Homeless Friend posted:

lol the url frame thinger is blocking the best part

Homeless Friend posted:

lol the url frame thinger is blocking the best part

Al! posted:

Weka posted:

Homeless Friend posted:

lol the url frame thinger is blocking the best part

Homeless Friend posted:

lol the url frame thinger is blocking the best part

Homeless Friend posted:

lol the url frame thinger is blocking the best part

The Voice of Labor posted:

one thing has been puzzling me. how did stalin remain so svelte after eating all that grain?

I've been eating a liitle more grain than I usually do and I'm getting really fat, even by american standards. I can't imagine how fat I'd be if I ate all the grain in the ukraine

Homeless Friend posted:

lol the url frame thinger is blocking the best part

The Voice of Labor posted:

one thing has been puzzling me. how did stalin remain so svelte after eating all that grain?

I've been eating a liitle more grain than I usually do and I'm getting really fat, even by american standards. I can't imagine how fat I'd be if I ate all the grain in the ukraine

hamas ftw posted:

I suspect I know more about the Shoah than most people, including you. Your casual use of 'Nazi collaborator', for example, is a based the fact he edited a paper that published articles approved by the Nazi administration. By that light, you could label anyone acting in any role that required them to co-operate with the Nazis as a 'collaborator'. All the way up to Adam Czerniakow.

The origins of the press has no bearing on the editor's beliefs unless you can show he was involved in obtaining it - so why mention it apart from trying to somehow tie his fate to the editors? Are you claiming that somehow Freeland's grandfather had anything to do with the seizure of the press and sending it's owner to a camp? Surely not. So why harp on it? It's irrelevant.

If you'd like to discuss the pathological anti-Semitism of 1930's Poland and Ukraine, that's a different subject for a different thread.

Likewise having an SS recruiting poster in your paper - anyone thinking that any editor would refuse that ad in wartime Krakow is crazy. People did far worse to stay alive and feed their families.

Again, enough with the raving about all this unsubstantiated or irrelevant (the press) statements. Agree that using her grandfather was questionable and she should probably stop doing it.

hamas ftw posted:

I suspect I know more about the Shoah than most people, including you. Your casual use of 'Nazi collaborator', for example, is a based the fact he edited a paper that published articles approved by the Nazi administration. By that light, you could label anyone acting in any role that required them to co-operate with the Nazis as a 'collaborator'. All the way up to Adam Czerniakow.

The origins of the press has no bearing on the editor's beliefs unless you can show he was involved in obtaining it - so why mention it apart from trying to somehow tie his fate to the editors? Are you claiming that somehow Freeland's grandfather had anything to do with the seizure of the press and sending it's owner to a camp? Surely not. So why harp on it? It's irrelevant.

If you'd like to discuss the pathological anti-Semitism of 1930's Poland and Ukraine, that's a different subject for a different thread.

Likewise having an SS recruiting poster in your paper - anyone thinking that any editor would refuse that ad in wartime Krakow is crazy. People did far worse to stay alive and feed their families.

Again, enough with the raving about all this unsubstantiated or irrelevant (the press) statements. Agree that using her grandfather was questionable and she should probably stop doing it.

hamas ftw posted:

I suspect I know more about the Holodomor than most people, including you. Your casual use of 'Soviet collaborator', for example, is a based the fact he edited a paper that published articles approved by the Soviet administration. By that light, you could label anyone acting in any role that required them to co-operate with the Soviets as a 'collaborator'. All the way up to Adolf Hitler.

The origins of the press has no bearing on the editor's beliefs unless you can show he was involved in obtaining it - so why mention it apart from trying to somehow tie his fate to the editors? Are you claiming that somehow Petrovsky's grandfather had anything to do with the seizure of the press and sending it's owner to a camp? Surely not. So why harp on it? It's irrelevant.

If you'd like to discuss the pathological anti-Capitalism of 1930's Russia and Ukraine, that's a different subject for a different thread.

Likewise having an KGB recruiting poster in your paper - anyone thinking that any editor would refuse that ad in wartime Kiev is crazy. People did far worse to stay alive and feed their families.

Again, enough with the raving about all this unsubstantiated or irrelevant (the press) statements. Agree that using her grandfather was questionable and she should probably stop doing it.

hamas ftw posted:

I suspect I know more about the Shoah than most people, including you. Your casual use of 'Nazi collaborator', for example, is a based the fact he edited a paper that published articles approved by the Nazi administration. By that light, you could label anyone acting in any role that required them to co-operate with the Nazis as a 'collaborator'. All the way up to Adam Czerniakow.

The origins of the press has no bearing on the editor's beliefs unless you can show he was involved in obtaining it - so why mention it apart from trying to somehow tie his fate to the editors? Are you claiming that somehow Freeland's grandfather had anything to do with the seizure of the press and sending it's owner to a camp? Surely not. So why harp on it? It's irrelevant.

If you'd like to discuss the pathological anti-Semitism of 1930's Poland and Ukraine, that's a different subject for a different thread.

Likewise having an SS recruiting poster in your paper - anyone thinking that any editor would refuse that ad in wartime Krakow is crazy. People did far worse to stay alive and feed their families.

Again, enough with the raving about all this unsubstantiated or irrelevant (the press) statements. Agree that using her grandfather was questionable and she should probably stop doing it.

Weka posted:

Ftfy

gradenko_2000 posted:

The palworldomor

hamas ftw posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted:

Punished Turtle posted: