Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: weg, Toxic Mental)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Blistex
Oct 30, 2003

Macho Business
Donkey Wrestler

Tai posted:

Terriotorial gains, Russia is up. Not really sure you can call it up though as it's a few square KM over the last month for an insane amount of tank/IFV losses. Probably been one of the worst 4 weeks for Russian losses since the start of the war.

That's what I figured. I have a co-worker who's a little on the alt-news side of things, but he's also the only person who has any sort of interest in the topic. His take is that Ukraine has essentially run out of gas and that from now on it's going to be Russia pushing ahead. I countered that Ukraine is ceding territory to avoid taking massive losses themselves while allowing Russia to waste troops and material. The point being is that Ukraine is not pulling a "not one step back" and is instead allowing Russia to throw more meat into the grinder so that they can exploit that at a later date.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
UA is running out of gas though but so is Russia if they want to continue with its current losses. But all it takes is a couple of UA gently caress ups or Russia to get its poo poo together and you could see a UA front collapse. Russia is still very much odds on favourite imo to see this through. Just at what long term cost for Russia.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
This isn't really dissimilar to how things have been going until now. It's a reasonable tradeoff for some time as long as there's a way to reverse this at some point.

Russia should run out of equipment before the Western MIC but we'd have to make a bit of effort so I dunno...

Jasper Tin Neck
Nov 14, 2008


"Scientifically proven, rich and creamy."

War on the Rocks released a new podcast episode with Michael Kofman titled Some preliminary thoughts on Ukraine's position in the war.

Highlights:

  • Kofman discusses Zaluzhnyi's interview with the Economist, broadly agreeing with his assessment of the situation.
  • Kofman predicts 2024 will become a year of attritional fighting, as neither side has a decisive advantage.
  • According to him, this offers an opportunity to reconstitute for both sides, but it's counterbalanced by the political pressure on both sides to make demonstrable gains.
  • Russian equipment and tactics are steadily improving, which makes it even more important that the US and especially Europe commit to supporting Ukrainan efforts.
  • Kofman worries that Ukraine's AA missile stocks are runnng low and expresses doubt whether European countries can make good on their announced ammunition commitments.

Tai
Mar 8, 2006

Jasper Tin Neck posted:


Highlights:

  • Russian equipment and tactics are steadily improving, which makes it even more important that the US and especially Europe commit to supporting Ukrainan efforts.

lol

Samovar
Jun 4, 2011

When I want to relax, I read an essay by Engels. When I want something more serious, I read Corto Maltese.

Shaman Tank Spec posted:

True. You barely hear anything from Finnish pagans these days in general though.

From an cultural standpoint (divorced from lunatic political psychos), that's pretty sad.

3D Megadoodoo
Nov 25, 2010

Samovar posted:

From an cultural standpoint (divorced from lunatic political psychos), that's pretty sad.

It absolutely isn't sad.

CSM
Jan 29, 2014

56th Motorized Infantry 'Mariupol' Brigade
Seh' die Welt in Trummern liegen

Blistex posted:

That's what I figured. I have a co-worker who's a little on the alt-news side of things, but he's also the only person who has any sort of interest in the topic. His take is that Ukraine has essentially run out of gas and that from now on it's going to be Russia pushing ahead. I countered that Ukraine is ceding territory to avoid taking massive losses themselves while allowing Russia to waste troops and material. The point being is that Ukraine is not pulling a "not one step back" and is instead allowing Russia to throw more meat into the grinder so that they can exploit that at a later date.
Ukraine isn't voluntarily ceding territory, they defended Bakhmut toot and nail, and are they doing the same with Avdiivka now.

It's unclear who is taking the largest losses and what the impact of these battles will be in the longer run, but at least Ukraine's counteroffensive failed this year, while Russia was able to conquer the Bakhmut rubble pile.

Talk about voluntarily ceding territory is mostly coping behavior. Ukraine doesn't want to lose territory, because it's either lost forever or they'll have to reconquer it some day.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Jasper Tin Neck posted:

[*] Russian equipment and tactics are steadily improving, which makes it even more important that the US and especially Europe commit to supporting Ukrainan efforts.

