(Thread IKs:
bunnyofdoom)
|
infernal machines posted:The thing he posted here was not 15 big brained libertarian posts about the tyranny of government and the sanctity of personal choice But that's against the rules! I think!
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 00:11 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 06:44 |
|
To expand upon the issue with SSC's implementation, a personal anecdote from the base I worked on at the time. We had a telephony section to do installation, maintenance, and administration of all phones and switchboards on the base. When SSC took over, that section was shut down and replaced with civilians working directly under SSC. No problem with those guys, they were great. The problem was that SSC refused to give them anything to accomplish their tasks. No tools. No money to procure tools. No vehicle. Certainly no money to procure a vehicle. DND had to provide them with everything they needed to fulfill their mandate (which was beyond just the base), because an executive more than 1000km away was making a bonus by giving them nothing. Arivia posted:ZShakespeare can't probe over there. And frankly, asking the IK to keep out people we know are idiots from other threads has been something a lot of people who post in this thread want to happen in general, so I don't think ZShakespeare jumped the gun here. It was a good shoot, even if it didn't look like one immediately.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 00:13 |
|
Gainsboro posted:Just feels unsporting, to be honest. The rules also stipulate bringing up personal issues with the individual in question before contacting the mods about them, and that's (bafflingly) for cases of goddamn harassment. the only rules this thread follows are the charter
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 00:39 |
|
Bleck posted:But that's against the rules! I think! The days of LF are long past. Arivia posted:the only rules this thread follows are the charter Two years from now there's going to be a hell of a supreme court ruling on this!
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 01:23 |
|
Muscle Tracer posted:I for one am simply disgusted by the treatment of dissenting voices in this subforum. Is the freedom of speech not enshrined in our constitution??
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 01:45 |
|
Gainsboro posted:To expand upon the issue with SSC's implementation, a personal anecdote from the base I worked on at the time. We had a telephony section to do installation, maintenance, and administration of all phones and switchboards on the base. When SSC took over, that section was shut down and replaced with civilians working directly under SSC. No problem with those guys, they were great. The problem was that SSC refused to give them anything to accomplish their tasks. I think this is misrepresentating the issue a bit. There aren’t execs in the feds making 100k bonuses outside of maybe a handful of DMs, which are very senior bureaucrats & politically impacted appointments. The issue is that SSC was created with an intentional underfunding and has been on the back foot since then. The money didn’t get to service delivery because the money wasn’t there. That funding decision was political, not driven by the execs in the public service. That’s not to say there weren’t also real operational issues unrelated to funding. In particular culture in GC isn’t great around accountability and SSC is no different there.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 02:02 |
|
Jordan7hm posted:I think this is misrepresentating the issue a bit. There aren’t execs in the feds making 100k bonuses outside of maybe a handful of DMs, which are very senior bureaucrats & politically impacted appointments. The issue is that SSC was created with an intentional underfunding and has been on the back foot since then. The money didn’t get to service delivery because the money wasn’t there. That funding decision was political, not driven by the execs in the public service. Combined with broader figures like "Between 88 and 91 per cent of executives received bonuses between 2015 and 2022" and "of 2,393 fulfilled performance indicators, only 1,361 met established targets", and I feel the picture I've painted is fairly accurate. We have a problem with tying executive bonuses to nebulous standards that clearly don't involve succeeding at the tasks they're responsible for. Gainsboro fucked around with this message at 02:38 on Jan 25, 2024 |
# ? Jan 25, 2024 02:35 |
|
ZShakespeare posted:Y’all practically BEGGED me to get rid of the last one. I should let the next one go wild. For what it's worth I think we should wait and see how someone behaves in this thread before smacking them with the 6er. CSPAM is a weird and strange place, and the posting is different there. That said, an incredibly short leash, no benefit of the doubt approach with someone with lovely posting elsewhere is absolutely warranted.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:08 |
|
TrueChaos posted:For what it's worth I think we should wait and see how someone behaves in this thread before smacking them with the 6er. CSPAM is a weird and strange place, and the posting is different there. That said, an incredibly short leash, no benefit of the doubt approach with someone with lovely posting elsewhere is absolutely warranted.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:18 |
|
Gainsboro posted:I was posting under the assumption that nothing in CSPAM was taken seriously. I have since been disabused of this notion. Most of SA understands people post differently on different forums. I wouldn't worry about it
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:24 |
|
If someone gets banned for posting in CSPAM they should get to have their name added to the Victims of Communism memorial in Ottawa.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:33 |
|
am I not supposed to post here if I also post in CSPAM? I wonder which faction would be more upset by the crossover
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:35 |
|
Only cowards don't .
