(Thread IKs:
OwlFancier)
|
Tesseraction posted:The judge releases her ruling at 3 so I'm curious if it'll really take him an hour to read it. Maybe this painfully slow reading ability is the real reason he kept losing acting roles. To me, this screams of his lawyer going "I have prepared a script for what you should say when you lose this, in the vain hope that an apology outside of court might prevent future damages and stop you from doing a Trump."
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 14:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:43 |
|
|
Lozza Fox, red-eyed and railed up, standing in front of the court: "I only lost because the judge is a paedophile"
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 14:44
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:https://twitter.com/GBNewsSpin/status/1751333623607750893 Usual bag of ballix from the execution lovers. Smirking about it with obvious glee, bitching about what an easy ride he'll have in checks notes a secure prison for the criminally insane, and claiming it'd be kinder to kill him than keep him in that prison. All without a hint of shame at the obvious contradiction. Also the consistent "ah well obviously I only support execution when it's beyond a reasonable doubt" and the argument that it's cheaper at the same time. Of course it's cheap if you assume you can just know every necessary piece of information accurately. In reality killing someone is more expensive than locking them up for life. They take that poo poo fairly seriously in America, insofar as you get your day in court and you get a lot of appeals - and there are still plenty of people who get railroaded or just falsely convicted. An ostensibly fair and open system that at first glance takes a lot of serious measures to ensure they get the right person and that person really deserves to die still falls well short of that. It's pretty much impossible to actually be sure in all cases, or if not, it's prohibitively expensive. Not that I really need to spell that out here, pretty sure we all know her type are wrong'uns who don't care and just want their baby brained regressive lust for revenge to be the law again. I did like the "Not!" like a kid attempting sarcasm for the first time at playtime though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 15:28
|
|
|
mossyfisk posted:Surely you can just audit the compiling? The LLM / network isn't really compiled but trained. You could certainly have the training program (which might be compiled but e.g. Python often isn't compiled) log it's input (picture name, size, checksum, description, url, ?). But since you don't necessarily have the pictures themselves afterwards, this does not prove everything. And obviously even small changes in the picture change most of the logged values. The description of the picture might be wrong, but then via other things might get linked to the real thing. also this leaves out that you can't remove a picture afterwards if you should find out that it was copyrighted. E: this stuff is not my specialty, I learned somethings like 20 years ago and I have friends who use it (on own data).
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 15:32
|
|
|
Just make them provide the source images and literally have someone from a regulatory body watch to confirm it's what they feed into the big GPU racks or whatever. Keep a copy archived for when you want to check rights etc. I don't think there's actually a technical barrier?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 15:59
|
|
|
Mano posted:The LLM / network isn't really compiled but trained. You could certainly have the training program (which might be compiled but e.g. Python often isn't compiled) log it's input (picture name, size, checksum, description, url, ?). But since you don't necessarily have the pictures themselves afterwards, this does not prove everything.  , the popular DL packages do actually compile the model graphs. But yeah, that won't help with logging the training data (which people would have every incentive to bullshit anyway).Sometimes these models can actually output almost exact copies of some of their training data. This paper shows some examples for Stable Diffusion, but I've seen similar results with generative LLMs. However, that's still impossible to do at scale, and models certainly never copy the vast majority of their training examples (it would be information-theoretically impossible). mossyfisk posted:Just make them provide the source images and literally have someone from a regulatory body watch to confirm it's what they feed into the big GPU racks or whatever. Keep a copy archived for when you want to check rights etc. I don't think there's actually a technical barrier?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 15:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:03
|
|
|
cat botherer posted:
cat botherer posted:Sometimes these models can actually output almost exact copies of some of their training data. This paper shows some examples for Stable Diffusion, but I've seen similar results with generative LLMs. However, that's still impossible to do at scale, and models certainly never copy the vast majority of their training examples (it would be information-theoretically impossible). well yeah, storing the entire internet is kinda hard
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1751983862240944581 Tweeted at one minute past 3. I guess it's quite a brutal and short judgement. fuctifino fucked around with this message at 16:07 on Jan 29, 2024 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:05
|
|
|
https://x.com/PA/status/1751985068833210823?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:06
|
|
|
Wow he can read so fast
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:07
|
|
|
gonna go down and watch this - might grab some popcorn first and live that emoji for real
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:07
|
|
|
Just randomly saying that it's weighing on me how this Palestinian genocide is ongoing and the UK establishment's (and the greater western one's) response to it is to firmly pretend that they can't see anything, while they aid and abet Israel and shriek accusations at anyone who stands up and speaks out about what's happening. Just so much cognitive dissonance at the moment.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:10
|
|
|