How can this even remotely be true?

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
https://twitter.com/P_Kallioniemi/status/1724012806989594723

lmao, I never knew he wrote creepy fiction about girls...

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



CommieGIR posted:

How can this even remotely be true?
Improved planning for convict batallion routings.

Bertha the Toaster
Jan 11, 2009

CommieGIR posted:

How can this even remotely be true?

Well this isn't helping. Well if the numbers are to be believed that is, I've no idea where the Russian figures are from.

Burns
May 10, 2008

Tai posted:

https://twitter.com/P_Kallioniemi/status/1724012806989594723

lmao, I never knew he wrote creepy fiction about girls...

Lol. This dude is assistant DA somehow.

Bluemillion
Aug 18, 2008

I got your dispensers
right here

Neddy Seagoon posted:



Russia's apparently playing stupid gently caress-gently caress games again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gne7beWy8fU

Gotta post the sequel, too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6skqOouxuFs

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

CommieGIR posted:

How can this even remotely be true?

https://twitter.com/Volodymyr_D_/status/1724037799832113235

Russia is refurbishing its Soviet stocks, while easily supplied Western (European) equipment is growing short - "the bottom of the barrel is now visible" - and production still has not been ramped up to match or exceed Russia's. Ukraine also has problems dealing with Lancets and Russian EW, and the Lancets are getting improved with longer range and better penetration. Russia may not innovate as quickly, but they're set up to mass produce the things that are proven to work.

Jasper Tin Neck
Nov 14, 2008


"Scientifically proven, rich and creamy."

CommieGIR posted:

How can this even remotely be true?

They're getting better at camouflage, ammo storage is dispersed, their trenches are deep and well reinforced, they make good use of Orlan drones to spot attacking Ukrainian units, they've made the kill chain from observation to fires much faster over the past year and make heavier use of loitering munitions and Krasnopol rounds to hit those targets than before.

Kofman makes it clear it's lethal to underestimate the Russians and credits Zaluzhnyi with not falling into that trap, noting that the kind of mechanised offensives Western advisors were pushing on Ukraine in spring probably would have looked a lot like the Russian push on Avdiivka because of how dangerous defensive tactics have become in Ukraine.

Set
Oct 30, 2005

Shaman Tank Spec posted:

Maybe, but Finland has never really been involved in the war on terror. Or really any war since World War II, since then we've just participated in UN peacekeeping missions. But of course, our local right wing idiots are nothing if not impressionable, so they're definitely getting influences from their American idols. Like I posted, it's wild to see them literally copy American republican and alt-right talking points and replacing "democrats" with "the Green Party" or whatever, or just not bothering to edit them in any way and insisting the democrats are operating a paedophile pizza ring in Finland, or some poo poo.

I'm sure the topic has been researched, and now I kinda want to look it up, because the shift is fascinating. It's probably not a surprise that in a left-leaning country that was under Soviet soft control for ~50 years, we've traditionally had a lot of right wingers. Until the skinhead movement really started picking up speed in the late 80s and early 90s, our right wingers were... well, literal nazis. The main guy, Pekka Siitoin, styled himself after Adolf Hitler up to and including making Hitler-style speeches from the balcony of his loving summer cottage, and calling himself the "Reichsführer of Finland".

*snipped out some pics*

But of course they were also very much marginalized and a national joke, like real life versions of Spode's Black Shorts from the Jeeves and Wooster stories. The rise of racist, christian, traditional values right wing ideology is a fairly recent thing, and the main right wing rear end in a top hat party, "True Finns", was founded in 1995 (during the first big immigration/refugee waves into Finland, not at all coincidentally). Their leadership was heavily religious, which might play a large part in shifting the landscape over here. They're the real modern republican populist style party that opposes everything but doesn't actually propose any solutions besides limiting the rights of everyone who isn't them, and kicking out everyone with darker skin than milk. Sadly they are also a pretty big success, maintaining a steady number of seats in the parliament and getting ministerial positions in many governments. Populism sells :(

(Unsurprisingly many of their big names are also on the Russian payroll)

Like I said, interesting topic.

You should pick up the book Äärioikeisto Suomessa by Koivulaakso, Brunila and Andersson. It was released in 2012, so isn't super up to date today, but it is super interesting. I haven't finished it yet myself (set it aside and forgot about it at some point :v:), but it does discuss how the Finnish far right activists moved away from being absolute jokes with Siitoin at the head, to a lot more online and dangerous form, which we see today in the True Finns and such.

As a fun Siitoin fact, there is a Swedish SVT documentary that a friend showed me once about the ferry that goes between Finland and Sweden from the 90s, where Siitoin just happens to pop up because his "nazi party" has a meeting organized there. It turns out to be him, his son and maybe one other guy? All drunk as poo poo, and he starts shouting about how "Jesus is a humanist!" at some lady in a staircase. This guy was how the public viewed nazis as for quite some time, and it is a travesty that they ever managed to "reform" their image so much that they are now in government.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVJGSCCdFJ4 At around 7 minutes 50 seconds he just appears in the most pathetic/hilarious way. The docu is really great for some 90s nostalgia as well.
edit: I had forgotten about the old lady getting upset at him lol good for her!

Set fucked around with this message at 17:17 on Nov 13, 2023

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Bertha the Toaster posted:

Well this isn't helping. Well if the numbers are to be believed that is, I've no idea where the Russian figures are from.

That "if the numbers are to be believed" is the key part here. Because I'm gonna need some citations for Russia cranking out 60 T-90s in 10 months, for instance.

E:

Set posted:

You should pick up the book Äärioikeisto Suomessa by Koivulaakso, Brunila and Andersson. It was released in 2012, so isn't super up to date today, but it is super interesting.

Thanks, I will!

Shaman Tank Spec fucked around with this message at 17:26 on Nov 13, 2023

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

Shaman Tank Spec posted:

That "if the numbers are to be believed" is the key part here. Because I'm gonna need some citations for Russia cranking out 60 T-90s in 10 months, for instance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctrtAwT2sgs

This is from a couple of months ago. If you don't watch the video, you can check out the footnotes for sources.

CSM
Jan 29, 2014

56th Motorized Infantry 'Mariupol' Brigade
Seh' die Welt in Trummern liegen

Tai posted:

https://twitter.com/P_Kallioniemi/status/1724012806989594723

lmao, I never knew he wrote creepy fiction about girls...
Nice haircut.

Shaman Tank Spec
Dec 26, 2003

*blep*



Hannibal Rex posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctrtAwT2sgs

This is from a couple of months ago. If you don't watch the video, you can check out the footnotes for sources.

A lot of the citations are Russian government officials who... you know.

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010

Shaman Tank Spec posted:

A lot of the citations are Russian government officials who... you know.

A large part of the video is assessing Russian claims vs OSINT information and known data.

CommissarMega
Nov 18, 2008

THUNDERDOME LOSER
Honestly, whether or not the RUAF is the second coming of the Keystone Kops or have spontaneously turned into an army of T-800s is irrelevant- the sooner this war ends favourably for the Ukrainians the better, and that can only be done with an increase in Western aid.

Set
Oct 30, 2005
So there's been a lot of noise in Finnish media lately about how Russia is using asylum seekers as a weapon again. The numbers haven't been that high, but they are noticeably increased at some border stations. This kind of hybrid influencing is so goddamn disgusting and dehumanizing, specifically using vulnerable people as a bludgeon against Western nations who do recognize them as human beings. How goddamn hosed up do you have to be to even think about something this evil?

Anyway, Yle had an article about the three main ways Russia uses hybrid influencing to harass and bully their neighbors that you guys might find interesting.

Author: Mika Mäkeläinen
Release date: 13.11.2023
Link to untranslated article: https://yle.fi/a/74-20059989

quote:

Russia has three ways to bully neighboring countries, and it has definitely used only one of them against Finland

Research director Sinikukka Saari highlights three methods of hybrid influence that Russia has used or could use against its border neighbors.

The clearest example of Russia's bullying tactics against neighboring countries is directing migrants across the border. Russia has already used it against Norway and Finland.

