Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
Probation
Can't post for 26 hours!
Are palestinians still starving and drinking ocean water or is some aid getting through?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

gurragadon
Jul 28, 2006

Willo567 posted:

Are the subs both conventional and nuclear attack subs?

An SSGN is dosen't have nuclear weapons, but they are powered by a nuclear power plant.

Edit: I'm not seeing in any stories on whether it is an SSBN or an SSGN, but i'm not sure what would be the upside of bringing in an SSBN and announcing it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-nuclear-submarine-has-arrived-at-the-middle-east-the-pentagon/ar-AA1jqWIf

quote:

The identity of the submarine was not disclosed and it is not known whether it is one of the four submarines that carry Tomahawk cruise missiles or of the 14 submarines that carry the Trident-II ballistic missiles, but it is still a significant addition to the American deterrence force in the region, and the ability to attack if necessary.

gurragadon fucked around with this message at 03:17 on Nov 6, 2023

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)

Main Paineframe posted:

And now today he's suspended Amichai Eliyahu from cabinet meetings after making a number of comments that ranged from obvious political blunders to downright genocidal rhetoric. He said that "there is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza" and that "we wouldn’t hand the Nazis humanitarian aid", he suggested that nuking Gaza shouldn't be ruled out, he stated that the lives of hostages were less important than the lives of soldiers, and he said that Israel should reoccupy and resettle Gaza and that the Palestinian population that would be displaced by that should go to "Ireland or deserts". Real fuckin class act there.

This guy's already back in cabinet meetings btw.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

Neo Rasa posted:

At least one of the times the IDF decided to massacre more Palestinians this was actually an officially funded part of the IDF's PR. Like "hey gorgeous young Israeli women paint and show off your rear end for the IDF" was a thing on Twitter.

notwithoutmyanus
Mar 17, 2009

Main Paineframe posted:

Not a lot of detail out about it yet, but the Palestinian telecoms company says Israel cut off communications in Gaza again:

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-771820

Meanwhile, Netanyahu seems to be getting increasingly frustrated with Otzma Yehudit, who are making basically no effort at all to play along with Israel's PR needs.

A couple of days ago, he reportedly scolded Ben-Gvir for downplaying the ongoing epidemic of settler violence in the West Bank:

And now today he's suspended Amichai Eliyahu from cabinet meetings after making a number of comments that ranged from obvious political blunders to downright genocidal rhetoric. He said that "there is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza" and that "we wouldn’t hand the Nazis humanitarian aid", he suggested that nuking Gaza shouldn't be ruled out, he stated that the lives of hostages were less important than the lives of soldiers, and he said that Israel should reoccupy and resettle Gaza and that the Palestinian population that would be displaced by that should go to "Ireland or deserts". Real fuckin class act there.

I'm confused with one part of this:
"Meanwhile, Netanyahu seems to be getting increasingly frustrated with Otzma Yehudit, who are making basically no effort at all to play along with Israel's PR needs."

What do you mean/interpret as Israel's PR needs at this point? Considering the comments were basically something like "we're not that crazy" and that Israel obviously is trying to massage the PR here, but still.

WhiskeyWhiskers
Oct 14, 2013


"هذا ليس عادلاً."
"هذا ليس عادلاً على الإطلاق."
"كان هناك وقت الآن."
(السياق الخفي: للقراءة)

notwithoutmyanus posted:

I'm confused with one part of this:
"Meanwhile, Netanyahu seems to be getting increasingly frustrated with Otzma Yehudit, who are making basically no effort at all to play along with Israel's PR needs."

What do you mean/interpret as Israel's PR needs at this point? Considering the comments were basically something like "we're not that crazy" and that Israel obviously is trying to massage the PR here, but still.

Ben Gvir wasn't trying to downplay violence occurring to an international audience, he was suggesting they intentionally allow the pogroms against Palestinians in the West Bank to continue by turning a blind eye to them. Which was and probably still is the Israeli plan, but Ben Gvir making an rear end of himself outflanks Netanyahu from the right by appearing like the only one to support the pogroms, while Netanyahu has to denounce them.

WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 04:45 on Nov 6, 2023

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Jaxyon posted:

Are palestinians still starving and drinking ocean water or is some aid getting through?

water situation last time i had solid info: two to three of the israel pipelines of clean water are functioning at half-ish capacity, one of the major desalination/treatment plants is operational and self-powered, some aid is coming through. situation isn't good but it's not immediately apocalyptically dire

food situation: doesn't seem like enough is getting through on a quick skim and that's going to become a problem

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

notwithoutmyanus posted:

I'm confused with one part of this:
"Meanwhile, Netanyahu seems to be getting increasingly frustrated with Otzma Yehudit, who are making basically no effort at all to play along with Israel's PR needs."

What do you mean/interpret as Israel's PR needs at this point? Considering the comments were basically something like "we're not that crazy" and that Israel obviously is trying to massage the PR here, but still.

Netanyahu wants to maintain the pretense that this is all just a terrorist-busting campaign with heavy weapons like what the US did in Iraq and Afghanistan, rather than ethnic cleansing with some pogroms on the side.

For context, Ben-Gvir, as Minister of National Security in charge of the police, has been handing out police weapons to civilians all over Israel, and has promised to supply thousands of guns to the settlers. He's also been doing photo-ops of himself passing out guns at political events. This has quite a few US government figures concerned, given Ben-Gvir's notorious extremism and the skyrocketing levels of violence against Palestinians in the West Bank by gun-toting Israeli civilians in the last few weeks.

Now, Israel has also ordered 27,000 assault rifles from US gunmakers in the past month, saying the guns are for police - and that some of them are likely to end up in the hands of these ad-hoc civilian "security squads". This purchase requires the approval of the State Department, and Congress had to be informed of the purchase as well. There's plenty of people in both bodies who are making noise about it because they'd rather not directly supply American weapons to extremist settler pogroms in the West Bank. The Biden administration seems to be happy to let Israel do whatever it wants to Gaza in the name of "fighting Hamas", but they're much more hesitant to endorse aggressive activities in the West Bank where Hamas doesn't have much of a presence.

In order to please the US and other international observers, Netanyahu thinks it's crucial to publicly act like settler violence is a serious and important issue that he wants to restrain and prevent at all costs. Meanwhile, Ben-Gvir and his buddies - who are the direct cause of most of this trouble because they're the ones arming the settlers and encouraging aggressive action in the West Bank to begin with, are just playing coy and acting like it's not worth worrying about.

Don't mistake any of this for sympathy for Netanyahu, though. He's the one who chose to coalition with Otzma Yehudit, and he's the one who agreed to give a bunch of important positions with actual authority to those genocidal lunatics.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

Main Paineframe posted:

For context, Ben-Gvir, as Minister of National Security in charge of the police, has been handing out police weapons to civilians all over Israel, and has promised to supply thousands of guns to the settlers.
More on this connecting to home demolitions in the West Bank:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KICczZ1DyZU&t=1273s

Comstar
Apr 20, 2007

Are you happy now?
Those guns sent going to be used on Hamas or other people who fight back.


It will be used on Palestine’s and other Israelis.

Willo567
Feb 5, 2015

Cheating helped me fail the test and stay on the show.
https://twitter.com/MazenMahdi/status/1721509190684786986
This have any teeth to it or likely a bluff?

Hong XiuQuan
Feb 19, 2008

"Without justice for the Palestinians there will be no peace in the Middle East."

