(Thread IKs:
weg, Toxic Mental)
|
MTG: in-dic-ta-ble Boebart: Imma pull that dick Hell yeah snipe
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 20:08 |
|
|
What I am getting from this is that I want 6 more justices of the caliber of Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson. Not because they're "liberal" but because they are really fuckin smart and good at their jobs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:04
|
|
|
"It's not an insurrection because it had to be carefully planned." And we all know Trump isn't capable of careful planning. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:04
|
|
|
Your Honor, my client is too incompetent to organize an insurrection.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:05
|
|
|
Hazo posted:Still amazes me that after Ginsberg died he was like “well I know I said under no circumstances should a new justice be appointed in an election year, much less two months from the election, but this is different because… I dunno, I said so” and people weren’t rioting outside congress. Because literally no one took it seriously when he made that argument in the first place. Everyone knew the reason for blocking Obama was "because I can." Not a single person in the universe thought Mitch was holding up some principle.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:05
|
|
|
Youth Decay posted:What I am getting from this is that I want 6 more justices of the caliber of Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson. Not because they're "liberal" but because they are really fuckin smart and good at their jobs. Absolutely, it's cliche but it's obvious they've had to work twice as hard for half the recognition.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:05
|
|
|
Youth Decay posted:What I am getting from this is that I want 6 more justices of the caliber of Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson. Not because they're "liberal" but because they are really fuckin smart and good at their jobs. The Constitution is a living document, and they are doing their Oath-sworn part to keep it alive. The others are would be murders of the same.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:06
|
|
|
I love that Jackson got Trump's lawyer to agree that it would be an insurrection if there was proof that it was organized. The Jan 6th case is easily going to prove that because there is such a long trail of evidence that Trump and his team organized the event, from bringing in the rioters/Proud Boys/Oathkeepers, Trump sending them to the capitol, and the entire false electors plot. Honestly, the false electors plot is the real smoking gun in my opinion. The violent riot was just there to apply pressure. The real coup was going to be the false electors.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:06
|
|
|
Grey Cat posted:You've been convicted of arson so we won't hire you as a firefighter, but you could be able to be the fire chief. Judging by C-suites and general incompetence of leadership in the US, this kinda tracks. Idiots like Eddie Lampert somehow are able to run every business they touch into the ground and waltz back up to a directorship position shortly thereafter.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:06
|
|
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:Barrett is definitely skeptical. I'm reading Gorsuch and Kavanaugh saying "give us something to work with here" and I'm not sure the lawyer is doing it yeah Gorsuch and Beer want to cover for trump on this but they want to do it on some legal cover or basis but the chuds are too dumb/in their own paracosim to be able to make an argument.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:06
|
|
Random Stranger posted:"It's not an insurrection because it had to be carefully planned." And we all know Trump isn't capable of careful planning. Shays rebellion and the Whiskey rebellion weren't organized but they were certainly insurrections against the sitting government
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:07
|
|
|
THE LIBERAL ANTIFA SUPREME COURT
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:08
|
|
|
So Thomas's argument here is because this hasn't come up before it doesn't count?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:08
|
|
|
Waffle House posted:THE LIBERAL ANTIFA SUPREME COURT
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:08
|
|
|
gwarm01 posted:I love that Jackson got Trump's lawyer to agree that it would be an insurrection if there was proof that it was organized. The Jan 6th case is easily going to prove that because there is such a long trail of evidence that Trump and his team organized the event, from bringing in the rioters/Proud Boys/Oathkeepers, Trump sending them to the capitol, and the entire false electors plot. Honestly, the false electors plot is the real smoking gun in my opinion. The violent riot was just there to apply pressure. The real coup was going to be the false electors. thats what it always was, it chud rebellion was mostly as lovely "put pressure on them" tactic mixed with trump thinking it would be the end of a adam sandler movie. i dont think he FULLY grasped how bad it was gonna get, but i also think he didnt care.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:08
|
|
|
kazil posted:So Thomas's argument here is because this hasn't come up before it doesn't count? Sounds like.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:09
|
|
|
kazil posted:So Thomas's argument here is because this hasn't come up before it doesn't count? yeah, he's fishing for an example of a state denying access to a national candidate, and the attorney correctly pointed out elections didn't work that way
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:10
|
|
|
Thomas seems to have a real problem with understanding that things have changed in 150 years.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:10
|
|
|
generally I prefer posted:Sounds like. Sounds like he’s a loving moron yeah Random Stranger posted:Thomas seems to have a real problem with understanding
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:10
|
|
|
Should I get excited for trump to get dunked on or is this an unlikely outcome.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:11
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:12
|
|
|
Tai posted:Should I get excited for trump to get dunked on or is this an unlikely outcome. It's unlikely Trump gets dumped on. He may, but it's unlikely.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:12
|
|
|
Tai posted:Should I get excited for trump to get dunked on or is this an unlikely outcome. It really doesn't sound like his lawyers have much of an argument.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:13
|
|
|
Breaking News: https://twitter.com/metzgov/status/1755610371409559805
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:13
|
|
|
Right now it sounds like the conservative judges are questioning if States have the right to disqualify a national candidate
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:13
|
|
|
Tai posted:Should I get excited for trump to get dunked on or is this an unlikely outcome. You’re expecting one of the Justices who overturned Roe v Wade to apply a logical conclusion to “their” guy. They’re disingenuous snakes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:14
|
|
|
Random Stranger posted:Thomas seems to have a real problem with understanding that things have changed in 150 years. Eh, "textualism" is total bullshit that discredits itself. They only pretend to not understand things have changed when it's convenient for their current argument and it immediately goes away when they want to argue something else. So, Republicans.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:14
|
|
|
Tai posted:Should I get excited for trump to get dunked on or is this an unlikely outcome. Unlikely? Yes loving hilarious if it actually happens? Also yes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:15
|
|
|
kazil posted:Right now it sounds like the conservative judges are questioning if States have the right to disqualify a national candidate It's rich for the states rights people to suddenly be very concerned about whether or not states have rights.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:15
|
|
|
Three days until he says he's autist-ic. Not actually autistic, but he feels a great admiration and sense of community with people with autism.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:16
|
|
|
Grey Cat posted:Imagine being a stupid as poo poo confederate, and hundreds of years later people are still talking about you being stupid as poo poo in a case of some other guy being stupid as poo poo. This is pretty drat lol though honestly
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:16
|
|
|
kazil posted:So Thomas's argument here is because this hasn't come up before it doesn't count? He is also wrong about this from what I understand because the Whiskey Rebellion is an example of this happening. But that's not going to stop him from ruling in the most insane and corrupt way that ignores precedent anyway. Seth Pecksniff posted:Shays rebellion and the Whiskey rebellion weren't organized but they were certainly insurrections against the sitting government Ah didn't know about Shays rebellion time to start doing some reading. Vire fucked around with this message at 17:21 on Feb 8, 2024 |
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:16
|
|
|
kazil posted:Right now it sounds like the conservative judges are questioning if States have the right to disqualify a national candidate ...that seems obvious, each state has its own individual process, and IMO should be vigilant on that count.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:17
|
|
|
Tai posted:Should I get excited for trump to get dunked on or is this an unlikely outcome. its possible. trumps lawyers are doing a publically lovely job. they arnt using the wiggle room that the Tunons would feel comfortable signing off on. I think its like 60/40 they rule that he can't be remoeved unless convicted.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:18
|
|
|
Rod Hoofhearted posted:You’re expecting one of the Justices who overturned Roe v Wade to apply a logical conclusion to “their” guy. What's going to be extra fun about this is that they'll reject Colorado's argument and they'll find new depths of distrust and disapproval of SCOTUS by the American people. The public's trust in SCOTUS is already at a historic low of 41% approval and 58% disapproval, so let's see what happens when they clear a literal insurrectionist for the presidency!
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
Kagan is trying to find some sort of argument that'll pull a majority and she might have found it, seeing how Barrett and Gorsuch picked up on it
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
If he's going to fake a pregnancy he needs to tuck the pillow underneath his shirt
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:19
|
|
|
Serious_Cyclone posted:If he's going to fake a pregnancy he needs to tuck the pillow underneath his shirt I'm pregnant-ish.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:20
|
|
|
kazil posted:Ring-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 29, 2024 20:08 |
|
|
funeral home DJ posted:What's going to be extra fun about this is that they'll reject Colorado's argument and they'll find new depths of distrust and disapproval of SCOTUS by the American people. The public's trust in SCOTUS is already at a historic low of 41% approval and 58% disapproval, so let's see what happens when they clear a literal insurrectionist for the presidency! i think the big dip is if they rule in favor of trump on the immunity poo poo(they wont pick it up) but yeah.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2024 17:21
|
|