- Now once again the effort is being made to put pressure on Finland with possibly such a migrant weapon, Saari estimates.

Saari works as a research director at the Foreign Policy Institute. Yle interviewed her via video connection.
Translation of video interview with Sinikukka Saari:
Russia's actions normally aim for intimidation, and they think that the methods that work well inside Russia, would also get results with their neighbouring countries. Intimidation and sabotage are typical for Russia, but it has to be said that it hasn't always worked and Russia hasn't necessarily gotten any political advantages with this harassment, the result seems mostly to be the opposite, leading to Russia's neighbours preparing even better for these provocations. This feels more like political signaling rather than actual attempts to control political decision making in Finland.


The first bullying tactic: Asylum seekers across the border

Asylum seekers began to come from Russia to Norway and Finland more widely since the end of 2015.

- The question was about a fairly limited activity that only lasted for a few months, says Saari.

Since then, the same thing has been seen on the western borders of Belarus.

- However, Belarus has used the migrant weapon much more systematically in relation to Poland and Lithuania for many years, says Saari.

Saari reminds that Russia and Belarus are close allies and their security services cooperate a lot.

- At least ideas about the operation have been exchanged. It feels like 2015 was a test case that was developed mainly by Belarus, says Saari.

So far, however, there is no evidence of large-scale Russian activities to guide or allow migrants to enter Finland.

- We are talking about really small amounts, so there is really no reason to panic, says Saari.

Western countries have also had time to prepare for something similar. Last October, Norway tightened the entry conditions at the only border crossing between the two countries, in Storskog near Kirkkoniemi.

The second bullying tactic: Migrant workers become a tool for pressure

Russia has many migrant workers from the countries of Central Asia and the Caucasus. If necessary, it can use them to put pressure on neighboring countries.

In late 2006, Russia arrested thousands of Georgian migrant workers and deported more than 2,300 of them back to Georgia. The background was the tension between Russia and Georgia. Before the expulsions, Russia also imposed economic sanctions on Georgia.

According to a report by the human rights organization Human Rights Watch (HRW), many of the deportees had lived in Russia legally. Russia took those arrested to show trials that could only last a few minutes.

- They could even have a Russian passport, but still they were sent to their former homeland, says Saari.

According to Russia, it was about the fight against crime and illegal immigration. However, according to HRW, Russia specifically targeted Georgians.

Relations between the countries tightened even more. Russia and Georgia went to war in August 2008.

According to Saari, the same means of pressure is useful for Central Asian countries, because many workers have left for Russia from there.

- Russia can very creatively use different means or hint at their use, i.e. put pressure on, says Saari.

The third bullying tactic: Environmental destruction or a fake accident

Russia could also damage the neighboring country's infrastructure. Saari reminds that this is exactly what was suspected when the gas pipeline between Finland and Estonia was damaged by an anchor.

There could be other ways as well.

– Damage to the environment or sabotage disguised as an accident. In addition to border issues, Saari lists Russia's possibilities.

In practice, it could be, for example, an oil spill from a Russian tanker in the Baltic Sea.

According to Saari, it is typical of these hybrid means that it is difficult to prove the culprit. It may also remain unclear whether it was deliberate sabotage or an accident.

Whatever Russia's method, it is often about intimidation.

- However, Russia does not necessarily get political benefits from these actions, but on the contrary, these things are prepared for even more strictly, says Saari.

According to Saari, Finland should not panic, and not let Russian pressure influence its own decisions.

Set fucked around with this message at 18:24 on Nov 13, 2023

Nice piece of fish
Jan 29, 2008

Ultra Carp
Is the western industrial complex genuinely unwilling or unable to provide Ukraine with sufficient military means to make warfare to painful for the russians?

That seems very stupid and short-sighted.

I mean while russia is busy with Ukraine they aren't a threat to the rest of us, but that's going to change if they win. Russia has pulled the mask fully off, and I really don't think anything is off the table for Putin. He might want a chunk of any of our countries.

We literally have zero excuse for european military means other than to defend against russia, the only realistic threat. Might as well put it to work for its intended use, it's not as if NATO is losing soldiers.