Unlikely to be a bluff. *At least* 20% of Jordan's population is Palestinian (and that ratio is only because of the huge influx of Iraqi & Syrian refugees). If Israel does any large scale cleansing, it's going to completely upset the delicate balance and has the opportunity of Arab-springing the Jordanian monarchy (recall some years back how that instability almost led to significant moves). They'd only be able to field about a third of the men and equipment that Israel theoretically could but if Jordan goes to war there's a substantial likelihood others would join them (think: Hizbullah, maybe factions in Iraq or thorough Syria, potentially even Egyptian guerrilla support). Israel isn't in a position to fight any meaningful war outside its own borders beyond running some bombing campaigns. Jordan would almost certainly ask the US to leave its waters. There's all sorts that could theoretically happen but it's definitely something Israel doesn't want. And I doubt the US would allow it.

tl;dr - this is probably more for the US than anyone else. "Sort Israel out or poo poo's about to fall the gently caress apart" is the message I think.

Irony Be My Shield
Jul 29, 2012

As much as Israel would like to dump the population they've abused for decades on someone else I don't think there's any reasonable way they can compel their neighbours to take them. Even if they managed to do it somehow Egypt/Jordan could at minimum retaliate by giving Hamas free reign to attack Israel from within their borders.

karthun
Nov 16, 2006

I forgot to post my food for USPOL Thanksgiving but that's okay too!


Jordan does take it's custodianship of the al-aqsa mosque very seriously.

Panzeh
Nov 27, 2006

"..The high ground"
The attempt by the PLO to coup(with Syrian support) the Jordanian government kinda soured them on taking on more Palestinian refugees after historically being willing to offer citizenship- it also made the Hashemites more amenable to a relationship with Israel.

Willo567
Feb 5, 2015

Cheating helped me fail the test and stay on the show.
Nevermind

Willo567 fucked around with this message at 14:45 on Nov 6, 2023

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Jordan is extremely unlikely to declare war over Gaza's populace being driven into Egypt, but it's basically impossible for them to stand by and do nothing if Israel starts trying to drive the West Bank's population over the border to Jordan. It's extremely unlikely that Israel is going to do that this time, though.

Hong XiuQuan
Feb 19, 2008

"Without justice for the Palestinians there will be no peace in the Middle East."

Panzeh posted:

The attempt by the PLO to coup(with Syrian support) the Jordanian government kinda soured them on taking on more Palestinian refugees after historically being willing to offer citizenship- it also made the Hashemites more amenable to a relationship with Israel.

The Hashemis have been amenable to working with Israel since the beginning. In 1948 they essentially had a gentlemen's agreement with Israel to annex the West Bank (including refusing to engage at key moments). In the period between 1948-1967 Jordan frequently shared intel with Israel. In 1967, Jordan and Israel essentially had an understanding that Jordan wouldn't get involved in any major conflict. They only got involved because Israel took out its airforce, went 'whoopsies, but we'll leave you alone if you don't do anything'.

The Hashemis have only ever been interested in securing their reign and getting as much resource under their control as possible. To that end, everything (including the Waqf) has to be understood through the lens of their own survival mechanisms.

Willo567
Feb 5, 2015

Cheating helped me fail the test and stay on the show.

Main Paineframe posted:

Jordan is extremely unlikely to declare war over Gaza's populace being driven into Egypt, but it's basically impossible for them to stand by and do nothing if Israel starts trying to drive the West Bank's population over the border to Jordan. It's extremely unlikely that Israel is going to do that this time, though.
What makes you think Israel won't try doing just that? They've already shown they don't care about civilians

CeeJee
Dec 4, 2001
Oven Wrangler

Hong XiuQuan posted:

The Hashemis have been amenable to working with Israel since the beginning. In 1948 they essentially had a gentlemen's agreement with Israel to annex the West Bank (including refusing to engage at key moments). In the period between 1948-1967 Jordan frequently shared intel with Israel. In 1967, Jordan and Israel essentially had an understanding that Jordan wouldn't get involved in any major conflict. They only got involved because Israel took out its airforce, went 'whoopsies, but we'll leave you alone if you don't do anything'.


