Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Meow Tse-tung
Oct 11, 2004

No one cat should have all that power
Why do they push so hard to get married. Is the idea that enlisted will get into less trouble or something?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sullat
Jan 9, 2012

Meow Tse-tung posted:

Why do they push so hard to get married. Is the idea that enlisted will get into less trouble or something?

Military is thinking ahead to the recruitment goals for 19 years down the line

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Meow Tse-tung posted:

Why do they push so hard to get married. Is the idea that enlisted will get into less trouble or something?

I have a few books on this, but the short answer is that soldiers were famous for whoring and a terror to the wives and daughters of garrison towns, so the Victorians started pushing for army reforms so enlisted soldiers could marry. It was part of the same program of moral reform that brought team sports, libraries and canteens that served tea and coffee to military life.

Marriage and the British Army in the Long Eighteenth Century: 'The Girl I Left Behind Me'

The Girl I Left Behind Me addresses a neglected aspect of the history of the Hanoverian army. From 1685 to the beginning of the Victorian era, army administration attempted to discourage marriage among men in almost all ranks. It fostered a misogynist culture of the bachelor soldier who trifled with feminine hearts and avoided responsibility and commitment. The army's policy was unsuccessful in preventing military marriage. By concentrating on the many soldiers' wives who were unable to win permission to live "on the strength" of the regiment (entitled to half-rations) and travel with their husbands, this title explores the phenomenon of soldiers who persisted in defying the army's anti-marriage initiatives.

Using evidence gathered from ballads, novels, court and parish records, letters, memoirs, and War Office papers, Jennine Hurl-Eamon shows that both soldiers and their wives exerted continual pressure on the state through evocative appeals to officers and civilians, fuelled by wives' pride in performing their own military "duty" at home. Respectable, companionate couples of all ranks reflect a subculture within the army that recognized the value in Enlightenment femininity. Looking at military marriages within the telescoping contexts of the state, their regimental and civilian communities, and the couples themselves, The Girl I Left Behind Me reveals the range of masculinities beneath the uniform, the positive influence of wives and sweethearts on soldiers' performance of their duties, and the surprising resilience of partnerships severed by war and army anti-marriage policies.

e: and from one of my favourite books on homosex, Martial masculinities: Experiencing and imagining the military in the long nineteenth century

Ch 3: Recalling the comforts of home: bachelor soldiers’ narratives of nostalgia and the re-creation of the domestic interior

The domestic conditions that British bachelor soldiers encountered during the Napoleonic Wars presented at times a fragmentary and nomadic experience, creating something of a ‘frontier of domesticity’. Whilst on campaign, a combination of physical and emotional comforts were provided by soldiers’ access to some semblance of shelter and domestic material goods, but such provisions often varied according to availability and social status. Billeting was a common practice in the towns and villages that the military passed through, with the quality of accommodation regularly determined by rank - which found commanding officers often quartered in the best house in the street. Army life could potentially disrupt traditional understandings of masculine ideals and provided an environment within which bachelors could invert conventional models of eighteenth-century masculinity: models that located domesticity firmly within the confines of marriage. The predominance of studies exploring normative masculinity has meant that men in their bachelorhood (in the military and civilian spheres) are frequently separated not only from histories of the home, but also from histories of the family and of the emotions. As this chapter will demonstrate, however, despite often inhospitable environments and lack of suitable housing, bachelor soldiers’ life-writings show that they sought to remodel or classify the novel space of their temporary quarters in ways that achieved a sense of comfort from familiar domestic material objects and the rituals they associated with home.

Frosted Flake has issued a correction as of 02:13 on Jan 6, 2024

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy
It's simple. We (the royal we) want you (the scummy enlisted peasantry) to engage in death defying fast life strategies on the battlefield yet engage in slow life family focused lifestyle off the battlefield or whenever not on duty. Because we can't abide warrior types in civilised society with afternoon tea and cupcakes.

Incompatible goals? Sorry I don't understand.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

DancingShade posted:

It's simple. We (the royal we) want you (the scummy enlisted peasantry) to engage in death defying fast life strategies on the battlefield yet engage in slow life family focused lifestyle off the battlefield or whenever not on duty. Because we can't abide warrior types in civilised society with afternoon tea and cupcakes.

Incompatible goals? Sorry I don't understand.

Yes, but in several monographs and detailing how that same ruling class liked hiring out handsome soldiers as prostitutes.

Pretty much every European country grappled with this in the 19th century. Some of them, like Prussia, just brutalized the gently caress out of their enlisted soldiers, and others, like France, made sure military bases were as far from decent society as possible.