And not ramping up production? I mean come the gently caress on, absent peace in europe we know from a lot of loving experience that no nation in europe is safe. Russia has broken the european peace that NATO and the UN and even the goddamned EU was supposed to help keep and we are really going to do the thumb twiddling thing again against a country with the gdp a fraction western europe? We are really going to do that?

Seems quite stupid.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.
The "western industrial complex" is happy to provide the aid, but building up capacity that had previously been left to wither away takes time.

You also need politicians willing to pay the industrial complex to make the goods that either get sent to Ukraine or get used to replace the older stuff sent to Ukraine. The profit needs to be there for the military industrial complex to come alive. As you can see from some of the people in Hungary and the US and various weird corners of the internet, that political will to use the money in that way can be inconsistent.

I've found that you really cannot underestimate the number of people all over the world who are happy to look the other way in the face of an injustice and pretend everything's okay.

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






In the case of Germany, Industry is unwilling to make the necessary investments without guaranteed orders and investment from the German government and they have been unable to get that going due to something very similar to the US debt ceiling/government budget shenanigans.

bad_fmr
Nov 28, 2007

Nice piece of fish posted:

That seems very stupid and short-sighted.
...
Seems quite stupid.

Yeah, well that is the neoliberal system rot and EU dysfunction in general for you.

Ronwayne
Nov 20, 2007

That warm and fuzzy feeling.

Tai posted:

lmao wtf is Russia doing. The last few weeks have been complete car crash of failed assaults after failed assaults and repeating the same strategy hoping it works this time. So many dead and so much lost equipment. Maybe Ukraine could actually win a war of attrition if this keeps going on.

10-1 russian dead per ukr dead still favors russia, and probably even higher. Relentlessly keeping up assaults means they stop ukranian momentum, and the longer they prolong the slaughter, the longer they give TLIMP and other right wing shitheads time to get elected and torpedo all support. We rightfully point out the weaknesses of dictatorships in engaging in war, but liberal democracies have some weaknesses compared to one dictator who is able to avoid getting couped and keep focus while the leadership of opposing democracies is churned and changed by multiple election cycles. Especially when a lot of said democracies really want to get back to doing business with said dictator.

Nice piece of fish posted:

Is the western industrial complex genuinely unwilling or unable to provide Ukraine with sufficient military means to make warfare to painful for the russians?

That seems very stupid and short-sighted.

I mean while russia is busy with Ukraine they aren't a threat to the rest of us, but that's going to change if they win. Russia has pulled the mask fully off, and I really don't think anything is off the table for Putin. He might want a chunk of any of our countries.

We literally have zero excuse for european military means other than to defend against russia, the only realistic threat. Might as well put it to work for its intended use, it's not as if NATO is losing soldiers.

And not ramping up production? I mean come the gently caress on, absent peace in europe we know from a lot of loving experience that no nation in europe is safe. Russia has broken the european peace that NATO and the UN and even the goddamned EU was supposed to help keep and we are really going to do the thumb twiddling thing again against a country with the gdp a fraction western europe? We are really going to do that?

Seems quite stupid.

The 'cynical' point of view at the start was that NATO was going to dripfeed juuuust enough kit to keep the fight going for as long as possible to bleed russia as much as possible, even if it means an eventual pyrrhic victory for russia.

I think we're undercounting that being able to sustain human meat walls supported by affordable drones might actually eventually be a hard counter to undersupported western kit.

Ronwayne fucked around with this message at 19:33 on Nov 13, 2023

The_Franz
Aug 8, 2003

Ronwayne posted:

10-1 russian dead per ukr dead still favors russia, and probably even higher. Relentlessly keeping up assaults means they stop ukranian momentum, and the longer they prolong the slaughter, the longer they give TLIMP and other right wing shitheads time to get elected and torpedo all support. We rightfully point out the weaknesses of dictatorships in engaging in war, but liberal democracies have some weaknesses compared to one dictator who is able to avoid getting couped and keep focus while the leadership of opposing democracies is churned and changed by multiple election cycles. Especially when a lot of said democracies really want to get back to doing business with said dictator.