Necrothatcher posted:gonna go down and watch this - might grab some popcorn first and live that emoji for real Pack of monster munch and a Cornetto
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:10
|
|
|
lol. And indeed lol again
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:14
|
|
|
Well, there goes another UKMT poster for saying incredibly inappropriate poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:22
|
|
|
cat botherer posted:That would be impractical, especially with how much training goes on, and the sheer volume of images or w/e. It can be done, the models are built using exactly such archives of image data - it's certainly within the capability of the state. These companies simply want to pretend it's impossible and skimp on accountability. It would be more expensive to comply with these hypothetical regulatory processes, but so what? They couldn't sell a product that doesn't pass, so they'd have to either comply or shut down.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:29
|
|
|
Jedit posted:Well, there goes another UKMT poster for saying incredibly inappropriate poo poo. I didnt think referring to Cornetto's was probe-worthy? Edit: Eurrrk. Just seen the offending post lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:31
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1751991214994329942
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:32
|
|
|
Say what you will, the man can draw a crowd.  Also Piers Corbyn is here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:32
|
|
|
he seems to be rambling a bunch about demanding to know exactly what the definition of a racist is. not sure what this has to do with calling someone a pedo
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:36
|
|
|
Angepain posted:he seems to be rambling a bunch about demanding to know exactly what the definition of a racist is. not sure what this has to do with calling someone a pedo Cocaine is a terrible drug
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:38
|
|
|
Stopping to light a cigarette during your statement where you explain that you aren't an arsehole for defaming a bunch of people by calling them "paedophiles." Classy, an in keeping with all the cigarette chat from earlier. Does anyone know what brand he's likely to be smoking?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:40
|
|
|
Sue me, Linneker, do it
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:40
|
|
|
He - an upper class white man - is currently explaining what racism is
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:41
|
|
|
Monster Munch recalled as they may contain traces of Laurence Fox.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:41
|
|
|
His complete absence of any form of chin really sets this picture off. I don't even need a transcript to know he's pontificating about how the sovcit definition of racism he ascribes to is akshually ephebophilia or something.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:46
|
|
|
Did you offer him one?
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:46
|
|
|
killerwhat posted:Did you offer him one? gently caress no, I'm not having his filthy nicotine-stained fingers in my monster munch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:47
|
|
|
 and  https://twitter.com/bat020/status/1751991126993645672 
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:50
|
|
|
mossyfisk posted:It can be done, the models are built using exactly such archives of image data - it's certainly within the capability of the state. These companies simply want to pretend it's impossible and skimp on accountability. It would be more expensive to comply with these hypothetical regulatory processes, but so what? They couldn't sell a product that doesn't pass, so they'd have to either comply or shut down. I'm not saying this is good. It isn't. Large companies with more to lose would probably be easier to bring into a decent degree of compliance, but ultimately the genie is not going back in the bottle. cat botherer fucked around with this message at 17:10 on Jan 29, 2024 |
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 16:55
|
|
|
Found by a court of law to be a real dogshit person. Legally declared a oval office.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:06
|
|
|
You can't technically prove that someone didn't independently invent something but if you come out with a copy of someone else's work you're still gonna get done for copyright infringement. I don't see why that would be any different because you invented a complicated machine to generate the thing. If it shits out something that is plagiaristically close to someone else's work then rinse the bastards for it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:09
|
|
|
OwlFancier posted:You can't technically prove that someone didn't independently invent something but if you come out with a copy of someone else's work you're still gonna get done for copyright infringement.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:14
|
|
|
I guess he enjoys being sued? He's digging in https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1752001661441049057
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:17
|
|
|
Tesseraction posted:Found by a court of law to be a real dogshit person. Legally declared a oval office. Which would have been the funniest outcome of Graham Linehan attempting to circumvent all the courts by appealing directly to the Lords that he was being unfairly harassed last year, even though they no longer have said authority. Appeal denied. Appellant must begin all future statements with "But I Am a Massive oval office" in a style parody of the HMS Pinafore.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:I guess he enjoys being sued? He's digging in He also repeatedly said "Gary Lineker is a racist" and then told him to sue him during his little spech.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
The Question IRL posted:To me, this screams of his lawyer going "I have prepared a script for what you should say when you lose this, in the vain hope that an apology outside of court might prevent future damages and stop you from doing a Trump." Ah optimism.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 00:43 |
|
|
fuctifino posted:I guess he enjoys being sued? He's digging in It worked for Donald Trump. Wait, no it didn't.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2024 17:21
|
|