(Thread IKs:
OwlFancier)
|
Chubby Henparty posted:I watched Reality yesterday which was the literal transcript of Reality Winner(!)'s fbi interview, so it can be done, sorta That was a p. Good film, and I liked the stylistic choice of just using the transcript
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:16 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 05:23 |
|
I realised I have no idea what he’s actually been in, so looked it up. He was in The Hole! The kid who hid the coke (lol, cola) and then was beaten to death over it.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:25 |
|
fuctifino posted:It's on youtube fuctifino posted:e: I'm a few mins in, and lost it when a character said "We believe in truth over facts"... The acting is as you would expect
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:26 |
|
DreddyMatt posted:That was a p. Good film, and I liked the stylistic choice of just using the transcript The bit where the partner is genuinely interested in Reality's weight lifting accomplishments, and then both he and Reality have to stop and keep their eyes from rolling back when agent-dad busts in with his crossfit stories was actually hilarious Chubby Henparty fucked around with this message at 15:02 on Jan 31, 2024 |
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:37 |
|
Inevitable contribution from
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:37 |
|
"It was but a rhetorical flourish, your honour!"
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:39 |
|
Chubby Henparty posted:I watched Reality yesterday which was the literal transcript of Reality Winner(!)'s fbi interview, so it can be done, sorta US transcript so 1st amendment applies.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:40 |
|
I see that the "School worker who says she was sacked for being Christian wins right to appeal" case is back up in the news for similar reasons. You were sacked just for saying that you believe that Jesus Christ died for our sins and that we should love our neighbour as we do ourself? No, the other ones.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:41 |
|
I feel like a "rhetorical flourish" is more something you'd see in some poncy debating society as opposed to getting gakked up and calling random people paedos on Twitter. But that's just me.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:48 |
|
OwlFancier posted:The cardboard box is called delivering on the promise to build more hospitals. Grim reminder of the Covid-era invention of the cardboard hospital bed that converted into a cardboard coffin for the user.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:50 |
|
Necrothatcher posted:I feel like a "rhetorical flourish" is more something you'd see in some poncy debating society as opposed to getting gakked up and calling random people paedos on Twitter.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:56 |
|
He was being a rhetorical fuckhead.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 14:56 |
|
your honour, these are my emotional support flourishes
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:31 |
|
Flourished Snake
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:34 |
|
OwlFancier posted:The cardboard box is called delivering on the promise to build more hospitals.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:37 |
|
lmao https://twitter.com/TalkTV/status/1752695517535220196 https://twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1752690712133447784
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:51 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Fox has definitely not won reality though. when a former, bad, MMA fighter gets the headline name in front of you
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:51 |
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:54 |
|
https://twitter.com/barrydeutsch/status/1024567665094930432
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 15:57 |
|
Why are you posting the shameless ripoff?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 16:00 |
|
I have been silenced for my views What views? Oh mainly the racist and homophobic ones.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 16:02 |
|
fuctifino posted:It's on youtube I can't really fault them for their casting choice for a massive coke head.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 16:42 |
|
There’s a First Hearing for another of fragile snowflake free speech hating Fox’s cases against a Twitter poster today. This one is against well known left wing poster Mukhtar for calling him racist, for , erm, being racist
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 16:45 |
JFC Nick Clegg may have been a long term sleeper agent after all. He has just hosed Zuckerberg by virtue of having written and then probably leaked a bunch of emails to Zuck saying “you need to do more to protect kids on FB”. This is coming out in a senate hearing. I expect he won’t keep his job after this. “Mr Zuckerberg do you believe you have a constitutional right to lie to congress?” E: the alternate explanation which is also amusing is that Clegg is so atrociously bad at his job that when hired at an exorbitant rate to make FB look good he made them look bad. Beefeater1980 fucked around with this message at 18:05 on Jan 31, 2024 |
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:02 |
|
Zuck solved this problem by ensuring that no-one under the age of 40 uses facebook.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:08 |
|
Beefeater1980 posted:JFC Nick Clegg may have been a long term sleeper agent after all. He has just hosed Zuckerberg by virtue of having written and then probably leaked a bunch of emails to Zuck saying “you need to do more to protect kids on FB”. This is coming out in a senate hearing. Going to appoint this person known only for being an outright liar and who's only instinct is that of self preservation to a senior role in my company. What's the worst that can happen?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:14 |
|
I mean above a certain pay grade is there any candidate that doesn't fit that description?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:20 |
|