The 'cynical' point of view at the start was that NATO was going to dripfeed juuuust enough kit to keep the fight going for as long as possible to bleed russia as much as possible, even if it means an eventual pyrrhic victory for russia.

I think we're undercounting that being able to sustain human meat walls supported by affordable drones might actually eventually be a hard counter to undersupported western kit.

While Russia does have a larger pool to draw from, they do not have the ability to sustain 10-1 losses over the long term, especially when thousands of lives are wasted trying to advance a few meters with the goal of capturing a literal pile of slag.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

[quote="Eric Cantonese" post="535912587"

I've found that you really cannot underestimate the number of people all over the world who are happy to look the other way in the face of an injustice and pretend everything's okay.
[/quote]

Or who justify whatever they're seeing to avoid having to feel bad about it.

Victim blaming is the most powerful force in the universe

Ronwayne
Nov 20, 2007

That warm and fuzzy feeling.

The_Franz posted:

While Russia does have a larger pool to draw from, they do not have the ability to sustain 10-1 losses over the long term, especially when thousands of lives are wasted trying to advance a few meters with the goal of capturing a literal pile of slag.

I dunno, I worry that they might. One of the things that's actually been developed and improved upon by russia is its internal conscription system. Even if the ukranian soldiers aren't being killed they are being traumatized just by having to endure relentless assault and a morale collapse of either the ukr military and/or civilians due to the trauma the war is causing might occur before the russian government runs out of bodies to throw on trains.

Putin is/already turned this conflict into who can endure human misery at a widespread societal level the longest, and in that respect, russia has a huge advantage.

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Ronwayne posted:

I dunno, I worry that they might. One of the things that's actually been developed and improved upon by russia is its internal conscription system. Even if the ukranian soldiers aren't being killed they are being traumatized just by having to endure relentless assault and a morale collapse of either the ukr military and/or civilians due to the trauma the war is causing might occur before the russian government runs out of bodies to throw on trains.

Putin is/already turned this conflict into who can endure human misery at a widespread societal level the longest, and in that respect, russia has a huge advantage.

They are already running out of effective bodies and the human waves haven't paid off.

spankmeister
Jun 15, 2008






Reporting from Ukraine said that they amassed 40k troops in Donetsk for the attack and with the current rate they can keep it up for three more months.

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
Russia can likely sustain 10:1 losses for longer than you think. But having your vehicles getting dunked on the rate that has been happening is a problem though. All of their stuff fancy stuff in tanks for example is imported. They need to learn to build that internally and coupled with a brain drain could be problematic.

Ronwayne
Nov 20, 2007

That warm and fuzzy feeling.

CommieGIR posted:

They are already running out of effective bodies and the human waves haven't paid off.

trust me, i really really hope I'm wrong and there's some kind of *crack ping* in the russian war effort very soon.

Tai posted:

Russia can likely sustain 10:1 losses for longer than you think. But having your vehicles getting dunked on the rate that has been happening is a problem though. All of their stuff fancy stuff in tanks for example is imported. They need to learn to build that internally and coupled with a brain drain could be problematic.

I think they're starting to simply adapt to the fact they will not be able to replace it and have to use what they can replace: i.e. bodies+swarms of drones. Fought with sticks and stones on the offensive. No matter how many russians its killed, a piece of western kit that breaks due to lack of replacement parts that have stopped coming is as killed as if it were blown up by a high tech missile.

Ronwayne fucked around with this message at 20:04 on Nov 13, 2023

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Thing is the decisions aren't being made with any sincere attempt to pick what's best even for an imperial expansionist Russian state.

The oligarch class doesn't need a population that can sustain a tax base or operate public services except as a sort of executive toy. They don't need a national economy because they have armed guards, cobalt mines, and can buy their lifestyles from the UAE.