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




they should have just had enlisted wives for support roles

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Real hurthling! posted:

they should have just had enlisted wives for support roles

Spluttered foppish gasp: A woman? In UNIFORM?!?

Just wait until my father Baron Duke Von Wibbleflop hears about this!

Tankbuster
Oct 1, 2021

Frosted Flake posted:

Do American scouts not learn about the Battle of Mafeking and do the activities about it? I remember we made Zulu cowhide shields out of cardboard and then learned about the veldt for an orienteering activity. We learned about telegraph lines and semaphore, that’s where you get the badge for Morse Code.

Then we learned about Kitchener, Gordon, obviously Baden-Powell and Mahon, Louis Botha, Jan Smuts and Christiaan de Wet.

The Boer War was a big part of Scouts and Venturers.

we didn't learn that when I was a scout either. We did do a lot of drills and did a pretty good march-past by the time we were done.

ModernMajorGeneral
Jun 25, 2010
Government considers poaching defence talent from overseas in major shift

quote:

Foreign citizens could be allowed to serve in the Australian military under options being explored by the federal government as it seeks to fix a recruitment and retention crisis.

The government has set an ambitious goal of adding 18,500 uniformed personnel by 2040, a 30 per cent increase on the current level of about 60,000, but the Defence Force is struggling to maintain its current staffing numbers.

Longstanding defence policy states that only Australian citizens can serve in the military, with exemptions granted only in “very rare and exceptional circumstances”.

Defence Personnel Minister Matt Keogh said on Friday that “we are certainly looking at all options that we need to look at in terms of how we can grow our Defence Force and that includes looking at how we might be able to grow it from friendly forces”.

Keogh, who is serving as acting defence minister, told ABC radio the government was looking at “opportunities for people to come to Australia, or who are already in Australia, from other countries to join our Defence Force”.

Asked which foreign nationals could be allowed to serve in the Australian military, Keogh said the government was “looking at the Pacific, but we’re also looking more broadly than that because we recognise the importance of growing our Defence Force”.

The idea is a sensitive one, with some senior military figures opposed to foreigners serving in the Defence Force because they believe there should be a direct link between citizenship and military service.

This masthead reported last year that the federal opposition and leading military experts were calling on the Albanese government to consider allowing foreigners to fight under the Australian flag to boost the number of uniformed personnel.

Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said at the time that “with immigration about to increase, we should consider opening service in the ADF as an accelerated pathway to citizenship”.

“If someone is willing to fight and die for our country, we should take them over a $5 million golden visa any day of the week,” he said.


Other nations allow non-citizens to serve in their militaries, most famously the French Foreign Legion and the British Army’s brigade of Nepalese Gurkhas.

Defence experts have said a shortage of navy personnel is probably one of the reasons why Australia last month declined to send a warship to join an international coalition protecting shipping routes through the Red Sea.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did not go into detail on Friday when asked about the proposal to allow foreign fighters, but said the government was seeking to boost interoperability with other nations such as New Zealand.

Retired major-general Mick Ryan said the government should consider creating a Pacific Islands regiment and allowing non-citizens from friendly nations to serve in the Defence Force.

“Why shouldn’t a Japanese citizen be able to join the Australian military if they want to make a contribution to the nation?” Ryan asked.

Peter Jennings, a former deputy secretary for strategy in the Defence Department, said the ADF faced a massive problem with recruitment and bold solutions were needed.

“Just doing another advertising campaign during the cricket is not going to cut it,” he said.

Keogh said there would be complexities involved in implementing the proposal, and any non-citizens would need to be subject to careful security vetting and consultation with other nations.

With the need for skilled workers widely acknowledged as a significant challenge for the AUKUS security pact, the Royal Australian Navy has launched a major recruitment drive to find hundreds of personnel to support the shift to nuclear-powered submarines and make more staff available to train with the United States and Britain.

what stage of neoliberal rot are we at when our proud tradition of exploiting desperate Pacific Islander migrant labour is being extended to the military

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

sounds more like australia's going to become very political and very ukrainian in the near future imo

galagazombie
Oct 31, 2011

A silly little mouse!
Lol. Does service guarantee citizenship? Even the US knows you have to dangle that carrot (even if there are sometimes *ahem* “complications to your application process”).

Complications
Jun 19, 2014

galagazombie posted:

Lol. Does service guarantee citizenship? Even the US knows you have to dangle that carrot (even if there are sometimes *ahem* “complications to your application process”).

No, it doesn't. Not that citizenship guarantees anything, either, but guarantees from the government to peasants are communism and we don't do that here.