This may be a stupid straw that's broken the camel's back, but the banker bonus poo poo is what's set me over the edge of not being to vote for Labour. This whole time I've kind of kept quiet on it (partly because I mainly lurk) because I was struggling to square the idea of potentially allowing the Tories - who I genuinely think are evil - back into the power. But loving hell this is such an obvious easy win. There is absolutely no downside. Oh sure some bankers will grumble but what the gently caress are they actually going to do? It's a wildly popular position that the public support. If you can't do the bare minimum that might vaguely suggest you are somewhat still a left wing party (I know that's a very naive idea) then why the gently caress should I even kid myself anymore.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:22 |
|
I think internalizing a sense of guilt because the people in charge have arranged it such that you have no good choice, but you feel responsible for not dutifully ticking the "less bad" box, is a pretty objectionable thing to have done to you tbh. It ignores the psychopath putting you in that position to begin with. That is where the guilt lies but of course they won't even entertain the possibility of being responsible for that and there is no mechanism to punish them for it, so it's really set up to kind of gaslight you into believing you're the one at fault for your essentially consumer decision re: which party you subscribe to, and not the people arranging the world so that that's the only decision you have.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:29 |
|
EvilHawk posted:This may be a stupid straw that's broken the camel's back, but the banker bonus poo poo is what's set me over the edge of not being to vote for Labour. This whole time I've kind of kept quiet on it (partly because I mainly lurk) because I was struggling to square the idea of potentially allowing the Tories - who I genuinely think are evil - back into the power. But loving hell this is such an obvious easy win. There is absolutely no downside. Oh sure some bankers will grumble but what the gently caress are they actually going to do? It's a wildly popular position that the public support. If you can't do the bare minimum that might vaguely suggest you are somewhat still a left wing party (I know that's a very naive idea) then why the gently caress should I even kid myself anymore. The people in charge of Labour hate that the party is funded by the unions. They desperately want to break that link and for that they have to court rich cunts, like the Blair years getting cash from the likes of Bernie Ecclestone. It's entirely ideological, the desire to stop Labour being a more mass participation party to one more like the US Democrats
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 18:34 |
|
At this point even the dems are better, which is just incredible. I suppose Starmer et al take it as a mark of how far they've come. A
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 19:24 |
|
fuctifino posted:e3: He does another line of 'stunt' cocaine at 10 mins, then get the crack pipe out 40 seconds later to take some 'stunt' crack
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 19:34 |
|
Beefeater1980 posted:JFC Nick Clegg may have been a long term sleeper agent after all. He has just hosed Zuckerberg by virtue of having written and then probably leaked a bunch of emails to Zuck saying “you need to do more to protect kids on FB”. This is coming out in a senate hearing. Humiliation for loser Zuckerberg for hiring loser Clegg.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 19:48 |
|
OwlFancier posted:I think internalizing a sense of guilt because the people in charge have arranged it such that you have no good choice, but you feel responsible for not dutifully ticking the "less bad" box, is a pretty objectionable thing to have done to you tbh. It ignores the psychopath putting you in that position to begin with. That is where the guilt lies but of course they won't even entertain the possibility of being responsible for that and there is no mechanism to punish them for it, so it's really set up to kind of gaslight you into believing you're the one at fault for your essentially consumer decision re: which party you subscribe to, and not the people arranging the world so that that's the only decision you have. This is just a long way of saying that the solution to the pop-philosophy trolley problem is to find out who the fucker is that keeps tying people to the tracks. ...The actual trolley problem is a very good takedown of consequentialist ethics and has nothing to do with how people use it most of the time. Yes, I have a grudge.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 20:19 |
|
EvilHawk posted:This may be a stupid straw that's broken the camel's back, but the banker bonus poo poo is what's set me over the edge of not being to vote for Labour. E: this sounds like I'm having a go at you personally and I don't intend it seriously, it's just after the last page or two talking about the Pet Shop Boy making trans-exclusion 'a priority' and the absolute lack of consequences for Rosie Duffield's continued political existence, it's just strange to hear what is and isn't a deal breaker for people. Bobby Deluxe fucked around with this message at 20:32 on Jan 31, 2024 |
# ? Jan 31, 2024 20:22 |
|
Miftan posted:The actual trolley problem is a very good takedown of consequentialist ethics and has nothing to do with how people use it most of the time. Yes, I have a grudge.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 20:30 |
|
Miftan posted:This is just a long way of saying that the solution to the pop-philosophy trolley problem is to find out who the fucker is that keeps tying people to the tracks. It's OK, pop culture also solved it
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 20:34 |
|
fuctifino posted:e3: He does another line of 'stunt' cocaine at 10 mins, then get the crack pipe out 40 seconds later to take some 'stunt' crack
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 20:37 |
|
Bobby Deluxe posted:
No I totally understand and that's why I framed it as very stupid. Tbh Wes's poo poo from the last page probably put me into that mindset, then when I checked the news at lunch I had this moment. I still think the Tories are and will be worse, but there's just no reason to give Labour my support.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 21:01 |
|
|
# ? May 23, 2024 05:23 |
|
There's something rather freeing about knowing that you don't give a poo poo who wins the next election. Very much: whoever wins, we lose. But with the added bonus that whoever loses, you get to laugh at them.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2024 21:54 |