It was more Nasser lying to King Hussein that the Israeli air force was destroyed, Egyptian planes were bombing Tel Aviv and he should attack Israel immediately.
The Jordanian air force was indeed taken out but not after it had attacked Israel first and got hit while refueling at their bases.

Nancy
Nov 23, 2005



Young Orc

Willo567 posted:

What makes you think Israel won't try doing just that? They've already shown they don't care about civilians

I think they're saying Israel doesn't have an excuse lined up to completely purge the West Bank right now. So far the Israeli government, IDF & settlers have been breaking it up into enclaves and terrorizing Palestinians in the area & this has worked while keeping the West Bank largely out of the public eye. Doing something larger to the West Bank, a nominal noncombatant, while they are currently destroying the Gaza strip would draw down a lot of international scrutiny, as ultimately ineffective as that may be.

Nancy fucked around with this message at 21:11 on Nov 6, 2023

Hong XiuQuan
Feb 19, 2008

"Without justice for the Palestinians there will be no peace in the Middle East."

CeeJee posted:

It was more Nasser lying to King Hussein that the Israeli air force was destroyed, Egyptian planes were bombing Tel Aviv and he should attack Israel immediately.
The Jordanian air force was indeed taken out but not after it had attacked Israel first and got hit while refueling at their bases.

Not going to take this thread down "what happened in 1967" but suffice to say that the Hashemis have been cosy with Israel since the 1948

E2M2
Mar 2, 2007

Ain't No Thang.

Nancy posted:

I think Willo567 means they don't have an excuse lined up to completely purge the West Bank right now. So far the Israeli government, IDF & settlers have been breaking it up into enclaves and terrorizing Palestinians in the area & this has worked while keeping the West Bank largely out of the public eye. Doing something larger to the West Bank, a nominal noncombatant, while they are currently destroying the Gaza strip would draw down a lot of international scrutiny, as ultimately ineffective as that may be.

Aren't they handing AR15s to the settlers enmass right now? Feels like what Hamas did to the Kibbutzs is gonna be childs play pretty soon

Rukeli
May 10, 2014

Hong XiuQuan posted:

The Hashemis have been amenable to working with Israel since the beginning. In 1948 they essentially had a gentlemen's agreement with Israel to annex the West Bank (including refusing to engage at key moments). In the period between 1948-1967 Jordan frequently shared intel with Israel. In 1967, Jordan and Israel essentially had an understanding that Jordan wouldn't get involved in any major conflict. They only got involved because Israel took out its airforce, went 'whoopsies, but we'll leave you alone if you don't do anything'.

The Hashemis have only ever been interested in securing their reign and getting as much resource under their control as possible. To that end, everything (including the Waqf) has to be understood through the lens of their own survival mechanisms.

Back then Israel didn't care about Jordan kicking out the few thousand Jews from the Jewish Quarter and other areas?

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

E2M2 posted:

Aren't they handing AR15s to the settlers enmass right now? Feels like what Hamas did to the Kibbutzs is gonna be childs play pretty soon

Not yet, no. There's certainly some concern that they're going to do so, but most of the violence so far is from settlers who were already armed (or who aren't armed, but are well aware that the watchful eye of the IDF will protect them from any consequences).

And the guns that Israel is distributing are not primarily for assaulting Palestinians. It's a measure to restore public confidence after the IDF dropped the ball big-time on Oct 7th: the point is to provide an assurance that any community within a few miles of any Palestinians will have a local militia on hand for self-defense, even if the nearest IDF base gets caught napping and lets another Palestinian incursion through. Some of those guns are inevitably going to fall into the hands of extremists who'll use them for violence, and the administration isn't really going to do all that much to prevent it, but it's not going to be at the kind of level that leads to mass refugees fleeing into Jordan.