Coolguye
Jul 6, 2011

Required by his programming!
i don't really feel like the numbers i posted a few months back in terms of manpower capacity for russia have changed that much. they're fine for now still but if they start getting to 600-700k liquidations (dead + permanently injured), it's gonna start showing because that will be 1 in every 20 men of fighting age dead. knocking out 5% of a population has measurable effects on the top level, and "fighting age" in this case was basically 21-38, so the measurable effects will be pretty obvious. in any population, if you're doing it right (and Russia has been pretty diligent about doing this particular horrible thing right), you can disappear 3-4% of the group and mostly take away people that society won't miss much that much. convicts, lower-class people on the edge of being homeless, actual drifters, failsons, and other people that society has failed in various ways. if anyone at all notices they're gone, you give them the fish brick and it'll mostly shut them up.

much more than that and you start really moving the needle on labor forces and the services those workers would otherwise staff. not at all to the "omg, critical labor shortage" stage, but that's when labor-hungry industries start having difficulty finding workers, truly productive men with otherwise well cared for families start vanishing, and businesses start saying "we're not doing x any more due to lack of staff". some restaurants might start closing a day or two a week as a result. that's still a tipping point because that's when the war effort starts hitting the average muskovite in an undeniable, if very minor, way. right now there's still a lot of internal messaging of russia strong, ukraine doomed to defeat, we ride to victory. individuals may (and probably do) doubt that, but there's no material impact to the contrary. if your favorite tea shop starts closing on tuesdays because half of the shift got drafted, that's material impact to the contrary.

i don't know where they're at currently but when we spoke about it last, napkin math estimated like 150-200k to go before they started broaching this barrier, with the asterisk that we don't have any idea how many fighting-age russians up and fled the country when the drafts started. in that vein i can believe 40k manpower per month for 3 months before it starts becoming unsustainable. it may be 4-5, honestly. i'd have to go back and check my other posts from when i wasn't just slapping off some musings over lunch, though.

Ronwayne
Nov 20, 2007

That warm and fuzzy feeling.

Coolguye posted:

i don't really feel like the numbers i posted a few months back in terms of manpower capacity for russia have changed that much. they're fine for now still but if they start getting to 600-700k liquidations (dead + permanently injured), it's gonna start showing because that will be 1 in every 20 men of fighting age dead. knocking out 5% of a population has measurable effects on the top level, and "fighting age" in this case was basically 21-38, so the measurable effects will be pretty obvious. in any population, if you're doing it right (and Russia has been pretty diligent about doing this particular horrible thing right), you can disappear 3-4% of the group and mostly take away people that society won't miss much that much. convicts, lower-class people on the edge of being homeless, actual drifters, failsons, and other people that society has failed in various ways. if anyone at all notices they're gone, you give them the fish brick and it'll mostly shut them up.

much more than that and you start really moving the needle on labor forces and the services those workers would otherwise staff. not at all to the "omg, critical labor shortage" stage, but that's when labor-hungry industries start having difficulty finding workers, truly productive men with otherwise well cared for families start vanishing, and businesses start saying "we're not doing x any more due to lack of staff". some restaurants might start closing a day or two a week as a result. that's still a tipping point because that's when the war effort starts hitting the average muskovite in an undeniable, if very minor, way. right now there's still a lot of internal messaging of russia strong, ukraine doomed to defeat, we ride to victory. individuals may (and probably do) doubt that, but there's no material impact to the contrary. if your favorite tea shop starts closing on tuesdays because half of the shift got drafted, that's material impact to the contrary.

i don't know where they're at currently but when we spoke about it last, napkin math estimated like 150-200k to go before they started broaching this barrier, with the asterisk that we don't have any idea how many fighting-age russians up and fled the country when the drafts started. in that vein i can believe 40k manpower per month for 3 months before it starts becoming unsustainable. it may be 4-5, honestly. i'd have to go back and check my other posts from when i wasn't just slapping off some musings over lunch, though.

How much can you mitigate by expanding "fighting age" and grabbing older men? Not just a few afganistan war vets here but a concerted effort at throwing 40+ year old men at the front? Especially those with no family or other connections that make them 'worth something' from a spreadsheet perspective. Or I guess the extra spicy option of just starting to mass conscript women undesirables for offensive front line combat troops, which I don't think any nation has done so far?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
When/if Putin starts yoinking 20's men off the street in Moscow/St Peter is going to be wild to see what happens then.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply