|
https://twitter.com/DCIPalestine/status/1736764560776867896?t=GFD0DwSTWth7qpXXSx1R-g&s=19 gently caress, dti
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 06:15 |
|
|
Hamas tunnel systems George: I have a confession! I cheated, Jerry! Jerry: What!? George: In the genocide contest! Jerry: Why? George: Because I'm a cheater! Hamas guard: Please be quiet. Jerry, grumbling: Master of my domain, right.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:14
|
|
|
gdi
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:15
|
|
|
SniperWoreConverse posted:Hamas tunnel systems
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:16
|
|
|
Cpt_Obvious posted:How the gently caress do you get rid of all your supply ships!? Is there any precedent for this? the tenders didn't have the ability to reload the VLS cells at sea anyway https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2023/03/28/us-navy-prioritizes-game-changing-rearming-capability-for-ships/
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:21
|
|
|
It's pretty clear at this point the Israeli KIA count is only applicable to deaths undeniably caught on camera or high ranking. Otherwise how would one grizzled old nazi's immediate relatives be 2% of casualties
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:21
|
|
|
SniperWoreConverse posted:Hamas tunnel systems Where is the smarxist edit of "it's the third infantada Jerry"
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:24
|
|
|
Cpt_Obvious posted:How the gently caress do you get rid of all your supply ships!? Is there any precedent for this? I think we're just mostly past the age of ship combat so it doesn't make that much sense to put a thousand people on a supply ship to prolong theoretical naval battles that aren't likely to occur
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:24
|
|
|
Engorged Pedipalps posted:I think we're just mostly past the age of ship combat so it doesn't make that much sense to put a thousand people on a supply ship to prolong theoretical naval battles that aren't likely to occur - Every MIC theorist since 1991
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:26
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:- Every MIC theorist since 1991  How many naval battles have we had since 1991 across all navies worldwide? Of that vanishingly small number what percentage of them were between peer combatants? They're not wrong I'm sure this vessel made a lot of sense in it's day and could expand the combat capacity of our navy I just don't see the point
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:28
|
|
|
Cpt_Obvious posted:How the gently caress do you get rid of all your supply ships!? Is there any precedent for this? just in time warfare
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:28
|
|
|
Capital recognizes that the military is not productive labour and so tries to get rid of it, while also requiring empire to maintain exploitation. It works as long as the natives don't get restless.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:28
|
|
|
text editor posted:Posted the article but not the title - shameful lmao what
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:32
|
|
|
Spaced God posted:Where is the smarxist edit of "it's the third infantada Jerry" 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:38
|
|
|
 (oldie but a goody)
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:41
|
|
|
Engorged Pedipalps posted:I think we're just mostly past the age of ship combat so it doesn't make that much sense to put a thousand people on a supply ship to prolong theoretical naval battles that aren't likely to occur I mean, then why even park those carriers off the coast in the first place?? What if someone actually calls your bluff? What then???
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:41
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:47
|
|
|
Youd think as a self professed 'philosemite' shed embrace a name that was approved by a jewish guy 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:48
|
|
|
Griz posted:the tenders didn't have the ability to reload the VLS cells at sea anyway Don't you still want some sort of supply ship that follows behind with fuel and weaponry and food?
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:54
|
|
|
Clip-On Fedora posted:I mean, then why even park those carriers off the coast in the first place?? What if someone actually calls your bluff? What then??? This is a bad example because carriers can literally just have a supply plane land on the deck The supply ship is needed for destroyers, which haven't served in their intended battlefield role in about eighty years. Also, notably, between the point we last actually needed these things (1948) and today, we built virtually every type of aerial supply vehicle we use today
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:55
|
|
|
Engorged Pedipalps posted:
This is the fundamental flaw with the logic. Military spending on warships is inherently wasteful because a military is not a business. Full stop. The entire purpose of a warship - since the time when they accounted for 40% of the total state budget - is that you incur huge costs in labour, materials, maintenance for something that hopefully never sees use. You don't want your warships to fire their guns in anger. You want, ideally, for their entire 20-30 year careers to be spent "wasted" because your country is at peace. That's always been understood. It doesn't matter how many battles have taken place in whatever interval - because remember it was 100 years between Trafalgar and Jutland too - because you need to have the capacity to fight and win that battle, including resupplying a fleet at sea, before it ever happens. This is very, very hard for people in contemporary society to understand, but this is the logic of all military capacity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:55
|
|
|
Cpt_Obvious posted:Don't you still want some sort of supply ship that follows behind with fuel and weaponry and food? The ship's never going to be more than a day or two's voyage from a friendly port, why bother! 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:55
|
|
|
Cpt_Obvious posted:Don't you still want some sort of supply ship that follows behind with fuel and weaponry and food? They call it an aircraft carrier
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:55
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:This is the fundamental flaw with the logic. It's been eighty years and the invention of cruise missiles since the last time a destroyer fought another ship in serious combat and one of the few recentish examples I can find of their use is them getting sunk by missiles in the Falklands I'm not saying ships don't need to exist, I'm just saying they don't need to be resupplied at sea anymore because most of them aren't even firing their guns We don't actually need to spend a trillion dollars on useless boondoggle weapons every year
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 20:58
|
|
|
Frosted Flake posted:This is the fundamental flaw with the logic. I think the unspoken logic is that if someone is both capable and willing to sink a us carrier then the nukes are going to be launched, so the supply ships would be useless anyway. This thinking is of course rapidly becoming outdated now that any non state actor can slap poo poo on a drone swarm.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:02
|
|
|
Ramrod Hotshot posted:Dir: Armando Iannucci 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:08
|
|
|
What a loving crybaby lol https://twitter.com/ytirawi/status/1736734700603916384?t=AchzwRvV072oJp5IMGpSuA&s=19 Go back to New York rear end in a top hat
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:16
|
|
|
Sancho Banana posted:What a loving crybaby lol all these guys end up ganked why do they keep recording these videos of trashing people's stuff
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:17
|
|
|
Sancho Banana posted:What a loving crybaby lol Dude is desperate to show up on telegram
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:21
|
|
|
Arc Hammer posted:https://twitter.com/DCIPalestine/status/1736764560776867896?t=GFD0DwSTWth7qpXXSx1R-g&s=19 holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:22
|
|
|
Sancho Banana posted:What a loving crybaby lol Going to be a former new Yorker soon
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:30
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Goodbye Jerry "Jerry! Jerry, the Iron Dome is down!! We gotta get out of here!" "Down? What do you mean down?" "Down, Jerry! Oh god, my mother told me not to come here with you! The first time I don't listen to her!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:30
|
|
|
OctaMurk posted:just in time warfare This Justin Time guy has a lot to answer for
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:31
|
|
|
Arc Hammer posted:https://twitter.com/DCIPalestine/status/1736764560776867896?t=GFD0DwSTWth7qpXXSx1R-g&s=19 i sure am glad joseph r biden decided to send israel an additional 45,000 tank shells to secure peace and freedom
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:32
|
|
|
Sancho Banana posted:What a loving crybaby lol imo its fine to dedicate the book to martyrs but lmao people in the replies pointing out that the page that the dedication is written on has weird folds that dont show up on the page before or after it. fold that you would expect from a piece of paper folded so you could fit it in your pocket Ringo Roadagain has issued a correction as of 21:40 on Dec 18, 2023 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:37
|
|
|
noy leyb... star wars rear end name
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:40
|
|
|
Engorged Pedipalps posted:This is a bad example because carriers can literally just have a supply plane land on the deck The intended role of destroyers is to protect other larger ships. That was originally from torpedo boats, by WW2 it was from primarily submarines and aircraft. Nowadays it's mostly against missiles and drones. We have seen in this very conflict American destroyers doing this, shooting down attacks on commercial shipping. As to resupplying via plane, using a fully loaded C-130 (largest plane to land on a carrier, don't know if it can do so fully loaded), you get about 4% of the (admittedly over the top) max bomb load for the F/A-18s on board. Do you think it is practical to do 25 supply landings per bombing run? Ships are an infinitely more practical way of resupply. Engorged Pedipalps posted:
This is mostly a function of nuclear weapons and MAD, but the lack of direct naval conflict between ships operated by peer great powers doesn't mean ships haven't been fighting. The destroyer as a class is kind of merging into cruisers because both just want a shitload of missiles on board. Attacking targets on land still requires resupply. As does operating air defence. Engorged Pedipalps posted:That's like a fifth of the entire system lmao I presume they mean 2 launchers, which is at least 5% of the system, per the military balance.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 8, 2024 06:15 |
|
|
It's going to be the Aluminium Sieve soon
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2023 21:43
|
|