Ardent Communist
Oct 17, 2010

ALLAH! MU'AMMAR! LIBYA WA BAS!

ModernMajorGeneral posted:

Government considers poaching defence talent from overseas in major shift

what stage of neoliberal rot are we at when our proud tradition of exploiting desperate Pacific Islander migrant labour is being extended to the military

actually this might just be the sign of an empire in decline, especially on the frontiers. after all, rome started hiring foreign mercenaries to protect their borders from their countrymen......i forget, how'd that all end?

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

galagazombie posted:

Lol. Does service guarantee citizenship?

It guarantees you some amount of pay and the opportunity to get completely hosed over. Anything else is just marketing.

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Ardent Communist posted:

actually this might just be the sign of an empire in decline, especially on the frontiers. after all, rome started hiring foreign mercenaries to protect their borders from their countrymen......i forget, how'd that all end?

It worked out pretty well really. Perhaps slightly less well if you were Roman.

After all not everyone can be a winner at the same time.

Danann
Aug 4, 2013

https://twitter.com/C3_AI/status/1742682253988085853

it's time for start up pentagon

DancingShade
Jul 26, 2007

by Fluffdaddy

Instead of using kickstarter to crowd fund video game scams run by con artists and adult aged children we should be using it to crowd fund military themed scams run by con artists and adult aged children.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

Danann posted:

sounds more like australia's going to become very political and very ukrainian in the near future imo

lollin at Ukrostrailia

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Frosted Flake posted:

Yes, but not with your wife.



The revolting part about all the homosex in the British army is that they’re British. Have some loving standards smdh

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

Complications posted:

No, it doesn't. Not that citizenship guarantees anything, either, but guarantees from the government to peasants are communism and we don't do that here.

So it's just straight up foreign legions. Wait, do French foreign legion or British Gurkhas brigades give out citizenships?

DickParasite
Dec 2, 2004


Slippery Tilde

stephenthinkpad posted:

So it's just straight up foreign legions. Wait, do French foreign legion or British Gurkhas brigades give out citizenships?

The FFL does after five years or if you're wounded in battle.

fits my needs
Jan 1, 2011

Grimey Drawer
https://x.com/starsandstripes/status/1743558019357810842?s=20

https://x.com/starsandstripes/status/1743512721751175352?s=20

OhFunny
Jun 26, 2013

EXTREMELY PISSED AT THE DNC

stephenthinkpad posted:

So it's just straight up foreign legions. Wait, do French foreign legion or British Gurkhas brigades give out citizenships?

Gurkhas can apply for citizenship after applying for settlement after they are discharged. They were first allowed to do so in 2004, but only for those discharged after 1997. That got expanded to everyone in 2009.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

The FFL famously gives you a new name, and later citizenship. It’s why it’s been cyclically full of Spanish Republicans/German Jews and Communists/the opposite of German Jews and Communists/ ??? (mid Cold War) ???/Yugoslavians/Africans.

JAY ZERO SUM GAME
Oct 18, 2005

Walter.
I know you know how to do this.
Get up.


dunno if this is biosphere or economics or wwIII losing

i heard an energy researcher claim that the US's goal is to attract all of Europe's industry/production, as Europe no longer has access to cheap energy, but they would have access to it in the US. So, come on over! We continue to roll back environmental and labor protections, so i guess i could see it. just never heard anyone else talk about it.

idk

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:

dunno if this is biosphere or economics or wwIII losing

i heard an energy researcher claim that the US's goal is to attract all of Europe's industry/production, as Europe no longer has access to cheap energy, but they would have access to it in the US. So, come on over! We continue to roll back environmental and labor protections, so i guess i could see it. just never heard anyone else talk about it.

idk

We've been talking about it since Ukraine started.

JAY ZERO SUM GAME
Oct 18, 2005

Walter.
I know you know how to do this.
Get up.


i guess. i've heard plenty of "the us is securing a market for its natural gas," and less "The US wants europe to wholesale move its manufacturing to the US"

maybe i missed that, i don't read that thread super closely

Sancho Banana
Aug 4, 2023

Not to be confused with meat.

JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:

dunno if this is biosphere or economics or wwIII losing

i heard an energy researcher claim that the US's goal is to attract all of Europe's industry/production, as Europe no longer has access to cheap energy, but they would have access to it in the US. So, come on over! We continue to roll back environmental and labor protections, so i guess i could see it. just never heard anyone else talk about it.

idk

It's been discussed extensively - one thing NATO seems to be doing with Ukraine is achieving a more fully financialized, deindustrialized Europe for the sake of American interests. They gotta compete with Russia and China somehow, and the US since the 70s certainly hasn't had its own domestic industrial capacity capable of doing that.

Real hurthling!
Sep 11, 2001




load every germany factory onto a boat and sink it on the way over oopsie sorry hans, would you like a couple million f150s?

Rodney The Yam II
Mar 3, 2007




Wish dot com socialism with Chinese characteristics

Taking the industrial base from your vassals to lift the bougeois out of uh poverty

JAY ZERO SUM GAME
Oct 18, 2005

Walter.
I know you know how to do this.
Get up.


guess i'll have to pay more attention. it seems like quite the explainer for so much of american activity. also seems impossible that america has enough leadership to accomplish a long term project like that.

anyone have a particular article/etc. expanding on this?

Zodium
Jun 19, 2004

Sancho Banana posted:

It's been discussed extensively - one thing NATO seems to be doing with Ukraine is achieving a more fully financialized, deindustrialized Europe for the sake of American interests. They gotta compete with Russia and China somehow, and the US since the 70s certainly hasn't had its own domestic industrial capacity capable of doing that.

they aren't trying to compete with so much as disconnect from russia and china. in the face of collapsing control across the periphery, the core economies are reorganizing themselves to a state of relatively uniform and intensive level of exploitation of their local working classes. the american state is overly deindustrialized and focused on administration of the periphery for the empire's needs.

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020

JAY ZERO SUM GAME posted:

i guess. i've heard plenty of "the us is securing a market for its natural gas," and less "The US wants europe to wholesale move its manufacturing to the US"

maybe i missed that, i don't read that thread super closely

Pushing the European manufacturing move to the US follows the same logic of forcing Samsung and TSMC semiconductors fab move to the US. But the policy makers who thought up this bright idea will soon find out either the Samsung plant nor the TSMC plant is operational until they actually give out the subsidies they promised.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011



A friend in computer science who's been very interested in communism for a few months and asked for my help to learn had this absolute golden moment of insight after understanding cost-saving as capital efficiency (use less capital to extract more surplus value). He asked if military work could generate surplus value: outside of engineering battalions building stuff and other similar tasks, no, it does not. Military has a very high demand of value, however, and that can be of use for many economic activities, especially for a socialist country.

He then connected this value demand with neoliberalism and asked if cost-cutting could be used as a way to diverge direct investment (government -> military) into private investors, and yeah, totally. He immediately banged on: "holy poo poo mfers gotta be pitching machine learning for NATO right now" and started talking about how absolutely terrible of an idea that is going to be (from the perspective of a computer scientist). a lmao after another

stephenthinkpad
Jan 2, 2020
”Startup Pentagon" has a nice trashy airport triller ring to it.

Grilled Beef
Oct 27, 2023

dead gay comedy forums posted:

He asked if military work could generate surplus value: outside of engineering battalions building stuff and other similar tasks, no, it does not.

This seems inaccurate.

A military does not *directly* generate surplus value, true.

However, it is a powerful tool for expropriating surplus value from others. It is used for this far more than “protecting the nation” or whatever; there is a strong case that its primary use is as a coercive tool for seizing surplus value. Obviously in its most crude form of pillaging and looting (which, as we see in Palestine, is not as far into history as many would like to imagine). But also in capturing resources to be added to internal markets and labor enforcement. Yes it is the workers on the rubber plantations that were generating surplus value, but it was the military that made them convert crop land to rubber production and forced them to work at the plantations in the first place, who kept them from demanding the value of their labor, who enforced the ownership claims that directed the surplus value back to the core.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

It was also productive as the public health services, roads and railways, telegraph networks, and steel industries created to support militaries also created value or enabled value to be created.

The internet was originally a military project, for example. Commercial airlines first used surplus military aircraft, then were paid to design aircraft with dual use in mind, and the same went for the shipping companies.

I think the missing piece here is that these all required active states that were willing and able to “intervene” in “the economy”, a sphere of life they didn’t see as any different than the national interest and state building.

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


Grilled Beef posted:

This seems inaccurate.

A military does not *directly* generate surplus value, true.

I meant in the strict sense of Marx, as capital-generating labor (which is why I also emphasized the value demand, which is all economic activity that is charged by having a military, like ff posted)

And of course, yes, I agree with the point. Militaries allow for imperialism and that is very appreciable to the ruling class

Ted Wassanasong
Apr 8, 2020

Frosted Flake posted:

How frequently do Americans mustang enlisted men?

Depends on if enlisted dudes get a degree on their own time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Crazypoops
Jul 17, 2017



All of our nukes are emptied out and filled with old socks aren't they

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply