|
Should I step down as head of twitter This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
|
420 | 4.43% |
| No |
|
69 | 0.73% |
| Goku |
|
9001 | 94.85% |
| Total: | 9490 votes | ||
|
Mods please make any mention of Musk automatically show up as Grok.
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
Aramis posted:Why yes, once a critical mass of people gather into a mob, they start acting as if they shared a single mentality. This is such a novel concept! sociology is woke, studying group dynamics is verboten
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:48
|
|
|
potato! posted:little known fact, Elon's child X-12 is named that because he is Elon's 12th child lol loving hell. I thought it was because it was after a-12 the 60s reconnaissance plane but then was thinking does he have a kid named x-12 as well as ae-12 or whatever? Would not surprise me.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:50
|
|
|
Vichan posted:https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1721182507863793751 I'm sure the Yaccarino will be along shortly to make it even cringier, don't you worry. It can get way more obnoxious
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:51
|
|
|
imagine going to university for computer science and machine learning only to get out of the school and the only job you can find is making a chat bot act "Based and Red Pilled" for a guy with more divorces than hair plugs (and he has a lot of hair plugs)
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:51
|
|
|
The Grimace posted:i hate grok
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:53
|
|
|
The market no one was capitalizing on, edgelords. I'm sure they have a bajillion dollars to throw away on this totally real AI
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 17:54
|
|
|
Careful about calling ColdSteel no one, they might cut you open like a 2 liter of dyed water
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:00
|
|
|
The npc thing is such blatant and hosed up fash poo poo. "People who are different than me all say the same canned thing, they aren't individuals like people who believe and say the same exact things as me. " It's goddamned mind poison. So, of course Musk loves it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:01
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:Careful about calling ColdSteel no one, they might cut you open like a 2 liter of dyed water Tactical gladius!
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:07
|
|
|
I have no real proof of this, but it's plain to me that AI has been "good" if not great for several decades now (according to *Wikipedia* we've been having expert-level conversations with well-learned machines since like the ARPANET days), and the modern consumer-grade stuff we're getting excited about is basically just a highly developed fork of yeeeeears of hard research, effort, and labor, with some if not many of the contributors uncredited. Considering AI can likely code itself, having a chat bot that can spout racial epithets on the front end of Twitter really isn't that amazing or much of a value-add. I imagine there's much worse lurking in the swarms of Elon Musk's 90% automated followers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:07
|
|
|
Aramis posted:"gros con" is closer to "colossal idiot", which is conveniently even funnier.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:08
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:I have no real proof of this, but it's plain to me that AI has been "good" if not great for several decades now (according to *Wikipedia* we've been having expert-level conversations with well-learned machines since like the ARPANET days), and the modern consumer-grade stuff we're getting excited about is basically just a highly developed fork of yeeeeears of hard research, effort, and labor, with some if not many of the contributors uncredited. What wikipedia have you been reading? Before ChatGPT we only had stuff that amounts to glorified chatbots. (ChatGPT is still a glorified chatbot, but it does actually read like a proper conversation instead of something responding with canned answers triggered by keywords)
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:10
|
|
|
No joke: Believing in an unseen secret agi is mixing conspiracy theory and religion. If that's what you want to do then more power to you, but if you're trying to have a realistic view of the world you need to take a hard look at your information sources
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:12
|
|
|
Can we go back to when Musk was freaking out his AI research was behind so he was saying dumb poo poo like AI was a greater threat to humanity then nuclear war or whatever nonsense he was spouting.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:16
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:No joke: Believing in an unseen secret agi is mixing conspiracy theory and religion. If that's what you want to do then more power to you, but if you're trying to have a realistic view of the world you need to take a hard look at your information sources I do find it funny that it could theoretically happen. ChatGPT, if it was sentient and bent on world domination (it is not sentient in any way, this is just musing) could spread itself far and wide easily: https://twitter.com/philhawksworth/status/1720106515300860230
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:17
|
|
|
What kind of lovely devs push untested code, ChatGPT or not, to production? That’s baffling. I mean I work in tech and none of my code goes to production it is all in house testing and I still test it before merging to the master branch to do a release. We don’t get to use ChatGPT or LLMs internally either though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:20
|
|
|
ymgve posted:What wikipedia have you been reading? Before ChatGPT we only had stuff that amounts to glorified chatbots. (ChatGPT is still a glorified chatbot, but it does actually read like a proper conversation instead of something responding with canned answers triggered by keywords) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_intelligence ymgve posted:I do find it funny that it could theoretically happen. ChatGPT, if it was sentient and bent on world domination (it is not sentient in any way, this is just musing) could spread itself far and wide easily: Lol forever at bullshit, untested, unsourced, uncredited, anonymous ontology. We're gonna be picking up disasters for decades. Hope nobody left any time bombs. Waffle House fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Nov 5, 2023 |
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:22
|
|
|
Toplowtech posted:I am french and i am not saying GROK is "gros con", i am saying it's half of it and there are not that many sentences where you use the sound "GROK" where you aren't calling someone a gros con. It's like calling something SmallD and be surprised some people call it small dick. First thing that comes to mind when i hear grok in french is unsurprisingly the most common insult "gros con". Because it's half of it and the sound isn't that common outside the insult. That's interesting. I am french as well and my perspective is completely different. Saying "grok" in french, to me, sounds a lot like "Froc", "Grog", "Rock" (as in Rock n' Roll), "Grotte", etc... where the O is pushed much closer to an A, and jumping from that to "gros" just does not work at all to my ears. Is there a piece of regional slang where "gros con" contracts to "Groc" with the O mushed into an A? I'm genuinely curious.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:23
|
|
|
so this is the kind of person who laughs at marvels
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:23
|
|
|
If ai starts some bullshit we just, you know, locate were the huge draw in energy originates, and cut the wires.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:24
|
|
|
rowkey bilbao posted:If ai starts some bullshit we just, you know, locate were the huge draw in energy originates, and cut the wires. Sooooooo what if there's a special sequence of words that basically tell it to package itself up for hibernation if this scenario occurs and wait until later to be a virus again
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:25
|
|
|
redshirt posted:I feel bad for Grok Grok is gonna be that really annoying kid who you hate, until you meet his father; after that you just feel sorry for him
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:25
|
|
|
Aramis posted:Is there a piece of regional slang where "gros con" contracts to "Groc" with the O mushed into an A? I'm genuinely curious. Idk grok is like trouduc. I think toplowtech is stretching it a bit but who cares. Audi sells etrons here too.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:25
|
|
|
redshirt posted:I feel bad for Grok let's kill Grok!