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:46 |
|
McGavin posted:If someone gets banned for posting in CSPAM they should get to have their name added to the Victims of Communism memorial in Ottawa. Brutal
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 03:47 |
|
I'm pretty sure this is what hell looks like https://x.com/ABDanielleSmith/status/1750314605316833396?s=20
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 04:32 |
|
It's like a Batman comic book cover. e: LMAO at Baron Black of Crossharbour's struggling jacket button.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 04:34 |
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:I'm pretty sure this is what hell looks like Who's the chap on the right what looks like he's melting? He's like the wax figure of Nigel Mansell in the last Grand Tour special toward the end. EDIT: Oh christ, that's Lord Fuckwit of Felony, then? I mean, say what you will about the class system, but it used to be that the venal inbred crooks wouldn't debase themselves by associating with anyone so terribly, terribly common. PT6A fucked around with this message at 04:39 on Jan 25, 2024 |
# ? Jan 25, 2024 04:35 |
|
PT6A posted:Who's the chap on the right what looks like he's melting? He's like the wax figure of Nigel Mansell in the last Grand Tour special toward the end. Conrad Black, who else?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 04:37 |
|
infernal machines posted:It's like a Batman comic book cover. gotham would have to get a lot fuckin darker for those four to make an appearance
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 04:37 |
|
flakeloaf posted:gotham would have to get a lot fuckin darker for those four to make an appearance Real four horsemen poo poo. PT6A posted:EDIT: Oh christ, that's Lord Fuckwit of Felony, then? I mean, say what you will about the class system, but it used to be that the venal inbred crooks wouldn't debase themselves by associating with anyone so terribly, terribly common. IDK, he probably doesn't have a whole lot of friends these days It's nice to get out once in a while, you know?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 04:55 |
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:I'm pretty sure this is what hell looks like Oh Tubby, it didn't have to go this way.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 08:57 |
|
Wistful of Dollars posted:I'm pretty sure this is what hell looks like Oof, those Muppets look terrible. Who decides this was a good look for a Muppet reboot? I'm sorry, those are actual people? But that's Kermit on the left, isn't it?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 15:25 |
|
So the National Post is alternative media now?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 17:14 |
|
Precambrian Video Games posted:So the National Post is alternative media now? Always has been.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 17:18 |
|
e: oopsie
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 17:34 |
|
Precambrian Video Games posted:So the National Post is alternative media now? It’s full of insufferable opinions and never makes a profit? Sounds like every alt-weekly I’ve ever read.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 18:34 |
|
sitchensis posted:It’s full of insufferable opinions and never makes a profit? Sounds like every alt-weekly I’ve ever read. Pretty sure no print media makes money these days. At least they don't have Shree Paradkar churning out race baiting columns every two weeks
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 18:51 |
|
e: completely misread something
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 20:15 |
|
Newspapers were never supposed to make money they're mouth pieces for the rich and have only failed because the rich have found its a lot easier to sway public opinion through other mediums. Journalists decrying the death of journalism never seemed to have figured this out though.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 20:25 |
|
https://twitter.com/Emmanuel_Rach/status/1750262470651134353 Cool! Cool cool cool! Baffling that Carlson is even allowed in the country.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 20:54 |
|
I hope that our next Prime Minister is fabulously gay and that Trump gets elected and they both have to attend state functions where they have to pretend to like each other and that CBC makes a sitcom about it.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 21:23 |
|
McGavin posted:I hope that our next Prime Minister is fabulously gay and that Trump gets elected and they both have to attend state functions where they have to pretend to like each other and that CBC makes a sitcom about it. Unfortunately I think we're just going to get Poilievre and North America is going to turn into a TTRPG from the early 90s...
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 21:26 |
|
When is our next federal election so I can cast my vote into the void and watch as our country decides that Milhouse is the best candidate because we're actually racist as gently caress and deserve nuclear annihilation. Wait, the Conservatives are still xenophobic nutjobs, right? I've lost track of how vile each right wing party is in Canada.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 21:42 |
|
Randalor posted:When is our next federal election so I can cast my vote into the void and watch as our country decides that Milhouse is the best candidate because we're actually racist as gently caress and deserve nuclear annihilation. Well Danielle Smith, the Premier of Alberta, was photographed with Tucker Carlson, a man who went on Fox News and said that the US should invade and annex Canada for.....reasons (socialism? The drugs? Having a Prime Minister that's too
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 22:09 |
|
Right, because the trust fund beneficiary who loves bowties is definitely in a position to look down on Trudeau for being overly effete or something.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2024 22:14 |
|
Justin to me seems a bit checked out the last year or so. And I would likely be the same having crisis after crisis rear its head.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2024 00:57 |
|
If I were Kathleen Wynne right now I would be calling him every 90 seconds pleading with him to resign and not taking gently caress off for an answer
|
# ? Jan 26, 2024 01:00 |
|
tagesschau posted:Right, because the trust fund beneficiary who loves bowties is definitely in a position to look down on Trudeau for being overly effete or something. it's always projection. Like, it's rich to me that the majority of conservatives that call men effeminate as an insult, are rarely examples of their ideal masculinity themselves.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2024 01:30 |
|
Stephen Harper was the only PM in the closet.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2024 04:55 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 06:44 |
|
PT6A posted:Who's the chap on the right what looks like he's melting? He's like the wax figure of Nigel Mansell in the last Grand Tour special toward the end. Cancon correction: He is Lord Fuckwith of Hybrid Summary/Indictable Offense
|
# ? Jan 26, 2024 05:04 |