To put things in perspective, around 150 Palestinians have been killed by Israelis in the West Bank since Oct 7th. That's a loving awful increase from what it was before Oct 7th - the total number killed from January through August was 172, which was already a big increase from the total 2022 count of 155 - but it's still gonna be a far cry from mass expulsion, even if Ben-Gvir gets to hand out a couple thousand free guns to the price taggers and hilltop youth.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

Giving them all assault rifles is a good way to make sure settlers are never forced to leave the West Bank like they were forced to leave Gaza.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Hebron is a nightmare rn for anyone who’s not a settler:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/5/like-a-prison-the-palestinians-in-hebron-living-under-israeli-lockdown?utm_source=pocket_reader

quote:


Following the shocking October 7 attack on southern Israel by Hamas, Israeli soldiers came without warning to Palestinian shops in Hebron and ordered their owners and workers at gunpoint to close shop and stay home.

In online community chat groups, word trickled across the neighbourhoods of H2: Any Palestinians found outside their homes would be shot.

Settlers are playing dress-up in military uniforms and torturing people, which is like, probably already a death squad, but if not technically, is a hair’s breadth away from it.

Hong XiuQuan
Feb 19, 2008

"Without justice for the Palestinians there will be no peace in the Middle East."

Rukeli posted:

Back then Israel didn't care about Jordan kicking out the few thousand Jews from the Jewish Quarter and other areas?

Ben Gurion’s primary concern was getting a demographic majority in the land he could hold on to and then to ensure Israel didn’t have to fight another three-front war. When he wanted to expand he looked initially to Egypt.

To be clear, he and his successors and Hussein weren’t in some deep and meaningful sexual relationship. They used each other politically.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
Probation
Can't post for 26 hours!

selec posted:

Hebron is a nightmare rn for anyone who’s not a settler:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/5/like-a-prison-the-palestinians-in-hebron-living-under-israeli-lockdown?utm_source=pocket_reader

Settlers are playing dress-up in military uniforms and torturing people, which is like, probably already a death squad, but if not technically, is a hair’s breadth away from it.

I posted a video earlier of a woman visiting her parents hometown of Hebron.

Part of it was an old lady having to scale a building because she wasn't allowed to use the street her house was on. Every day.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Jaxyon posted:

I posted a video earlier of a woman visiting her parents hometown of Hebron.

Part of it was an old lady having to scale a building because she wasn't allowed to use the street her house was on. Every day.

I think there’s a real job of work to be done sending people who lived under Jim Crow over to Israel to talk to people and compare what they go through with what happened in our own country. You wouldn’t even need to go to Gaza or the West Bank, just talk to Israeli Arabs about their schools, how marriage works between Arabs and Israelis, or same-sex marriage still being illegal there.

I think that would do a lot to push sentiment and get people asking what the hell is going on there and why we fund it.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
Probation
Can't post for 26 hours!
They have nets outside their homes because the settlers who live above just toss trash down on them.

Best Friends
Nov 4, 2011

selec posted:

I think there’s a real job of work to be done sending people who lived under Jim Crow over to Israel to talk to people and compare what they go through with what happened in our own country. You wouldn’t even need to go to Gaza or the West Bank, just talk to Israeli Arabs about their schools, how marriage works between Arabs and Israelis, or same-sex marriage still being illegal there.

I think that would do a lot to push sentiment and get people asking what the hell is going on there and why we fund it.

How could one even get that information out there in the west? It would be labeled as antisemitism by the mainstream if it wasn’t simply ignored, just like the protests now. Social media services would be pressured to categorize it as harmful misinformation. Sharing it could open people to genuine legal trouble in several western democracies.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-germany-palestinian-supporters-say-they-struggle-be-heard-2023-10-19/

quote:

Over the weekend, Paris police issued a ban on the "presence and circulation of people that present themselves as pro-Palestinian". Since Oct. 12 they have issued 827 fines and arrested 43 people.

In Germany, Berlin police have approved two requests for pro-Palestine protests since the initial Hamas attacks, a police spokesperson said. Both were proposed as silent vigils.

But at least seven, including one called Jewish Berliners Against Middle Eastern Violence and another entitled Youth Against Racism, were refused permission. At least 190 people have been detained at protests.

quote:

Darmanin said on Tuesday that 327 antisemitic acts had taken place in France since Oct. 7, with 183 arrests for antisemitism or apologising for terrorism.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/10/20/palestinian-tiktok-instagram-algospeak-israel-hamas/

quote:


Since the bloody conflict between Israel and Hamas escalated into war this month, Palestinian-focused creators have increasingly been using “algospeak” — a collection of phrases, special spellings and code words — to prevent their posts from being removed or suppressed by social media companies. Some users are bleeping or adding sounds to disguise their voice-overs, while others are shifting the spellings of common English and Arabic words like “Palestine,” “genocide” and “Hamas” to evade detection. Many popular creators are instructing Palestinian users to adopt similar tactics and to keep track of how the content tech companies take down or suppress.

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.
Have there been any ballpark estimates of Israeli military casualties and materiel losses since they launched their assault? There's a ton of video of Palestinian fighters doing things like running up to tanks and destroying their outer defences before firing an RPG at them but its hard to know if this is having real effects on the Israeli assault or if its mostly just a show for the cameras.

Speleothing
May 6, 2008

Spare batteries are pretty key.
Are we counting damage from Hezbollah? Because they've claimed a few tank kills and some direct hits on border forts in the north.

HonorableTB
Dec 22, 2006

HootTheOwl posted:

This thread seems to think that a destroyed or downed tank goes up in flames and there's black pillars of smoke like they're searching for a Pope, when the reality is much less cinematic.
In real life a tank just has a big hole in it, and the tank next to it drags it away

You have not seen many tank kills if you think this is true lol. If you have any kind of turret toss event there's absolutely going to be a massive column of smoke and flame because all the tank's ammo just cooked off. I don't know if Merkava tanks have the Abrams system of ammo storage in a separate compartment from the crew but those systems are designed to blow out special panels if ammo is hit so the whole tank doesn't go up. Even that causes a lot of smoke and flame, it just results in an alive crew rather than a dead one.

Tanks have a lot of explosives and fuel in them. They tend to make large explosions when they get hit with a high explosive weapon.

HonorableTB fucked around with this message at 22:07 on Nov 6, 2023

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
Edit: I absolutely did not mean to post in this thread

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Best Friends posted:

How could one even get that information out there in the west? It would be labeled as antisemitism by the mainstream if it wasn’t simply ignored, just like the protests now. Social media services would be pressured to categorize it as harmful misinformation. Sharing it could open people to genuine legal trouble in several western democracies.

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/france-germany-palestinian-supporters-say-they-struggle-be-heard-2023-10-19/



https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/10/20/palestinian-tiktok-instagram-algospeak-israel-hamas/

The ideal would be to send people under the aegis of an org like MSNBC (lol, I know) and you could do one better by tracking down Jewish freedom riders and organizers from the era and having them go along to. You’d get riveting footage, I suspect, as people who lived under and fought these kind of policies were bearing witness to the version of them at play right now in Israel.

I don’t hold out hope that this kind of reporting would be undertaken, but it’d be nice to see.

E2M2
Mar 2, 2007

Ain't No Thang.
I think theres a reason why Israel is pretty selective on who can visit.

Ta-Nehisi Coates talked about his visit and thats the closest thing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_df_u7yJj3k

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



E2M2 posted:

I think theres a reason why Israel is pretty selective on who can visit.

Ta-Nehisi Coates talked about his visit and thats the closest thing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_df_u7yJj3k
I listened to this interview last week...experiences like this are why you see reports about how CNN is being forced to run all of their coverage through the IDF. If the average person saw what was going on in Israel, even in the 'free' (massive quotes) Palestinian parts of the West Bank, they would be furious.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012
Both Irish and Brazilian nationals seem to be deliberately excluded from the lists of people allowed to leave Gaza, while countries that did not press for a ceasefire or gave carte-blanche to the scouring got bumped to the front.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply