IncredibleIgloo posted:

Infinitum posted:

Discount Matt Mercer

Bugsy posted:

Escape From Noise posted:

Oh boy. Cash bar and light appetizers?

Deptfordx posted:

Wait. Mike Pence is still running?!?

Onkel Hedwig posted:

"Bowtie on nussy" is basically old men lingerie

Onkel Hedwig posted:

"Bowtie on nussy" is basically old men lingerie

Stoatbringer posted:

Samovar posted:

So what precisely happened with Mayorkas, or whatever his name is?

The Locator posted:

She's stupid. She thinks he means that kids should be allowed to fly for free, when he is saying that you shouldn't have to pay an EXTRA fee to allow your kids to sit with you.

quote:

'Lied under oath in my courtroom': Judge Engoron email suggests massive penalty for Trump

putin is a oval office posted:

Is this a thing? Is it America specifically? I've booked (in Australia) multiple seats on a flight before and never had to pay some extra fee. If that's a thing in the US I'm not surprised but also, goddamn, that's ridiculous. Explains why you always get those parents who suddenly want to swap seats, I thought it was just poor planning but there's actually some extra fee?

putin is a oval office posted:

Is this a thing? Is it America specifically? I've booked (in Australia) multiple seats on a flight before and never had to pay some extra fee. If that's a thing in the US I'm not surprised but also, goddamn, that's ridiculous. Explains why you always get those parents who suddenly want to swap seats, I thought it was just poor planning but there's actually some extra fee?

Onkel Hedwig posted:

Have some hopium: The Engoron ruling might be big

https://www.alternet.org/judge-engoron-massive-penalty/

Onkel Hedwig posted:

Have some hopium: The Engoron ruling might be big

https://www.alternet.org/judge-engoron-massive-penalty/

Onkel Hedwig posted:

Have some hopium: The Engoron ruling might be big

https://www.alternet.org/judge-engoron-massive-penalty/

Infinitum posted:

Lied under oath against a judge already completely done with your poo poo?

Deptfordx posted:

Wait. Mike Pence is still running?!?

Maigius posted:

I'm not the only one getting Vampire vibes off this guy, right?

Onkel Hedwig posted:

You are all radical left degenerates

Stoatbringer posted:

But Star Witness Michael "The Filthy Weasel" Cohen also LIED in courtroom like a DOG, completely DESTROYING the FAKE HOAX Biden case even though I am INNOCENT and my 100% disclaimer was "PERFECT". Sack the political "hack" judge NOW! We rear end {grapes)

Beefed Owl posted:

Oh my God I forgot about

We rear end Grapes

Trump's lovely term as president really did bring out the Lols

Onkel Hedwig posted:

Have some hopium: The Engoron ruling might be big

https://www.alternet.org/judge-engoron-massive-penalty/

Ralph Crammed In posted:

Oof how do you come back from losing to nobody? Obviously you don't, but how much longer is she gonna fake it for?

BBC posted:

Donald Trump's failed immunity appeal is still a win for his delay strategy

...

So while Mr Trump did not successfully assert sweeping new presidential powers to act with impunity while in office, the tentative 4 March start date in Washington DC has been removed from the federal court's calendar.

And there is no indication of when it might reappear.

This is in keeping with the former president's strategy of throwing sand in the gears of the judicial process whenever possible, according to Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor.
"It's in Trump's interest to delay the case until after the November election," Mr Rahmani said. "If he wins control of the White House, a sitting president can't be prosecuted."

...

He can turn to the Supreme Court, which would have to decide whether to review the case or let the lower-court decision stand. They can also decide whether to put the 6 January trial on hold in the meantime.

That appears the likely route, as the appeals court has given the Trump legal team until 12 February to prepare its Supreme Court request.
That is where there are further opportunities for delay or for the trial to get back on track.

If the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case, the election interference case could return to its normal schedule. But if it agrees to do so, that all but guarantees that a trial would take place under the shadow of election day - at the very earliest.

It is a prospect that may prompt Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the trial, to shelve the case until Americans can cast their ballots in November.

Ghostlight posted:

that's his literal partner in crime jack burkman

Stoatbringer posted:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68061183

Must be great to be a criminal who gets to decide when, if ever, their trial happens just by endlessly gumming up the works.

Moai Ou posted:

Nikki Haley: "With these dark magics, NOBODY can defeat me!"

*Monkey's paw curls*

MrMojok posted:

I will never forget the time MTG’s fellow howler monkey Lauren Boebert stood up in front of her constituents and said “ina-leen-able”

Someone in the crowd shouted “It’s ‘inalienable’!” and she goes “no, it’s ‘ina-leen-able’”

SlurredSpeech609 posted:

She's so confident about it. lol

https://twitter.com/RzstProgramming/status/1373647691637420040