the threshold is the point you'll accidentally see the offending demographic by accident. So simple math, you see ten commercials over an hour, 30% have nontraditional couples thus you've seen three instances of non white/straight couples. Confirmation bias dictates that if there's something you find distasteful and worry about it's frequency, you're going to notice examples a whole lot more frequently and go out of your way to find them in a manner inconsistent with passive TV viewing. So this and your theory suggest they don't like seeing biracial couples on TV, start watching for them (actively encouraged by other reactionaries on social media) and start jumping at shadows when they suddenly notice they are 'everywhere'. Honestly the only commercial I remember with a biracial couple off the top of my head was a cheerios commercial, and I probably would not have even twigged that there was a biracial couple if it didn't cause such an over the top tantrum from reactionaries (almost as bad as when they realized Zipper was coded as Black in the recent Rescue Rangers film) Another bizarre anecdote I've heard about racists like these are that they are really, really into biracial porn which is pretty to me, I mean wouldn't they hate that stuff? I remember reading a reddit post (that we'll take at face value here, don't pop my bubble) about a Redditor finding his racist dad's porn stash and it was all huge black dudes railing little twink white guys which was pretty ironic. So maybe they hate these biracial commercials because they get weirdly aroused by it which makes them feel angry and ashamed?
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 21:57 |
|
I remember there was an advertising trend for a while here for showing a bunch of different families enjoying the same breakfast cereal or sauce or whatever as a fast montage, and the easiest way to both increase diversity and signal to a larger audience but also make it clear that hey look at all these different families all enjoying Brand to an audience barely paying attention was to make them obviously different ethnicities or cultures or numbers of kids or whatever. And of course assholes would count that as a gay black commercial even if if that was well under half of the number of featured families.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 22:02 |
|
disposablewords posted:It's straight up that study from a while ago (a few years, I think?) where white guys feel like they've been "outnumbered" when the group they're in hits a certain percentage of Not White Guys, and it's a small percentage. I think it was like 30%? (Google is being very unhelpful in finding this again, no surprise.) But basically as soon as the population of a group hits a relatively low threshold, the dominant group thinks they're suddenly outnumbered, and for many of them that includes feeling like they're being assailed somehow. Absolutely zero surprise that the same phenomenon happens on a low incidence of minority people appearing at all in any kind of mass media. This also happens with women in workplace meetings. Women speaking 20-30% of the time is reported by male colleagues as the women "dominating" the conversation.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 22:11 |
|
InsertPotPun posted:i love that he doesn't give an example of the "wokeness" and i bet he'd get reeeeeeeeal roundabout if you asked. Edit at below: I discovered some fun poo poo I'm into with a black sub chick much earlier in my life and not once did it occur to me to fetishize that racially The Islamic Shock fucked around with this message at 23:39 on Oct 26, 2023 |
# ? Oct 26, 2023 22:12 |
|
Panfilo posted:Another bizarre anecdote I've heard about racists like these are that they are really, really into biracial porn which is pretty to me, I mean wouldn't they hate that stuff? I remember reading a reddit post (that we'll take at face value here, don't pop my bubble) about a Redditor finding his racist dad's porn stash and it was all huge black dudes railing little twink white guys which was pretty ironic. So maybe they hate these biracial commercials because they get weirdly aroused by it which makes them feel angry and ashamed? Two different approaches to get there: Some people will fetishize the forbidden and/unobtainable. Some people enjoy the, in their mind, power imbalance of social status these pairings create. This goes in both directions and feeds into different fetishes depending on relationship dynamics. Racists are some people. QED.
|
# ? Oct 26, 2023 22:32 |
|
darthbob88 posted:According to Wikipedia at least, Nuclear Gandhi is a myth. quote:Gandhi was programmed to exhibit this behavior in Civilization V, released in 2010, and it is unclear whether this led to the belief that the behavior had also been present in earlier games.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 01:21 |
|
Nuclear Gandhi was already a meme by the time of Civilization 2, I thought. I know he was programmed to get pretty belligerent once nukes arrived in Civ4
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 01:26 |
|
Tarezax posted:Nuclear Gandhi was already a meme by the time of Civilization 2, I thought. I know he was programmed to get pretty belligerent once nukes arrived in Civ4 It's been around since at least some point in the mid to late 90s but my memory can't get more specific than that.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 01:37 |
|
The thread has become self aware and we have reached the singularity
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 01:38 |
|
Tarezax posted:Nuclear Gandhi was already a meme by the time of Civilization 2, I thought. I know he was programmed to get pretty belligerent once nukes arrived in Civ4 It's as old as "the Romans are revolting!" jokes. Very early.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 03:14 |
|
Panfilo posted:This has now wrapped around to being a right wing gotcha against representation in media. Frieza genocides nearly the entire race and calls them Monkeys.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 04:36 |
|
Panfilo posted:This has now wrapped around to being a right wing gotcha against representation in media. From what I've seen the running joke with black DBZ fandom is that Piccolo is the black guy of the show, but I don't know how Saiyans fit in.
|
# ? Oct 27, 2023 04:51 |
|
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 14:26 |
|
Oh sure, let's all use 'cash' minted by the central bank controlled by the government. Okay sheeple
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 14:29 |
The GOVERNMENT doesn't want you tipping waitresses at a restaurant. There is something to be said for huge amounts of things nowadays not being able to be resold due to be on digital markets, but the above is dumb.
|
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 14:37 |
|
I don't like Al Gore telling me how many small pieces of gold I cut off of a larger piece of gold that I carry around at all times a loaf of bread should cost!
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 14:38 |
|
Have they never paid for a meal with a credit card? Why on earth do they think tipping wouldn't be possible?
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 15:06 |
|
Dienes posted:Have they never paid for a meal with a credit card? Why on earth do they think tipping wouldn't be possible? BECAUSE*THEY* ARE FORCING IT ON US YOU SHEEPLE
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 15:07 |
|
Guavanaut posted:I don't like Al Gore telling me how many small pieces of gold I cut off of a larger piece of gold that I carry around at all times a loaf of bread should cost! Pieces of Eight were good enough for and they're good enough for me!
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 15:13 |
|
Dienes posted:Have they never paid for a meal with a credit card? Why on earth do they think tipping wouldn't be possible? They don’t tip anyway, you know it in your heart.
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 15:20 |
|
joke's on them, I already didn't give to busking musicians
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 16:20 |
|
I thought busking musicians wanted kisses Maybe I misheard
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 16:26 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 21:55 |
|
It's all 'tinfoil' about "social credit scores" and how the government can ruin you by deleting all your Apes or Slurp Juices or whatever the digital monopoly money is called. They like to use the Trucker Convoy in Canada as an example, as I guess some of them had assets frozen so it got everyone all paranoid about getting canceled for wrongthink. You'll note these types of folks never bring up the actual existent issues of a cashless society (weed dispensaries in the US unable to use the banking system effectively, and sex workers being overly reliant on the mercy of credit card processors).
|
# ? Oct 29, 2023 16:38 |