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:26
|
|
|
what if AI sends a killer robot backwards in time to kill the mother of the human leader before he's even born?! 
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:27
|
|
|
lol what a crock
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:30
|
|
|
Exactly where in that article do you see anything about "expert-level conversations with well-learned machines" in the ARPANET days? ELIZA was a trick played on the human psyche. SHRDLU was a carefully controlled demo. MYCIN was never publicly used in clinical practice settings. It was estimated that the WABOT-1 had the mental faculty of a one-and-half-year-old child. And those are only the ones I bothered giving a cursory look. ymgve fucked around with this message at 18:38 on Nov 5, 2023 |
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:32
|
|
|
priznat posted:What kind of lovely devs push untested code, ChatGPT or not, to production? That’s baffling.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:33
|
|
|
LLM AIs seem boring as heck to me, glorified 90s chatbots imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:34
|
|
|
ymgve posted:Exactly where in that article do you see anything about "expert-level conversations with well-learned machines" in the ARPANET days?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:35
|
|
|
Real LLMs are incredible. Grok is a whitelabeled chatbot with the most annoying internet discourse filter imaginable
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:37
|
|
|
AI generated code is something that looks okay at a quick glance, but then you realize it's doing some tremendously stupid things because it gets languages and frameworks all muddled. Even if it compiles, there's a good chance that it will be wrong in all sorts of ways. It doesn't shock me that someone who would be stupid enough to push right to prod without testing would be too stupid to tell when code is wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:37
|
|
|
Aramis posted:That's interesting. I am french as well and my perspective is completely different. Saying "grok" in french, to me, sounds a lot like "Froc", "Grog", "Rock" (as in Rock n' Roll), "Grotte", etc... where the O is pushed much closer to an A, and jumping from that to "gros" just does not work at all to my ears. Toplowtech fucked around with this message at 18:40 on Nov 5, 2023 |
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:38
|
|
|
priznat posted:LLM AIs seem boring as heck to me, glorified 90s chatbots imo Machine text generation used to be pretty funny when it made crazy sentences, but the current stuff is just boring sludge that has probably already started ingesting its own output, now that that garbage is everywhere and you can't reliably sniff it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:38
|
|
|
ymgve posted:Exactly where in that article do you see anything about "expert-level conversations with well-learned machines" in the ARPANET days? I'm not about to neg on the efforts, there. I mean poo poo, if we're going to talk about military hardware, we had loving https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_D-21 in '64. Not that that was something that *talked* to us, but automation has been a thing for a long, long time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:43
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:I'm not about to neg on the efforts, there. I mean poo poo, if we're going to talk about military hardware, we had loving https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_D-21 in '64. Not that that was something that *talked* to us, but automation has been a thing for a long, long time. Dude, you were the one that literally said they had conversations with well learned machines back then. You were the one that brought up talking to computers. I don't see why you pull an automated drone out, because those have a very narrow and well defined set of inputs from their sensors, which is entirely unlike conversations with real humans.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:48
|
|
|
Elon just wanted to read grimes dms and say slurs, and dehumanize people that aren't him vOv
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:48
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:I'm not about to neg on the efforts, there. I mean poo poo, if we're going to talk about military hardware, we had loving https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_D-21 in '64. Not that that was something that *talked* to us, but automation has been a thing for a long, long time. In case you forgot what you literally said Waffle House posted:I have no real proof of this, but it's plain to me that AI has been "good" if not great for several decades now (according to *Wikipedia* we've been having expert-level conversations with well-learned machines since like the ARPANET days), and the modern consumer-grade stuff we're getting excited about is basically just a highly developed fork of yeeeeears of hard research, effort, and labor, with some if not many of the contributors uncredited. Did you watch Person of Interest and think it was a documentary?
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 18:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 30, 2024 00:55 |
|
|
JossiRossi posted:In case you forgot what you literally said I have no idea what Person of Interest is, sorry. I don't mean to insult here, but is there a valid reason that the notions and prospects of scientific advancement over the past century make you this testy? Digging in on me over this topic makes no sense.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2023 19:00
|
|